BobTHJ wrote:
> How does this not satisfy R2263(a)? Note the clauses of R2263 are ORed.
Also note R2263(c) doesn't require specifying which public contract
is enabling the action (though it's certainly a good idea to minimize
disputes).
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:40, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>>
>>> I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following:
>>
>> I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule,
>> by having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the ru
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> I deposit 4 * Debate-o-Matic. (It's just not a good idea these days to
> have excess cards lying around.)
You're out of proposals?
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
Sean Hunt wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following:
I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1
rule, by having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the
rules (that e acts on behalf of Tiger) without a reasonable belief th
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:27, Sean Hunt wrote:
> pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Acting on behalf of Grand Poobah (if required): {
>> Darth Cliche is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Government:
>> Arm-Twist, Roll Call
>> }
>
> This fails.
>
Why?
pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Acting on behalf of Grand Poobah (if required): {
Darth Cliche is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Government:
Arm-Twist, Roll Call
}
This fails.
-coppro
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> 3. Darth Cliche is being dealt 2 extra cards from the Deck of Change
> for eir previous registration (the Anarchist at the time was inactive
> and never dealt em cards before e mistakenly deregistered)
Proto: registration cards are only award
Notes:
1. I have revised the "acting on behalf" wording in hopes of bringing
it in compliance with the current ruleset. Please let me know if you
think the new updated wording is ineffective.
2. I mistakenly attempted to revoke points and issue a digit ranch to
Taral. This obviously failed.
3. D
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 18:15, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I join Scumbuddies and change my membership to full.
>
> -coppro
>
Did comex and ais523 grant their consent? of not this was unsuccessful.
BobTHJ
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 23:01, Pavitra wrote:
>> == CFJ 2695 ==
>>
>> c. awarded emself 70 x-points via the Contract B contest.
>>
>>
>>
>> Caller's Arguments:
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo
