ehird wrote:
> On 06/12/2008, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ehird wrote:
>>
>>> I object to the termination of Warrigal's Grand Poobah pledge.
>> There are two reasonable referents (The List, and the older one that
>> explicitly mentions October), so I don't think this objection is
>> sp
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I change my name to the null string (i.e., "" without the quotes.)
>
> You know, since names are unofficial anyway, I change my name to the
> spoken wo
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following: {This is a public pledge known as "Youth".
> Any person CAN join this contract by announcement if and only if they
> were born after February 14, 1984. Any party to this contract CAN
> leave this contra
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Warrigal, I suggest amending your pledge to include reversing The List
>> after each round of caste changes.
>
> OscarMeyr and similar people, would you obje
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal, I suggest amending your pledge to include reversing The List
> after each round of caste changes.
OscarMeyr and similar people, would you object if I tried to amend my
pledge this way?
--Warrigal
On 06/12/2008, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ehird wrote:
>
>> I object to the termination of Warrigal's Grand Poobah pledge.
>
> There are two reasonable referents (The List, and the older one that
> explicitly mentions October), so I don't think this objection is
> specific enough to be
ehird wrote:
> I object to the termination of Warrigal's Grand Poobah pledge.
There are two reasonable referents (The List, and the older one that
explicitly mentions October), so I don't think this objection is
specific enough to be effective.
ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 14:40 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> There was also the Quantum Crisis (major economic revamp turning
>> out to have failed due to a bug in a vote-affecting ability).
> I didn't know of that one. Care to relate its history?
I told most of it the other day in a-d,
BobTHJ wrote:
> I end the pre-trial phase.
NttPF
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I rule TRUE. In matters of controversy (which the CFJ system is
> designed to handle) it is best to err on the side of inclusion rather
> than exclusion.
I intend to appeal--oh, whatever. These cases are so trivial that
they
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 14:40 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> There was also the Quantum Crisis (major economic revamp turning
> out to have failed due to a bug in a vote-affecting ability).
I didn't know of that one. Care to relate its history?
--
ais523
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 00:36, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BobTHJ, I inform you of this criminal case and invite you to rebut
> the argument for your guilt:
>
I'm guilty. I was on vacation with limited internet and didn't have
the chance to address this issue.
I end the pre-trial phase.
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 21:53 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
> I change my name to the null string (i.e., "" without the quotes.)
Isn't that illegal, due to the null string already being generally used
to refer to a particular Patent Title?
--
ais523
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 14:39, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Nomic Wars II
>
> Object.
>
There didn't seem to be much interest in this mini-game. Are you
interested in attempting to revive it?
BobTHJ
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 11:03 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I call for judgement on the statement "The Executor of the public
> > message that purported to initiate the Agoran Decisions on whether to
> > adopt proposals 5686-5687 canno
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I call for judgement on the statement "The Executor of the public
> message that purported to initiate the Agoran Decisions on whether to
> adopt proposals 5686-5687 cannot be determined with reasonable effort,
> other than via
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 16:18 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> * Does Fookiemyartug still exist?
> * Does the P2P Partnership still exist?
> * Was Levi removed from the AFO's parties?
Not sure about the first two, but I'm pretty sure that Levi was removed
from the AFO's parties by proposal (although I can't
17 matches
Mail list logo
