On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I rule TRUE. In matters of controversy (which the CFJ system is > designed to handle) it is best to err on the side of inclusion rather > than exclusion.
I intend to appeal--oh, whatever. These cases are so trivial that they're not worth appealing, even though I disagree with this judgement. I request a REASSIGN if CFJ 2252 is appealed.
