On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 11:03 -0500, comex wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I call for judgement on the statement "The Executor of the public > > message that purported to initiate the Agoran Decisions on whether to > > adopt proposals 5686-5687 cannot be determined with reasonable effort, > > other than via a judicial declaration." > > I suggest a judgement of IRRELEVANT. Executorship is only relevant to > messages including an intent to perform a dependent action with > Support or Agoran Consent. In all other cases the identity of the > Executor is not referenced or used anywhere by the Rules.
Whether the Executor is known or not is relevant to rule 2170 (even though the exact identity of the Executor isn't). That's why I asked whether the Executor is known, not who it was. -- ais523
