On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I call for judgement on the statement "The Executor of the public > message that purported to initiate the Agoran Decisions on whether to > adopt proposals 5686-5687 cannot be determined with reasonable effort, > other than via a judicial declaration."
I suggest a judgement of IRRELEVANT. Executorship is only relevant to messages including an intent to perform a dependent action with Support or Agoran Consent. In all other cases the identity of the Executor is not referenced or used anywhere by the Rules.
