Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 Pledge #52 terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 I'm Just FINE terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 Happiness in Slavery terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:12:06 Pledge #53 is noted as having self-terminated
Fri 3 Oct 16:32:38 Pledge #19 terminated by root
Sat 4 Oc
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 Pledge #52 terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 I'm Just FINE terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 Happiness in Slavery terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:12:06 Pledge #53 is noted as having self-terminated
Fri 3 Oct 16:32:38 Pledge #19 terminated by root
Sat 4 Oc
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or just fake the email..
They bear digital signatures.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm. Could also be useful for TNP2, since it's been receiving a lot of
> Agora stuff that no sane person would read from Normish..
Addresses that can receive but don't want to can simply adjust their
mailing list settings:
http://ww
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FWIW, I save the dice-roll emails in case I need to supply them as evidence.
>
> As a note: That doesn't quite work. You could easily request die rolls
>
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I pledge the following:
>
> {Players may add or remove an email address as a "send-only address"
> to a specific Public Forum Without Objection. The Distributor SHALL
> take what actions are necessary to permit (or prevent, as appro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I save the dice-roll emails in case I need to supply them as evidence.
As a note: That doesn't quite work. You could easily request die rolls
from the server until you get the answer you want.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PR
ehird wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2008, at 22:36, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> What would you suggest? Text is text, after all.
>
> Eh, just a nicer, cleaner, faster interface.
Are you complaining about wikidot, or about the old site? (I've
loaded about half the contracts from the early-October report, so
you
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One disclaimer can allow the rest of the message to say whatever it
>> wants. Perhaps the rule can be worded such that the only illegal uses
>> of a trademark are things that can be considered falsehoods.
>
> Knowingly posting false
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this proposed rule would need to be at Power 3
> as it directly forbids the sort of regularity of communication that's
> essential for the healthy function of the nomic.
Did you just say that a relative clause claiming tha
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 17:06, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try # 3. Changes are to make the ONCE apply to the rule number, and to use
> X as a wild-card seed:
>
> Within one week after an existing rule is mutated (its power is changed), a
> Farmer CAN once Harvest the ID number of
> One disclaimer can allow the rest of the message to say whatever it
> wants. Perhaps the rule can be worded such that the only illegal uses
> of a trademark are things that can be considered falsehoods.
Knowingly posting falsehoods TTPF with the intent to deceive is illegal.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I spend Ab B Eb to decrease Warrigal's caste to Savage.
>
> I transfer a prop from Warrigal to 0x44 for putting em at the end of
> the List in eir pledge.
Well, someone had to go there.
--Warrigal the Democratic Voter
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure I see a point to any trademarking at all. In the real
> world, exclusivity rights to trademarks exist to prevent businesses
> from confusing consumers by marketing goods and services that appear
> to be market
On 2 Dec 2008, at 22:36, Ed Murphy wrote:
What would you suggest? Text is text, after all.
Eh, just a nicer, cleaner, faster interface.
ehird wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2008, at 21:46, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> I nominate myself for Notary.
>
> That wiki idea was suggested in comex only minutes ago.
I suggested it weeks ago.
> If I may, though, offer a wiki that isn't awful to use and read?
> (Note: subjectivity in the previous sentence
On 2 Dec 2008, at 22:03, Elliott Hird wrote:
That wiki idea was suggested in comex only minutes ago.
Err, in ##nomic by comex.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I nominate myself for Notary.
>
> I've just created http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/ and am about to
> initialize it with the contract texts from October 3:
>
> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/20
On 2 Dec 2008, at 21:46, Ed Murphy wrote:
I nominate myself for Notary.
That wiki idea was suggested in comex only minutes ago.
If I may, though, offer a wiki that isn't awful to use and read?
(Note: subjectivity in the previous sentence is rampant.)
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In theory, it's impossible to not inform the Notary for a public
> contract, as changes have to be published. On the other hand, repeatedly
> publishing diffs, rather than the whole contract can lead to all sorts
> of trouble.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following pledge
> {
> If Sgeo is allowed to make a prop transfer, OscarMeyr can and may
> cause Sgeo to transfer a prop from Sgeo to OscarMeyr for any reason.
> If this happens, this pledge is terminated.
> }
No mech
Wooble wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I fill my own sell ticket on 5997, specifying FOR.
>> I fill my own sell ticket on 5998, specifying FOR.
>
> Does this even work? A vote of SELL is, by contract, a vote
> conditionally endorsing the filler of the
comex wrote:
> I transfer one prop from OscarMeyr to Bayes: it's OscarMeyr's job, not
> yours, to know the Rules concerning eir duties.
Fails, ownership of props is limited to first-class players.
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 12:30 -0500, comex wrote:
> We really need a Notary. I'm tired of having to search through old
> reports-- Agora's stint with a web-accessible Notary site was highly
> productive.
>
> I could take on the office but I'd rather not. Alternatively, I'm
> contemplating initiati
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 12:37 -0500, Sgeo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:13 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 18:41 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> >>> Demoted to Delta: Bayes (twice!) (2
On 2 Dec 2008, at 17:30, comex wrote:
We really need a Notary. I'm tired of having to search through old
reports-- Agora's stint with a web-accessible Notary site was highly
productive.
I will provide it to the next Notary.
I could take on the office but I'd rather not.
I nominate comex f
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I transfer one prop from Bayes to ais523: Why should Bayes get a prop
> when it's ais523 correcting OscarMeyr, who doesn't know the rules?
HE DOES KNOW THE RULES.
I'd transfer a prop from Sgeo to OscarMeyr, but I already transferr
We really need a Notary. I'm tired of having to search through old
reports-- Agora's stint with a web-accessible Notary site was highly
productive.
I could take on the office but I'd rather not. Alternatively, I'm
contemplating initiating a set of criminal cases against the parties
to some contr
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 18:41 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>> Demoted to Delta: Bayes (twice!) (2nd class, weakest exemption, forced)
> CoE: According to rule 2211, you SHALL NOT demote the same person twice;
> the 4th par
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 20:18 -0500, comex wrote:
>> I'd say that I've gotten more conservative... voting against new rules
>> without a good purpose and for repealing them (for example, Win by
>> Junta now encompasses the role
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 20:18 -0500, comex wrote:
> I'd say that I've gotten more conservative... voting against new rules
> without a good purpose and for repealing them (for example, Win by
> Junta now encompasses the role of Win by Proposal, although I don't
> think the latter has ever been used
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "I deprive some people of a chance under a system. I then claim this is
> an example of why you should vote for another system."
Players at the end of the List realistically have no chance whatsoever
of the Poobah ever prom
On 2 Dec 2008, at 14:51, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I object. I encourage harblcat, Siege, and Charles to vote for
OscarMeyr, who not only won't automatically prefer to demote them, but
will give them a chance of every being promoted, which is impossible
under Warrigal's proposed system.
"I depri
On 2 Dec 2008, at 12:12, Warrigal wrote:
Without objection, I intend to amend my Grand Poobah pledge by
replacing "promoting players higher in The List" with "promoting
players higher in The List to those lower in The List, and those to
players not in The List" and "demoting players lower in The
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Filing fee" to discourage pointless trademarking
I'm not sure I see a point to any trademarking at all. In the real
world, exclusivity rights to trademarks exist to prevent businesses
from confusing consumers by marketing good
Suggested changes by woggle:
Trademarks belong to contracts
Trademarks must be filed without 3 objections (or with 2 support)
What a trademark can be used in reference to must be explicitly stated
Limit on number of trademarks in a time period
"Filing fee" to discourage pointless trademarking
On
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fill my own sell ticket on 5997, specifying FOR.
> I fill my own sell ticket on 5998, specifying FOR.
Does this even work? A vote of SELL is, by contract, a vote
conditionally endorsing the filler of the ticket, not a vote
condi
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 13:40, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I withdraw the previous version of this proposal titled "Fix asset
> redefinition", and submit the following revised version.
>
> Proposal: Contract precedence
> (AI = 2, please)
>
> woggle is a co-author of this proposal.
>
> Cr
38 matches
Mail list logo
