On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this proposed rule would need to be at Power 3 > as it directly forbids the sort of regularity of communication that's > essential for the healthy function of the nomic.
Did you just say that a relative clause claiming that something is necessary for the health of something else has an effect besides clarifying the remainder of the sentence it's in? I see what you did there.
