On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Chester Mealer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am posting an announcement of my intent to register as a player under the
>> name "cdm014"
>
> Welcome to Agora! Any relation to ais523?
>
> -ro
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Chester Mealer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am posting an announcement of my intent to register as a player under the
> name "cdm014"
Welcome to Agora! Any relation to ais523?
-root
On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:58 PM, ihope wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will you be on later tonight? Or shall we set this up for tomorrow?
I'll be able to do it later tonight, most likely. Just a few minutes.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
Okay, I'll
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will you be on later tonight? Or shall we set this up for tomorrow?
I'll be able to do it later tonight, most likely. Just a few minutes.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:54 PM, ihope wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You, sir, are on. Let me change computers, as this one can't run
YPP too
well.
Unfortunate that this computer doesn't have Puzzle Pirates installed
at the moment. You'll
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You, sir, are on. Let me change computers, as this one can't run YPP too
> well.
Unfortunate that this computer doesn't have Puzzle Pirates installed
at the moment. You'll have to wait a bit.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:46 PM, ihope wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Very well, I will slap you with a trout as soon as I can find you
on Sage
Ocean (sage.puzzlepirates.com)... assuming that my trout hasn't
turned to
dust by then.
My pira
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very well, I will slap you with a trout as soon as I can find you on Sage
> Ocean (sage.puzzlepirates.com)... assuming that my trout hasn't turned to
> dust by then.
My pirate's name is Igo. Catch me if you can. :-P
--
On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:33 PM, ihope wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, the Defendant is dangerously close to contempt of court
in eir
defense. Too bad contempt isn't clear enough in the rules for me
to slap em
with a trout regarding
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:34 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sure. E had 502 ribbons before the transfer e posted at that second
>> took place, 452 afterwards.
>
> I wish. :-P
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
Uh, good th
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. E had 502 ribbons before the transfer e posted at that second
> took place, 452 afterwards.
I wish. :-P
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, the Defendant is dangerously close to contempt of court in eir
> defense. Too bad contempt isn't clear enough in the rules for me to slap em
> with a trout regarding it.
Slapping with a trout is an unregulated
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> To resolve CFJs 1995 and 2004, I request the Bank of Agora to inform me
>>>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would anybody support changing black ribbons to be awarded for judging
> a question on culpability rather than sentencing? It seems a bit
> arbitrary that you can only get a black ribbon in cases where the
> defendant happens
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:01 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Then I ask the kind Bankers of the BOA to consider an exchange rate for
>> Points.
>
> Points are a fixed currency, so they can't be transferred (and that
> inc
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then I ask the kind Bankers of the BOA to consider an exchange rate for
> Points.
Points are a fixed currency, so they can't be transferred (and that
includes depositing or withdrawing them at the Bank of Agora).
--Ivan Hope CX
On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To resolve CFJs 1995 and 2004, I request the Bank of Agora to
inform me of
Ivan Hope's holdings of pens as of Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:11:46 -0400.
Umm... I intend, wi
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then I ask the kind Bankers of the BOA to consider an exchange rate for
> Points.
Points are a fixed asset and as such couldn't be transferred to the
Bank (well, not without making it a Contest, but I don't see that
happening wi
Under the concept of Don't Muck With the Ruleset By Fiat, I am
inclined towards ruling REVERSE on 1966c.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If the Bank of Agora doesn't currently have an exchange rate for a
>> type of currency how does an exchange rate get initiated?
>
> The list of exchange rate
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the Bank of Agora doesn't currently have an exchange rate for a
> type of currency how does an exchange rate get initiated?
The list of exchange rates is part of the contract, so it requires a
Contract Change with the consent
If the Bank of Agora doesn't currently have an exchange rate for a
type of currency how does an exchange rate get initiated?
On Jun 15, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/6/15 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, this is not what I'm used to. I thought roleclaiming and public
voting (which entails bandwagons) were nice aspects of the game.
/me shrugs
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
Ditto, add these and I'll play.
ehird
On Monday 16 June 2008 7:16:50 Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Monday 16 June 2008 2:22:56 Quazie wrote:
> >> I submit the following proposal entitled "A win of monstrous
> >> proportions" with the following text:
> >> ---
> >> "Upon the adoption of this proposal The barlog, Large Luigi the
> >> Behold
On Jun 15, 2008, at 1:23 AM, George Roberts wrote:
I hereby register under the name 'doopy'.
Welcome to Agora, doopy!
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Ben Caplan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Monday 16 June 2008 2:22:56 Quazie wrote:
>>> I submit the following proposal entitled "A win of monstrous
>>> proportions" with the following text:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2008 2:22:56 Quazie wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal entitled "A win of monstrous
>> proportions" with the following text:
>> ---
>> "Upon the adoption of this proposal The barlog, Large Luigi th
On Monday 16 June 2008 6:50:33 ihope wrote:
> The rules can't stop you from posting to the DF. They can prohibit it,
> but my proposal doesn't (well, shouldn't) claim to do so.
R2141: Rules are unlimited in scope.
On Monday 16 June 2008 6:39:52 Nick Vanderweit wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Ben Caplan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You'd have to have a good definition of "gamestate".
>
> If it's not explicitly prohibited, then why bother disallowing it?
> We'll prohibit what we see as counter t
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:50 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Ben Caplan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How about making statements to the DF that I haven't taken the time to
>> carefully evaluate for truthfulness? Or, for that matter, making jokes
>> to the
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about making statements to the DF that I haven't taken the time to
> carefully evaluate for truthfulness? Or, for that matter, making jokes
> to the DF (see CFJ 1849 and
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)?
The rules can't stop you fr
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2008 2:22:56 Quazie wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal entitled "A win of monstrous
>> proportions" with the following text:
>> ---
>> "Upon the adoption of this proposal The barlog, Large Luigi th
On Monday 16 June 2008 2:22:56 Quazie wrote:
> I submit the following proposal entitled "A win of monstrous
> proportions" with the following text:
> ---
> "Upon the adoption of this proposal The barlog, Large Luigi the
> Beholder, the Jabberwocky, Pikachu, Dracula, The Hydra, Godzilla, and
> t
Just to say so, when I wrote the Bank of Agora contract, I intended
the announcements for depositing and withdrawing to include both
what's deposited and withdrawn and the number of pens.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:31 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Jeremy a zombie with myself as
> zombiemaster.
I support.
--Ivan Hope NTTPF
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2008 10:13:14 ihope wrote:
>> Hmm, yes, you're probably right about the contract-defined actions
>> thing. I would rather have a sentence or two stating that the
>> gamestate can only be changed as the rules
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 June 2008 8:38:19 ihope wrote:
>> So what is it that you need to do that the rules have the power to
>> prevent you from doing, and do not allow you to do? I'm taking out
>> scammable paragraphs and replacing th
I understand now.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 14 June 2008 8:38:19 ihope wrote:
> So what is it that you need to do that the rules have the power to
> prevent you from doing, and do not allow you to do? I'm taking out
> scammable paragraphs and replacing them with a sentence or two that
> have the same effect, if not a better one.
On Monday 16 June 2008 10:13:14 ihope wrote:
> Hmm, yes, you're probably right about the contract-defined actions
> thing. I would rather have a sentence or two stating that the
> gamestate can only be changed as the rules allow than a list of what's
> regulated and what's not that uses ambiguous t
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/16 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Yes, there are no "secret" rules or anything like that.
>>
>> -root
>>
>
> private contracts
Those aren't rules. They don't apply to anybody who hasn't
specifically agreed to the
On Saturday 14 June 2008 7:23:10 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ben Caplan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Huh. I was always taught in school that the sestet begins with a trochee.
>
> Well, it could just be that I'm an idiot and can't recognize a trochee
> when I see one. B
2008/6/16 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, there are no "secret" rules or anything like that.
>
> -root
>
private contracts
ehird
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would anybody support changing black ribbons to be awarded for judging
> a question on culpability rather than sentencing? It seems a bit
> arbitrary that you can only get a black ribbon in cases where the
> defendant happens
Would anybody support changing black ribbons to be awarded for judging
a question on culpability rather than sentencing? It seems a bit
arbitrary that you can only get a black ribbon in cases where the
defendant happens to be guilty. In fact, it sort of provides a
motivation to illegally find som
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When R2199 states
> If this rule mentions at least six different specific colors for
> Ribbons, then a player CAN destroy one Ribbon of each such color
> in eir possession to satisfy the Winning Condition of
> Renaissance.
>
> doe
When R2199 states
If this rule mentions at least six different specific colors for
Ribbons, then a player CAN destroy one Ribbon of each such color
in eir possession to satisfy the Winning Condition of
Renaissance.
does it mean that a player must have all types of ribbons to win OR
that e must hav
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can either re-retract my proposal to add em all, or we can write
> another proposal to award them Elder Lurker if it passes.
Probably best to wait for them to prover their lurkership by posting, anyway.
-root
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Chester Mealer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On the business thread I noticed there was some talk of harvesting and crops
> and what not. I saw no rules for such in the SLR and as a potential player
> I'm interested in learning where I can find out more?
It's a co
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Award Elder Lurker to both Michawl Norrish and David Nichol
>>
>> At least you mana
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Award Elder Lurker to both Michawl Norrish and David Nichol
>
> At least you managed to misspell both their names equally...
>
> I suspect that Maud, Steve,
2008/6/16 Chester Mealer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On the business thread I noticed there was some talk of harvesting and crops
> and what not. I saw no rules for such in the SLR and as a potential player
> I'm interested in learning where I can find out more?
>
> It is possible they are referring t
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Award Elder Lurker to both Michawl Norrish and David Nichol
At least you managed to misspell both their names equally...
I suspect that Maud, Steve, Kelly, and Crito are are still lurking as well.
-root
On the business thread I noticed there was some talk of harvesting and crops
and what not. I saw no rules for such in the SLR and as a potential player
I'm interested in learning where I can find out more?
It is possible they are referring to some contract or contest, so mainly my
question is does
2008/6/16 Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Award Elder Lurker to both Michawl Norrish and David Nichol
>
MICHAWL NORRISH
ehird
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal entitled Elder Lurker. BobTHJ is a
> co-author of this proposal even though E doesn't know it yet.
>
> Append the following to Rule 1922
>
> (g) Elder Lurker, to be awarded to Persons who are true
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Er, that's my recollection anyway. The Registrar's report lists
> Crito's email as 'dalbertz', so I hope I'm not mistaken.
Dang, I did misremember. I dug up an email from the actual Crito, who
was still lurking as of 2005.
2008/6/16 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> E's a former player, by the nickname of Crito. And there's nothing
> wrong with the occasional digression.
>
> -root
>
Ah, OK then. I apologise.
ehird
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is your first post, right?
>>
>> I can't see anything else by you in the logs.
>>
>> If so, do you know what Agora Nomic is? This isn't a genera
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/6/16 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> This is your first post, right?
>>>
>>> I can't see anything else by you in the logs.
>>>
>>> If so
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/16 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> This is your first post, right?
>>
>> I can't see anything else by you in the logs.
>>
>> If so, do you know what Agora Nomic is? This isn't a general discussion list.
>>
>> ehi
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is your first post, right?
>
> I can't see anything else by you in the logs.
>
> If so, do you know what Agora Nomic is? This isn't a general discussion list.
E's a former player, by the nickname of Crito. And there's
2008/6/16 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is your first post, right?
>
> I can't see anything else by you in the logs.
>
> If so, do you know what Agora Nomic is? This isn't a general discussion list.
>
> ehird
>
Extra notes:
no, not his first post - but his other ones don't look too goo
2008/6/16 David Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> sounds like warfare -- the on-going feudal eugenics program -- take
> the idiots to battle and bump them off with full honor. Anyone read
> http://www.amazon.com/WORLD-WAR-II-INFANTRY-SOLDIER/dp/B000LZG698
> by W. Y. Boyd? There are several scenes of a
2008/6/16 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You could, you know, read the voting results and find out.
>
> -root
>
WHAT A RIDICULOUS IDEA.
ehird
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/15 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I no longer agree to the previous version of this.
>>
>> I agree to the following:
>>
>> 1) The name of this public contract is The Werewolves of Agora Nomic.
>>
>> 2) The purpose
ehird wrote:
> I agree to this contract.
There are 5 contestants, so I'm obligated to start a game. I'll wait a
few more days in case anyone else wants to join.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:58 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also mill 2009 and 2010 (CFJ numbers) for 4 WRVs.
>
harvest?
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy has been inactive for three months. I intend to deregister em
> without objection.
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Jeremy a zombie with myself as
zombiemaster.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Give the Equity Court Teeth!
> AI: 1.7
> II: 1
> {
> Append to the second to last paragraph of R2169:
> {{
> A person SHALL NOT violate the terms of such a binding agreement they
> are pa
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, comex wrote:
>> How about Rule 101 (vi), the right of participation in the fora?
> This all rather depends on the definition of "participation". As you
> found in your spam scam there's a difference be
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the goal of the game
> becomes to survive with as few survivors as possible, not to eliminate
> the other side.
sounds like warfare -- the on-going feudal eugenics program -- take
the idiots to battle and bump them off with
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you ever vote FORx7 AGORA AGORA AGORA AGORA?
>
> If not, I initiate a criminal CFJ against you, for, uh, not doing so. Yeah.
You could, you know, read the voting results and find out.
-root
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/14/08, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FOR if voting FOR would cause the resulting VI to be exactly 3, PRESENT
>> otherwise
>
> Somehow this makes me uncomfortable. What happens in this case?
>
> Player A: I vo
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Somehow this makes me uncomfortable. What happens in this case?
>
> Player A: I vote FOR if player B votes FOR, AGAINST otherwise.
> Player B: I vote FOR if player A votes AGAINST, FOR otherwise.
My opinion as Assessor is that nei
Did you ever vote FORx7 AGORA AGORA AGORA AGORA?
If not, I initiate a criminal CFJ against you, for, uh, not doing so. Yeah.
ehird
On 6/14/08, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FOR if voting FOR would cause the resulting VI to be exactly 3, PRESENT
> otherwise
Somehow this makes me uncomfortable. What happens in this case?
Player A: I vote FOR if player B votes FOR, AGAINST otherwise.
Player B: I vote FOR if pla
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From my perspective, I don't think there is a need to specify.
> Assuming I can remember about X crops in the future I will use regular
> 0-9 crops first and then X crops if none are available.
I imagine it could cause some
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing, other than trying to make a more obvious and forceful obligation.
Without some sort of suggestion of what a "strict sentence" should
entail, and maybe something more forceful than just encouraging the
judge, I'm not
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Append to the second to last paragraph of R2169:
>> {{
>> A person SHALL NOT violate the terms of such a binding agreement they
>> are party to. The ju
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I h
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Append to the second to last paragraph of R2169:
> {{
> A person SHALL NOT violate the terms of such a binding agreement they
> are party to. The judge of a criminal case regarding a breach of this
> rule is encouraged to ass
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I harvest 1992, a CFJ, for 2 WRV.
>>>
>> Fails, you lack a 2 crop.
>>
> Disrega
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure if I can do this... I nominate myself as Tailor.
Yes, you can. There's a 4-day nomination period during which anyone
can be nominated; if more than 1 nominee who hasn't refused eir
nomination exists at the end of that
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recommend the judge of these cases implement a significant penalty
> upon comex for eir continued blatant violation of this agreement.
Wouldn't a criminal case be more appropriate?
On 6/16/08, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I nominate Ivan Hope CXXVII, comex, and Zefram as Herald.
I accept this nomination, as I don't hold an office currently. Of
course, as I understand it, nominations are considered accepted by
default, so there's technically no reason for me to
On 6/16/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those would fall under "the rules do not have the power to prevent it"
> in the new rule, the Soviet-style "everything not explicitly allowed is
> prohibited" approach is distasteful nonetheless. Upon reflection, I
> think it would also break cont
2008/6/16 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 5547 D1 2ais523
> FOR
>
>> 5548 D1 3Murphy Chronological order
> FOR
>
>> 5549 D1 2Wooble Earning Interest
> FOR
>
>> 5550 O1 1Ivan Hope Tongue-tied
> AGAINST * 3, FOR * 1
>
>> 5551 O1 1BobTHJ Empo
> 5547 D1 2ais523
FOR
> 5548 D1 3Murphy Chronological order
FOR
> 5549 D1 2Wooble Earning Interest
FOR
> 5550 O1 1Ivan Hope Tongue-tied
AGAINST * 3, FOR * 1
> 5551 O1 1BobTHJ Empower the Notary
FOR * 4
> 5552 O1 1.7 Murphy Clerk disi
Wooble wrote:
> I only went back though the CotC reports looking for the players who
> didn't already have a Blue ribbon for cases judged, and stopped
> looking for the ones who, like you two, were Supine in the first few
> reports I looked at.
Ah, I'm not a Senator, so I was forced to supine by th
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:12 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I harvest 2206, a new rule number, to gain a random land.
>>
>> Fai
Wooble wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:18 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm, why is everybody (except one voting PRESENT, apparently) against
>> this? Does it break something?
>
> Some people prefer to have the right to do the thousands if not
> millions of non-game-related actions t
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, comex wrote:
> How about Rule 101 (vi), the right of participation in the fora?
>
> It is physically impossible for the rules to prevent me from posting
> to the fora- possible for the Distributor, perhaps, but not for the
> rules themselves. So, by this tack, the Rules are j
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:18 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, why is everybody (except one voting PRESENT, apparently) against
> this? Does it break something?
Some people prefer to have the right to do the thousands if not
millions of non-game-related actions they perform on a daily ba
> Proposal 5554 (Democratic, AI=3, Interest=1) by Ivan Hope
> Isn't that just silly?
>
> In rule 101, remove "ii. Every player has the right to perform an
> action which is not regulated." and subtract 1 from the number of each
> following element of the list. Replace the text of rule 2125 with "It
97 matches
Mail list logo
