On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Append to the second to last paragraph of R2169:
>> {{
>> A person SHALL NOT violate the terms of such a binding agreement they
>> are party to. The judge of a criminal case regarding a breach of this
>> rule is encouraged to assign a strict sentence should the defendant be
>> found GUILTY.
>> }}
>
> What's wrong with the SHALL in R1742?
>
> -root
>
Nothing, other than trying to make a more obvious and forceful obligation.BobTHJ
