On Monday 16 June 2008 10:13:14 ihope wrote: > Hmm, yes, you're probably right about the contract-defined actions > thing. I would rather have a sentence or two stating that the > gamestate can only be changed as the rules allow than a list of what's > regulated and what's not that uses ambiguous terms such as "allowed" > and, I suppose, "under certain conditions" (though my initial > interpretation of that phrase was unpopular).
You'd have to have a good definition of "gamestate".
