On Jan 1, 2008 11:40 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 9:06 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If this is B Nomic, I submit the following:
> > {
> > The game state becomes what the game state of Agora was at the time of the
> > submission of this proposal.
>
On Jan 1, 2008 9:06 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is B Nomic, I submit the following:
> {
> The game state becomes what the game state of Agora was at the time of the
> submission of this proposal.
> }
>
> If this is Agora Nomic, I submit the following:
> {
> The game st
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, comex wrote:
> Arguments:
> See CFJ 1434. The relevant portion of CFJ 1769 (If some Rule
> requires... if some Rule bases) is unchanged from the time of CFJ 1434
> (evidence (2)) to now (evidence (3)).
Well-spotted! Seems like a pretty good precedent there. -Goethe
Completely missed that. Meh. Back to working on the blog proposal.
On Jan 1, 2008 3:08 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 1:03 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shouldn't that be a logical extension of the holiday period though? The
> > holiday period seems like a
On Jan 1, 2008 1:03 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't that be a logical extension of the holiday period though? The
> holiday period seems like a time for everyone to take a break from the game
> and enjoy the holidays.
>
> *gets idea for a proposal*
This is what Murphy's "Symmetr
Shouldn't that be a logical extension of the holiday period though? The
holiday period seems like a time for everyone to take a break from the game
and enjoy the holidays.
*gets idea for a proposal*
On Jan 1, 2008 2:55 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Kelly wrote:
> >(Some or all of t
Ian Kelly wrote:
>(Some or all of these votes may be too late to be valid.)
Holidays don't extend voting periods. A quorum problem would, however.
-zefram
On 12/31/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I nominate Eris for Clerk of the Courts, just to see the look on
> eir face.
Mmm, tempting, but no.
--
Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Dec 31, 2007 7:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Each Note has exactly one of the standard twelve pitches (ignoring
>octaves, and treating enharmonics as equivalent).
"Each Note has exactly one pitch from the chromatic scale."
> (2) A player CAN spend five N
On Jan 1, 2008 11:28 AM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you say concurring opinion, do you want an opinion on the original
> statement or an opinion on why it should be appealed?
Rule 911 defines the term:
A panel CAN publish a concurring opinion when judging AFFIRM,
and SHA
When you say concurring opinion, do you want an opinion on the original
statement or an opinion on why it should be appealed?
On Dec 25, 2007 7:54 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the agreement of my fellow H. Appeal Panelists Iammars and root,
> I intend to have the panel AF
On Dec 31, 2007, at 9:55 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I nominate Eris for Clerk of the Courts, just to see the look on
eir face.
I nominate avpx, BobTHJ, and OscarMeyr for Registrar.
I SUPPORT the nominations of TG Eris, avpx, and root.
I suppose (a non-official term) BobTHJ.
I'll flip a coin late
12 matches
Mail list logo
