On Jan 1, 2008 11:40 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 9:06 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If this is B Nomic, I submit the following:
> > {
> > The game state becomes what the game state of Agora was at the time of the
> > submission of this proposal.
> > }
> >
> > If this is Agora Nomic, I submit the following:
> > {
> > The game state becomes what the game state of B Nomic was at the time of the
> > submission of this proposal.
> > }
>
> Not sure what B Nomic considers to be part of their game state, but in
> Agora the fora, the set of players, and the name of the game are all
> part of the game state, so I think there would be no practical effect
> if both proposals passed. If exactly one passed, the practical effect
> would probably just be to demolish the nomic in which it passed.
Also, the Agoran proposal would require AI >= 3.
-root
