Re: DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

root wrote: On 11/1/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Zefram wrote: Kerim Aydin wrote: When Agoran Rules allow an action to be conducted "by announcement", the specific announcement is the action in question, giving the appearance that we support ISIDTID. In reality, we are recognizi

Re: DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

On 11/1/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Zefram wrote: > > > Kerim Aydin wrote: > > >> When Agoran Rules allow an action to be conducted "by announcement", > >> the specific announcement is the action in question, giving the > >> appearance that we support ISIDTID. In reality, we are rec

Re: DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

Zefram wrote: Kerim Aydin wrote: When Agoran Rules allow an action to be conducted "by announcement", the specific announcement is the action in question, giving the appearance that we support ISIDTID. In reality, we are recognizing the actual act of posting a message as the action. Yes.

Re: DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

On Thursday 01 November 2007, Zefram wrote: > comex wrote: > >By the way, although I'm not going to try to perl 10,000 CFJs, I see > >no reason not to try to scam this before the loophole is closed (with > >Proposal 5284 or such) with, say, 100. > > Actually 100 has been done before, written out in

Re: DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

comex wrote: >By the way, although I'm not going to try to perl 10,000 CFJs, I see >no reason not to try to scam this before the loophole is closed (with >Proposal 5284 or such) with, say, 100. Actually 100 has been done before, written out in full. Also, the voting period on P5284 will end befor

Re: DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

On 11/1/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that requiring the scammer to repeat the message 10,000 > times is not that much of a technical or time effort; eg. 5 minutes > and a perl script. It does present a cultural/social barrier > which is a de facto effort to break. We recognize

Re: DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

Oh, I just remembered another precedent which supports part of your analysis: some years ago KoJen posted an announcement along the lines of "I hereby perform every action that it is possible for me to take in Agora, simultaneously.". I don't think there was a CFJ, but everyone treated it as inval

Re: DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

Kerim Aydin wrote: >Too subjective a precedent? Maybe. Discuss. -Goethe ] Has generic and case-specific portions, which you've clearly labelled. Good arrangement. >When Agoran Rules allow an action to be conducted "by announcement", >the specific announcement is the action in question, giving

DIS: I say I pseudo-judge

[Long because I'm honored to finally weigh in on ISIDTID? Yes. Too subjective a precedent? Maybe. Discuss. -Goethe ] PSEUDO-JUDGEMENT 1774 First of all, Agora, by custom and practice, is based on actual actions of individuals, not on purported actions by directed avatars. Hence Kelly's Fa

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to deputise

comex wrote: >I CFJ on the following: A worthwhile CFJ from comex. With cogent arguments, even. Will wonders never cease? >While it seems that the CotC is indirectly required to perform that action >(else he can't assign any judges, which he is required to do), This is slightly wrong. The C