On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
So I'm going to poll the players and watchers: Upon first seeing
Peekee's message, were you able to understand it within a reasonable
amount of effort? If so, was a knowledge of HTML required?
Yes, and no. Apple Mail 2.1 rendered the message in
On 9/13/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the proposal confuses me; I don't understand how the second sentence is
> necessary given the first one.
Oops. Ignore the first sentence, that's the old proto.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Taral wrote:
> Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job II
>
> Add the following paragraph to the end of Rule 1871 (The Standing
> Court):
>
> When a judge is recused with cause, e becomes supine.
> When the CotC has recused a judge with cause in the past wee
Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job II
Add the following paragraph to the end of Rule 1871 (The Standing Court):
When a judge is recused with cause, e becomes supine.
When the CotC has recused a judge with cause in the past week, e
SHALL flip that player's posture to supine by
On 9/13/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto 2: Stare Decisis (AI=1)
> Create a new rule, at power=1, titled "Stare Decisis":
> The CotC's Monthly Report shall include the Stare Decisis, which
> is a list of past CFJs. The following information shall be
> included for each CFJ:
>
>
Revised.
Proto: 2158 changes. (AI=2)
Amend Rule 2158 by replacing:
Within a judicial case, one or more judicial questions may
arise. Each judicial question is either inapplicable (default)
or applicable; this is not a persistent status but is evaluated
instantaneously. E
On 9/13/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto: Get some colors.
>
> Amend Rule 2126 by appending the following clause after e)
>
> f) A player may spend all of their VCs provided e owns at least 6 of
> different colors to gain a VC of any color defined by the rules.
"all of eir VCs"
-root
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Peekee wrote:
> Any player CAN ask the Assessor to handout a VC of that color by
> announcement. The Assessor MAY then select a random player and
> announce the player and the color as soon as possible. The selected
> player then gains a VC of the color in question.
R
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Zefram wrote:
> Losing a clarifying clause that I think is useful.
Yes, the main purpose of the proto is to remove unnecessary clauses. The
only rules with the "persistent status" terminology are 2158 and 1868 and
I don't think they need them.
> This has a logic le
Or,
Proto: Get some colors.
Amend Rule 2126 by appending the following clause after e)
f) A player may spend all of their VCs provided e owns at least 6 of
different colors to gain a VC of any color defined by the rules.
--
Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
Any player CAN ask the Assessor to handout a VC of that color by
announcement.
Free VCs? No thanks. It particularly damages the palette win.
-zefram
I was thinking that it is going to be nearly impossible to get a
pallet win (I still th
Peekee wrote:
>Any player CAN ask the Assessor to handout a VC of that color by
>announcement.
Free VCs? No thanks. It particularly damages the palette win.
-zefram
Think I am a bit rusty at this. Any help would be good. Is it a good
idea to let the Assessor decide which requests to accept or should it
be mandatory? If so then how to handle multiple requests etc.
Proto-Proposal: Colorful
Create a new rule titled "Agora is Colorful" to read as foll
Pavitra wrote:
>It is possible for a judicial case to exist that has no subclass.
Ah, the Mousetrap loophole. I wrote the new judicial rules with the
intent that such an entity could not be created. What actually happens
to a CFJ of a subclass that is no longer defined by the rules is an
open qu
comex wrote:
> Each judicial question is either inapplicable (default)
> or applicable, as defined by the rules.
Losing a clarifying clause that I think is useful.
> Status is a judicial
> question switch, tracked by the CotC, w
15 matches
Mail list logo
