On Thursday 13 September 2007, Taral wrote: > Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job II > > Add the following paragraph to the end of Rule 1871 (The Standing > Court): > > When a judge is recused with cause, e becomes supine. > When the CotC has recused a judge with cause in the past week, e > SHALL flip that player's posture to supine by announcement. > > (Perhaps the "by announcement" bit should be split off into a separate > statement?)
maybe: When the CotC recuses a judge with cause, e SHALL as soon as possible flip that player's posture to supine by announcement. But the proposal confuses me; I don't understand how the second sentence is necessary given the first one.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
