Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Unofficial list of pending judicial actions

Goethe wrote: root wrote: Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs 1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier CFJs. I was wondering when someone would notice this. So was I. However, if HP2 did not become Speaker, Murphy is still Speak

DIS: Re: BUS: Unofficial list of pending judicial actions

root wrote: > Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs > 1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier > CFJs. I was wondering when someone would notice this. However, if HP2 did not become Speaker, Murphy is still Speaker. Lucky fact. The Cot

DIS: Re: BUS: Unofficial list of pending judicial actions

On 6/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I intend to have HP2 judge the appeal of CFJ 1684. Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs 1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier CFJs. -root

DIS: Re: BUS: HP2 judges CFJ 1687

root wrote: On 6/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Human Point Two judges CFJ 1687 FALSE. No arguments? I appeal. I don't see a substantive difference between this and "I accept the caller's arguments as valid". To-ma-to, to-mah-to.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Helping Primo Help You

On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Zefram wrote: Roger Hicks wrote: It is worth noting (for those of you who are not subscribed to the Corporate Forum) that Primo Corporation contains the following clause in Section 23 of its charter: { Any Player of Agora who spends Voting Credits to increase th

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1689 assigned to root

== CFJ 1647 == Murphy's message with datestamp Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:59:19 -0700 had the effect of submitting a proposal. According to Rule 106/4: A proposal

DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1689 assigned to root

comex wrote: >== CFJ 1689 == > > root changed his Primo Corporation share holdings to 1 million > on or about Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:35:18 -0600. I pseudo-judge: {{{ Primo Corporation shares are defined by the Corporate Charter. At the t

DIS: proposal history on the web

I've posted my current proposal database at . It goes back to when I took over the Promotorship. I'll keep it up to date in that location. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJs 1661-5 assigned to BobTHJ

BobTHJ wrote: On 6/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BobTHJ wrote: > Just to avoid un-needed problems, TTttPF (thanks Murphy!): You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Which word? "P". (Your second posting of the judgement was also to a-d.)

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 5027 - 5041

root wrote: I hereby dispute the announced results for proposals 5030 and 5041, as partnerships are not players and could not have voted on them. I disagree (I expect CFJ 1684 to wind up being reversed), but in any case this unambiguously stops the R2034 clock. If CFJ 1684 winds up being uphe