On 6/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I intend to have HP2 judge the appeal of CFJ 1684.
Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs 1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier CFJs. -root
On 6/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I intend to have HP2 judge the appeal of CFJ 1684.
Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs 1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier CFJs. -root