root wrote: > Ack! The whole point of CFJ 1684 was to settle the matter of CFJs > 1622 and 1623 while avoiding the paradoxes introduced in those earlier > CFJs.
I was wondering when someone would notice this. However, if HP2 did not become Speaker, Murphy is still Speaker. Lucky fact. The CotC can assign justices twice (or just write "Murphy or HP2" in the assignment line) and Murphy post judgement twice (or just sign one post behalf of emself as well as on behalf of HP2, and hopefully use restraint and not set up a paradox :) ). Issue solved...unless of course the third, necessarily random Appellate judge is not human. -Goethe
