Glad I'm not the only one.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:43 PM wrote:
> “February has been all about getting the work done I expected to be doing
> in November and December. “
>
> Put that on my tombstone.
>
> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 26, 2020 11:07 AM
I also end up cursing at it because the printing on the labels is light or
skips. Then I put in a new roll of labels and it’s fine for awhile.
Apparently the labels have a shelf life once the package is opened. I don’t
know if it’s temperature or they dry out or what. I should try taking t
We R starting to see some real world impressive results with just the
pmp450i CBRS radios on a 20Mhz channels
This guy is nearLOS about 2.5 miles of some tree and pointing into edge
of panel
Current Results Status
Stats for LUID: 65 Test Duration: 10 Pkt Length: 1714 Test
Direction
Do you have numbers for this same customer pre-CBRS?
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:26 AM dave wrote:
> We R starting to see some real world impressive results with just the
> pmp450i CBRS radios on a 20Mhz channels
> This guy is nearLOS about 2.5 miles of some tree and pointing into edge of
> panel
Still in winter. I'd like to see how it performs when the leaves are full
in May.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:26 AM dave wrote:
> We R starting to see some real world impressive results with just the
> pmp450i CBRS radios on a 20Mhz channels
> This guy is nearLOS about 2.5 miles of some tree and p
Before I recreate the wheel, I thought I would ask:
Any recommendations on fleet management software.
I probably have 50+ vehicles and machines that all need regular oil and filter
changes etc.
I am starting to create forms and may make a database but perhaps there is a
low cost solution alrea
About 70. Regularly hits 100Mbps DL. 20MHz channel. Surprisingly only 3 or
4 SMs worse than 6X MIMO-B downlink.
450m is definitely worth the cost where you have the density. And it's a
night/day difference especially when you upgrade from regular ol 450 APs.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:38 PM Josh B
For years there has been enthusiasm for the idea that 3.5 GHz is suitable for
NLOS propagation in a way that doesn’t apply to other mid band spectrum like
2.4, 2.5 or 5 GHz. Initially is wasn’t clear what type of NLOS people meant –
urban clutter or foliage – but I think it’s pretty clear peopl
In reality, I think it's a combination of all of those, with the exception
of "3.65 GHz somehow is absorbed less by foliage than other mid band
frequencies", which I've never seen any evidence for in the real world.
Plus the fact that we're allowed to use quite a bit higher EIRP than 2.4ghz
or 5ghz
Lots of wishful thinking combined with a little bit of LTE magic. 5 on your
list would be my vote - receiver sensitivity and lack of interference.
You left out the other adder - running at illegal power output levels at the
base station for the NN licenses.
LTE certainly has significantly bett
A lot of the initial hype was based on the signal levels the links were
reporting from the CPE. What people didn’t realize was that the signal being
reported was for the pilot carrier and not the full bandwidth signal. The
difference is about 30 dB. So when a CPE was connecting at say -70 the
r
Here are a few places to start:
https://blog.capterra.com/the-6-best-free-and-open-source-fleet-management-s
oftware-programs/
Thank you,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com
From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 11:5
Yeah, Baicells CPE report signal in RSRP, rather than RSSI like most of the
radios WISPs are used to, and I think that's pretty much standard for LTE
radios, in general.
You can get away with low signal levels when there's no noise and no load
on the AP, so it seems great when you put your first f
What are the various options for providing sync to a 3.65 450M?
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
TANSTAFAL Specially in RF
On 02/27/2020 10:05 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, Baicells CPE report signal in RSRP, rather than RSSI like most of
the radios WISPs are used to, and I think that's pretty much standard
for LTE radios, in general.
You can get away with low signal levels when there'
Shayne - There's a discussion on this topic here:
https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/450M-3Ghz-Power-options-sync-options/td-p/98000
Summary: CMM5 (for timing only, as the radio is DC-powered) or cnPulse
(connecting the AUX port).
The PacketFlux devices are also being used (as the
We use the PacketFlux rack injector - great product and easy to use for
lots of different equipment types.
We ripped out all of our CMM5s because honestly they are a PITA and a very
clunky solution.
-Sean
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Shayne Lebrun
wrote:
> What are the various options for
Was it the CMM5 that was basically a big metal box with a tiny Raspberry Pi
in it?
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:21 PM Sean Heskett wrote:
> We use the PacketFlux rack injector - great product and easy to use for
> lots of different equipment types.
>
> We ripped out all of our CMM5s because honestl
I was glad that we put up ubnt around the same time as the 320. It quickly
forced me to understand there was zero sauce to the band, outside it being
clean at the time. the ubnt offered no "penetration" as would be expected.
the 320, wimax offered better penetration, but not 900mhz penetration,
whe
CMM Micro was pretty cool. We dropped the coin for a few CMM4 (still have
one NIB) and were sorely disappointed in what a shitshow it was of cobbled
components at crazy high cost, half web interface, half CLI, and IIRC there
was java involved too. I wont even look at a CMM5
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at
Yes, the CMM4 was horrible. We still have a few as well.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Steve Jones
wrote:
> CMM Micro was pretty cool. We dropped the coin for a few CMM4 (still have
> one NIB) and were sorely disappointed in what a shitshow it was of cobbled
> components at crazy high cost, h
CMM5 is worse than the CMM4.
and yes the control board for the CMM5 is a Pi
-sean
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:44 PM Josh Baird wrote:
> Yes, the CMM4 was horrible. We still have a few as well.
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Steve Jones
> wrote:
>
>> CMM Micro was pretty cool. We dropped
WiMax was originally promised to do 70 Mbps to 70 subscribers at 70 miles. I
think those commas were misinterpreted.
From: Steve Jones
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 12:34 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: Cambium LTE
I was glad that we put up
I've been told the attenuation from foliage in 3.5ghz is going to be
about 15db per 100m. Obviously that really depends on what
/specifically/ is in the way, but I think that figure lines up with my
observations in the field. It means you can get through trees at a
steep angle to a high tower
Im really wanting to see what ericson does. I read a white paper on one of
their carrier product tests it was crazy, through some trees, some dirt
over some water, like 4 miles or something and they were doing something
like 70mbps in a small channel. The system has the cpe directing the base
stati
What name and address of the Road something place ewe guys go to? My lil
brother the EE is there with other EEs .
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Rodizio?
> On Feb 27, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> What name and address of the Road something place ewe guys go to? My lil
> brother the EE is there with other EEs .
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing
Yep . thanks I found it but I think they are going to Spencers
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 5:53 PM Cassidy B. Larson wrote:
> Rodizio?
>
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Jaime Solorza
> wrote:
>
> What name and address of the Road something place ewe guys go to? My lil
> brother the EE is there wit
We typically recommend one of the following options from our product line:
1) For sites with room for a rackmount device, a RackInjector with a PDU
card and a Cambium Sync Card. This will provide Power via the PDU card to
the unit, and sync via the cambium sync card. You'll need a syncbox
basi
That's a good one.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 7:28 PM Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> Yep . thanks I found it but I think they are going to Spencers
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 5:53 PM Cassidy B. Larson wrote:
>
>> Rodizio?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Jaime Solorza
>> wrote:
>>
>> What name and a
Not exactly a "steak" place, but most assuredly a "meat" place.
bp
On 2/27/2020 4:52 PM, Cassidy B. Larson
wrote:
Rodizio?
On Feb 27, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Jaime Solorza
Holy crap, I must be way out of the loop, but I never saw anything on this
list about "bleary's" situation. I just googled it, that is nuts.
On Thursday, February 27, 2020, Adam Moffett wrote:
> I've been told the attenuation from foliage in 3.5ghz is going to be about
> 15db per 100m. Obviousl
32 matches
Mail list logo