Re: Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?

I have a client who went from v5.5 32b to 6.2.2.2 64b on new hardware. So far they're running noticeably faster Paul Sent from my iPhone On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:36 PM, "Prather, Wanda" wrote: > Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0 or V6.2.2.2 on Win2K8 64b > confirm for me tha

Restore trouble on Virtuel W2K3 server.

Hi all, I have restored a W2K3 server in a VM environment, but now it will not back up. It is a new server, where I restored the backup from another server. 1. Restored C-drive 2. SystemState restored. Then boot the server, which then stops during boot. What went wrong? Have fun Bo Nielsen Sen

Ang: Restore trouble on Virtuel W2K3 server.

Some more information on what happens during boot would help trying to resolve the issue. Is the new VM identical to the old one? (SCSI adapter, VM version)? Are you restoring to the same ESXi server or to a different one? What is the error you're getting when trying to boot the newly restored

Re: Restore trouble on Virtuel W2K3 server.

I do not think it is possible to do restore like this - you need to use some Bare Machine Recovery software like TBMR (Bare Machine Recovery for TSM). In addition, you can just clone VM instead of using TSM, if source and target servers are VMs. Grigori G. Solonovitch -Original Message---

Re: Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?

I've not had any problems with the 6.2.2.x 64b client on Windows. >>> "Prather, Wanda" 6/16/2011 12:32 AM >>> Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0 or V6.2.2.2 on Win2K8 64b confirm for me that you are running OK? Have a customer who did the conversion from V5 on Win2K3 32b to V6.2.2

Re: Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?

Are you backing up System State? They changed how this works (I think in 6.2.?), which puts more processing on the client side and allows server-side expiration to run more quickly. I can confirm that the server-side expiration does indeed run much more quickly for System State backups. We've

Re: [adsm] Re: TSM 6.x and HADR

I've been playing with this recently...as Daniel indicated, it's pretty easy to set up. db2pd -hadr -db tsmdb1 Run from either the primary or secondary will give the status of the connection, and which log files it's working on. Failing over from primary -> secondary is also straight forward.

Re: [adsm] Re: TSM 6.x and HADR

Are there any tested proceedural steps to using this feature? There doesn't seem to anything in the IBM Technical Library. On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Lloyd Dieter wrote: > I've been playing with this recently...as Daniel indicated, it's pretty > easy to set up. > > db2pd -hadr -db tsmdb1 >

Re: Restore trouble on Virtuel W2K3 server.

> I have restored a W2K3 server in a VM environment, but now it will not back > up. > It is a new server, where I restored the backup from another server. > 1. Restored C-drive > 2. SystemState restored. > > I have had this issue before, we were specifically excluding the windows directory (assumin

Re: Restore trouble on Virtuel W2K3 server.

-Bo Carsten Krogholm Nielsen wrote: - >I have restored a W2K3 server in a VM environment, but now it will >not back up. >It is a new server, where I restored the backup from another server. >1. Restored C-drive >2. SystemState restored. > >Then boot the server, which then stops during boot

Re: Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?

Not backing up system state. And all firewalls turned off. We're seeing the slowdown in all clients, not just the win2k8 clients. So I'm more concerned about the server end, which was upgraded from Win2K3 32bit to win2k8 64bit. Thanks! W -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

Re: Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?

I know this is a silly question, but since it's comm wait, did you have the nic's checked that they were running at the correct speed with no errors? On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:30, Prather, Wanda wrote: > Not backing up system state.  And all firewalls turned off. > > We're seeing the slowdown in

Re: Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?

That's what I would have expected. Thank you VERY much for taking the time to reply. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Fielding Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:25 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance i

Re: [adsm] Re: TSM 6.x and HADR

This is a very good document: The installation is easy and it works perfectly. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Electronic+vaulting+using+deduplicated+remote+copy+storage+pools#Electronicvaultingusingdeduplicatedremotecopystoragepools-HADRconfigurationinfo

Re: Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?

Yep. Weird part is we can FTP at high speed over those NICS. It's just TSM that's slow. No firewalls, no hops. Can't see what is different except the TCP/IP port#. Thanks W -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew Carlson Sent:

Re: Restore trouble on Virtuel W2K3 server.

Here is a how-to on restoring a complete system. Good luck! Modified Instructions for Complete Restores of Windows Systems with the TSM Client: Bare Metal Restore (BMR), System State Restore, Windows System Object Restore https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21164812&wv=1 -O

Re: Restore trouble on Virtuel W2K3 server.

Without any detail it is hard to say why it did not work. We have restored many W2k3 servers by dropping an OS down and restoring the old OS on top. We have done it with real and imagined servers. There are some fatal traps... 1. The target of the restore needs to be similar hardware, real or ima

Adding a second library to TSM/HSM

Hello all, I am still very much a newbie with TSM.. I am adding a second library to use with HSM ts3310 LTO3, I have a current library active and in use. What I need to do is the following: Add new library so HSM will start using it while I migrate my data from the old LTO2

Why is restore -filelist so much faster?

For TSM restores that will be from tape, I am discovering that RESTORE -FILELIST is a whole lot faster for restores of multiple files than RESTORE . So I'm building a script to run QUERY BACKUP and then turn those results into a form for RESTORE -FILELIST. The performance difference is dramatic - s

Re: Restore trouble on Virtuel W2K3 server.

On VMware, I've also seen the version of VMware cause an issue (so-called "black screen" on boot, system does not even appear to POST). The target VMware host should be at the same or higher level of VMware than that of the source VMware host. Best regards, Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivo

Re: Why is restore -filelist so much faster?

On 16 jun 2011, at 21:31, Roger Deschner wrote: > For TSM restores that will be from tape, I am discovering that RESTORE > -FILELIST is a whole lot faster for restores of multiple files than > RESTORE . So I'm building a script to run QUERY > BACKUP and then turn those results into a form for REST

tsm and data domain

Any one use emc's data domain devices for storage pools and replication Would like to here positive and negative issues. Thanks, Tim Brown Systems Specialist - Project Leader Central Hudson Gas & Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: tbr...@cenhud.com <

DD & TSM

Hi Tim, We were in class about five ago in Middleboro Ma More Group At present, I am an installer (still in training) of DD and then Integrating to TSM. Are using you using VTL, NFS or both. What model are you using? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Ma

Ang: Re: [adsm] Re: TSM 6.x and HADR

Since Wanda said she didnt have any in-house competence on DB2, I will again however point out that if you're going to use HADR with your TSM server, make sure you have anyone who can diagnostic/troubleshoot a DB2 server in-house or someone you can hire. As long as it works, monitoring (as peop

Re: tsm and data domain

I use DDs as a VTL. Works good, in the aggregate it is fast. It can restore faster the 1Gb Ethernet (no 10Gb yet), I have heard some people complain that the restore was slow, I have not experienced it being slow. Meets my needs. I do not use NFS and I do not replicate yet. The GUI needs lots

Re: tsm and data domain

On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Tim Brown wrote: > Any one use emc's data domain devices for storage pools and replication > > Would like to here positive and negative issues. My current employer has dozens of DataDomain DD690s and DD880s, all arranged in pairs in which one is primary and one is a

Re: tsm and data domain

At 05:59 PM 6/16/2011, Nick Laflamme wrote: >We need to do a bake-off -- or study someone else's -- between using >deduplication in a DataDomain box and using both client-side deduplication and >server-side deduplication in TSM V6 and then writing to relatively >inexpensive, relatively simple (b