AW: manually ejecting a tape from a 3494 library

2001-10-25 Thread Baines, Paul
But they could have been checked out of TSM with remove=no and could possibly still be defined as storage pool volumes and still contain data. Always "know" the TSM state of tapes that you're going to do mtlib stuff to, like changing categories. Mit freundlichen Grüßen - With best regards Serdec

No Subject

2001-10-25 Thread SWIT3
I only have one tape drive to backup data. After the tape full, what will happen? Will the TSM alerts users to label a new tape and then continue to backup data? Or the users must prepare more tapes and labeled before using? Do you have any suggestion? Thank you very much!! Sincerely and Be

Re: Cache Hit % dropping on NT

2001-10-25 Thread Pétur Eyþórsson
Doh!!! stupid me :) Ok Mandy, it is always better for perfomance to have your database spread across muptiple PV. I´ts more dificult perfomance tuning NT than Unix so you need to bee careful in what decisions you make. I have never seen this message beefore. You should know that this problem

Re: Update Management Class

2001-10-25 Thread Pétur Eyþórsson
Hi Kelvin TSM does not automaticly move data between STGPools. The Incremental backups will conntinue as nothing has happend, and if you do a restore you must restore from both the storage pools. If you are planing to only use one of the storage pools you must manualy move the data between the s

Re: SAN Environment

2001-10-25 Thread Jörg Nouvertné
Hi Paul, it's an issue. Whenever I try to read data which has been backed up throught the SAN (audit vol, restore, ba stgp, etc), I get thousands of unreadable files with the following error message: 09/03/01 08:59:08 ANRD pvrntp.c(3438): ThreadId<37> Invalid block header

Re: 4.1.5.*

2001-10-25 Thread Jeff Bach
Joshua, We are currently at 4.1.4.4. Issues occur at this level involving library sharing and SAN attached devices. 4.1.5 written to fix. Just trying to find out if anyone is there yet and what they have seen. Jeff Bach Home Office Open Systems Engineering Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

Library migration

2001-10-25 Thread Alexandre Bicas
Hi *SMers ! I have a customer who has 2 Magstar 3590 Libraries and wishes to upgrade them to a single 3494 with two drives... This customer has a particular problem: he manually labeled his 700 tapes using 5-digit labels, and 3494 barcode labels are built with 6-digits ! I know I can buy 6-digi

unsubscribe

2001-10-25 Thread Pitts Fred
Automatic digest processor wrote: > > Subject: ADSM-L Digest - 23 Oct 2001 to 24 Oct 2001 (#2001-290) > Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 00:01:40 -0400 > From: Automatic digest processor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Recipients of ADSM-L digests <[EMAIL

Re: How do I find out which volume a File is on

2001-10-25 Thread Guan, Phillip
Hi Don, I don't know about HSM, is this what you want? Select volume_name,node_name,filespace_name,file_name, file_size from contents where filespace_name='FILENAME_FS_NAME' and file_name='FILNAME_TO_FIND_OUT' Phillip Guan -Original Message- From: Don Avart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] S

No Subject

2001-10-25 Thread Bill Mansfield
If it is a manual library (i.e. a bare tape drive) you still have to label and "check in" tapes as scratch. Then TSM will request you to unmount the full tape and mount a particular scratch tape. You can run "mountmode" console which will display the messages. _ Wi

No Subject

2001-10-25 Thread D. Malbrough
Well, SWIT3! The volumes have to be already labelled & checked into the library as SCRATCH volumes. Then, TSM will automatically mount a SCRATCH volume and proceed with the data write. If not you will have numerous insufficient space errors in the activity log. Thanks, Demetrius A. Malbrough A

IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server

2001-10-25 Thread David Longo
We currently have TSM Server 3.7.4.0 on RS6000 F50 with internal 4.5GB SSA Disks and External IBM ESS. Looking to upgrade server. One of the possibilities for TSM Server disk storage is IBM's new FAStT Disk storage. We want disk storage totally "local" to server. Does anyone have this disk stor

Strange Scratch behaviour in manual library.

2001-10-25 Thread Warren, Matthew James
Hello TSM'ers I have a strange problem, or is it 'Working As Designed?' Using a manual SCSI library with 9 slots, there are 4 tapes checked in as scratch defined to stgpool dailypool, 4 tapes chacked in as scratch defined to stgpool weeklypool, 1 tape checked in as scratch defined to no storage

SAN Info

2001-10-25 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
I have a few SAN configuration questions as it relates to my TSM server. I was wondering if someone who is very familiar with SAN and TSM could contact me either through email or by phone, I am also willing to call. We are in the process of setting one up from scratch. Parts are just arriving and

Re: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server

2001-10-25 Thread Adolph Kahan
RS/6000's do not support the FAStT Disk Storage. Adolph -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Longo Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server We currently have TS

Re: TSM 4.2.x on AIX 4.3.3

2001-10-25 Thread Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM
I believe, the client code of TSM is the highest at the current time. The lastest patch (released @ Sept. 2001) is applied. and AIX is just upgraded to 4.3.3. And the team is working on install SQL-Backtrack rather than TDP, I hope, this SQL_Backtrack can help the backup performance. Rosa "S

Re: Update Management Class

2001-10-25 Thread D. Malbrough
Kelvin, That is a manual process. You will have to move the files from one storage pool volume to other storage pool volumes. You can move files from a primary storage pool volume only to volumes in the same or a different primary storage pool. You can move files from a copy storage pool volume o

Windows XP

2001-10-25 Thread Paul Zarnowski
Can someone from Tivoli comment on when a supported TSM client will be available for Windows XP? I understand that one is being evaluated, etc, but I haven't heard anything recently, and XP is now available. Thanks...Paul

Re: Educational Licencing Question

2001-10-25 Thread Prather, Wanda
A while back there was an announcement that Tivoli would start supporting Passport Advantage as of September; should be available now. -Original Message- From: Joel Fuhrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Educational

Re: Library migration

2001-10-25 Thread Seay, Paul
I would use TAPEUTIL to dump the internal label on the tape and look at it. It is documented in the Magstar Installation and User's Guide and now supported on almost all platforms. -Original Message- From: Alexandre Bicas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:41 AM

Tape Copy pools and Colocation

2001-10-25 Thread Kyle Sparger
Hello, I'm starting to implement tape copy pools. My primary pool has colocation enabled, in order to speed up restores. My primary storage pool currently is using 27 tapes at varying degrees of usage. When I did a test BACKUP STGPOOL, the output indicated that it wanted to use another 27 tape

Re: SAN Environment

2001-10-25 Thread James Thompson
Keep in mind that one of the settings for a node is max number of mount points (MAXNUMMP). This is typically set to 1. This forces a node to only be able to reserve a single mount point. Resource utilization causes multiple sessions for a node to be used. When going to tape or a stgpool of type

reclamation not running

2001-10-25 Thread Long Nguyen
I noticed that my reclamation stopped running. After lowing the reclamation threshold lower, it still does not run (before, it would). I also updated the Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed and reclamation is still not running. Any ideas??? Thanks in advance. Long ___

Clientaction Restore

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
All, Does anybody know if it is possible to define an immediate clientaction that will restore files to a target server from a source server? I have tried just about every iteration of -virtualnodename, -fromnode, -tonode, etc but it never seems to work. Does anybody know if this is even possib

Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation

2001-10-25 Thread Kelly Lipp
Don't collocate the copy storage pool. Obviously, each day at least one tape will go out that is not full. No avoiding that. However, if you agressively reclaim the copy storage pool the number of tapes in that pool will be minimized. For instance, let's say you send a 10% full tape out on Mon

Re: Windows XP

2001-10-25 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Should be some time later today. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your frien

Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation

2001-10-25 Thread Gabriel Wiley
Kyle, If you do not have your copypool set to collocate, the copypool tapes will be used more efficiently. Just update your copy stgpool accordingly. Gabriel C. Wiley ADSM/TSM Administrator AIX Support Phone 1-614-308-6709 Pager 1-877-489-2867 Fax 1-614-308-6637 Cell 1-740-972-64

Running the Notes Connect Agent with a R5 Domino server with 4.6 databases?

2001-10-25 Thread Lisa Cabanas
I've not been able to find whether this is possible, and I don't have a test machine available to test right now. We are painfully moving forward in upgrading our email system, and we have a number of NT4 SP5/6 servers running a Domino R5 server, but with 4.6 databases & templates. I am using th

Re: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
The FAStT500 absolutely does support the RS6K. Last week I installed a FAStT500 in a SAN environment for one of my clients. It was connected to a W2K box, a few NT servers and a NetWare 5.1 server. The TSM backup server is running on the W2K box. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant I

Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation

2001-10-25 Thread Jack McKinney
When you run BACKUP STGPOOL with the PREVIEW=VOL or PREVIEW=YES options, then the tape that it reports are that ones from the primary storage pool that it is going to need to read from, not the ones it will need to write. In other words, it is saying that it needs all 27 primary tapes, not

Re: Windows XP

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
I have been successfully backing up my XP laptop with at first the 4.2.0.0 and now the 4.2.1.0 NT/W2K client. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (408)&(831) 332-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Messag

Re: reclamation not running

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
Are you sure there are volume eligible for reclamation? -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (408)&(831) 332-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PR

Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
When you define the copy storage pool, make sure you define it with the collocation parameter set to no. Then the storage pool will use the fewest tapes possible. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (408)&

oracle backup(linux)

2001-10-25 Thread Thiha Than
hi, I am not sure where you got the information about TDPO for Linux availability in first half of 2002. We are planning for it but don't count on having it in the first half of 2002. regards, Thiha >I just recently spoke with my IBM rep on this, and the word I got >back that, although there a

Client doesn't discard file after a failed restore

2001-10-25 Thread Alexander Verkooijen
Hello, (AIX 4.3.3, 4.2.0.0 client, 4.2.1.2 server) I just noticed something funny. I'm restoring several file systems from node A on node B. Node A has a unlimited maximum file size. Node B has a maximum file size of 1 GB. The file systems I'm restoring contain several files > 1 GB When the cl

internal server error / ANR0102E

2001-10-25 Thread Christian Wolfstieg
Hello, this error on my DB happened now the second time the last three months. Each time when the server is trying to migrate. "DSMSERV AUDITDB FIX=YES" fixed the problem. But what is causing this problem? Anybody seen this? (My TSM-Server: WIN NT, TSM v4.2, IBM 3494 library.) 10/18/2001 21:22:5

Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation

2001-10-25 Thread Prather, Wanda
It sounds like your COPY pool has colocation enabled. Just turn that off for the copy pool, leave it on for the primary pool. -Original Message- From: Kyle Sparger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape Copy pools and Colo

Re: Educational Licencing Question

2001-10-25 Thread Seay, Paul
We just signed a Tivoli Passport Advantage agreement. -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Educational Licencing Question A while back there was an announcement that Tivoli would s

Re: reclamation not running

2001-10-25 Thread Gabriel Wiley
What does the activity log say? Gabriel C. Wiley ADSM/TSM Administrator AIX Support Phone 1-614-308-6709 Pager 1-877-489-2867 Fax 1-614-308-6637 Cell 1-740-972-6441 Long Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 10/25/2001 07:46:16 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

Re: Running the Notes Connect Agent with a R5 Domino server with 4.6 databases?

2001-10-25 Thread Del Hoobler
> I've not been able to find whether this is possible, and I don't have a > test machine available to test right now. We are painfully moving forward > in upgrading our email system, and we have a number of NT4 SP5/6 servers > running a Domino R5 server, but with 4.6 databases & templates. I am

Re: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server

2001-10-25 Thread Slag, Jerry B.
We have been running a FastT200 in production since 11/2000. It has been a solid platform and has survived two power outages with no problems. We have been using FastT500 and Exp500 frames in a test environment for a few months without any failures. If I ever move TSM from our 390 I will use FastT

upgrade ADSM 3.1 DB to TSM 4.1

2001-10-25 Thread Henrry Aranda
Hello, I'm planning to install an TSM 4.1 server in a client location who already has ADSM 3.1, in fact i have to use another box (both are AIX 4.3.3) How should i do in order to migrate the database? Because the client wants to keep all the backups and policies he has already defined. Could you

Re: Clientaction Restore

2001-10-25 Thread Gabriel Wiley
Change the 'Nodename' parameter in the client options file to the target server name. And follow you previous syntax commands. i.e. -fromnode -tonode This works for me.. Gabriel C. Wiley ADSM/TSM Administrator AIX Support Phone 1-614-308-6709 Pager 1-877-489-2867 Fax 1-614-308-6

Really slow restores

2001-10-25 Thread Jason Webb
We are running adsm 3.7.0 on os/390. The client level is for nt servers 4.1.1. Our OS/390 has about 100 nodes backing up between 8PM and 5am. Sometimes a backup session will run long and keep going to 10am but that is not always the case. Over the last week our restores are running very slow somti

Re: oracle backup(linux)

2001-10-25 Thread Thomas A. La Porte
Well, like I said, I spoke with my IBM rep and was told that it *could* be available with TSM v5 in the first half of 2002. Since there has been no announcement, we are left to our own design in making determinations about IBM/Tivoli's product directions. It seems safe to assume that a TDPO for Li

Re: EXCLUDE W2K "SYSTEM OBJECT"

2001-10-25 Thread LeBlanc, Patricia
Here's what I have listed for the domain below: Domain C: D: Domain SYSTEMOBJECT When I look at the file spaces in TSM I don't show one for the system object. Does anyone know if I need to correct the syntax to get the system object to backup?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Prath

Re: Clientaction Restore

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
Unfortunately I cannot change anything on the client, I need a solution to do this without touching the client machine. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (408)&(831) 332-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Origi

Re: How do I find out which volume a File is on

2001-10-25 Thread Alex Paschal
Just a quick note, this will probably get all versions of that file, all archive versions, all backup versions, and hsm. Good luck. Alex -Original Message- From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How do I

Offsite Data

2001-10-25 Thread Dearman, Richard
Is there anyway other than creating a backup set to offfsite data for a particular day for one server. For example I want to offsite xyz servers backup of a database every friday just once a week and keep it offsite indefinitely. Basically, I will have a copy of that server offsite has it was on

Re: Client for Cluster

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
The regular TSM Backup-Archive client and the Tivoli Data Protection for MS SQL Server are all cluster aware applications. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (408)&(831) 332-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Or

Re: EXCLUDE W2K "SYSTEM OBJECT"

2001-10-25 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Hi Patricia, Which version of the TSM server and client are you using? Also, check your dsmsched.log file (presumably you are doing scheduled backups?). Does it have a message like this 10/24/2001 21:40:33 Incremental backup of volume 'SYSTEM OBJECT' near the beginning of the backup? Regard

Client for Cluster

2001-10-25 Thread Nazir
Hi, I have two machines that are working Win 2000 Server and SQL. Those machines are in cluster, and there is a virtual machine too. Is there TSM client for Microsoft cluster? What Can I do in this case? Thank you Nazir

Re: Offsite Data

2001-10-25 Thread Prather, Wanda
You could create a separate archive storage pool, and use archive instead of backup to do the copy. -Original Message- From: Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Offsite Data Is there anyway other than creat

Re: EXCLUDE W2K "SYSTEM OBJECT"

2001-10-25 Thread Prather, Wanda
SYSTEMOBJECT is the default, we don't include it in the domain - what version fo the client are you using? -Original Message- From: LeBlanc, Patricia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EXCLUDE W2K "SYSTEM OBJECT" Here's

Re: Client for Cluster

2001-10-25 Thread Joe Cascanette
There is no actual client for the cluster, you need to install the client on both nodes, and then add a group in the cluster admin to start the services on the node that is active. see the admin guide for cluster setups. Its really easy. Joe -Original Message- From: Nazir [mailto:[EMAI

Re: Running the Notes Connect Agent with a R5 Domino server with 4.6 databases?

2001-10-25 Thread Lisa Cabanas
Thanks for your answer, Del. It confirms what I suspected-- it *might* work, but its not supported. Too bad there isn't something for the interim-- because it is my understanding that Lotus says that this is one of the migration paths (i.e. Domino R5 server, 4.6 databases, then convert your clie

Re: Offsite Data

2001-10-25 Thread Bill Mansfield
How about creating an archive to a collocated storage pool and checking out the tape? _ William Mansfield Senior Consultant Solution Technology, Inc 630 357 7744 x338 "Dearman, Richard" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

40 NT servers suddenly failing

2001-10-25 Thread Adam J. Boyer
A few days ago, about 40 NT/2000 clients failed to backup. The error for all of them was: ANR2716E Schedule prompter was not able to contact client CLIENT001 using type 1 (1.2.3.4 1501). The clients are 4.2.0 and the server is 4.2.1. Not only did they fail, but the cl

TSM 4.2.1

2001-10-25 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
To all, I contacted Tivoli today regarding the PMR I have open. I don't know if this affects all platforms but on AIX 4.3.3 with TSM 4.2.1 about every 3 days I can count of a core dump of TSM, last night was the latest. According to Tivoli they want me to change one parameter in the dsmserv.opt f

Re: 40 NT servers suddenly failing

2001-10-25 Thread Rushforth, Tim
We ran into this a few times also. APAR IC29491 - WITH SCHEDMODE PROMPTED NETWORK BREAKS COULD FREEZE A SCHEDULE. was opened for this. This is now fixed in the 4.2.1 client, bypass is not to run schedmode prompted. Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg -Original Message- From: Adam J. Boyer [

Re: TSM 4.2.1

2001-10-25 Thread Jeff Bach
The problem with database backups, migrations failing and not waiting for tape drives existed in 4.1.2.0 also. If TSM attempts to access a scratch tape and cannot read the label, the tape is marked private. I have seen this issue due to label libvol failures. What specific problem did they ide

Re: 40 NT servers suddenly failing

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
Yes, I am running into the same problem! All of my clients are failing even though I look in the activity log and see that they backed up successfully except for like the ntuser.dat and ntuser.dat.log which is normal. TSM W2K Server 4.2.0.0 NT/W2K & NetWare Clients 4.2.1.0 -- Joshua S. Bassi I

Re: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server

2001-10-25 Thread Bill Mansfield
Actually, neither of the FastTs are supported under AIX yet, according to the official IBM support lists. Coming soon, I hear. _ William Mansfield Senior Consultant Solution Technology, Inc 630 357 7744 x338 "Joshua S. Bass

Re: TSM 4.2.1

2001-10-25 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
>The problem with database backups, migrations failing and not >waiting for >tape drives existed in 4.1.2.0 also. I just moved up from 4.1.2.0 and did not see this problem here. That version seemed to be very stable for me. >If TSM attempts to access a scratch tape and cannot read the >label, th

Re: SAN Info

2001-10-25 Thread Jeff Bach
Please list the specific hardware / OS being used in general. RS6000, Brocade, Connectrix, EMC, 3590, LTO, HP ? Jeff Bach Home Office Open Systems Engineering Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: reclamation not running

2001-10-25 Thread Alex Paschal
Can we get a q vol f=d q drm f=d q stg f=d Alex -Original Message- From: Long Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: reclamation not running I noticed that my reclamation stopped running. After lowing the reclamation

Re: 40 NT servers suddenly failing

2001-10-25 Thread Sung Y Lee
Sounds like network issue. Depending on how it's configured, but usually in the schedule backup the TSM server uses port 1501 to contact client boxes to start the backup. Sounds like somehow the port 1501 was disabled or turned off. You can also test it by telnetting to "ip client 1501" (assumin

Windows clients slow

2001-10-25 Thread Varian Greenwale
We just recently upgraded to TSM 4.1.4 and have noticed a degredation in aggregate network transfer rate for the Windows clients. Has anyone had this same experience? If so is there a fix? Varian Greenwale

Re: Clientaction Restore

2001-10-25 Thread Alex Paschal
Josh, here ya go, buddy. Just tried it and it worked fine. Names, paths, and passwords have been changed to protect the innocent. Good luck. Oh, I used a client schedule instead of a clientaction because I didn't want to wait hours for it to start in my testing. Alex Paschal Storage Administr

Re: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server

2001-10-25 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
I reread the presentation I have and it indicates it is coming out on Nov. 30th. Sorry about getting the dates wrong. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (408)&(831) 332-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Origin

Re: Windows XP

2001-10-25 Thread Len Boyle
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > >Should be some time later today. > >Regards, > >Andy > Hello Andy I see that IP22373_15.exe is now available on the service.boulder.ibm.com download site. This fixtest appears to also fix the RC 4 probem and the perform

RH Linux 7.2

2001-10-25 Thread John Bremer
TSMers, Has anyone tried TSM client 4.2.1 on this latest RedHat Linux 7.2 version? dsmc incr returns ANS1149E No domain available for incremental backup. These are ext3 type filesystems versus RH 7.1 ext2 type filesystem. My feeling is that TSM 4.2.1 does not yet support this latest version of

Re: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server

2001-10-25 Thread Adolph Kahan
Joshua Which RS6K box did you install it on? Your list only shows Intel boxes. According to IBM it is not supported on RS6K. Adolph -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joshua S. Bassi Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:19 AM To: [EMA

searching all nodes

2001-10-25 Thread David N. Reiss
I want to search the lists of files backed up for all our ADSM Nodes. We are running the 3.1 ADSM Server on AIX 4.3.3. I want to find files that are backed up... including inactive files. So that we might restore them. The problem is, I want to do this for all our nodes at at once. I want to

Re: EXCLUDE W2K "SYSTEM OBJECT"

2001-10-25 Thread Joe Cascanette
I have this added to the dsm.opt file under client 4.2 Include.SystemObject ALL STANDARD Joe -Original Message- From: LeBlanc, Patricia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EXCLUDE W2K "SYSTEM OBJECT" Here's what I h

Drive Mapping in TSM SAN

2001-10-25 Thread Jorge Rodriguez
Hi... I have tsm server 4.2 on AIX 4.3.3, LTO 3584, McData Director ED-5000 connected to McData ES-1000. The LTO is connected to the ES-1000. The SAN is active. When I run a backup the LTO mount the tape but the tsm server doesnot receive the notification of the mount and the session is IdleW.

Re: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server

2001-10-25 Thread Jerry Kube
If you are running the SAN with firmware version 04.01.02.13 is works with AIX hosts. The version of the SAN firmware is capable of defining a host type of AIX Jerry R. Kube Senior Technical Analyst - Corporate Technology Ceridian Canada Ltd, Winnipeg, Mb. R3C 3P2 Phone 204-975-5489 Fax 204-975-

Re: TSM v4.2.1

2001-10-25 Thread Paul Zarnowski
At 11:52 AM 10/22/2001 -0400, Stephen A. Cochran wrote: >As someone who's still runnings ADSM 3.1 but with a new TSM AIX server on >order >and no choice but to run a newer version, is the general feeling that 4.1 is >stable, or is 4.1 still buggy? If 4.2.x is unusuable, what's the safe >fallback,

Re: reclamation not running

2001-10-25 Thread Joe Faracchio
Try this: ( with a parm of 0 (zero) and change TAPEPOOL to match your setup.) select volume_name pct_reclaim,status,pct_utilized,access from volumes - where stgpool_name='TAPEPOOL' and pct_reclaim>$1 - order by pct_reclaim desc then change the rec= to be something within range. also check devc

What Happens When TSM Starts

2001-10-25 Thread Andy Carlson
I would like to know more about what actually happens when TSM starts. We see that it takes 2-3 hours to start sometimes. Here is an example from today. We upgraded to 4.1.4.4 yesterday, and apparently put us above the 6 default 256MB segments of memory allowed to a process. Talking to level 2

Re: internal server error / ANR0102E

2001-10-25 Thread Pothula S Paparao
Did u find any volumes causing this problem. observe which are the volumes mounted during migration and also perform audit volume on that. not really know, which is causing problem after going through ur message. I can only suspect that this was the result of a failed transaction. The error that y

Re: RH Linux 7.2

2001-10-25 Thread Steve Harris
I've not done it, but I believe that you can zap the client. Do an archive search on ReiserFS >>> John Bremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 26/10/2001 8:57:50 >>> TSMers, Has anyone tried TSM client 4.2.1 on this latest RedHat Linux 7.2 version? dsmc incr returns ANS1149E No domain available for increm

Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients

2001-10-25 Thread Subash, Chandra
Guys Is there a patch for this issue ? Regards Chandra -Original Message- From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients Originally, you reported a problem where the TSM 4.2.1 client s