Sounds like you've got a handle on the issues... you will help performance
of concurrent sessions by defining the disk pool volumes so they're the
lined up with the physical volumes, and match or exceed the number of
concurrent sessions you plan to run. You might just use 4 volumes, one each
for
You need to realize that the include/exclude list is used for SEL as well as
INCR; if you must have varying kinds of overlapping/conflicting inclexcl
lists, you must use different node names --- all backup data is subject to
the inclexcl list. (I understand this is not the case with NetBackup, b
You should also look at the RESTORE VOLUME command which will attempt to
recreate your primary storage pool volume (on a different volume) from copy
pool volumes.
>
>update vol access=destroyed looked like what I wanted, but I thought
>I ought to get a second opinion. I find the manuals to be use
Let me know how/when that works out. I will have to travel that same path
soon. Trying to work out an offsite handling procedure with CA1 and *SM.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
Shekhar,
It looks like you have not yet done a backup on the CLIENT1 node.
Glen
-Original Message-
From: Shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Generate backupset fails.
While generating backupset TSM gives fol
Matt,
Do not know about CA1 but DFRMM works very well in our case in conjunction with
an STK silo.
It produces nice lists for offsite vaulting and gives each tape a logical slot
number, which you can tie in with physical racking, so if you have a large
number you can easily locate them, when the t
...that's right selective backups do process the include-exclude
list... I neglected to mention making reference to a separate dsm.opt file
when I perform selective backups (aliases do wonders in AIX, and when I
call for a selective backup, the behind-the-scenes details are taken care
of
update the volume to access=readonly up front The volume won't be
used to write any new data, but it will allow you to attempt at reading the
data whenever a request for that data is made, until you get the move data
completed for all volumes affected.
Serge Gaudet, CMI
Consultant
Hi All
I've just taken over a somewhat badly organized site and have a query about
Oracle databases on normal file systems.
At my previous position the Oracle databases resided on AIX raw logical
volumes, so I didn't have to exclude them from filesystem backups and on a
restore (say to a replace
Hi:
We also have Oracle and the DBA's were not interested in learning how to set up RMAN.
So initially they put together scripts to export the DB prior to the scheduled
backups. Then they discovered that SQL-BACKTRACK (we had it for SYBASE) could back up
ORACLE without implementing RMAN and th
Shekhar
You have to let ADSM know a tape is bad or destroyed, and eventually
delete the knowledge of existence of that tape completely in ADSM. it
is not enough to remove a tape from a library, and then audit the library.
When a library gets to full capacity, some of the local onsite data
True , but depends on which tape gone bad ,tape from tapepool or copypool ?
if tape in copypool goes bad every morning " backup stgpool tapepool
copypool" command
backups the primary pool (tapepool) to copypool ( in my case i am having
extra copypool -> copypool1 )
and in case of req
Receiving the following msg when trying to start the client scheduler or
querying the schedule:
/usr/lpp/Tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin>dsmc q schedule
ANS0113E NLInit: Message repository
'/usr/lpp/Tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dscameng.
txt' has an invalid control record.
DSM_DIR looks to be correct. I d
Hello all,
Our TSM 3.7.3 server is currently running on AIX 4.3.2.0
A couple of questions:
1. Does anyone know of any issues/problems with running a TSM server 3.7.3
on AIX version 4.3.3?
2. Is there a limit to the number of processors that a TSM 3.7.3 (or TSM V4)
server can utilize running on
If I understand your questions correctly -
We are running AIX 4.3.3 and TSM 3.7.3 on an H70 with four processors and
not having any problems.
I would guess that the utilization of the processors is really dependent on
TSM being multi-threaded/multi-tasking. I've never heard of a multi-x
applicati
Hi:
We upgrade AIX to 4.3.3 prior to upgrading to TSM 3.7.2
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/00 11:38AM >>>
Hello all,
Our TSM 3.7.3 server is currently running on AIX 4.3.2.0
A couple of questions:
1. Does anyone know of any issues/problems with running a TSM server 3.7.3
on AIX version 4.3.3?
2.
I am running AIX Ver. 4.3.3 with Tivoli 3.7.4 and it is working just fine.
I am running it on an F50 with 2 processors and I have no issues. Don't
know about going beyond 2 processors but I would be interested in knowing if
this is an issue.
George
-Original Message-
From: Kleynerman, A
Ok, so here's a question based on my lack of knowledge of Domino. Going through the
Domino Red Book, during the section on rebuilding a Domino server from scratch, I get
to the line that says -
"Re-install and configure the Domino Server".
The next steps are to set up the Domino client and ba
Dear *SM gurus,
I have observed a strange behaviour from a client that seems to be in a
loop while opening new sessions with the server.
Environment: ADSM server 3.1.2.0 running on OS/390 2.8, WinNT client
3.1.0.6 running on WinNT 4.0,
Service Pack 5.
I see a series of messages:
10/
One of my libraries is getting close to maxing out its storage. Its a
Breece Hill Q47 with 3 DLT4000 drives. I'd like to replace the drives with
4 DLT8000 drives. So far I've been hearing it should all be backward
compatible but mostly thats just from the sales people. Some of the people
arou
Jack,
We also have a Breece Hill Q47 with 3 DLT4000 drives. It is no longer
our primary robot, but it used to be. It is true that a DLT7000 or DLT8000
drive should be able to read tapes written by a DLT4000 drive. I *think*
it is true that ADSM will read these tapes also, but I do not have
f
This library is also single-ended not differential. I am not a SCSI expert
so I am wondering why you would not just leave the library in single-ended
mode instead of changing all of its guts to work with differential. What is
the gain other than the distance you can run your cable? Breece Hill
If you want to take it a little deeper, has anyone else noticed
that selective backups do not honor the exclude.dir statement?
Whether this is a feature or a bug I don't know.
James Thompson
>From: Serge Gaudet/EIG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 02:35 PM 11/1/2000 -0500, Palmadesso Jack wrote:
>This library is also single-ended not differential. I am not a SCSI expert
>so I am wondering why you would not just leave the library in single-ended
>mode instead of changing all of its guts to work with differential. What is
>the gain other
Historically, some vendors will tell you things are backward-compatible but
mean that "you can read the old format, but you cannot write the old
format"... we had this with 3490 and 3590 upgrades. In those cases, the
ADSM doc. clarified that we needed to mark "read-only" all the older-format
tape
I have been running an 'export node' command with 'filedata=backup' for a
client system with about 4.5 million backup files. One of the file systems
accounts for almost 1.4 million of these. The export process has processed
about 85,000 files in four hours, and has slowed down to about 2 files per
Hello All
Is anyone familiar with restoring Sun Solaris from scratch. I have a Sun
Sys Admin that does not believe TSM can restore the entire OS from scratch.
With AIX we use a SYSBACK to take an image of the OS and restore the image
and then apply the incremental to bring the OS back to pristin
Does anyone know if the Win NT/2000 client can restore from a backup
set that was created on a 3590 tape or an 8mm tape? The TSM server platform
is AIX.
I know that I can install the drivers for 3590 tape drives on Win NT,
but I don't know if the TSM NT Client can use a 3590 backup set.
The TSM
Hi James,
I believe this is working as designed. The client manual (TSM 4.1 for UNIX
)
states under the exclude option for exclude.dir:
"When you exclude a directory, you can still back up specific files within
that directory, using a selective backup. However, the next time you
perform an incre
At 12:47 PM 11/1/2000 -0800, France, Don G (Pace) wrote:
>I suggest you check the vendor spec. but also run a test to confirm your
>understanding... and, also, check the spec. on your old media to see if the
>new density is supported.
DLT4000, 7000, and 8000 all use CompactTapeIV tape media.
We have a Windows NT client with C, D, and E drives. The central scheduler
requests an incremental backup every night. The schedule has a null object
list. We recently discovered that the E disk had not been backed up in several
months. The system administrator and I logged in an attempt to discov
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there are some ways to start a schedule daemon safely
while 'passwordaccess' is set to 'prompt' ? This happens when we want to
backup Oracle automatically . Here is what we do:
#nohup dsmc sched -password=secrete -optfile=dsm.opt &
But if someone types 'ps -ef' c
you need to check the permissions on the E_Drive...
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Denier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Missed backups on Windows NT
We have a Windows NT client with C, D, and E drives. The central s
We have two schools-of-thought in use by our shop:
- using ADSMPIPE, re-direct "ufsdump" or "dd" to TSM storage --- currently,
we have this in place for about 30+ machines; the OS file systems are the
only ones handled this way; full system recovery starts with the OS,
redefine the remaining phy
I am also interested in answers to this, as it is something I will
eventually have to address too.
Obviously you cannot restore without installing the OS to run the client,
and having the right filesystem layout to restore into.
This means that there are two basic options:
1. install the OS to
Unfortunately that's the way it work when you pass it the -pass= flag.
You might to try create a korn shell script with that cmd in there and
see what happens when you execute it.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX Support, HACMP,
Enterprise Disk(Shark)& Tape Solutions
Tivoli Certified Consu
Hi
Since July we have been trying to upgrade our current version of ADSM
v3 to TSM v4 through IBM.
After exchanging numerous emails about the no. of licenses, size of the
servers, other applications running, what these servers and clients are
used for (very strange request), etc. their last reply
Maybe you don't have stopped and started the ADSM Scheduler Service on WNT since those
days. Once you have a modification in the disks configuration, you have to stop and
start the service to let the ADSM to know about taht.
Angel Antón
IZFE. S.A.
Plaza de Pinares, 1-3
Donostia 20001
Tlf.: +34
38 matches
Mail list logo
