8
> An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] Confused about Spectrum Protect replication
> compatibility
>
> No, I have not and it seems very valuable, thank you very much. I will
> look into this tomorrow.
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 18:41, Zoltan Forray wrote:
>
&
t Stor Manager Im Auftrag von Stefan
Folkerts
Gesendet: Montag, 8. April 2019 19:38
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] Confused about Spectrum Protect replication compatibility
No, I have not and it seems very valuable, thank you very much. I will look
into this tomorrow.
On Mo
No, I have not and it seems very valuable, thank you very much. I will look
into this tomorrow.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 18:41, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Assume you saw this discussion:
>
>
> https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tsm-replication-between-servers.32369/
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 1
Assume you saw this discussion:
https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tsm-replication-between-servers.32369/
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:30 PM Stefan Folkerts
wrote:
> I don’t think so, the q server output says that it is transitional.
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 16:35, Zoltan Forray wrote:
>
I don’t think so, the q server output says that it is transitional.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 16:35, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Probably due to the enforced-by-default TLS/SSL level of anything at/beyond
> 7.1.8.x/8.1.2.x. See this article:
>
> https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22004844
Probably due to the enforced-by-default TLS/SSL level of anything at/beyond
7.1.8.x/8.1.2.x. See this article:
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22004844
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:06 AM Stefan Folkerts
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This page of the 8.1.7 knowledge center:
>
>
> https://w
Hi all,
This page of the 8.1.7 knowledge center:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEQVQ_8.1.7/srv.admin/r_adm_repl_compat.html
States:
Before you set up replication operations with IBM Spectrum Protect™, you
must ensure that the source and target replication servers are compatible
f
archived filed from the
imported node (as long as the nodes versions are not older than 5.4.0.0)
Regards,
Jean Yu
(512) 286-9376 (T/L 363-9376)
From: Bill Boyer
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
Date: 03/28/2014 10:36 AM
Subject:[ADSM-L] Export/Import compatibility between server
What is the compatibility for being able to EXPORT from one TSM server and
IMPORT on another? I have a customer with (2) TSM servers on the other side
of the world from each other. They plan on wanting to EXPORT from one and
IMPORT and restore on the other. How far apart can the 2 TSM server be
Nick, the catch here is that I already have media in Generation 3
format..
After setting the Gen 3 drives to write in Gen 2 density, they are also
restricted to reading at Gen2. I would still have to remediate the Gen3
media.
Hi George,
I've had mixed drives in a library from before. What I've
Hi George,
I've had mixed drives in a library from before. What I've had to do
set the devc format to the lesser drive format. I know this does not
utilize the features of the new drives. But administratively when you
no choice, it is much easier than splitting the library.
http://publib.boulder.
Cheers back to you Neil!
- They are all JA volumes. I have to wait for them to fail to ID them.
- There are copypools so a second virtual library is a good option.
- I was able to determine that all of the scratch made private were
formatted for E06 drives. I took the E06 drives/paths offli
rent sequence, you will need to
assign new volser ranges for each virtual library - not difficult just
another thing to manage.
Cheers,
Neil Strand
From: George Huebschman
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU,
Date: 03/11/2014 01:56 PM
Subject:[ADSM-L] Tape Drive compatibility
Sent by:&
t Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of George
Huebschman
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:54 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Tape Drive compatibility
My question is:
Is there a way to determine what tapes in a 3584 library have been written
to by E05 or E06 3592 tape
My question is:
Is there a way to determine what tapes in a 3584 library have been written
to by E05 or E06 3592 tape drives?
Because:
I have a library with two generations of drives.
I discovered this morning that my DR Tape Library had no scratch tapes. I
expected around 200.
I found that I ha
ssues
> upgrading.
>
> Andy Huebner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Steven Harris
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 7:04 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Library Manager/Cl
Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Steven
Harris
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 7:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Library Manager/Client compatibility problem
Hi all
I've painted myself into a corne
Based on this:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21302789
I installed a 6.3.4.0 library manager to handle a handful of 5.5.3.0 library
clients. So far, the only issue we've had is our tape robot falling apart
(unrelated).
-
Cameron Hanover
chano...@umich.edu
"They that can give
Hi Steve,
we just went through this for a migration from Windows TSM 5.5.1 to Sun
with TSM 6.3.3. It worked flawlessly, even aligning the storage agents
during the move. We had plan b in case of errors because of support issues
(even starting from scratch would have been feasable), but no problem
We ran multiple 5.5 library clients to both 6.1 and 6.2 library managers
for a few years with no issues. All TSM servers are RH Linux.
As other folks have reminded me 'Not supported does not necessarily mean it
doesn't work'
-
Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virg
Hi all
I've painted myself into a corner.
I have a customer with TSM V5.5.6 and V6.2.4 instances hosted on AIX.
The original plan was to move the clients one at a time off V5 and onto v6.
The V5 database is too big to convert, and as the instance is over 10
years old I fully expect it to have d
Hi Skylar,
No. There is not.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 06/08/2012
08:51:14 AM:
> From: Skylar Thompson
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
> Date: 06/08/2012 08:58 AM
> Subject: Re: API/BA client compatibility
with BA client operations.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Del
>
>
>
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 06/07/2012
> 05:11:02 PM:
>
> > From: Skylar Thompson
> > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
> > Date: 06/0
06/07/2012
05:11:02 PM:
> From: Skylar Thompson
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
> Date: 06/07/2012 05:14 PM
> Subject: API/BA client compatibility
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> I'm looking at using the API client to try to track backup usage
> generat
I'm looking at using the API client to try to track backup usage
generated by the BA client back to the particular object owner. I've
written a test client based around the callret.c sample code, and can
get it to connect, but I get a DSM_RC_UNKNOWN_FORMAT return code for
every object I process.
I've been digging through the compatibility matrices at e.g.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&uid=swg21053218&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
which I'll parenthetically note were reasonably straightforward to find,
and reasonably simple
We are running AIX 5.2 on some old legacy systems.
Our TSM installation is TSM V6.2.0.0 server and V6.2.x clients, except
the legacy systems are still on AIX V5.2 with TSM BA Client (AIX)
V5.4.1.
I looked at the compatibility notes and V6.2.0.0 server does not support
V5.4.1 clients
if anyone knows where I can find the compatibility info for it
I'd be grateful.
We're fully expecting it not to work, but you never know we may be
pleasantly surprised, we're moving to TSM 6 and therefore TDP for
Flashcopy soon anyway but I just wondered if anyone had any d
Hi all,
I'm involved in planning the upgrade of all TSM clients at a customers' site.
This particular customer has had some bad experiences upgrading some clients.
I've looked in the DB2 infocenters and found that the minimum level for TSM is
4.2.0, even for DB2 v 9.7, but is there also a highe
Hello everybody,
we have a Windows 2003 Server with TSM Client 6.1 on which we now also
installed HSM for Windows. We had to use the 5.5 Version of HSM because 6.1
only works with Server 2008 and ran into the problem that the file-backup
schedules fail while trying to backup HSM migrated files. Ar
Hello all,
Can anyone put some light on storage agent compatibility with tsm server 5.5
?
Is it still n-1, n-2 or changed.
( o )
---
I,I ' ' I,I
"(("
))
With Best Regards,
Sandeep Jain
** Legal
Disclaimer
ak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> In a next few months I have to upgrade my TSM server from 5.2.2 to 5.4
> and
> I have lots of 5.1 and 5.2 BA clients. I have tried to find some
> compatibility list but with no results. Does anyone have compat
>-Original Message-
>From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mladen Portak
>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 8:54 AM
>To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Server 5.4 and client compatibility question?
>
>Hi everyone,
>
>In
Thank you guys!
Mladen
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:11 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Server 5.4 and client compatibility question?
There is no compatibility
There is no compatibility list which covers "historic" client/server
levels. It is generally the case that the TSM client and server are
FORMALLY defined as compatible within one release level of each
other, where that limit pertains to what IBM has actually tested.
You naturally
Upgrade path for clients and servers:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/topic/com.ibm.itsmfdt.doc_5.4/ans624.htm#upgpth
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Server/Client Compatibility and Upgrade
Considerations:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SS
Hi everyone,
In a next few months I have to upgrade my TSM server from 5.2.2 to 5.4 and
I have lots of 5.1 and 5.2 BA clients. I have tried to find some
compatibility list but with no results. Does anyone have compatibility list
for TSM Server 5.4 and old clients.
Thank you in advance
: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 9:38 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] tsm 5.3/5.4 server-to-server compatibility
We are having discussions about upgrading to TSM v5.4. The question of
compatibility of server-to-server communications came up, and whether
we have to upgrade all tsm instances at the
We are having discussions about upgrading to TSM v5.4. The question of
compatibility of server-to-server communications came up, and whether
we have to upgrade all tsm instances at the same time or can we
roll through them upgrading one at a time. In researching
this, I became confused (common
At 07:36 PM 2/20/2006, Richard Sims wrote:
I don't recall any customer postings over the years where a server
tape could not be read on another platform.
I've actually been wondering about this myself, in the contect of
whether to deploy a VTL solution or just use server-managed disk and
use se
SM-L] Tape format compatibility between platforms?
On Feb 20, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Robert Clark wrote:
> Folks I talk to occasionally ask about reading TSM tapes written by a
> TSM server on a differing platform.
>
> For example: TSM server that wrote tape runs on Windows 2003.
> In DR
On Feb 20, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Robert Clark wrote:
Folks I talk to occasionally ask about reading TSM tapes written by
a TSM
server on a differing platform.
For example: TSM server that wrote tape runs on Windows 2003.
In DR exercise, TSM server runs on AIX 5.2, and attempts to read tape
written
Folks I talk to occasionally ask about reading TSM tapes written by a TSM
server on a differing platform.
For example: TSM server that wrote tape runs on Windows 2003.
In DR exercise, TSM server runs on AIX 5.2, and attempts to read tape
written on Windows 2003.
As long at the TSM version is the
Thanks Curt. It is great to know that information.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Magura, Curtis
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:03 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 5.2.3 and library compatibility.
Larry
similar situation.
>From the readme-
* $$2 Added library sharing compatibility
*
Version 5.2.2 Servers acting as a library mana
ubject: Re: Compatibility LTO2/LTO3
Hi,
Yes it's possible to write on cartridge one generation back, and to read
two generations but it's not exactly my question.
I found this redbook, very interesting and accurate but not my answer
The IBM TotalStorage Tape Libraries Guide for Open Syst
Hi,
Yes it's possible to write on cartridge one generation back, and to read two
generations but it's not exactly my question.
I found this redbook, very interesting and accurate but not my answer
The IBM TotalStorage Tape Libraries Guide for Open Systems SG24-5946-02
Is it possible (which const
ave a customer who wants to read, on an other site, with LTO2
drives, LTO2 cartridges writen with LTO3 drives in LTO2 format (of
course).
I've read documents about LTO compatibility at lto.org and adsm.org, but
didn't find exactly this answer.
Does anyone have some information or experience with
Hi TSMers,
We have a customer who wants to read, on an other site, with LTO2 drives, LTO2
cartridges writen with LTO3 drives in LTO2 format (of course).
I've read documents about LTO compatibility at lto.org and adsm.org, but didn't
find exactly this answer.
Does anyone have some info
As it relates to Tivoli Storage Manager SAN Tape Library Sharing.
Can anyone tell me if a TSM Server 5.3.0.0 as a library manager is
compatible with a TSM Server 5.2.2.0 as a library client? They are
sharing a 3494.
I would like to avoid upgrading both of my TSM servers at the same time if
p
>Does anyone know how the versioning between TSM and Aix is set up or if
>there is a Compatibility Matrix available anywhere. I can't seem to
>find anything on IBM's website. We are mainly concerned with TSM 5.1
>through 5.2 and Aix 5.1 through 5.2 functioning toget
Hello all,
Does anyone know how the versioning between TSM and Aix is set up or if
there is a Compatibility Matrix available anywhere. I can't seem to
find anything on IBM's website. We are mainly concerned with TSM 5.1
through 5.2 and Aix 5.1 through 5.2 functioning together.
Thanks,
Rob
5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Version compatibility with baclient and SQL TDP?
Check to make sure your dsm.opt for the SQL client doesn't have any
unsupported communication protocols listed. (IPX/SPX, etc) 4.2.x
clients ignored them. 5.1.x clients does not.
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Version compatibility with baclient and SQL TDP?
Larry,
Data Protection for SQL 1.1.2 is quite old and out of support.
Normally, upward compatibility should work fine, but...
Without seeing the error messages that yo
Larry,
Data Protection for SQL 1.1.2 is quite old and out of support.
Normally, upward compatibility should work fine, but...
Without seeing the error messages that you are receiving,
it is hard to know what problem you are encountering.
Can you append the error messages that you see in the
Data
Client is W2K, MSSQL 6.5
TDP 1.1.2
We upgraded the baclient from 4.2.2.0 to 5.1.5.9.
Now the SQL backups no longer work.
Is there possibly a compatibility problem with the newer api
and the TDP?
Thanks for any help,
Larry McNutt
Timken Company
"Coats, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04-11-2003 14:58
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:LTO Tape Compatibility
I have
I have a library that uses LTO-1 drives. We are contemplating getting a new
library (bigger) with LTO-2 drives.
I know there are some folks with experience with both kinds of drives out
there :)
Is the media different between LTO-1 and LTO-2?
Some follow on questions, if the media is different:
ED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
JEWOUD.NL> Subject: downward compatibility
clients / server v 5.2
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DU&g
To what level downwards are clients compatible to server version 5.2?
(I can't seem to find that in the readme's / references (or I am looking in
the wrong place in which case I would like to be pointed in the right
direction ;-)
We are planning for a server upgrade (windows) from level 4.2.2.6,
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: TSM & AIX compatibility
> True perhaps I could but you must see what I'm getting at.. would I want
to?
> At that point I'd personally prefer to buy a pSeries based on the power4
> architecture over
om: Ochs, Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM & AIX compatibility
Realistically you would be able to find a machine that could run 4.3.3 and
you would be able to find TSM 4.2.
But to answer your questions:
1) Can I resto
]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM & AIX compatibility
I'm just looking at some of the new IBM pSeries servers based on the power4
architecture. It's my understanding that they only run AIX 5L and not AIX
4.3.. That has me wondering abou
) 595-3962
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gerald Wichmann
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM & AIX compatibility
I'm just looking at some of the new IBM pSeries servers based on t
everything
in a disaster except my offsite tapes. Lets say the only replacement server
I can acquire is a new pSeries that only runs AIX 5L. Perhaps I even can
only get a newer version of TSM (5.1 or 5.2). Are there any compatibility
issues in recovering a TSM DB snapshot backup to a newer vers
4.0G... it is supposedly only compatible up to version 4.1.3 of TSM.
-Original Message-
From: Wilcox, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: stupid backup compatibility question
What version of Tru64 are you running
What version of Tru64 are you running?
Cheers
Andy Wilcox
Midrange Services
Aquila Networks Services Ltd
> -Original Message-
> From: Conko, Steven [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 March 2003 15:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: stupid backup compati
> okay, im going to ask a stupid question... does anybody have any ideas how
> to backup a compaq tru64 client running tsm 4.1.3 to an aix 4.3.3 server
> running 5.1.5 server? i know these versions arent compatible, but we cant
> upgrade the compaq's o/s to allow us to upgrade the tsm client softwa
Pilgram
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 10:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Versions-Compatibility
Hi all,
as I have to migrate to Server Version 5.x.x (from 4.2.3 on AIX 4.3.3) I
have to check wether our used client-version can remain the same as before
or have to be migrated to
Hi all,
as I have to migrate to Server Version 5.x.x (from 4.2.3 on AIX 4.3.3) I
have to check wether our used client-version can remain the same as before
or have to be migrated to version 5.x-clients.
Is there anywhere a list of which client-version does work with which
server-version (we are so
be earlier - push your BMC rep.
>
> Regards
> Phil
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anderson F. Nobre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:45 AM
> Subject: TSM 5.1 and Backtrack compatibility
>
>
>
; System/Storage Admin
> AFC Enterprises
>
>
>
> "Anderson F.
> Nobre" To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: George
Lesho/Partners/AFC)
>
D]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:45 AM
Subject: TSM 5.1 and Backtrack compatibility
Hi all,
Does any body know where I can find information about TSM 5.1 compatibility
with BackTrack/OBSI?
Regards,
Anderson
"MMS
- Original Message -
From: "Anderson F. Nobre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:45 AM
Subject: TSM 5.1 and Backtrack compatibility
Hi all,
Does any body know where I can find information about TSM 5.1 compatibility
with BackTrack/OBSI?
Regards,
Anderson
Nobre" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: George
Lesho/Partners/AFC)
OM.BR> Subject: TSM 5.1 and Backtrack
compatibility
Sent by: "ADSM:
Hi all,
Does any body know where I can find information about TSM 5.1 compatibility with
BackTrack/OBSI?
Regards,
Anderson
Ooops,
Solaris 2.6 is not in the list. It IS supported.
Sorry
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
---> I think TIVOLI doesn't understand IBM's religious belief in upward
compatibility and so TSM 4 doesn't have a bridge from ADSM/TSM 3.
More than that now we have v5.1 which would support compatibility only
with v4.2.x. And v4.1 would be out of support very soon.
There
We are in the process of writing an Linux archive client through
the TSM API (4.2), storing objects in an TSM 4.1 server running
on AIX. We would like to avoid writing a retrieve client, as
we're satisfied with the functionality of the TSM BA client. I
know there have been interoperability issues
We have a TSM v4.1.2 Server on Sun Solaris 7 (64-bit kernel). I need to
install TDP for Oracle for testing with an Oracle 8.1.7 database & RMAN, &
could use some guidance.
What's are the compatible version-combinations of:
TDP for Oracle pkg: TDPoracle
TSM API pkg: TIVs
3.7 code is out of support end of
>October.
>I wish to migrate the server first and follow with the clients mainly Netware
>and NT.
>I wanted to go straight to server code 4.2 but the compatibility list does not
>show 3.7 clients as supported with 4.2 server
>I have looked back thr
Hi all,
We are on TSM server 3.7.20 for OS390
We need to migrate to 4.1 or 4.2 because 3.7 code is out of support end of
October.
I wish to migrate the server first and follow with the clients mainly Netware
and NT.
I wanted to go straight to server code 4.2 but the compatibility list does not
Xavier
The Tivoli web-site has been updated with the compatibility list for v4.2:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/devices/all.html
At first glance, it looks like you're OK with your HP/Seagate LTO drives
but not your SDLTs. That's unless anybody else knows differen
From: Xavier 1 Chavanet
Does somebody know the hardware compatibility list for the new TSM 4.2 release?
I just need to check if SDTL and/or HP/SEAGATE LTO are or not include.
Thank
Hello ADSM'ers! Can anyone tell me if ADSM Version 3, Release 1, Level 0.3 is
compatible with AS/400 Version 4 Release 5? We currently run that ADSM version on an
AS/400 V3, R1, L1.7.
Thank you!
Laura Huffman
Information Services
716-888-3652
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Ray for the information. I will bear that in mind.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Pratts [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 10:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ADSM and Legato compatibility
>
> My memory is of a proj
My memory is of a project about three years ago. A client was migrating from
Legato to ADSM and left Legato on the systems for a while, until they got used
to ADSM. What I remenber is, Legato changed attribute flags every time it ran,
this caused ADSM to backup files which had not actually chang
Does anybody have any experience of running ADSM and Legato concurrently on
a RS6000 running AIX?
I have already thought about the contention issues with the drives and the
processor. What I need to know about is there any known issues with the O/S?
Thanks for your time
Neil Sharp
Merrill Lynch
Hi all-
Anyone know if it is possible to generate a backupset on a given
platform that can be used to perform a local restore on a client node of
a different type?
For example, if I generate a backupset on an AIX TSM server using a DLT
drive, can I restore that DLT backupset locally on, say, an
]
Subject: Compatibility
Hi every one
I have an adsm v3.1.3 working on Aix 4.2.1 and i want to up grade the Aix to
4.3 is that would work?
Thanks
Regard Saad
Opens Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi every one
I have an adsm v3.1.3 working on Aix 4.2.1 and i want to up grade the Aix to 4.3 is
that would work?
Thanks
Regard Saad
Opens Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| cc: |
| Subject: compatibility |
>---|
I've got a problem with SQL-BACKTRACK (signal 11)... BMC
>Isn't Signal 11 typically a symtom of bad memory, i/o timing, or other
>hardware flakiness?
It's typically a software engineering boo-boo, as in:
Segmentation Fault (Segmentation Violation (SEGV) - Signal 11)
The program attempts to write to a region of memory to which it does not
; Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 2:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: compatibility
>
> we're getting a signal 11... apparently a problem with the OBSI module...
> BMC sez "they want to have the ADSM client upgraded to 4.1. Then
> reinstall
> the 2.4.10
ADSM 3.1 on AIX and the client is Sun 2.5 running ADSM 3.1.0.8
Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Davidson, Becky [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 3:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: compatibility
>
> Our DBA's just told
August 14, 2000 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: compatibility
I've got a problem with SQL-BACKTRACK (signal 11)... BMC is telling me to
load the 4.1 client software.
My server is ADSM 3.1...
Has anybody had any experience running TSM 4.1 client software into ADSM 3.1
server? Proba
I've got a problem with SQL-BACKTRACK (signal 11)... BMC is telling me to
load the 4.1 client software.
My server is ADSM 3.1...
Has anybody had any experience running TSM 4.1 client software into ADSM 3.1
server? Probably just asking for trouble and BMC will probably tell me to
upgrade server
;
>Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: client/server compatibility
>Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:35:30 +0200
>
>Hi Reinhard!
>
>- Can 2.1 and 3.1 clients run against a 4.1 server?
>Probably yes, but
23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: client/server compatibility
Hi,
running a 3.1.2.57 server and a wide mix of clients (even version 2.1)
and planning to upgrade to 3.7 or directly to 4.1, raises a number of
compatibility questions, some of which I do not find answered in the
publications:
- Ca
Hi,
running a 3.1.2.57 server and a wide mix of clients (even version 2.1)
and planning to upgrade to 3.7 or directly to 4.1, raises a number of
compatibility questions, some of which I do not find answered in the
publications:
- Can 2.1 and 3.1 clients run against a 4.1 server?
- Can 4.1
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
