On Aug 17, 2005, at 3:39 PM, Joni Moyer wrote:
... Would you happen to know if there is a max. size for a
volume? ...
See IBM Technote 1170255.
Richard Sims
Ben is absulutly correct here in my
oppinion, raw volumes are beter.
Even though aix has the best I/O perfomance
is not as good as raw volumes.
you need be a good AIX administrator
to tune the filesystem to be as good as raw. I do alsow agree with Ben
on to take earch LUN a volume and to put them
This is a little off the topic of your question, but we don't
have our TSM server on a SATA SAN, just on SSA drives, so I'm not sure
what the best ways.
I see you are making all those luns into 1 LV, putting a
filesystem on that vol and then putting it in the storage pool.
SM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Dist Stor
cc
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
.EDU> Re: Disk Pool Volume
Configuration
08/17/2005 03:34
PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist S
Subject
.EDU> Re: Disk Pool Volume Configuration
08/17/2005 03:34
PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes, you can have more than one tsm volume per physical volume.
the smaller the allocation, the more volumes, which gives to
flexibility to
assign them per the needs of the storage pool rather than simply give
two to each.
we just define them to a storage group per demand.
but once define and al
>> My question is should I destroy all the individual devices and lump
>> the devices into one large pool so that the entire night's backup is
>> written as quickly as possible (then migrated), or should
>things stay
>> the same?
>
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Beh
> My question is should I destroy all the individual devices and lump
> the devices into one large pool so that the entire night's backup
> is written as quickly as possible (then migrated), or should
> things stay the same?
When you run migration from a single disk storage pool there is, as far
a
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: disk pool utilization?
>>Is there a way to find the max utilization during the night?
Yes, with a TSM Monitoring tool such as Servergraph/TSM,
http://www.servergraph.com . Alternatively, you could try to write
your own scripts t
>>Is there a way to find the max utilization during the night?
Yes, with a TSM Monitoring tool such as Servergraph/TSM,
http://www.servergraph.com . Alternatively, you could try to write
your own scripts to monitor, record, and report on such events.
David Ehresman
University of Louisville
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mike
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disk pool utilization?
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Warren, Matthew (Retail) wrote:
> It will be indicating the current utilization of the diskpool. IE; the
> amount of space within the di
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Warren, Matthew (Retail) wrote:
> It will be indicating the current utilization of the diskpool. IE; the
> amount of space within the diskpool that is currently occupied by TSM
> data.
>
> Matt.
Is there a way to find the max utilization during the night?
Mike
It will be indicating the current utilization of the diskpool. IE; the
amount of space within the diskpool that is currently occupied by TSM
data.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mike
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:51 PM
To:
Also, has the MAXSCRATCH limit for the next stgpool been hit?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bill Dourado
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DISK POOL
.have you tried
.have you tried :
q vol stgp=3494pool
access=readwrite stat=filling
to make sure tapes are available
q stg 3494pool f=d
che
going to be something wrong with your next pool in one way or another
3494POOL, you should check the status of the library
if AIX, "lsdev -Cctape", look for lmcp#, use in "mtlib -l/dev/lmcp#
-qL" look for anything like ~gripper not available~ or ~paused operational
state~, etc...
mtlib
unt of time for several people to get RMAN in sync again.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Karel Bos [mailto:Karel.Bos@;NUON.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 16:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disk pool volume mirroring
Hi Eri
Hi Eric,
Yep, and if there is a fire and your copy tapes aren't in the bunker yet
and so on. It is just a matter of how safe you want to be. Performance isn't
a issue, not that we could find out. We turn cashing on and of and back on,
without finding the famous performance degradation we heart
This is one I had a long time ago... hanging pointers, here is how to solve.
make sure all data is migrated from disk pools to tape pools
do "q vol dev=disk" to capture all info on what disks are where
write macros to delete all disk volumes (except the problem one) and define
them back
then when
Hi Chris!
That's an old one! Issue an AUDIT VOLUME /TSM1/stgc/stg6.dsm FIX=YES.
Afterwards you will probably be able to delete the volume.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Pilgram
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September
I would be tempted to send the Onbar data directly to tape, especially since
you have plenty of drives. If you send the data to disk first, you will
only be able to run one stream to tape during migration.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs, CO 80949
Change your Hi Lo migration threshold (up the 60% on the hi) or throw more disk at
your solution. I'd first change the threshold though.
-Original Message-
From: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: disk pool pro
20:28
Please respond to ADSM-L
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: disk pool problem tsm 4.2.1.9
Hi Burak,
You can prevent clients from accessing tapes directly:
update
Hi Burak,
You can prevent clients from accessing tapes directly:
update node ** MAXNUMMP=0
This prevents the node from grabbing a tape drive for backup or archive (it
can still get a tape for RESTORE or RETRIEVE).
However, with MAXNUMMP=0, if there is not enough space in the disk pool when
the
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disk pool problem tsm 4.2.1.9
You will need to ensure that at all times there is enough space in the disk
pool for any client data that might arrive in order to guarantee that direct
to tape won't happen. I think you'll have trouble with that with a 3 GB
disk
You will need to ensure that at all times there is enough space in the disk
pool for any client data that might arrive in order to guarantee that direct
to tape won't happen. I think you'll have trouble with that with a 3 GB
disk pool.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 513
x27;t resist. I will not blindly reply with the entire
history heretofore.
lisa
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/29/2001 01:35 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Lisa Cabanas/SC/MODOT)
Subject
>...*please* trim your email responses...
Amen, Mark. It's dismaying to see, like, a one-sentence response to an issue
which includes the entire thread of a discussion along with it, running for
hundreds of lines. If you've visited www.adsm.org to like Browse Current Month,
you've seen how post
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:26:51 -0500, you wrote:
>ADSM SUPPORT PEOPLE,
>
>How do we find out about all of these "FEATURES" of design
>that cause ADSM to break?
I had to laugh when I read the above statement. I suddenly summoned
this mental image of a Tivoli level 2 support engineer reading it,
le
en Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From: France, Don G (Pace) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disk pool size vs
Inspect your server activity log; there's probably better info, there --
like a tape mount request that didn't get satisfied within the "mount wait"
time on the device class of the storage pool your
management-class/copy-group points to. I've seen this happen where the
max-scratch was set too lo
How to have a MC directly points to tape?
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disk pool size vs large file
What we do is to put the one BIG Oracle TDP client we have into a
Yes, you are completely right ... files grater than available space in
diskpool are currently writed to tapepool ... no data will be lost and no
backup crash wouldn't occure. You can even set up the limit for diskpool to
exactly specify size of files, which have skip diskpool - parameter
MAXSIZE.
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/21/2001
> 02:19:07 PM
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> cc: (bcc: Sam Schrage/Nashville)
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: Disk pool size vs large fi
TED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 06/21/2001 01:00:54 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Disk pool size vs large file
>I have a 56GB dis
9:07 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Sam Schrage/Nashville)
Subject: Re: Disk pool size vs large file
A couple of questions first. What kind and how many tape drives are you
migrating to?
My experience with hugh files that exceed the backuppool is adjusting the
high and low thresholds to a high=85 and a low=70. So far the tape migration
will start when the 85% of the storage is used and the mount point will
remain until the 70% is meet. The default of 15 timeout for the tapes will
A couple of questions first. What kind and how many tape drives are you
migrating to? What kind of disk are you using and how is it attached? I
have a seen a few sites with SSA disk pools and multiple 3590 tape drives
with a backups over a 100meg ethernet connection where migration from disk
to ta
What we do is to put the one BIG Oracle TDP client we have into a separate
domain for BIG users with a management class that points direct to tape,
instead of the disk pool. Just remember that whenever this client backs up,
there should be a tape drive available (although if there isn't one
avail
>I have a 56GB disk pool with the next pool to tape. I have a user, DB2
>Admin, that wants to back up a 125GB DB2 backup. What's the best way to
>handle this one user? If he/she backs up the file will it crash the system
>because it's bigger that the diskpool, or will it go right to tape?
That
40 matches
Mail list logo
