Try this:
LABEL LIBV SEARCH=B LABELS=B CHECKIN=SCR OVERWRITE=Y
We use a 3583 library. I assume your syntax may differ.
Terry McColgan
"Go ahead ... backup."
-Original Message-
From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Checkin libvol
Food for thought (or at least what I have noticed on a 3584) when TSM
mounts
a tape, the libvolume still has the home element id of the slot it came
out
of. Therefore when TSM checks in tapes it will cannot us
e Services
Aquila Networks Services Ltd
> -Original Message-
> From: Otto Schakenbos [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 October 2003 08:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Checkin libvol
>
> If that happens (having a tape in slot where another tapes belongs
If that happens (having a tape in slot where another tapes belongs then
tsm will take the drive offline and you will have take the tape out of
the drive by hand. This is probarly not what you want. You could do a q
mount, get a list of the mounted tape and with a query libv see in which
slots these
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:35:43AM -0500, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
> From: Christian Svensson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Search=yes is not picking up the media from the Service port.
> I need to use Search=bulk.
> And and it??s still does??nt work.<
>
> If you're loading tapes into the I/O station,
volumes that are in insert status.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Checkin libvol
The PERL script was more portable than an shell script. We do TSM
implementations on both Unix a
: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Wilcox, Andy
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Checkin libvol
Hiya Ted,
Just out of complete curiosity, why would you want to run such a script from
somewhere other than on the server itself??? We do
why would you want to run such a script from
somewhere other than on the server itself???
Hi Andy,
Usually the checkin script does run on the server. In some instances, we
also have a set of administrative scripts and programs running from another
system, and we group all of those together to mak
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Byrne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 October 2003 13:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Checkin libvol
>
> > >Hi everyone!
> > >Everytime I try to checkin my tapes to my library I need to run q
> > request
>Hi everyone!
>Everytime I try to checkin my tapes to my library I need to run q
request and reply
>Is it possible to checkin tape without to run a reply ?
Checking in the tapes through an I/O station (search=bulk) does require
that a reply be issued to a request. However, for many of our custome
eed to use Search=bulk.
And and it´s still does´nt work.
/Christian
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Otto
Schakenbos
Skickat: den 10 oktober 2003 14:25
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: Checkin libvol
we do for our 7337 (you should use your o
From: Christian Svensson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Search=yes is not picking up the media from the Service port.
I need to use Search=bulk.
And and it´s still does´nt work.<
If you're loading tapes into the I/O station, you'll have to run the request/reply
process to check them. The search=yes
we do for our 7337 (you should use your own libname ofcourse)
checkin libv 7337 search=yes checkl=yes stat=scr
and sit back
Christian Svensson wrote:
Hi everyone!
Everytime I try to checkin my tapes to my library I need to run q request and reply
Is it possible to checkin tape without to run a
Checkin libvol
was, traditionally, a single-threaded component -- regardless of how many
processes you started; this will probably not be changed, since most
customers use a single library per TSM server (and the libvol must be
serialized during the checkin process).
BTW, checkin will fail if th
I have not seen this, but I would assume TSM process in the order which
the command was received.
Sung Y. Lee
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Gill, Geoffrey
L." To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
I have not seen this, but I would assume TSM process in the order which
the command was received.
Sung Y. Lee
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what you're saying is if I start 2 processes to copy 2 disk pools to
separate tapes and both take a separate tape drive the smaller pool that was
started sec
16 matches
Mail list logo
