t: Re: [ADSM-L] Sometime returning offsite tapes still can't be
checked in a scratch
As you know each tsm instance has its own volume history .Volume history
( library manager ) contains history of all volume which physical in
library as well as not in library. It can happen a particular
eider, John
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:21 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Sometime returning offsite tapes still can't be
checked in a scratch
Anil,
Thanks for your email, but the tapes that are in this state are
NOT in a library. They are tapes that are coming
: [ADSM-L] Sometime returning offsite tapes still can't be
checked in a scratch
I have seen similar behavior some time. I would suggest run audit
library from library clients ( AUIDT LIBRARY LIBRARYNAME CHECKL=BARCODE
). Make sure no tapes mounted on library clients. This processes tells
li
: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Howard Coles
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 8:59 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Sometime returning offsite tapes still can't be
checked in a scratch
I'm not sure any of this would affect your situation, but jus
rd
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Schneider, John
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:16 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Sometime returning offsite tapes still can't be
> checked in a sc
Greetings,
We are running TSM 5.4.2 server on AIX 5.3. We are in a shared
library environment, with 10 TSM server instances sharing a IBM3584 tape
library, while one TSM server instance acts as the library master.
Occassionally, maybe once every few weeks, we get into a situation where
a tape
When you send the tapes offsite, do you update them to
access=offsite?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David Hensley
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 6:28 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Offsite tapes not being brought back.
I have
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Jim Young
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 9:11 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite tapes not being brought back.
>
> Quick check SQL:
>
> select volume_name,status,pct_reclaim,pct_ut
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Hensley
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 9:28 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Offsite tapes not being brought back.
I have tapes in my offsite tapecopypool that are not being returned. How
do I bring these tapes back for use?
Dave Hensley
Technical Analys
age -
From: "David Hensley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite tapes not being brought back.
Tapes are not flagged as empty. Reclaim does not appear to be working
correctly. I have reclaim set to 30% and still nothing is
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of David Hensley
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:45 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite tapes not being brought back.
>
> Tapes are not flagged as empty. Reclaim does not appear to be worki
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent by: "ADSM:cc
Dist Stor
Manager" Subject
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite tapes not
Are the tapes flagged as Empty? Is reclamation working?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David Hensley
Sent: 28 April 2008 14:28
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Offsite tapes not being brought back.
I have tapes in my
I have tapes in my offsite tapecopypool that are not being returned. How do
I bring these tapes back for use?
Dave Hensley
Technical Analyst
McNeilus Companies, Inc.
Desk: 1-507-374-8587
Cell: 1-507-244-0921
Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus
or othe
> Wouldn't then the relevant required for the restore (list of the
> copypool volumes) pop up in the actlog?
It did not in any tests I performed.
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
get a list of the OFFSITE tapes required to restore
> a
> > specified node to the *latest* backup?
>
> >Many Thanks,
> > =Adrian=
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
> Is it possible to get a list of the OFFSITE tapes required to restore
a
> specified node to the *latest* backup?
>Many Thanks,
> =Adrian=
I worked on this scenario with IBM support some time ago. It doesn't
surprise me that, even though I have recommended the system be ab
>From the 'volumeuseage' table, you can identify which offsite tapes
contain the data for that node. However, as i understand it, you cannot
determine which have the latest backups on them.
We done this last week for a node, identified 43 offsite LTO3 tapes that
had the data for
Is it possible to get a list of the OFFSITE tapes required to restore a
specified node to the *latest* backup?
Many Thanks,
=Adrian=
Adrian Davis * System Administrator * SunGard Public Sector Ltd * (Unit
72) 1st Floor, Romer House, 132 Lewisham High Street, Lewisham, London,
SE13 6JG, UK
Make sure your reuse delay is set to something reasonable for your
offsite storage pool. Then start a program of "delete vol xx
discard=yes" of the tapes in the old non-collocated offsite storage
pool. Delete a few and then do a "backup stg new-onsite-collocated-pool
new-offsite-collated-po
Hi *,
I've recently turned a non-collocated server to collocated by creating a new
management class and also executing a move nodedata command of the node's
onsite data to my collocated disk pool. What happens to the offsite data that I
collocated onsite ? Now that I've collocated the data, I
11 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] OFFSITE TAPES
Hello,
I restore the volume, and made the volume readw. However, I am not
seeing the data that was on the other tape eligible for a restore.
Infact in the client gui, I am not seeing anything to restore, it looks
like it has
this is a new tape, or committing it to the database.
Thank you
Jim
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bos, Karel
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:46 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] OFFSITE TAPES
The restore vol
2006 17:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: OFFSITE TAPES
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:35:59AM -0500, Lepre, James wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
>I need to bring back some offsite tapes for a restore. How do I
> check them into the library, and then force Tivoli to use them. I
&
library if not already done so.
* TSM> checkout libvol LIBRARYX C00252 remove=yes
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lepre, James
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 9:36 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: OFFSITE TAPES
H
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:35:59AM -0500, Lepre, James wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
>I need to bring back some offsite tapes for a restore. How do I
> check them into the library, and then force Tivoli to use them. I have
> a tape that broke and now I need to bring back the offs
Hello Everyone,
I need to bring back some offsite tapes for a restore. How do I
check them into the library, and then force Tivoli to use them. I have
a tape that broke and now I need to bring back the offsite copy, but I
am not sure what how to set this up. Should I bring back every tape
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Offsite tapes
EDU
03/06/2004 10:07
AM
Please respond to
a 1 to 1 correlation of offsite to onsite
> tapes.
>
> Best of luck ... Jack
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Reimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 8:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Offsite tapes
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We st
respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Offsite tapes
Hi,
We start moving our backup system solution to TSM and in our actual backup
system we daily move backup tapes used last night to an offsite building
and I would like t
luck ... Jack
-Original Message-
From: Reimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 8:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Offsite tapes
Hi,
We start moving our backup system solution to TSM and in our actual backup
system we daily move backup tapes used last night to
Hi,
We start moving our backup system solution to TSM and in our actual backup
system we daily move backup tapes used last night to an offsite building
and I would like to know how can we address this process with TSM.
Thanks in advance!
Reimer
[EMAIL
uential Access Storage Pools"
Especially these parts: "Reclamation for Copy Storage Pools" and "Reclamation of
Offsite Volumes".
Regards,
Imre
> -Original Message-
> From: Hegedus György [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:54 PM
ge-
> From: Hegedus György [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: offsite tapes 'reclamation'
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to copy the primary storage pools to a copy
> stor
Hi All,
I would like to copy the primary storage pools to a copy storage pool, then
take the tapes offsite. The 'backup stgpool' command make incremental
backups, so every day I should take some tapes offsite. And will be more and
more offsite tapes. How can I initiate the reclamati
I saw this posting, but I did not see a reply. SteveC, did you ever
receive a reply? Do you have any tips regarding move nodedata or other ways
to reduce the # of offsite tapes. We do not have enough tape head time
avaiable to keep up with offsite reclaims. All of our tapes are 3590, but I
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:onsite and offsite tapes destroyed
Let's say for the sake of
.
For onsite tape that is "destroyed, do a RESTORE VOL blah
PREVIEW=YES. When this process completes, examine actlog and
see what offsite tapes are needed to rebuild this tape. Get them,
checkin to library and set access mode to readonly for these tapes.
Then run RESTORE VOL without PREVIEW and it
Let's say for the sake of this discussion the following is true.
Onsitetape1, 7, 9 and 11 are destroyed and not in the library, they have
mixed node data on them. Offsitetape6, 9 and 15 have also been destroyed,
they also have mixed node data on them. These tapes don't mirror each other
but could
The "Pending" state simply means the reuse-delay is in
effect! That is, after expiration occurs, *all* offsite
tapes go thru the period defined for "re-use delay"...
which is intended to protect from over-writing tapes
that might be needed during the period immediately
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Reclaming offsite tapes
>
> Sorry if I sound a little ignorant. I took our backup environment over a
> few months ago and have been trying to learn how it was set up. It was
> explained to me that I could not get tapes back from offsite, just
]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reclaming offsite tapes
Sorry if I sound a little ignorant. I took our backup environment over a
few months ago and have been trying to learn how it was set up. It was
explained to me that I could not get tapes back from
assume that I can pull these(Pending)
tapes back.
={
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reclaming offsite tapes
When you start reclaims on a COPY pool where the tapes are OFFSITE, TSM
We do reclaimation of our offsite, COPY POOL tapes, all the time.
TSM is smart enough to figure out that it is a COPY POOL and simply
creates NEW TAPES. It doesn't mount the offsite tapes.
We have a process that checks for the % UTILIZED of the OFFSITE tapes and
then creates a "recal
nsite copies of all those files, and create a new tape in
the OFFSITE tape pool that is 30% full. Then it marks the OFFSITE tapes as
EMPTY. So you send the new tape offsite, and then you can bring the EMPTY
tapes back on site and reuse them.
We do it constantly.
-Original Message-
Here is my scenario...
We currently send all of our tapes offsite for 7 years. In the library we
collocate by filespace. But, when we send the tapes offsite they are
uncollocated. We have retired a number of servers in the past couple years,
meaning we no longer need that data. Being that we
Do a QUERY VOLUME DEVCLASS=offsite_copy_pool_name and see which are
empty. However, unless you are doing a reclamation on the offsite copy pool
there fill be few, if any, empty volumes.
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IS&T) wrote:
> I backed up the primary stg pools to copy pools for
With DRM in use, you do a :
q drm wherestate=vaultretrieve
This gives you a list of tapes that are now empty and can be
returned from offsite.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/03/01 02:57AM >>>
I backed up the primary stg pools to copy pools for offsite backups. I
ejected the tapes from cop
Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IS&T)
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 2:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Offsite tapes
>
>
> I backed up the primary stg pools to copy pools for offsite backups. I
> ejected the tapes from copy pools and sent to offsite. How can i
> determi
I backed up the primary stg pools to copy pools for offsite backups. I
ejected the tapes from copy pools and sent to offsite. How can i determine
the tapes to be returned from offsite in order to use again? The access
type of the volumes were set to offsite after ejecting from the tapes
library
site and
onsite.
Jim Taylor
cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Offsite tapes expiration
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You state that you are running reclamation. What is the reclamation
threshold on your offsite copypool being set to? Check the status of your
offsite tapes. If the Pct Util for a volume is less than that of your
reclamation threshold, those volumes should be reclaimed(emptied) when you
run the
except that the offsite tapes seldom become
empty. We have two domain which are backed up SAP R/3 and all the other NT
machines. For R/3 the backups are supposed to be kept for 360 days and for
NT machines for 30 days. The expiration process runs everyday and
reclamation process runs every weekend.
It
>Thanks for all the response, it's truely helpfull and encouraging.
>Good news is, we found the tape (Richard, we didn't give up searching :)
>Strange news is, the tape is in a cabinet where we keep our scratch tapes,
>how it got out there at the first place? my best bet is due to human error.
>I'
r Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Restore Volume from offsite tapes
>Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:51:02 -0500
>
>I'll 2nd that! I've found many tapes in creative location in our 3494.
>
>Besides the floor, I've found the
Could the tape have been manually removed from the library?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| cc: |
| Subject: Re: Restore Volume from offsite tapes |
>-
ot; -
Scott Adams/Dilbert
> -Original Message-
> From: Estee Chen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Restore Volume from offsite tap
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 09/28/2000 06:55:32 AM
Any replies will be addressed to: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
>>"q vol HO1302" shows it's in primary tape pool
>>"q libvol 3494 HO1302" said no match found
>>"mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -qV -VHO1302" shows
I don't know which level ADSM you'r running, but we had exactly the same
problems with adsm 3.1.2.55 (AIX 4.2.1, Atape 5.0.2.0, atldd 4.0.1.0):
volumes are "not
>we have a primary disk pool, a primary tape pool(in 3494 tape library) and a
>copy tape pool(also our drm tape pool, which get offsite everyday).
>We lost/misplace one volume from primary tape pool (how it get out from the
>3494 tape library? I don't know), I found that out when space reclamation
hi folks,
let me try to make my story short ..
we have a primary disk pool, a primary tape pool(in 3494 tape library) and a
copy tape pool(also our drm tape pool, which get offsite everyday).
We lost/misplace one volume from primary tape pool (how it get out from the
3494 tape library? I don't kno
Hi Mark!
With collocation on for onsite and not for offsite,
I have found that the process of reclamation offsite tapes
reads just about every tape in my library. I've thought about it:
every day, every user sends me some backup data. I put it on their very
own tape (well not very own!
Hello,
When I turn on reclamation for a copypool where my OFFSITE tapes
are adsm uses tapes from the primary tape pool to reclaim the offsite
tapes.
Does anyone have a script that can report what tapes from a primary pool
will be asked for when reclaiming an offsite copypool
--
Thank You
64 matches
Mail list logo
