Re: Move Media problem

2008-01-08 Thread Richard Sims
On Jan 8, 2008, at 10:49 AM, David Longo wrote: I have TSM server 5.3.4.0 and a 3584 library with LTO2 and 3 tapes. Over a month ago, my library was getting full and I used "Move Media" to move some little used tapes out of the library, worked fine. Yesterday my new expansion

Fw: Move Media problem

2008-01-08 Thread Nicholas Cassimatis
>From the Admin Reference: Task Generate the CHECKIN LIBVOLUME commands for full and partially full volumes that are in the ONSITE.ARCHIVE primary storage pool and stored in the overflow location, Room 2948/Bldg31. Command move media * stgp

Move Media problem

2008-01-08 Thread David Longo
I have TSM server 5.3.4.0 and a 3584 library with LTO2 and 3 tapes. Over a month ago, my library was getting full and I used "Move Media" to move some little used tapes out of the library, worked fine. Yesterday my new expansion frame was installed on library. I want to move all tap

Re: Fw: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING

2007-09-26 Thread Kelly Lipp
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:13 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fw: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING Hi Nick, That worked! Thank you so much! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Nu

Re: Fw: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING

2007-09-26 Thread Joni Moyer
; Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 09/26/2007 03:05 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Fw: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING Joni, Have you tried doing a regular CHECKOUT LIBVOL with checklabel=no? If that works, you can then mar

Fw: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING

2007-09-26 Thread Nicholas Cassimatis
Joni, Have you tried doing a regular CHECKOUT LIBVOL with checklabel=no? If that works, you can then mark it as "unavailable" until you find it. Nick Cassimatis

Re: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING

2007-09-26 Thread Joni Moyer
Hi Kelly, The problem is that the tape is missing out in our library and nothing I do seems to skip this tape in the move media process. I have tried to use acc=destroyed then unavailable, then readwrite and just do the move media command with rem=no checkl=no. Shouldn't that then put the

Re: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING

2007-09-26 Thread Kelly Lipp
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:49 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING Hi Kelly, Actually it is appearing as mountableinlibrary, but within the physical library which is a SUN SL8500 it looks like it'

Re: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING

2007-09-26 Thread Joni Moyer
N00810 0134 81 0 missing LTO-200G data I tried to fake out TSM by telling it to move media n00810 stg=tape_ndmp_offsite wherestate=mountableinlib rem=no checkl=no which I thought would then just change the status to mountablenotinlib, but it says that there is no mat

Re: MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING

2007-09-26 Thread Kelly Lipp
-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-266-8777 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:39 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING Hell

MOVE MEDIA KEEPS FAILING

2007-09-26 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello everyone, I am trying to eject all tapes from my SL8500 library by using the move media function and it keeps failing on tape N00810. Upon further inspection it appears as if N00810 is "missing" physically from the library. Date/Time

Re: Anomalous Move Media Behavior

2006-05-05 Thread Orville Lantto
-L] Anomalous Move Media Behavior I suspect there aren't any full tapes. when using move commend if WHERESTATUs is not used the default is full tapes. Could you verify if there are indeed Full tapes with this command q media * Stgpool=nas_tapep_01 wherestate=mountableinlib WHERESTATUs

Re: Anomalous Move Media Behavior

2006-05-05 Thread Sung Y Lee
Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 05/05/2006 12:37:11 PM: > I am puzzled by an anomalous TSM behavior. This is on TSM 5.3.2.3 > running on AIX 5.3.0.4. The storage pool is of type NETAPP_DUMP. > > When I try to move media out of the library, the server reports no > match is found, but when

Anomalous Move Media Behavior

2006-05-05 Thread Orville Lantto
I am puzzled by an anomalous TSM behavior. This is on TSM 5.3.2.3 running on AIX 5.3.0.4. The storage pool is of type NETAPP_DUMP. When I try to move media out of the library, the server reports no match is found, but when I query the same storage pool with the same parameters, there are media

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-23 Thread Terry McColgan
: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Move Media & DR Hi Terry, When I get down to dr the tapes are going to have that status of mountablenotinlib and be readonly. Do I have to do another move media to change them back to mountableinlibrary? We're just going to have manual tape drives, so

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-23 Thread Joni Moyer
Hi Terry, When I get down to dr the tapes are going to have that status of mountablenotinlib and be readonly. Do I have to do another move media to change them back to mountableinlibrary? We're just going to have manual tape drives, so I thought that maybe I could just bring the tapes fro

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-23 Thread Terry McColgan
e the last switch. If this doesn;'t work please let me know - t -Original Message- From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:21 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Move Media & DR NDMP backups cannot have copy storage pools, so I can't u

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Joni Moyer
NDMP backups cannot have copy storage pools, so I can't use move drmedia for this scenerio. I've been using move media, but my confusion is concerning when I get to the DR site. Do I have to update the volumes? When I use move media, it updates the tape to read-only and mountablenoti

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Curtis Stewart
If it's NDMP data then from my understanding, you can't use DRM. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Mark D. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 03/22/2005 02:12 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.ED

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
MAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU> Re: Move Media & DR 03/22/2005 11:17 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Joe Pendergast
Dist Stor cc Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU> Re: Move Media & DR 03/22/2005 11:17 AM Please respond to

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Sung Y Lee
Okay.. I see that you are using move media command, not move drmedia. Here's my finding. Before move media volume Status=full, Access=READ/WRITE, State=Mountable After move media(defult) Status=Full, Access=Read-Only, State=Mountable After you bring back and checkin as private Status=FULL, A

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Joni Moyer
To Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread William Boyer
Backupsets are not considered DRMEDIA by DRM. You can't use MOVE MEDIA on them either because they do not belong to a storage pool. You would have to write your own scripts to look for the backupset tapes and then update the volhistory record for that tape with a LOCATION= parameter. You s

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
Joni, My first question is are you licensed for the "Extended Edition" of TSM, because it includes DRM support which will make your life much easier when it comes to managing off site tapes and doing DR testing. In particular you would be using "move drmedia" commands in

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Joni Moyer
Hi! I was just wondering, the access of the tape is read-only and not offsite when I run the move media command. Do I then have to update the tape to offsite or can I just leave it as read-only? This is an NDMP backup tape, so it is being handled a little differently than my other tapes

Re: Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Sung Y Lee
) are updated with acces destroyed. Happy DR test. Sung Y. Lee "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/22/2005 11:30:57 AM: > Hello Everyone! > > I have the volume N00043 that I have sent to the vault by using the move > media command. I will be having a DR test and wil

Move Media & DR

2005-03-22 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello Everyone! I have the volume N00043 that I have sent to the vault by using the move media command. I will be having a DR test and will be taking the tape(s) to the DR site. The volume is read-only and is mountable, but not in the library. Will I have to do any updates to the tapes if I

Move Media

2005-03-07 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello All, I have moved several tapes out of the library with the move media command successfully. A special thanks to all that helped! My next challenge is how to get the tapes back within the library without scratching them. I believe that I need to issue the command: move media * stgpool

Re: Move media for backupsets?

2005-01-19 Thread Tab Trepagnier
t; Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 5:48 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Move media for backupsets? > > > TSM 5.1.9.0 > > Is there some command(s) that would allow sequential, one-step > processing > of backupset volumes similar to the operation of the Move Media comma

Re: Move media for backupsets?

2005-01-19 Thread Prather, Wanda
n Behalf Of Tab Trepagnier Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 5:48 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Move media for backupsets? TSM 5.1.9.0 Is there some command(s) that would allow sequential, one-step processing of backupset volumes similar to the operation of the Move Media command for storage pool

Move media for backupsets?

2005-01-18 Thread Tab Trepagnier
TSM 5.1.9.0 Is there some command(s) that would allow sequential, one-step processing of backupset volumes similar to the operation of the Move Media command for storage pools? For example, Move Media will check out the library volume, alter its access to read-only, set its location to the

Re: Question about move media

2004-08-18 Thread Richard Sims
>I have a storage pool for archive which is at the LTO library. >The Pool is of course primary pool. >If i Move media xxx from the pool outside for SAFE , soon or later the >volumes became unavailable. The reason is tha they are "requested" for >Reclamation, and

Question about move media

2004-08-17 Thread Robert Ouzen
Hello Expert I have a storage pool for archive which is at the LTO library. The Pool is of course primary pool. If i Move media xxx from the pool outside for SAFE , soon or later the volumes became unavailable The reason is tha they are "requested" for Reclamation. , and since th

Re: Preview on Move Media

2004-02-16 Thread Justin Bleistein
| | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc:

Preview on Move Media

2004-02-16 Thread Coats, Jack
There doesn't seem to be a preview option on my version of TSMs move media command. I want to find out what media in my library are of what 'age' (havn't been read or written). Could someone provide me a select that would allow me to see this data? Or where to go look it u

Move media question

2004-01-06 Thread Robert Ouzen
Hi to all I every month take offsite cartridges and needed to keep them for 3 months (total of 3 versions of the backup), I run a move media command: move media * stg=sca_drm wherestatus=full,filling wherestate=mountableinlib ovflocation="OFFSITE" remove=bulk checklabel=no When I

Re: Move media problem

2003-12-23 Thread Remeta, Mark
ok here's an update. It seems to be related to the reuse delay of the storage pool Yesterday when I deleted the two volumes that wouldn't delete it was set to 14 days. I changed it to 0 days and when I came in this morning both those volumes where empty and I was able to do a 'move

Re: Move media problem

2003-12-22 Thread Bill Smoldt
Hi, Mark, I've got the same problem on another site. Try a "Q MEDIA" and I expect that it will show "mountableinlib" - the reason it doesn't toggle with your MOVE MEDIA command. Same experience with the archives - no solid answer that worked for my situation. I wo

Move media problem

2003-12-22 Thread Remeta, Mark
is in "mountablenotinlib". When I try and do a move media wherestat=mountablenotinlib it says 0 volumes processed. I've tried checking it into the library and then doing the delete volume, still no good. I'm running 5.2.1.2 on Windows 2000. Thanks in advance, Mark Remeta Confidential

move media question.

2002-12-06 Thread Jason A Morgan
=empty 5. Check volumes into the library using the checkin libv command. 6. Update the from step 4 to read/write to return the volumes to scratch status. upd vol access=readwrite I have been looking through the TSM reference and am considering using the move media command. I have a few questions

Re: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-13 Thread Kelly J. Lipp
onday, November 13, 2000 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: "Move media" vs. checkout I know this thread is a few days old, but I wanted to comment on this issue because I don't think any of the responses so far have got it quite right, and I know from experience as an instr

Re: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-13 Thread Scott McCambly
ibrary). The implied moral to this story is that you should normally NEVER checkout primary pool volumes from the library! "But what if my library becomes full and I need to free up some slots?", you may ask. This is why the "MOVE MEDIA" command was invented back around release 3.1

Re: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-10 Thread Warren, Matthew James
) [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ >-Original Message- >From: Maria Paz Gimeno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 08 November 2000 10:15:AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: "Move media" vs. checkout > > >I use MOVE

Re: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-08 Thread Alex Paschal
Checkout is when the volume will no longer be managed by the automated library, ie, volumes going offsite. If ADSM wants that volume, its mount request fails. move media is used to move media to an overflow location, ie, the "tape room" because you don't have enough room in

Re: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-08 Thread Maria Paz Gimeno
I use MOVE MEDIA for this operation both ways, out and in the library. With CHECKOUT you have to provide the volume labels of the tapes you want to remove from the library, while with "move media" you can select by stgpool. I am not sure if the "checkout" changes the access

Re: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-07 Thread Werner Baur
"Diana J. Noble" wrote: > Then when and for what would I use the "move media"? Good question. I always wondered where the benefits of move/query media compared to checkin/checkout/query volume are. BTW: you can checkout a volume by move media in a single step. To bring b

Antw: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-07 Thread Reiner Sauer
.2000 22:14:11 >>> I'm looking at moving our copypool tapes offsite. We are not running DRM. I've been reading the archive of this list and it seems some people use the adsm checkout command and others the Move media command to remove the tapes from the library for offsite storage.

Re: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-07 Thread Diana J. Noble
Then when and for what would I use the "move media"? At 04:29 PM 11/7/00 -0500, you wrote: >Diane, >If all you want to do is remove the tape from the library and send it offsite >then the checkout command is what you want to do.

Re: "Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-07 Thread Ruth Peters
Diane, If all you want to do is remove the tape from the library and send it offsite then the checkout command is what you want to do.

"Move media" vs. checkout

2000-11-07 Thread Diana J. Noble
I'm looking at moving our copypool tapes offsite. We are not running DRM. I've been reading the archive of this list and it seems some people use the adsm checkout command and others the Move media command to remove the tapes from the library for offsite storage. I've read up