Hi Eric,
Glad to help out if its not too late...
Here are figures from our two main TSM sevres,
RUTLAND::
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-25
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-29 3812400
EXPIRATION 2005-03-29 5173200
EXPIRATION
ara: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Asunto: Re: Help me convincing IBM please
Good thing Eric asked " and send the output directly to me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:" or the list would be swamped with the replies!
:-)
Bill Boyer
"Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield&q
Another factor to keep in mind in general regarding TSM server
performance...
Easily overlooked is the impact of a large volumehistory inventory,
where its management in the face of substantial volume transitions can
induce appreciable overhead. This is particularly true as the
volumehistory backup
n - SPLXM
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 07. April 2005 11:57
> An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Betreff: Help me convincing IBM please
>
> Hi *SM-ers!
> Please help me with this and take the time to read this request
>
> We're having serious performance problems with our T
Here it is
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-1036
EXPIRATION 2005-03-10 3463
I sent these numbers previously, but then the relevent question was
riased as to
the I/O setup.
We use SSA. The database is on one SSA loop, conventional RAID-5
protected. Nothing else on that loop
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined
Up/Hr
-- -
Hi *SM-ers!
Thank you all VERY VERY much for your reply!
I think I have enough information to conclude that my expiration is far from
efficient.
It's very interesting to see how expiration performance varies. I see shops
doing worse than me, but I also see expiration running well over 4,000,000
obj
Here you go, the TSM box is a dual Xeon Windows machine with disks on a
FAST T 900:
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined
Up/Hr
-- --
-
EXPIRATION 2005-03-08
5864400
EXPIRATION 2005-03-0
At 01:40 PM 4/7/2005, David Longo wrote:
What's the difference? Last week my DB was on a FAStT200HA
with 4 drawers of 73GB 10K disks. This week it is on a
FAStT 600 Turbo with 4 drawers of 73GB 15K disks and the EXP710
drawers.
I also echo David's observation. Upgrading our disk subsystem from 1
On Thursday 07 April 2005 20:06, Bob Booth - CITES wrote:
> I would be interested in knowing what people are using for their platforms,
> and specifically what type of I/O infrastructure the database and log is
> on..
If there is enough interest, I or somebody else, can set up a small webpage
where
;Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
04/07/2005 04:57 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject: Help me convincing IBM please
Hi *SM-ers!
P
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:40:08PM -0400, David Longo wrote:
> I've been following this thread all day. Without running the script,
> I know I am getting abround 2.5 million objects per hour examined
> and it takes aboput 2.5 hours to run expiration daily. That's this
> week. Last week, it took
I've been following this thread all day. Without running the script,
I know I am getting abround 2.5 million objects per hour examined
and it takes aboput 2.5 hours to run expiration daily. That's this
week. Last week, it took about 8-10 hours to run expiration.
What's the difference? Last we
10
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 4:57 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Help me convincing IBM please
Hi *SM-ers!
Please help me with this and take the time to read this
Steve,
The three machines, the fourth is being built, are P615s, all at AIX 5.2
and TSM 5.2.2.5. The biggest one, named ADSM, today finished in less than
5 hours, but usuall runs 6+ hours. As for the middle sized one, named TSM,
if I get one complete expiration a week, that's good. Expiration ru
>
> I've attached the results from my three machines.
PCT_UTILIZED AVAIL_SPACE_MB
--
83.2 234820
Fred, how long does expiration take to complete a full run thru on this
DB? What platform and hardware config?
I have 2x125GB DB's both at 80%, a
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU> Re: Help me convincing IBM
please
r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julian
Armendariz
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 11:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Help me convincing IBM please
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/07 4:57 AM >>>
Hi *SM-ers!
Please help me with this and take the time to read th
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/07 4:57 AM >>>
Hi *SM-ers!
Please help me with this and take the time to read this request
We're having serious performance problems with our TSM database. Part of the
discussion with IBM is how expiration should perform.
A technical document on the TSM website stated
3636000
EXPIRATION 2005-04-04 2347200
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Troy Frank
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:57 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Help me convincing IBM
Well now I'm a bit nervous. My scores seem to be as bad or worse than Eric's.
Is performance in this task basically a disk i/o, and cpu bound task, or can
other things factor in? Just a little confused since our server isn't THAT
slow (P4-2.8ghz). DB is sitting on mirrored 10K scsi disks.
ANR1687I Output for command 'RU exp_perf ' issued against server TSM02
follows:
ACTIVITY Date Objects ExaminedUp/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-08327600
EXP
Those are some big databses I'm seeing!
Are the ones over 100MB all on AIX and using a single or multiple
TSM server?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/07/2005 10:32:14 AM >>>
TSMSERVER 1:
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined
Up/Hr
-- --
---
TSMSERVER 1:
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-10511200
EXPIRATION 2005-03-1451840
I've attached the results from my three machines.
Fred Johanson
ITSM Administrator
University of Chicago
773-702-8464
Server TSM
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 20
On Apr 7, 2005 4:57 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'm begging for your help with this. I would like to ask you to issue the
> following SQL statements on your TSM server(s) and send the output
> directly
> to me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> select activity, cast ((end_ti
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM might have said:
> Hi *SM-ers!
> Please help me with this and take the time to read this request
tsm: ADSM>select activity, cast ((end_time) as date) as "Date"
,(examined/cast((end_time-s tart_time) seconds as decimal(18,13))
*3600) "Obje
Expire_perf - TSM 24 hour report for MSPSTG1.CORP generated at 04/07/2005
08:50:26 on MSPM1BBKUP02 covering 2005-04-06 08:50 to 2005-04-07 08:50
Server name: MSPSTG1, platform: AIX-RS/6000, version: 5.2.4.0, date/time:
04/07/2005 08:50:27
ACTIVITY Date Objects Examined Up/Hr
--
tsm: MSPTSM01>run expire_perf
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-08597600
EXPIRATION 2005-03-09
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
Hi *SM-ers!
Please help me with this and take the time to read this request
We're having serious performance problems with our TSM database. Part of the
discussion with IBM is how expiration should perform.
A technical document on the TSM website stated that one sh
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- --
-
EXPIRATION 2005-03-08
360
EXPIRATION 2005-03-09
3373200
EXPIRATION 2005-03-10
3412800
EXPIRATION 2005-03-11
at biscuits dot com
"Loon, E.J. van -
SPLXM" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
M.COM> Subject: Help me convin
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- --
-
EXPIRATION 2005-03-08
1717200
EXPIRATION 2005-03-09
2077200
EXPIRATION 2005-03-10
1994400
EXPIRATION 2005-03-11
> select activity, cast ((end_time) as date) as "Date" ,(examined/cast
> ((end_time-start_time) seconds as decimal(18,13)) *3600) "Objects Examined
> Up/Hr" from summary where activity='EXPIRATION' and days (end_time)
> -days(start_time)=0
>
> select pct_utilized, avail_space_mb from db
Cool info.
Hello,
here are our figures:
PCT_UTILIZED AVAIL_SPACE_MB
--
76.3 32768
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:57 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Help me convincing IBM please
Hi *SM-ers!
Please help me with this and take the time to read this request
We're having serious performance problems with ou
TSM 5.2.4
AIX 5.3 p520
ESS disk for db
JFS2 filesystem
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-08471600
EXPIRATION 20
Hi Eric,
Output of my TSM server is attached.
Regards
Akash
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2005 3:27 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Help me convincing IBM please
Hi *SM-ers
Eric
Nice bit of SQL..
Here you are
ACTIVITY DateObjects Examined Up/Hr
-- -- -
EXPIRATION 2005-03-08 3164400
EXPIRATION 2005-03-09
me convincing IBM please
Hi *SM-ers!
Please help me with this and take the time to read this request
We're having serious performance problems with our TSM database. Part of the
discussion with IBM is how expiration should perform.
A technical document on the TSM website stated tha
: Help me convincing IBM please
Hi *SM-ers!
Please help me with this and take the time to read this request
We're having serious performance problems with our TSM database. Part of the
discussion with IBM is how expiration should perform.
A technical document on the TSM website stated
Hi *SM-ers!
Please help me with this and take the time to read this request
We're having serious performance problems with our TSM database. Part of the
discussion with IBM is how expiration should perform.
A technical document on the TSM website stated that one should be able to
expire 3.8 mi
43 matches
Mail list logo
