email: ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com
From: Stefan Folkerts
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 08/24/15 12:39
Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
But if enough volumes are in the filling state t
: Monday, August 24, 2015 3:37 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve
But if enough volumes are in the filling state this is not a problem and
may I ask why use collocation on a filepool?
On Monday, August 24, 2015, Lee, Gary wrote:
>
ARIST.EDU ]
> On Behalf Of Stefan Folkerts
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 6:07 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve
>
> I believe a fileclass storagepool is better suited for this kind of
> "permanent" stor
maxscratch.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan
Folkerts
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 6:07 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve
I believe a fileclass storagepool is better
-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan
Folkerts
Sent: maandag 24 augustus 2015 12:07
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve
I believe a fileclass storagepool is better suited for this kind of "permanent"
storage on disk.
A diskpool should b
ger [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Lee, Gary
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:31 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve
>
> Hoping to get upgraded to tsm server 7.1.x within the next month.
> At that time,
3:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve
Hoping to get upgraded to tsm server 7.1.x within the next month.
At that time, we are considering changing our storage strategy to all random
disk pool.
This because we cannot do a file level restore
Hoping to get upgraded to tsm server 7.1.x within the next month.
At that time, we are considering changing our storage strategy to all random
disk pool.
This because we cannot do a file level restore from a vmware backup from
sequencial media, (be it tape or disk).
Has anyone done this, or is
Re: TSM v5->v6 upgrade - permissions of raw disk pool vols
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Yes, permission needs to be considered for v6 resource access, although
you don't necessarily need to reassign ownership.
http://www
DU]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 1:03 PM
>> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>> Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM v5->v6 upgrade - permissions of raw disk pool vols
>>
>> Our TSM v5 servers all run as root. After the conversion to v6 they will be
>> running as a non-root
m: Shawn DREW
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 09/19/2013 01:27 PM
Subject: Re: TSM v5->v6 upgrade - permissions of raw disk pool vols
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Yes, permission needs to be considered for v6 resource access, although
you don't ne
Our TSM v5 servers all run as root. After the conversion to v6 they will
be running as a non-root account which is the tsm/db2 instance owner.
Our disk pools are all raw logical volumes. Do we need to change
ownership of the raw volumes to the new instance owner so dsmserv can
access the LV's?
A
rom: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 1:03 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM v5->v6 upgrade - permissions of raw disk pool vols
>
> Our TSM v5 servers all run as root. After the conversion to v6 they will be
&g
Thank you all for your comment.
So if I understand correctly, If I use storage agent for "Oracle backup" who
actualy write to the VTL to bypass the firewall. I can't use the TSM "disk
device" option to replace that because it's only IP.
It's to bad because I think that local disks on TSM server
On 5 feb. 2013, at 20:31, "Prather, Wanda" wrote:
> 1) If by "storage agent" you mean the Lan-Free agent, that requires a tape
> device. You cannot replace that with a disk or file pool.
>
if by cannot you mean 'can if you use GPFS or synergy or any of the other
supported clustered filesyste
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
ritchi64
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 10:25 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] VTL or disk pool
I know, there's already some previous post on this but I want your opinions on
our choice to make.
Our IB
I know, there's already some previous post on this but I want your opinions on
our choice to make.
Our IBM VTL is out of support next april. So we have to decide if we will buy a
new one or buy more direct attach disk pool in our TSM server?
We have some Oracle server who use the VTL an
Lee,
Gary
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9:56 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] VTL or disk pool
That depends on what you expect from your vtl.
Do you currently have deduplication at that level? Can you afford disk to
replace that storage, are you prepared to manage the disk
ver the deduplication function. And also to
figure out how much data per day/hour you need to process and dedup in a disk
pool, to see if your existing disk array has sufficient write speed and cache
to handle it.
When you figure out you need to push Gigabytes of data through the disk in
a
>We are considering using a NetApp V6210 with some attached shelves as a
>block storage TSM primary disk pool.
Some thoughts . . .
I'm curious, just what is the disk read/write pattern of a
primary disk pool?
You have many, many backup
sessions writing to it concurrently. The you
ct: Re: [ADSM-L] NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
Yes, when I mentioned block storage I was referring to FC connectivity to the
NetApp for the TSM server. Also, it should be noted that we plan to use native
TSM deduplication as well. The reason for this is that we use TSM for VE and
want to speed up
rmance you need.
Rick
From: "Mayhew, James"
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 08/29/2012 09:32 AM
Subject: Re: NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Yes, when I mentioned block storage I was referring to FC connectivity to
ubject: RE: NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
BUMP... Does anyone have thoughts on this?
From: Mayhew, James
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 6:42 PM
To: 'ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu'
Subject: NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
Hello All,
We are considering using a NetApp V6210 with some attached shelves as
d to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
>as a block storage TSM primary disk pool
Do you mean that the disk pool would be on san/iscsi luns, or, nfs/cifs
shares?
From: "Mayhew, James"
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Dat
>as a block storage TSM primary disk pool
Do you mean that the disk pool would be on san/iscsi luns, or, nfs/cifs
shares?
From: "Mayhew, James"
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 08/27/2012 04:28 PM
Subject:Re: NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
Sent by:&qu
must have the
space, I haven't looked too carefully...
- Margaret Clark
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Mayhew, James
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:28 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] NetApp for Primary
underlying array. By writing a full stripe at a clip, it
eliminates the need to perform any reads for RAID parity calculation (as
its replacing the stripe in its entirety, it can calculate the proper
parity with the data in hand). As such, your random-access disk pool
almost turns into one big m
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
BUMP... Does anyone have thoughts on this?
From: Mayhew, James
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 6:42 PM
To: 'ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu'
Subject: NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
Hello All,
We are considering using a NetApp V6210 with some attach
BUMP... Does anyone have thoughts on this?
From: Mayhew, James
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 6:42 PM
To: 'ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu'
Subject: NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
Hello All,
We are considering using a NetApp V6210 with some attached shelves as a block
storage TSM primary dis
Hello All,
We are considering using a NetApp V6210 with some attached shelves as a block
storage TSM primary disk pool. Do any of you have any experience using NetApp
storage as a TSM primary disk pool? If so, how was your experience with this
solution? Did you have any performance issues? How
December 06, 2010 4:16 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] we need more tapes in the next pool after replacing a
> primary disk pool with a primary sequential pool
>
> Hello,
>
> We replaced a primary disk pool on fc disks with a bigger primary
> sequential pool o
What is the tape drive model? Data transfer rate of LTO4 drives is about
120MB/s, so three drives can carry 3 x 120 = 360 MB/s. (This can be higher
with LTO5 or new IBM tape drives). I don't know your SATA disk
configuration, but you might not gain performance by three parallel
migration processes.
f TSM
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 4:16 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] we need more tapes in the next pool after replacing a primary
disk pool with a primary sequential pool
Hello,
We replaced a primary disk pool on fc disks with a bigger primary
sequential pool on sata disks.
T
Hello,
We replaced a primary disk pool on fc disks with a bigger primary
sequential pool on sata disks.
The primary sequential pool on disk is migrated to a primary pool an tape
using 3 processes.
Both pools are collocated by node.
Now we need more tapes in the next pool because the migration
cial
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
From:
"Lee, Gary D."
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/09/2010 09:52 AM
Subject:
[ADSM-L] Shrinking a disk pool
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Tsm ser
Tsm server 5.5.4
Suse sles9 under VM 5.3
I have a TSM server running as back end storage for IBM content
manager/Ondemand and content manager itself.
The OnDemand piece uses archive storage and the content manager uses backups.
I would like to shrink the archive pool and re-allocate that stora
- "Tuncel Mutlu" wrote:
> Hi gurus,
>
> I have a disk pool migrated once a day to a tape pool, but some data
> stays (capacity problems). Until I have solved that, every day I have
> to empty the disk pool deleting the data. Here are the questions:
>
>
>
I understood that his primary sequential pool is at capacity and instead
of deleting (expiring) older data that is already there, he is deleting
the more recent data that is still on his disk-pool.
Regards,
Shawn
Shawn Drew
Internet
jcho
Tuncel,
I'm not sure I'm following what you are wanting to do.
To help me understand what you are trying to do, can you explain why you are
deleting you primary disk storage pool and the underlying disk volumes daily.
And you also mentioned that some data stays in the primary disk
- Why are you worried about emptying data from a nearly empty disk pool?
- Very often disk pools do not empty completely every day. That is not
necessarily a bad thing.
- What are your capactiy problems?
- Is the disk filling faster than it can be migrated every day? Be sure
your
t; command
Regards,
Shawn
Shawn Drew
Internet
tuncel.mu...@akbank.com
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
10/06/2009 09:46 AM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] emptying disk pool
Hi gurus,
I have a disk pool
k pools to make sure that there is an off-site copy of the data.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Tuncel
Mutlu
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:47 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] emptying disk pool
Hi
disk pool migrated once a day to a tape pool, but some data
stays (capacity problems). Until I have solved that, every day I
have to empty the disk pool deleting the data. Here are the questions:
1. Is there any way to empty the disk pool without deleting the
volumes ? The only way I have found
Hi gurus,
I have a disk pool migrated once a day to a tape pool, but some data stays
(capacity problems). Until I have solved that, every day I have to empty the
disk pool deleting the data. Here are the questions:
1. Is there any way to empty the disk pool without deleting the volumes
and not loose data. This
compensates for the longer recover time of large disk.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-Original Message-
From: Grigori Solonovitch
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:39:43
To:
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Move data from DISK pool to FILE pool
RAID6 came together with
Grigori,
Regarding the point made below:
>>1) migration is totally controlled by TSM Server and depends on number of
>>nodes and number of migration processes. I am afraid to overlap migration
>>activity and backup/restore operations.<<
I don't know how big your d
...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Steven
Langdale
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Move data from DISK pool to FILE pool
Hello Grigori
Quite new then if you're using raid 6.
In that case, I'd not worry too much about fragmentation. If you have
to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Move data from DISK pool to FILE pool
Caterpillar: Confidential Green Retain Until: 28/08/2009
Hello Steven,
We have IBM DS8100 with:
- 146GB Enterprise disks (RAID5) for data;
- 500GB FATA (RAID
: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Steven
Langdale
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 8:57 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Move data from DISK pool to FILE pool
Hello Grigori
What SAN have you got, and is it shared storage? I ask because there has
been
SM-L] Move data from DISK pool to FILE pool
Caterpillar: Confidential Green Retain Until: 28/08/2009
Hello Christian,
Thank you very much for your proposal. I understand that it is much easier
to use migration, but I am still going to use procedure based on data
movement because of:
1)
activity (for example, at the weekends);
2) unfortunately there are limitations in disk space. I am not able to
allocate FILE storage pool with the same size as DISK storage pool initially. I
am planning to move raw logical volumes selectively to release SAN data volume
from DISK pool
25 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Skype: cristie.christian.svensson
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] för Grigori
Solonovitch [g.solonovi...@bkme.com]
Skickat: den 28 juli 2009 12:35
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: Move data
r of
tape drives you have available you could increase the migprocress
parameter to push the data off of the DISK pool to the next stgpool
faster; you should also run the migrations outside the backup interval.
You may still have to change any references of the DISK pool in the tape
copy pools before b
istian.svensson
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] för Grigori
Solonovitch [g.solonovi...@bkme.com]
Skickat: den 28 juli 2009 12:35
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: Move data from DISK pool to FILE pool
Dear TSMers,
We have TSM 5.5.1.1 under AIX 5.3.
I need to move
appropriate size;
2) move data from DISK primary storage pool to FILE pool by "move data
stg= reconstruct=no" (volume by volume);
3) delete DISK primary storage pool;
4) rename FILE storage pool to old DISK pool name.
My expectations:
1) all existing tape copy pools, made for DISK poo
s, if not, you
> could be severely fragmented.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Andrew Carlson
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:12 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Long Wait for Disk Pool Volumes
Do you ever migrate the data from the diskpools, if not, you
could be severely fragmented.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Long Wait for Disk
I am running TSM 5.3.2.3 on AIX 5.3.6. We started using big disk pools for
our onsite data some time ago. We are noticing an odd behaviour. It takes
up to 20 minutes for disk volumes to start varying online, and can take
longer obviously for it to finish. Before opening an incident with IBM
(wh
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mcnutt, Larry E.
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Problem deleting disk pool volume.
Thanks Gerald. I had not tried the VARY command, but it didn't solve
the problem.
Larry
-Original Message-
From:
oblem deleting disk pool volume.
With disk volumes I usually have to vary the volume offline first.
Syntax
.-Wait--=--No--.
>>-VARy--+-ONline--+--volume_name--+--+><
'-OFfline-'
'-Wait--=--+-No--+-'
'-Yes-'
G
> Timken Corporation
>
> - Message from "Mcnutt, Larry E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
> Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:32:26 -0400 -
>
> To:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Subject:
>
> Problem deleting disk pool volume.
>
> TSM Server 5.3
2006 2:59 PM
>To: Mcnutt, Larry E.
>Subject: FW: Problem deleting disk pool volume.
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mcnutt, Larry E.
>Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 1:32 PM
>To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
>Subject: Problem deleting disk pool volume.
>
communication to
others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message,
and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company / The
Timken Corporation
--- Begin Message ---
TSM Server 5.3.3.0
AIX 5.3 ML4
Hello list,
I have a disk pool volume that I cannot seem to delete. I have used
Sorry, but I have no clue as to what caused the format of my original
post to be so trashed. I hope this is better.
Thanks,
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Mcnutt, Larry E.
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:59 PM
To: Mcnutt, Larry E.
Subject: FW: Problem deleting disk pool volume
TSM Server 5.3.3.0
AIX 5.3 ML4
Hello list,
I have a disk pool volume that I cannot seem to delete. I have used
"move data" to empty the volume, but when I try a "delete volume", it
says the volume contains data. However, "audit volume fix=yes" says
there is no da
Is there a limit to how large a disk pool can be?
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and
may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any
We are trying to get our metapool to backup to a copy pool hosted on another
server, to allow faster recovery of these small files, in the event of a
disaster.
Our recovery plan involves restoring the TSM server to the server which
hosts the 'metacopy' pool. (This server is TSM server at another si
] Primary disk pool volume limit
On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:06 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
> ...
> When I do a show thread there is a line that is "Thread table size". I
> am assuming that is a thread limit of some sort. Do you know if
> this is
> correct?
It would seem to be TSM'
On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:06 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
...
When I do a show thread there is a line that is "Thread table size". I
am assuming that is a thread limit of some sort. Do you know if
this is
correct?
It would seem to be TSM's personal choice for a table which manages
thread information. T
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 9:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Primary disk pool volume limit
On Jan 6, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
> How would I determine what the per-process
On Jan 6, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
How would I determine what the per-process thread limit is? Your
suggestion of a thread limitation seems to fit the known facts.
Andy - Here's some info from my AIX notes...
Threads, maximum number The programming limits are
def
>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:38:04 -0600, Andy Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I do not understand the hard to manage argument, I use scripts to do
> all of that sort of work. It is nice to be able to fine tune the
> disk pool sizes.
I have found that keeping one volume p
I do not understand the hard to manage argument, I use scripts to do all
of that sort of work. It is nice to be able to fine tune the disk pool
sizes. We have started resizing the pool volumes to reduce the threads
TSM uses, but it will take more than a week to complete. It will take 2
days to
>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:29:26 -0600, Andy Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical question.
> Are 1800 volumes too many?
I would say 'Hell yes!', but not from a technical-constraint
perspective; I'd emphasize the management overhead inv
: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Primary disk pool volume limit
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
> Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical
> question.
> Are 1800 volumes too many? We have been experiencing TCP connection
> failures si
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical
question.
Are 1800 volumes too many? We have been experiencing TCP connection
failures since reaching this number. ...
Andy - You obviously need to look for ANR messages in the TSM
ebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Zarnowski
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:37 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Primary disk pool volume limit
One thing to keep in mind: If you ever have to restore your TSM
dat
on the number of disk pool
volumes and the total size of a disk pool? I am running 5.2.2.4 on AIX
5.1.
--
Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Systems Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there or what is the practical limit on the number of disk pool
volumes and the total size of a disk pool? I am running 5.2.2.4 on AIX
5.1.
Andy Huebner
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an
On Aug 17, 2005, at 3:39 PM, Joni Moyer wrote:
... Would you happen to know if there is a max. size for a
volume? ...
See IBM Technote 1170255.
Richard Sims
+354 863-0560
www.nyherji.is
Ben Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
17.08.2005 19:54
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Disk Pool Volume
Configuration
L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Disk Pool Volume Configuration
Hello,
I have just added fibre channel disk to our one AIX server. Here are
the LUN's that were added to filesystem /tsmdev/stgpool1
CHRS044 /tsmdev/stgpool1
lun 175 100 GB
lun 178 100 GB
lun 181 100 GB
size for a volume? My one disk pool will be
several
hundred GB, but I didn't want to have too many volumes within it, but
maybe
it would be better to create about 100-50GB storage pool volumes for a
500GB random disk storage pool...
Any suggestions? Thanks!
*
Lawrence,
What size TSM storage pool volumes do you create? Would you happen to know
if there is a max. size for a volume? My one disk pool will be several
hundred GB, but I didn't want to have too many volumes within it, but maybe
it would be better to create about 100-50GB storage
yes, you can have more than one tsm volume per physical volume.
the smaller the allocation, the more volumes, which gives to
flexibility to
assign them per the needs of the storage pool rather than simply give
two to each.
we just define them to a storage group per demand.
but once define and al
Hello,
I have just added fibre channel disk to our one AIX server. Here are the
LUN's that were added to filesystem /tsmdev/stgpool1
CHRS044 /tsmdev/stgpool1
lun 175 100 GB
lun 178 100 GB
lun 181 100 GB
lun 184 100 GB
lun 187 100 GB
lun 190
ustin Case
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:42 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Working SATA Disk Pool Configuration
Charles how many controllers and how much cache is the CX700 configured
with, I may be headed in that direction in the near future?
Thanks
Justin
&quo
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 6:30 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Working SATA Disk Pool Configuration
Yep 594GB Vols, @ 1-4 Vols per pool, so we have 594GB to 2TB TSM Pools.
Also I forgot to mention we are writing to 3592 Tape Drives connected to
there are 2 directories: one for disk vols (4 Gbyte) and on
for tapevols (4Gbyte)
We use a small amout of FC Disk 30 GB on the clariion as primary disk pool
with maxsize=50 Mbyte
Migration next to ATA Disk Pool (2 Tbyte) with 10 days retension (most
backup files should expire here) next to ATA Tap
To
Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU>
: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:30 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Working SATA Disk Pool Configuration
Thanks for the info, we have similar hardware and are thinking about
finally moving TSM to the SAN.
one question though on the last "TSM" section, did you mean to
say, "
#x27;m not sure you could (or would want
to) make 594 individual volumes
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Working SATA Disk Pool C
Someone had asked how we configured our Clarrion SATA Disk for TSM Disk
Pools... With this cfg we see 168GB Per Hour Data Transfer per stream
from Disk pool top Tape Pool
Clariion: CX700
Drives: 320 GB SATA
Raid Sets: Raid 3 (4+1) ((5 drives per set))
Number of Luns per Raid Set: 2
Approx Lun
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, James Marcinek wrote:
> Can someone explain how to backup the database to disk file versus sequential
> access
You create a file device class, eg.,
DEFINE DEVCLASS LOCALFILES DEVTYPE=FILE FORMAT=DRIVE MAXCAPACITY=1048576K
MOUNTLIMIT=3 DIRECTORY="C:\TSMDATA" SHARED=NO
Fo
] On Behalf Of
James Marcinek
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 11:48 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] How to backup DB to disk pool versus sequential?
Hello everyone,
Can someone explain how to backup the database to disk file versus
sequential access
"This e-mail and any attachment
Hello everyone,
Can someone explain how to backup the database to disk file versus sequential
access
000 array ( raid 5) and would like to
add
some more space to this. Is it best to delete the present backup disk
pool
and just create a brand new larger one ( i.e. 100GB ), or should I be
looking at creating a number of smaller volumes?
Any ideas on this subject are much appreciated
Many thanks
Hi TSMers
Running TSM 5.1.6.2 on Solaris
I have a 50GB backup pool on an A1000 array ( raid 5) and would like to add
some more space to this. Is it best to delete the present backup disk pool
and just create a brand new larger one ( i.e. 100GB ), or should I be
looking at creating a number of
** High Priority **
Hi,
I am trying to take DB2 offline backup of size 620GB to DISK storage
pool to reduce backup window time. I am going to creating DISK pool
from SSA drives. Just I want to take a sdvice on "what would be the
correct size to create disk storage pool to fit 620GB dat
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 11:21 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: I have a db and disk pool volume question.
==> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:38:58 -0500, "Martinez, Matt"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have an opportunity to redesign the disk pool an
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
