One more question: We have a few SQL servers with multiple SQL instances,
so the batch file runs the backup command separately for each instance.
This means that only the LAST backup will send an errorlevel to the
scheduler. Is there some way to combine these errorlevels (maybe add them
together)
Hi Gary,
Specify the destination file spec in the OBJECTS parameter as well. For
example, OBJECTS='"C:\My Dir\Files\*" "C:\My Restore Dir\Files\"'
Best regards,
Andy
Andrew Raibeck | IBM Spectrum Protect Level 3 | sto
How do you specify the destination file spdec when scheduling a restore command?
I see where the objects parm specifys file to restore.
Thanks.
Regarding TSM server on Centos, or other unsupported platforms
For a backup installation you need:
- hardware for a small fortune
- software licenses for a big fortune
- Installation and configuration work - a lot o
Maurizio
The goal of CentOS is 100% binary support. It's virtually identical, so
drivers SHOULD work unless they do something strange like look for the
actual RedHat trademark in the OS.
Also, there have been minor differences between same-numbered releases; I
don't have a list of those, you wo
Bo,
What is the total space occupied by this data?
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Bo
Nielsen
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 9:18 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Advice for archiving 80 billion of small fil
Whenever we have a situation like this we always tar.gz into one file first,
before archiving to TSM .. either the top level directory or multiple lower
level directories, if it makes sense to do so, based on what the retrieval
expectations might be.
Also very useful is to tar.gz verbosely, wri
Do you need to recover files individually? If so, then image backup (at
least on its own) won't be a good option. One thing you could do is tar up
chunks (maybe a million files) and archive/backup those chunks. Keep a
catalog (hopefully a database with indexes) of which files are in which tar
ball
On 20.1.2017. 15:31, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> TAR and/or GZip?
We do it here that way.
Regards,
--
Sasa Drnjevic
www.srce.unizg.hr
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Anderson Douglas
> wrote:
>
>> Try image backup
>>
>> Em 20/01/2017 12:23, "Bo Nielsen" escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I ne
On 20.1.2017. 15:06, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> We run TSM on CentOS6 x86_64 without problems, with HP LTO5 and LTO6, and
> IBM LTO7 drives and a pair of ACSLS-managed STK SL3000 libraries. We
> haven't had any problems - technical, support, or otherwise. I think the
> only unusual thing we had to do
Good one. :-)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Anderson Douglas
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 9:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Advice for archiving 80 billion of small files.
Try image backup
Em 20/01/2017 12:23, "
TAR and/or GZip?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Anderson Douglas
wrote:
> Try image backup
>
> Em 20/01/2017 12:23, "Bo Nielsen" escreveu:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I need advice.
> > I must archive 80 billion small files, but that is not possible, as I see
> > it.
> > since it will fill in the T
Try image backup
Em 20/01/2017 12:23, "Bo Nielsen" escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I need advice.
> I must archive 80 billion small files, but that is not possible, as I see
> it.
> since it will fill in the TSM's Database about 73 Tb.
> The filespace is mounted on a Linux server.
> Is there a way to pa
Hi all,
I need advice.
I must archive 80 billion small files, but that is not possible, as I see it.
since it will fill in the TSM's Database about 73 Tb.
The filespace is mounted on a Linux server.
Is there a way to pack/zip the files, so it's a smaller number of files.
anybody who has tried this
We run TSM on CentOS6 x86_64 without problems, with HP LTO5 and LTO6, and
IBM LTO7 drives and a pair of ACSLS-managed STK SL3000 libraries. We
haven't had any problems - technical, support, or otherwise. I think the
only unusual thing we had to do was pass
-vmargs "-DBYPASS_TSM_REQ_CHECKS=true"
t
Hi Maurizio,
No, I don't have details, but if problems do occur, it's usually in the
device/tape device support.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/20/2017
08:25:14 AM:
> From: ".Maurizio TERUZZI"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Da
~~ rechtliche Hinweise ~~ legal information ~~
BJB GmbH & Co. KG +++ Sitz: Werler Str. 1, D-59755 Arnsberg +++ HRA 1975,
Reg.-Gericht Arnsberg +++ Persoenlich haftende Gesellschafterin: BJB
Beteiligungs- und Verwaltungs-GmbH +++ Sitz: Arnsberg +++ HRB 360, Reg.-Gericht
Arnsberg +++ Geschaeftsfue
Hello Del,
thanks foy your reponse.
Do you have some ideas or fact were can be a problem between Tapes and
CentOS (we can maybe give some feedback on that later on).
My test installation is not yet finalising using tape because of
availability but It is the roadmap.
Grazie
--
Cordiali sal
IBM does not officially support CentOS for the Spectrum Protect server.
The experience from the product team is that many of the Linux
distributions work and behave with similar support and capabilities for
basic functions that the product requires such as memory management,
threading, and such
19 matches
Mail list logo