You may want to investigate an entirely different approach to both
optimizing your use of big tapes (Ultrium, SuperDLT...) in the library,
and to disaster backup. Run a second TSM server. It could even be a
second image on the same physical machine. (In our case, it will be on a
second machine in
I will be out of the office from 12/14/2001 until 12/17/2001.
I will respond to your message when I return., In my absence forward all
Tsm requests to Jim Healy
Problem Details
.
Abstract:
TivWeb: Exchange Backup Locks TSM Server
.
System Type: HP Intel
System Model:
Other related devices:
hi tsm'ers,
my cachehit pct utilization sometimes drops to 96.7% and few times i see it
touches 99%. due to this i see slow in server process like migration and
expiration and sessions hanging for long period of time.
please advise me , how can i overcome this. I tried increasing the database
buf
Tom,
I am importing in the other direction and seeing some wierdness also. I am
importing DLT to LTO.
Since "import" appears to be a streaming application, you would expect to
see full drive speed. Instead, my 8 MB/s DLT drives feed data to TSM at
2.5 to 3.5 MB/s. Even if the incoming file is
Hello tsm'ers.
Has anyone using these drives tried to do a import node?
I have HP Ultrium drives, LVD-connected to a S7A, AIX.
TSM is 4.2.1.7.
When running an import from these drives I only get aroung 200KB/s, until
after some time the drive/scsi-bus/controller will give up.
Repeated tests on
Hi folks,
I've been trying to install a TSM 4.2 Server on an english W2K Server. Everything
seems fine untill i open the Web-Based Management - it's in german
has anyone got an idea where the problem is?
Thanks in advance
René Hamann
Germany
Question:
Why would having your laptop docked or un-docked make a difference in
backup.
The only reason I have my Laptop docked is I don't want to look @ a 17"
monitor or I don't want to unwind the power cord.
My NIC card communicates the same way being docked or un-docked.
Orin,
Go to a DOS
Hey found a bug in the NT version, 4.2.1.8. I tried checking out a volume
that I did not know was mounted but idle. When this happened under version
4.1.x.x the checkout would fail stating the volume was in use. This is what
I got under 4.2.1.8:
ANRD mmsscsi.c(9218): ThreadId<73> Could not mo
Sorry. By "undocked" I mean the user is carrying it around the office or the
nation disconnected from any link to TSM.
The user's PC keeps trying to connect via VPN.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (7
Thank you very much my friend.
Paul Hughes
"PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 13/12/2001
15:07:26
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re
We moved from OS/390 to an AIX machine. We moved each client using server
to server export. We had about 400 clients to move and It took us about 3
months to move all of the clients to the new machine. We would do one to
several clients each day depending on the size of the clients.
Jim Sporer
Yes, a schedule is defined. So, does using the laptop undocked preclude you
from having scheduling set up?
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site:
-
Hi MarkAccording to your previous mails, you said you were saving your two weeks of db backups. Were you saving thoose in your library? Because if you do, you should hopefully be using something like Magstar MP or someting with small tapes. The question in matter was that Miles was trying to save s
I have 4 LTO Drive and 2 DLT in the same physical STK L700 Library. But I
have define 2 Virtual Lib
Here is my config file :
Try to not used the "Shared=Yes", when used you cannot remove without
deleting the library.
/* Device Configuration */
DEFINE DEVCLASS DBFILE DEVTYPE=FILE FORMAT=DRIVE MAXC
What version of client? I'd also be curious as to the rev of the pertinent nlms in NW6.
We're not backing it up yet, but have a number of issues with trying to back up a NW
cluster that are 'supposed' to
be addressed in 6.
Miles Purdy wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> AIX server 4.1 (4.2 planned)
> Net
You don't by chance have a schedule defined with this laptop and the TSM
server do you?
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Laptop message
Client has TSM version 4.2.0.0 on Win2k.
Didn't think this was possible. Did you have to do anything to the L700 to
configure the virtual libraries? Is SHARED=YES required for this config?
Is there any disadvantage to always setting SHARED=YES?
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
Info:
TDP for SQL ver 2.2 running on W2K server running SP2 and SQL2000.
I am looking to enhance the default settings for the TDP for SQL GUI. We
have one client that has lots of small DB's so that when you open the
restore GUI, it takes a long time to "see" available DB's and corresponding
log
This issue was just now being discussed in a different thread. What
does your dsm.opt look like (especially in the area of TCP performance
settings)?
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Independent IT Consultant
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (408)&(831) 332-400
TSM does not support mixed SCSI libraries. You need software that
virtualizes the library, such as ACSLS.
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
Matthias
Feyerabend To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
I do not believe there is any direct support in TSM for having 2 types of
drives within the same library.
You do not tell us your server platform, so I am not sure if this will help
you, as my experience is on AIX:
We did it with an STK9710 by defining 2 different TSM LIBRARY definitions.
A "LIB
I thought of that too but the problem with that is that you lose all the extra
versions. But it is better than nothing.
"Ron E. Leffew" wrote:
> What you can do , is restore the file to another directory and then backup the
> file using the new management class.
>
> Mark D Baker <[EMAIL PROTECT
DELETE FILESPACE will also cause this big time. I get them frequently, and
actually found an APAR somewhere in IBMLINK that agrees they are harmless -
just retry your operation after the background process has completed.
Wan
We got that error once. I opened a case with Tivoli support but they
never came up with anything. It isn't reoccurring regularly, however.
We're running TSM server 4.2.0.1 on Solaris 2.7.
adam
Matthias Feyerabend wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we get reproducable errors on Windows2000 Server 4.2.1.7
Hi Rick,
I might try collocation first by node (ie. ON) then by filespace - if you have extra
tapes and capacity.
Buy as much disk as you can for a disk pool.
You might try optimizing your database access.
Miles
-
I would look into other activity currently going on within TSM at that
time...
I see things like that when (say) expiration is running at the same time a
client is backing up...
another time might be when reclamation is running and a client is
backing up
and/or some combination of such ev
Hello,
we get reproducable errors on Windows2000 Server 4.2.1.7 running incr backup
from W2K fileserver:
ANRD dfutil.c(653): ThreadId<22> Lock acquisition (xLock) failed for
PoolId=1, cluster SrvId=0, Ck1=18, Ck2=1
Are these errors related to Server version, platform or to things like
bufpo
Or if there are a LOT of files, I believe you can do it by EXPORTING the
client, deleting it, then reimporting it. I THINK all the management class
rules have to get reapplied on an IMPORT.
Granted this is a big pain if the client has a huge amount of data, but it's
the only way I can think of..
Hi Matthias,
some APARs are opened for mount point pb in mixed libraries..
Please give us more details about you infrastructure (version, drives...)
!!!
Herve
Matthias Feyerabend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 12/13/2001
04:56:55 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[
Hi folks,
AIX server 4.1 (4.2 planned)
NetWare 6 client
Is any one backing up NetWare 6? Have any luck, our servers seem to be abend'ing on
the dsmc.nlm (so I'm told).
Miles
--
Miles Purdy
System Man
I can't rebind an inactive file that has no active version to another
management class. That is my problem.
"Seay, Paul" wrote:
> Have you tried rebinding everything to an intermediate management class to
> change all the inactive ones and then setting to the new management class?
>
> -Orig
What you can do , is restore the file to another directory and then backup the
file using the new management class.
Mark D Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 12/13/2001 10:53:13 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[
Client has TSM version 4.2.0.0 on Win2k.
Server is same version on NT.
The client PC keeps trying to launch VPN to get to the TSM server when the
laptop is undocked and being used stand alone.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [E
Have you checked to see that the registry key exists? It contains
information about your client, such as the password access generate key.
It should be located in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM
How do you execute dsmcutil install? If the nodename on the ba client is
not the same as the ser
Do you have any of these in the DSM.OPT file? on a 100MB line I get
around 10-15Megs/s transfer rate. Not sure if that is good, but ok for
me.
The resourceutilization 10 was a big help.
Joe Cascanette
The Cumis Group Limited
resourceutilization 10
Include.SystemObject ALL STANDARD
txnbytelimi
On 12 Dec 2001 at 13:37, Kliewer, Vern wrote, in part:
> Is there currently a way to back up these filesystems? If not, does
> anyone have any idea when they might be supported?
Yes, use the preferences statement "VirtualMountPoint" for each of your
ext3 file systems. cheers, wayne
Wayne T. Smi
Hi All,
I'm running TSM 4.2.1.7. And I'd like to a select statement for all volumes
in the library which are in a storage pool and are not mounted. I've got
most of the select statement figured out.
select volume_name from volumes where stgpool_name = 'RMANDEV' and
volume_name in ( select volu
Yes, I am aware of everything you are saying. I was refering to "backups". I
will try to make myself a little more clear. If the file no longer exists on
the client then it won't allow you to bind it to a new management class. The
file has to exist on the client to rebind it to another managem
Hello,
we are trying to use Storagetek library L700 with two DLT and two LTO drives.
All drives are online. Checkin of DLT volumes was ok, but we are not able to
checkin some LTO volumes. We were trying checkin libvol with parameter
devtype=LTOCLASS1, nevertheless we get message:
ANR8373I 001: F
Hi all,
I have a a question concerning performance on a W2K-Client.
On our W2K-fileserver (2 processors, 80 files, w2k-compression on) we
get a very poor performance with our backup (Vers. 4.2.0.0). With the
performance monitor there seems not to be an problem with memory or CPU
The bad time
And a Hi to you too Daniel. Yes I did read your previous mail, in fact
that's what I was responding too with my answers to your questions. Did you
read your previous mail?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Sparrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:17
Pl look at attachment.
-Original Message-
From: Paul A Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AiX4.3.3 IOT Abort Trap/Core Dump
When I run the dsm & command on AiX 4.3.3 (this brings up the
backup/restore/archive GUI),
> Del, I read the readme (that sounds strange!) and it says that for
> incremental's tdp always uses unique file names so the parameter that
> governs how many copies to keep is the retonly variable. Does this mean
that
> full backups use the same name every time and the parameter to use is the
>
When I run the dsm & command on AiX 4.3.3 (this brings up the
backup/restore/archive GUI), on searching through the backup file sets,
when it finds the required file the GUI disappears.
The server core dumps and the message IOT Abort Trap appears. This happens
on only one of our servers. I suspect
Ruud -
Make sure you've updated the off-site volumes to access=readonly or
readwrite (I prefer readonly). I don't run DRM, but I thought the scripts
generated would include this step. We just do "upd vol * acce=reado
whereacce=of"
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
> -Original Message-
> From: Van
Hallo everyone!
We installed TSM V4.2.1 on an WinNT Client V4.0 and got
svcerror.log:
12/11 17:10:12 dscsvc.c(1164):GetRegistryEntries(): Unable to open registry
entry for node'SAPHRI'
can anyone help us? Is this error severe?
Also we get an error when we call our TSM GUI:
Error initializing th
Hi,
I have been looking at the documentation for scripting through TSM and
it isnt that helpful. Does anyone know where I can get some
more info on this subject. I have also looked at the sample scripts. One
of the questions in my mind is can I do a `sleep` before continuing
with a loop.
Hi Niklas!
There are 4 APARS (PQ54549, IC32139, IC32138 and IC32137) with all about
the same text. I however cannot find any indication for a fix.
Anyway, here is the APAR text:
APAR= PQ54549 SER=IN INCORROUT
ANS1357S WHEN CONNECTING WITH NON-UNICODE CLIENT
Status:
Hi
I have restored our TSM 4.1 S/390 server at our DR site.
I have followed the instructions according DR Plan File.
Server is running fine.
But during a Client restore I got the following:
ANR0406I Session 7 started for node RYSAP435 (AIX) (BPX-Tcp/Ip
10.254.200.7(--22565)).
ANR1424W Read acce
My info is that these messages are network performance related..
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Coolen, IG (Ilja) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: donderdag 13 december 2001 11:43
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: ADSM Client V3.1.07 on NT4-sp6 SESSION LOST.
Hi there.
On a particul
Hi Didn't you look at my previous mail? We are talking about how many db backups that is necessary to keep in the library. This is because Miles doesn't have any slots available, and he's having problems because he now needs to put in another ½TB of data in the library.Therefore, he was wondering h
Hi there.
On a particular NT Server connected via WAN (2 M/b) we are experiencing
session lost errors since a couple of days. I cannot determine the cause of
this problem. The network shows no unregularities and the NT-box has no load
of any kind. The ADSM (v3.2.1.90) server shows no entries in t
Hi,
we want to move from our OS/390 TSM server to a Solaris TSM server. What's
the best practical way to get our "old" data to the new server?
mfg / regards
andreas rensch
When all else fails, read the instructions.
Hi Benja!
It will probably work, but it's not supported. Check
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/compatibility.html for the
supported combinations.
My advice is to upgrade your server first.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Benja Sa
Title: Message
Hello
We're using TSM
server 4.2.0 on MVS
Client levels from
3.1.5 to 4.2.1.15
Yesterday I noticed
that our large NT-fileserver couldn't connect to the server,
ANR0428W Session
3937 for node SPNT190 (WinNT) refused client is down-level with this server
version.
It turne
Hello,
this is an known problem. There is an APAR open.
Unfortunately I can not find the APAR in the Tivoli Database (no time to search)...
There is a way to reset this. If you contact Tivoli Support they could probably help
you.
Bye
Rainer Tammer
--Original Message Text---
From: Niklas Lund
Can't speak to the fiber part but we are running NT4 and Win2k file servers
with nothing but "ESS Drives". TSM works just fine. At this point we are all
SCSI attached.
Curt Magura
Lockheed Martin EIS
Gaithersburg, Md.
301-240-6305
-Original Message-
From: Ofer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I had a lot of trouble using windowssize 2048
Normal backup went ok, since receive window from NT is never
used with many data.
Restore to this NT-box(GB Ethernet) was sometimes not stable (internal
system error)
Restore over this box to a networkshare (all GB Ethernet) was impossible -
d
59 matches
Mail list logo
