Re: [Ace] [lamps] CMPv2/LightWeiight-CMP profile over CoAP transport

Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:01 AM Mohit Sahni wrote: > Hi Jim, > Thanks for the feedback. I will go over the EST document and update > sections around DTLS and proxying and address your other comments. Once > ready, I will post the draft in ACE WG. > > Regards, > Mohit > > &g

Re: [Ace] IETF 108 tentative agenda and presentations (Daniel Migault)

Hi Daniel, I had requested, in an earlier email, some time to discuss what changes are required in the ACE WG charter to adopt my draft for "CMPv2/Lightweight CMP profile over CoAP transport" ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-00). Would it be possible for you to ad

Re: [Ace] IETF 108 tentative agenda and presentations (Daniel Migault)

s not enough, please let us > know. > > Yours, > Daniel > > [1] https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-108-ace > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 3:58 PM Mohit Sahni wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> I had requested, in an earlier email, some time to discuss what changes >&

[Ace] Call for adoption draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01

ted by ACE WG. Link to the draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport/ Regards, Mohit Sahni ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Re: [Ace] Call for adoption draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01

Hi Michael, Thanks for going through the draft. Your feedback is very helpful. I just want to reiterate that the scope of this draft is only how to use CoAP as a transport protocol for CMP. The work on defining how CMP protocol itself should work on constrained devices is being done in the "Light W

Re: [Ace] Call for adoption draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01

Resending it with correct formatting: === Hi Michael, Thanks for going through the draft. Your feedback is very helpful. I just want to reiterate that the scope of this draft is only how to use CoAP as a transport protocol for CMP. The work on

Re: [Ace] Call for adoption draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport

erent protocols with different >abilities chosen in different verticals. Michael Richardson: > I have no fundamental objection to this work, and I think that it should be > adopted. >But, I think that it is worth doing more than just s/http/coap/. Plus some suggestions on the draft.

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-00.txt - do not mention V" of CMP in the document

Hi Hendrik Thanks for the update, I will make changes to remove the CMP version references from the document. I think we can exclude CMPv1 from the scope as it will obsolete soon. Thanks Mohit On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 9:36 AM Brockhaus, Hendrik wrote: > > Mohit > > > > We introduced V3 of CMP in d

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-00.txt - do not mention V" of CMP in the document

rom the EE's can terminate inside the trusted network and >will not require the server to listen on a UDP port making it safe >from UDP based address spoofing, Denial of Service, and amplification >attacks due to the characteristics of UDP. > > makes sense becau

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01.txt

over DTLS - Updated the CoAP-to-HTTP proxy section with more clarifications. - Updated the security considerations section based on David and Hendrik's comments. - Few other minor changes. I believe I have taken care of all the comments that I got. Thanks, Mohit Sahni On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01.txt

x27;V2' in the document tittle, heading line, and > file name with the next update as well. > > Many Thanks, > Hendrik > > > Von: Ace Im Auftrag von Mohit Sahni > > Gesendet: Freitag, 23. April 2021 07:54 > > > > Hello Ace WG, > > I have updated thi

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01.txt

Hi David Many thanks for the comments, please see my response inline, I will wait for couple of more days for any new comments and will publish a new version of draft with the name change (cmpv2 -> cmp) and changes based on your feedback. Regards, -Mohit On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 6:34 AM David von

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-02.txt

Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for > Constrained Environments WG of the IETF. > > Title : CoAP Transport for Certificate Management Protocol > Authors : Mohit Sahni >

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-02.txt

quot; is described in > 7252 section 12.3 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7252#section-12.3 > And it seems to me the IANA section needs to provide additional information > to select the appropriate number. > > > The registration of the 'cmp' needs to foll

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-02.txt

DTLS should be updated with > draft-ietf-tls-dtls13. > > mglt 9 > > """ > IANA section > """ > The registration of the content type "application/pkixcmp" is described in > 7252 section 12.3 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-02.txt

t publishes instead the URI suffix - of course we will have to > coordinate with the cmp-update co-authors. The real situation we want to > avoid is that we describe something that is not registered. > > > > Yours, > Daniel > > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 9:52

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-03.txt

trained Environments WG of the IETF. > > Title : CoAP Transfer for the Certificate Management > Protocol > Authors : Mohit Sahni > Saurabh Tripathi > Filename: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-03.txt >

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-03.txt

Hi Daniel, Please find answers to your questions: A) Currently there is an open source implementation to support CMP over CoAP maintained by @David von Oheimb . I believe these do not follow the draft exactly but are based on this draft. Here are github links: - https://github.com/siemens/Ligh

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-03.txt

siemens.com> wrote: > > > > > > *Von:* Daniel Migault > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2021 02:22 > > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 5:18 PM Mohit Sahni wrote: > > > > > > D) I will add a note for IANA mentioning this. Can you please review if

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-03.txt

anks Mohit On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 7:59 AM Daniel Migault wrote: > looks good to me. > Yours, > Daniel > -- > *From:* Ace on behalf of Mohit Sahni < > mohit06...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 26, 2021 10:57 AM > *To:* Brockhaus,

Re: [Ace] [Curdle] Fwd: NomCom 2021-2022 Call for Community Feedback

Hi Denis Thanks for sharing your concerns/feedback, Just wondering if we are from the same universe or you jumped into my dimension for a parallel universe [1]. Cheers! Mohit [1] https://www.dummies.com/education/science/physics/the-theory-of-parallel-universes/ On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 2:44 PM

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04.txt

t is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for > Constrained Environments WG of the IETF. > > Title : CoAP Transfer for the Certificate Management > Protocol > Authors : Mohit Sahni > Saurabh Tripathi >

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04

Hi Ben, Many thanks for your comments. I will review them and make the changes accordingly. Regards, Mohit On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:24 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi all, > > Jumping right in... > > > I guess this is probably more of a comment on draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates, > but since we ar

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04

t; What is the status and the current timeline of the document in ACE? > > Hendrik > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Brockhaus, Hendrik (T CST SEA-DE) > Gesendet: Freitag, 15. April 2022 17:07 > An: Mohit Sahni > Cc: ace@ietf.org;; Benjamin Kaduk ; > stripa...@paloa

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04

Hi Ben and Hello Paul, I have published a new version for the draft that incorporates Ben's Comments, I am sorry for the long delay that happened due to some personal reasons. I want to thank Hendrik for his help and support in resolving these comments. In summary, I have accepted all the comments

Re: [Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-05

Thanks Valery, for your comments. Please allow me some time to revert back to you. Regards Mohit On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 4:54 AM Valery Smyslov via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Valery Smyslov > Review result: Has Nits > > I have reviewed this document as part of the securit

Re: [Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-05

Hi Valery Here is my response to your comments, please let me know if this resolves the comments. > 1. I believe that the security considerations from RFC 6712 should be either > echoed in this document (where applicable), or at least be referenced. The HTTP a

Re: [Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-05

Hi Valery Apologies for not getting back on time, and a Happy New Year. Please see my response to your responses: > This text is insufficient, in my opinion. It is only concerned with > CoAP-to-HTTP proxy, while the resource exhausting attack can be mounted > against the CoAP server itself (in se

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-06.txt

n for > Constrained Environments WG of the IETF. > > Title : CoAP Transfer for the Certificate Management > Protocol > Authors : Mohit Sahni > Saurabh Tripathi > Filename: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-06.txt

CoAP over DTLS MAY be used providing a hop-by-hop security. == I will update the draft with resolution of 3). Thanks Mohit On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 6:02 AM Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:37 AM Mohit Sahni wrote:

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-07.txt

> > Title : CoAP Transfer for the Certificate Management > Protocol > Authors : Mohit Sahni > Saurabh Tripathi > Filename: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-07.txt > Pages : 11 > Date

Re: [Ace] Status of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport

Hi Hendrik I am working on resolving Paul's comments. Hopefully I will resolve and publish the next version by Monday March 6th. -Mohit On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:31 PM Brockhaus, Hendrik < hendrik.brockh...@siemens.com> wrote: > Dear Mohit > > Dear Saurabh > > > > Thanks’ a lot, for writing the

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-07

Hi Paul, Many thanks for the review comments. Please see my response below: >A CMP client SHOULD send each CoAP requests marked as a Confirmable message Section 2.1 of [RFC7252]. > >When would one not use a Confirmable message ? eg why is this a SHOULD and not a MUST ? > >(also, the senten

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-07

Hi Paul I am willing to be listed as author for this draft and I don't have any IPR knowledge related to this draft that I need to disclose. Thanks On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 5:51 PM Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:49 PM Paul Wouters > wrote: > >> AD review: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-07

ill consume resources on the server. With clients instructed to send CMP messages in as few packets as possible, servers can choose to ignore fragmented CMP messages to mitigate such DOS attacks. -Mohit On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 1:36 PM Mohit Sahni wrote: > Hi Paul, > Many thanks for the rev

Re: [Ace] Status of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport

, > Daniel > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:12 PM Mohit Sahni > wrote: > >> Hi Hendrik >> I am working on resolving Paul's comments. Hopefully I will resolve and >> publish the next version by Monday March 6th. >> >> -Mohit >> >> On T

Re: [Ace] Status of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport

Sure. On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:07 PM Daniel Migault wrote: > Please send the version by email and let Paul confirm it addresses its > concerns so we can have the draft being sent to the IESG before this IETF. > Yours, > Daniel > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 3:00 PM Mo

Re: [Ace] Status of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport

will >>>> be able to publish it the monday the IETF starts - whichever Paul thinks >>>> is easier. >>> >>> >>> We don't have to wait for the Monday, as the changes aren't changing core >>> aspects of the document and I don

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-07

Thanks Paul, I will upload a new version today. On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 9:33 PM Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 4:12 AM Mohit Sahni > wrote: > > [ proposed changes / confirmations in the xml file ] > > I have read the xml diff and I

Re: [Ace] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09.txt

Minor changes based on Paul's comments on the IANA section. On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 12:31 PM wrote: > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09.txt > has been successfully submitted by Mohit Sahni and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name:

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09.txt

Authentication and > > Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) WG of the IETF. > > > >Title : CoAP Transfer for the Certificate Management Protocol > >Authors : Mohit Sahni > > Saurabh Tripathi > >Filenam

Re: [Ace] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi John, Many thanks for your review and comments. Please see my response for your comments: >Or at a minimum, just eliminate the paragraph break between the two paragraphs (i.e., merge them into one, even if no other rewrite). > >I also wonder why the first alternative is given as a MAY but the s

Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-05

Hi Lars and Miral, Thanks for your review and comments, Please see my response for your comments: >## Comments > >### Boilerplate > >This document uses the RFC2119 keywords "SHOULD", "NOT RECOMMENDED", >"OPTIONAL", "SHOULD NOT", "SHALL", "MAY", "RECOMMENDED", "SHALL NOT", "MUST >NOT", "MUST", and

Re: [Ace] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Robert, Many thanks for your review and comments. Please see my response below: > (1) p 2, sec 2.1. CoAP URI Format >Presumably the goal here is to keep the URLs reasonable short, is that worth stating at all? I left that out as it's implicit when using CoAP protocol. > (2) p 3, sec 2.3. CoAP

Re: [Ace] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see my response to your comments below: >## idnits issues > >https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap->transport-09.txt > >

Re: [Ace] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Roman, Thanks for your review and comments. Please find my response below: >** RFC6712 chose to formally “update” RFC4210. Would such symmetry be appropriate in this document for RFC4210 and [I-D.ietf-lamps-cmp-updates]? I will change the draft to update the RFC4210. > == The document seems

Re: [Ace] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Zaheduzzaman, Thanks for your review and comments. The term server is used interchangeably for a CMP server. Since the document is in the context of CMP protocol, it's implied that the server is a CMP server. Let me review all the occurrences of "server" and see if it's required. Thanks Mohit

Re: [Ace] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-10.txt

Updated draft with the comments received in the Ballot. -Mohit On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:44 PM wrote: > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-10.txt > has been successfully submitted by Mohit Sahni and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name:

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-10.txt

PM >>> > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org >>> > Cc: ace@ietf.org >>> > Subject: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-10.txt >>> > >>> > >>> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>