How about disk storage ... HS21 have internal SAS controller that is
unsopported by Plan9.
>
> I'll just have to get my hands on one of those floppy disks i keep hearing
> so much about from my grandfather. ;)
>
>
>
>
--
С наилучшими пожеланиями
Жилкин Сергей
With best regards
Zhilkin Sergey
> Ok so i'm hearing a lot of "unsupported" here.
> I just wanted to mention that when it boots up from the CD it shows boot
> devices: fd0 so it seems like only floppy is recognized.
>
> This could be because this DVD-drive is kinda glitchy, FreeBSD had issues
> with it too when i installed it but
2009/5/20 erik quanstrom
> > Hi !
> >
> > It seems that Plan9 boot loader doesn't support modern hardware from IBM
> :(
> >
> > May be someone from IBM can help :)
> >
> > P.S.: I have some IBM HS21 servers and I wish to use Plan9 on them.
> >
> > 2009/5/19 nocturnal
>
> pci (or linux lspci -n)
> > pci (or linux lspci -n) output would be helpful.
> >
> > - erik
> >
> > lspci -n from IBM HS21
[...]
> 00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2680 (rev 09)
i have a couple of cpu servers that use similar hardware.
(at least the 63xxesb southbridge).
the ide driver works with ide drives and the ahci driver
works
HS21 does't have IDE pinouts and drives. Only QLogic SAS controller and two
SFF SAS Drives
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_BladeCenter#HS21
2009/5/22 erik quanstrom
> > > pci (or linux lspci -n) output would be helpful.
> > >
> > > - erik
> > >
> > > lspci -n from IBM HS21
> [...]
>
> > 00:1f.2
> lspci -n from IBM HS21
00:00.0 0600: 8086:25d8 (rev b1)
Intel Corporation
00:02.0 0604: 8086:25f7 (rev b1)
Intel Corporation
00:03.0 0604: 8086:25e3 (rev b1)
Intel Corporation
00:04.0 0604: 8086:25e4 (rev b1)
Intel Corporation
00:05.0 0604: 8086:25e5 (rev b1)
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Juan M. Mendez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if current npfs or spfs supports exporting different
> directories, each one with different permissions (protected by
> uid/pass). Is it possible?
>
> My aim is to give users different views of the filesystem of an
Is it unreasonable for me to rejoice that P9P compiles without (much)
trouble on the Yeeloong (Orchid) Notebook from Lemote? I started acme
and superficial use suggests that it will work on this particular MIPS
architecture without any hitch. I must concede that it is a point in
favour of GCC.
R
On Fri May 22 10:29:54 EDT 2009, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> Is it unreasonable for me to rejoice that P9P compiles without (much)
> trouble on the Yeeloong (Orchid) Notebook from Lemote? I started acme
> and superficial use suggests that it will work on this particular MIPS
> architecture witho
> Broadcom / ServerWorks BCM5715 Broadcom dual gigabit, pci bridge
> 04:00.0 0200: 14e4:16ac (rev 12)
> Broadcom Corporation
> 05:00.0 0604: 1166:0103 (rev c3)
> Broadcom / ServerWorks BCM5715 Broadcom dual gigabit, pci bridge
>
> Broadcom GigE - these are a problem, as I underst
> in favor of gcc over against what? p9p always uses gcc.
In favour of GCC. It promises portability and in this case, at least,
it delivers. This is mips-l, but I note that it is not the 64-bit
model ;-( I must look into that.
++L
If you don't use the Spfile/Npfile interfaces, you can easily do it.
Spfile/Npfile support a single root directory, so you'll need to do
some tricks to implement what you need. I think that your own
npfile_attach/spfile_attach implementation would be sufficient. There
are some static functions in f
> and as these are blades you have no chance to plug in a
> supported PCI NIC.
Hello,
I don't know if that's relevant but I had no problem pluging in a
supported PCI NIC card in my IBM eserver 325, after I found out the
default (broadcom too I think) one was not supported.
3.4.0: net 02.00.0
Hello
when I try '9fs sources' I get a timeout establishing connection...
(all day today)
I guess it's not my problem, or is it?
Thanks
Ruda
(why does this happen SO OFTEN?)
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> (why does this happen SO OFTEN?)
warning: complaining about something you get for free is
counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help
in some way.
ron
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:13 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> unfortunately, i think this will just encourage users to
> aim for 10 messages in their inbox.
Have you ever pointed an IMAP client at “[Gmail]/All Mail” and asked
it to download all headers?
—Joel
On Fri May 22 12:54:27 EDT 2009, joelcsalo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:13 PM, erik quanstrom
> wrote:
> > unfortunately, i think this will just encourage users to
> > aim for 10 messages in their inbox.
>
> Have you ever pointed an IMAP client at “[Gmail]/All Mail” and a
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Rudolf Sykora
> wrote:
>
> > (why does this happen SO OFTEN?)
>
> warning: complaining about something you get for free is
> counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help
> in some way.
>
> ron
there's web-only access at http://sources
>> (why does this happen SO OFTEN?)
>
> warning: complaining about something you get for free is
> counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help
> in some way.
>
> ron
well, maybe. Maybe not.
In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens,
first. I know
You may think it's a question of money (you mentioned it is for free).
It's not. There are many projects out, totally for free, but reliable.
When I do something it must be reliable, or it's worth criticizing.
Firstly if sources goes down, no-one dies so it's not a big deal.
Secondly, given the
2009/5/22 Latchesar Ionkov :
> If you don't use the Spfile/Npfile interfaces, you can easily do it.
> Spfile/Npfile support a single root directory, so you'll need to do
> some tricks to implement what you need. I think that your own
> npfile_attach/spfile_attach implementation would be sufficient.
Warning, posting gratuitous obnoxious condescending comments is
counter-productive.
Complaining about things on the other hand, it is helpful, specially
when certain people insist in being in denial of certain problems.
Also note that many people have offered to help, and help is clearly
not welc
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
>>> (why does this happen SO OFTEN?)
>>
>> warning: complaining about something you get for free is
>> counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help
>> in some way.
>>
>> ron
>
> well, maybe. Maybe not.
>
> In order I be
Something that is totally unreliable, no matter how cool, is not very useful.
And I think anyone that has limited time, and who wants to get
something done, will pick "very reliable but totally shit" over "very
unreliable but very cool" every single time.
Also there is little reason for Plan 9 se
Okay Noah, you've been tee'd up.
See how easy that was?
-Eric
Sent from my iPhone
On May 22, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Uriel wrote:
Warning, posting gratuitous obnoxious condescending comments is
counter-productive.
Complaining about things on the other hand, it is helpful, specially
when certa
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens,
> first. I know next to nothing about how the whole system of sources
> works, still I can help if I know how. But I do not remember anybody
> saying: 'hey guys, we have th
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:31 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Rudolf Sykora
> wrote:
>
>> In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens,
>> first. I know next to nothing about how the whole system of sources
>> works, still I can help if I know how
Uriel here's an honest question, would you stop complaining if you had
your own account on the murray hill version of plan9 will full access
to the venti? You'd also have the freedom to do whatever you want with
it.
Yes or no.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Uriel wrote:
> Something that is to
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Uriel wrote:
> Something that is totally unreliable, no matter how cool, is not very useful.
>
> And I think anyone that has limited time, and who wants to get
> something done, will pick "very reliable but totally shit" over "very
> unreliable but very cool" every
The reality is that the sources outages rarely cause any _real_
problems. I wasn't able to access it few days ago, and instead of
bothering geoff or jim, I just waited few hours. The server came up
and I got what I needed.
Lucho
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Uriel wrote:
> On Fri, May 22,
> While not having direct knowledge of what caused the current outage, I
> can say that such outages are rarely caused by Plan 9 or the hardware
> on which its running.
Ok. So what caused the other outrages in the recent past?
(I may give at least one other date, on which I even asked the same
que
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
>> While not having direct knowledge of what caused the current outage, I
>> can say that such outages are rarely caused by Plan 9 or the hardware
>> on which its running.
>
> Ok. So what caused the other outrages in the recent past?
> (I may g
sources.lsub.org is avaiable just by using 9fs.
But it's probably better to wait for the real thing.
There are also several other mirrors IIRC that have been posted to this list.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Rudolf Sykora
> wro
cdfs(4) contains a paragraph in BUGS that reads:
Closing a just-written DVD-R track can take minutes while
the drive burns the unused part of the track reservation
(for the whole disc). Thus only a single DVD-R track can be
written on a DVD-R disc; use other
On 23-May-09, at 1:54 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
sources.lsub.org is avaiable just by using 9fs.
But it's probably better to wait for the real thing.
There are also several other mirrors IIRC that have been posted to
this list.
% 9fs kix.in /n/sources
--
Anant
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.plan9/browse_thread/thread/7cda8e292be895a5/ec8ea0a9abbc8a69?lnk=gst&q=rob+pike+weekend#ec8ea0a9abbc8a69
well, maybe not so quiet.
I have an PCI expansion unit. Adaptec Inc ASC-29320ALP Ultra320 SCSI
Controller is lpuggit in it, and second port is free :) It's not a
problem... Problem is with LSI Logic LSISAS1064ET PCI-Express Fusion-MPT
SAS :)
2009/5/22 Steve Simon
> > lspci -n from IBM HS21
>
> 00:00.0 0600: 8086:25d8 (
37 matches
Mail list logo
