Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-11-16 Thread David du Colombier
> ;$PLAN9/bin/upas/smtp -ai 'tcp!128.141.146.215!12345' > rudolf.syk...@gmail.com rudolf.syk...@cern.ch Segmentation fault Yesterday, I found time to fix this problem. It happens when gethostbyname fail to resolve your hostname. You can apply this patch: http://codereview.appspot.com/download/i

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-09-21 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello, > I obtained the same behavior on Fedora 15. It doesn't happen > on earlier releases of Fedora, even when using the same > dynamically linked smtp binary. > > Probably you updated something like glibc before rebuilding. > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x0035db

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-09-20 Thread David du Colombier
> Ok. I wonder how I could forget to rebuilt then, but I did. > Anyway, after rebuilding I get: > > ;$PLAN9/bin/upas/smtp -ai 'tcp!128.141.146.215!12345' > rudolf.syk...@gmail.com rudolf.syk...@cern.ch Segmentation fault > ; I obtained the same behavior on Fedora 15. It doesn't happen on earlier

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-09-19 Thread Rudolf Sykora
On 14 September 2011 14:39, Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote: >> smtp: bad network /net/tcp!bluestar!12345 (tcp!bluestar!12345) > > This should have been corrected by the hg update.  But update only > changes the source code - you still have to rebuild the command with >  cd $PLAN9/src/cmd

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-09-14 Thread Richard Miller
> smtp: bad network /net/tcp!bluestar!12345 (tcp!bluestar!12345) This should have been corrected by the hg update. But update only changes the source code - you still have to rebuild the command with cd $PLAN9/src/cmd/upas/smtp mk smtp.install > so I tried > $PLAN9/bin/upas/smtp -ai 'tcp!128

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-09-10 Thread erik quanstrom
> but it does not seem like any email has been sent anywhere... > > Btw. I don't quite understand what '9f...@---.com' really stands > for. Plan9 man page says it should perhaps be a sender, but then, I > want to send as if from my gmail account; and more, even from gmail when the man page refers

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-09-09 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello, On 31 August 2011 16:22, Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote: > To use the plan9port version of upas/smtp with authenticated connections, > you need a couple of fixes which I've just submitted. 'hg pull -u' will > get them. > > The plan9port upas/smtp also does not support tls, which

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-31 Thread Richard Miller
To use the plan9port version of upas/smtp with authenticated connections, you need a couple of fixes which I've just submitted. 'hg pull -u' will get them. The plan9port upas/smtp also does not support tls, which is required by gmail. The workaround is to run smtp inside a tls tunnel, as shown bel

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-28 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello, On 28 August 2011 17:15, erik quanstrom wrote: >> now when I try (74.125.39.108 should be smtp.gmail.com): >> cat q | upas/smtp -a -d -h a.com 74.125.39.108 rudolf.syk...@gmail.com >> rsyk...@cern.ch > > i'm confused.  are you using plan 9 or p9p? p9p now > i would think that a.com is wr

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-28 Thread erik quanstrom
> now when I try (74.125.39.108 should be smtp.gmail.com): > cat q | upas/smtp -a -d -h a.com 74.125.39.108 rudolf.syk...@gmail.com > rsyk...@cern.ch i'm confused. are you using plan 9 or p9p? i would think that a.com is wrong. you need to use your real domain. also i think you want the real ta

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-28 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello, On 11 August 2011 19:55, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: >> But what about sending mail? I've only ever configured Plan 9 to act >> as its own smtp server, have never done anything with p9p or a remove >> server. > > It's pretty much the same as on Plan 9. > > See $PLAN9/mail/l

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-27 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello, On 11 August 2011 12:54, Mathieu Lonjaret > in acme, button-2 exec on Mail -s When I try to have several inboxes (?; what gmail calls labels), i.e. I run 9 Mail 9 Mail plan9 9 Mail CERN for some reason it seems that only my INBOX (i.e. the acme window related to the 1st line) is being upda

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-27 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello all! On 4 August 2011 17:49, Mathieu Lonjaret wrote: > Btw, for those who don't know yet, I have a version here with > threading for p9p acme Mail: I tried it now, using my gmail account and imap access. At first the threading seemed to work. However, when I sent a new mail to myself from

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-14 Thread Rudolf Sykora
On 14 August 2011 01:26, Fazlul Shahriar wrote: >> % mailfs -t imap.gmail.com >> /sbin/stunnel exec failed at /usr/sbin/stunnel3 line 39. >> mailfs: imapconnect: no greeting > > I think your stunnel3 is broken. stunnel3 is actually a perl script > that runs stunnel 4. In your case, it thinks stunn

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-13 Thread Mathieu Lonjaret
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Rudolf Sykora wrote: >> cd src/cmd/upas/nfs >> mk install >> factotum >> factotum -g 'key=somekey proto=pass service=imap >> server=some.imap.server.com user=your_username !password?' >> (it will ask for the pass you want to store for that key) >> mailfs -t some.im

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-13 Thread Fazlul Shahriar
> % mailfs -t imap.gmail.com > /sbin/stunnel exec failed at /usr/sbin/stunnel3 line 39. > mailfs: imapconnect: no greeting I think your stunnel3 is broken. stunnel3 is actually a perl script that runs stunnel 4. In your case, it thinks stunnel 4 is at /sbin/stunnel, but it's not. fhs

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-13 Thread Rudolf Sykora
> cd src/cmd/upas/nfs > mk install > factotum > factotum -g 'key=somekey proto=pass service=imap > server=some.imap.server.com user=your_username !password?' > (it will ask for the pass you want to store for that key) > mailfs -t some.imap.server.com > in acme, button-2 exec on Mail -s > > Cheers,

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-11 Thread David du Colombier
> But what about sending mail? I've only ever configured Plan 9 to act > as its own smtp server, have never done anything with p9p or a remove > server. It's pretty much the same as on Plan 9. See $PLAN9/mail/lib/rewrite. -- David du Colombier

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-11 Thread John Floren
Nice! Works for me too... But what about sending mail? I've only ever configured Plan 9 to act as its own smtp server, have never done anything with p9p or a remove server. John On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Fazlul Shahriar wrote: > I just tried -- it works fine with gmail. > > mailfs -t im

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-11 Thread Fazlul Shahriar
I just tried -- it works fine with gmail. mailfs -t imap.gmail.com# -t enable TLS It'll ask your for your username/password. Then start Mail in acme. mailfs will look for stunnel in your system. In my system, it found stunnel 4, which it doesn't know how to use. So, I had to point it to stunn

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-11 Thread Mathieu Lonjaret
gmail wrapped the line; there shouldn't be a break between the service and the server. On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Mathieu Lonjaret wrote: > I'm not sure I've tried with gmail, I think I did, but a long time ago. > Otherwise it's pretty simple: > > cd src/cmd/upas/nfs > mk install > factotu

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-11 Thread Mathieu Lonjaret
I'm not sure I've tried with gmail, I think I did, but a long time ago. Otherwise it's pretty simple: cd src/cmd/upas/nfs mk install factotum factotum -g 'key=somekey proto=pass service=imap server=some.imap.server.com user=your_username !password?' (it will ask for the pass you want to store for

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-11 Thread Rudolf Sykora
> Can anybody point me to some recipe which would get me from a point > when I have p9p installed to a point when I can read mail from my > gmail account via imap(s) in p9p acme? Well, that's a pity nobody can help :( Is there any reason for that man pages of p9p http://swtch.com/plan9port/ma

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-06 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello, On 4 August 2011 17:49, Mathieu Lonjaret wrote: > Btw, for those who don't know yet, I have a version here with > threading for p9p acme Mail: > https://bitbucket.org/mpl/acmemail-with-sort-by-thread/overview > nothing fancy but it suits my needs well enough. > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-04 Thread Mathieu Lonjaret
Btw, for those who don't know yet, I have a version here with threading for p9p acme Mail: https://bitbucket.org/mpl/acmemail-with-sort-by-thread/overview nothing fancy but it suits my needs well enough. On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Jacob Todd wrote: > Acme has Mail. It doesn't do threading

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-03 Thread Akshat Kumar
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Russ Cox wrote: >>> If anyone does this, I also suggest using Russ' rc version >>> (ported to Plan 9) of Acme Mail, instead of adapting the C >>> code. > > russ has an rc version of acme mail? > > russ Take the hint, Russ!

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-02 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
> I've been using a gmail account with the usual access via a web > browser for quite a while. > Sometimes I get little angry when using it, for various reasons, often > due to the firefox's slowness to render the page (scrolling a longer > thread is often pain for me). > I'd like to ask you. Do yo

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-02 Thread David Leimbach
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote: > >russ has an rc version of acme mail? > > > >russ > > you need to keep up! > > Sorry, you weren't' meant to read that. That email was from the future. My bad... let me just plug this time stability thingy back into this food processor look

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-02 Thread Charles Forsyth
>russ has an rc version of acme mail? > >russ you need to keep up!

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-02 Thread Russ Cox
>> If anyone does this, I also suggest using Russ' rc version >> (ported to Plan 9) of Acme Mail, instead of adapting the C >> code. russ has an rc version of acme mail? russ

[9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-02 Thread erik quanstrom
> Robert Raschke coded a threaded version of Acme's News. > But that depends on the filesystem hierarchy of messages > in nntpfs. (n)upasfs does not thread messages at the level > of the fs. Indeed, it would be a better approach to thread at > the interface level, which should be possible all the s

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-01 Thread Akshat Kumar
On 7/31/11, Jacob Todd wrote: > Acme has Mail. It doesn't do threading like mutt or anything, but it works. Robert Raschke coded a threaded version of Acme's News. But that depends on the filesystem hierarchy of messages in nntpfs. (n)upasfs does not thread messages at the level of the fs. Indeed

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-08-01 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:00:57 +0200 Rudolf Sykora wrote: > (I at least want to e.g. know, that using a web-client, although it is > a pain, is probably the way to go, and that I should perhaps have a > look for a quicker / simpler browser...) > Indeed. I find Firefox seems to run javascript abou

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-07-31 Thread hiro
I prefer gmail's basic html view. It's working reliably, because it's not maintained any more: http://mail.google.com/mail/h/

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-07-31 Thread dexen deVries
On Sunday 31 July 2011 22:00:57 Rudolf Sykora wrote: > I've been using a gmail account with the usual access via a web > browser for quite a while. > Sometimes I get little angry when using it, for various reasons, often > due to the firefox's slowness to render the page (scrolling a longer > threa

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-07-31 Thread Jacob Todd
Acme has Mail. It doesn't do threading like mutt or anything, but it works.

[9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-07-31 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello everybody! I've been using a gmail account with the usual access via a web browser for quite a while. Sometimes I get little angry when using it, for various reasons, often due to the firefox's slowness to render the page (scrolling a longer thread is often pain for me). I'd like to ask you.