Hello
after some time I crossed this matter again...
/old/c/new/
doesn't scroll to the dot where the change happens in neither sam nor acme.
My feeling is that it should. (Should there be any reason for
different behaviour compared to the situation when the command is
split as /old/ followed by c
> The .+#0 is there because if you Undo one of the changes,
> the text that is selected right now will be "old". Starting
> the search at .+#0 skips over that occurrence to go to
> the next one.
> Russ
the text that is selected right now will be "old" ... that's true BUT
it doesn't matter. The se
>>Edit .+#0/old/c/new/
> The command really goes through occurences of 'old' and highlights
> them, but it doesn't scroll, so I can't see them... which is somewhat
> crucial for beeing able to confirm/reject the change.
> I also don't quite understand why that .+#0 is there...
The .+#0 is
> Well, since noone helped me I started to play with it to find at least
> some solution. I found that when I write
> /old/c/new/ [ENTER]
> .
> somewhere, highlight it (2 lines) and 2-1 click on Edit in the window
> with my file, then it works.
> Is there anything simpler?
> Ruda
>
>
You could als
2008/10/22 Rudolf Sykora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/8/19 Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> 06. Search and replace with confirmation at each item
>>
>> Put the cursor at the top of the file.
>> In the tag, type and select
>>
>>Edit .+#0/old/c/new/
>>
>> and middle click it. That will sea
2008/8/19 Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 06. Search and replace with confirmation at each item
>
> Put the cursor at the top of the file.
> In the tag, type and select
>
>Edit .+#0/old/c/new/
>
> and middle click it. That will search for old, replace it
> with new, and scroll the file t
Not here in Najd, Saudi Arabia, where I live and work, it isn't.
2008/8/24 Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One more bit on Arabic:
>
> In a predicative sentence the subject is necessarily "Marfu'" (= "مرفوع")
> which means it either has a "damma" (= "ضمه") or a "dammatan" (= "ضمهٌ") on
> the
I like to garden. Can we talk about flowers now in this thread? I am
particularly fond of orchids and lilies. I don't really know that much
about them but lilies are hearty in Northern Georgia and the orchids I
tend to salvage from the grocery store after they begin to look dead.
So the lilies need
One more bit on Arabic:
In a predicative sentence the subject is necessarily "Marfu'" (=
"مرفوع") which means it either has a "damma" (= "ضمه") or a
"dammatan" (= "ضمهٌ") on the ending letter. Whether the "damma" or the
"dammaton" is used depends on whether the subject is "Ma'rafa" (=
"معرفه"
this leads to the conclusion that google is different from knowledge.
No. It leads to a more meaningful conclusion. Namely, that a 9person will
not learn another language, Arabic in this case, even by living in another
country, in this case the KSA.
And that there are better sources for copy
Man, this mailing list seems to love my contaminative presence. If you
don't want me to post please don't challenge my previous postings.
Otherwise, I'll have to respond.
1. "As-Salam" is a noun, "Salam," with the definite article "Al." It means
"peace." It is also one of the many descriptive
> Small correction, it is actually " ال سلام " , or "As-Salaam" (the L
> in AL elides with "shams" letters). It would also be inappropriate for
> you to receive such a greeting, which is a du'a reserved for muslims
> only. Since you are using the name "Eris, is the name of a "deity", it
> is safe t
Small correction, it is actually " ال سلام " , or "As-Salaam" (the L
in AL elides with "shams" letters). It would also be inappropriate for
you to receive such a greeting, which is a du'a reserved for muslims
only. Since you are using the name "Eris, is the name of a "deity", it
is safe to assume y
Now if only we others would stop sending any more mails...
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Anyway, you won't get any more of this. End of transmission. ␄
>>
> Hurrah!
>
>Anyway, you won't get any more of this. End of transmission. ␄
>
Hurrah!
relax
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> goodness, it's not annoying. It's just a waste of breath, bandwidth,
>> and bytes. Why not go do some reading and stop wasting all three?
>
> Breath I should rather save. Bandwidth I pay for. Bytes I push down the
goodness, it's not annoying. It's just a waste of breath, bandwidth,
and bytes. Why not go do some reading and stop wasting all three?
Breath I should rather save. Bandwidth I pay for. Bytes I push down the
pipe. I admit it also costs 9fans.net a very very tiny amount. Anyway, you
won't get an
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it _that_ annoying to you? I could just keep silent if it is so, no
> "booting" required.
goodness, it's not annoying. It's just a waste of breath, bandwidth,
and bytes. Why not go do some reading and stop wasting a
> List manager: can we *please* just boot this guy until he comes back
> as a real person? It's getting old.
Why don't you just ignore eris or the whole thread? I don't get all the fuss.
Skipping general offenses...
List manager: can we *please* just boot this guy until he comes back
as a real person? It's getting old.
Is it _that_ annoying to you? I could just keep silent if it is so, no
"booting" required. Though I have to say I don't understand how a handful
of emails to
namespaces are not public in the sense that they are visible to all
processes.
I was trying to compare UNIX to Plan 9. Apparently, UNIX processes share a
single "public" namespace which therefore has to be protected by access
privileges.
since this started out as a discussion of terminals,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, a terminal should not hold _any_ information on its users. Where
> does the security of not keeping authentication information on a so-called
> terminal go when you _keep_ it on the "terminal?" But with multipl
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A correction:
>
> Mea culpa. UNIX systems apparently force processes to share a single network
> stack,
gee how about that? Isn't it nice to acquire knowledge and *then* post?
> but that can be changed:
>
> http://www.te
A correction:
Mea culpa. UNIX systems apparently force processes to share a single
network stack, but that can be changed:
http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/papers/zec-03.pdf
A paper on virtualizing network stacks in FreeBSD kernel, 2003 USENIX.
Virtualization and jailing are hacks to work around the inherent
Virtualization is much more than that. It has a future and the future's
here. It also has a rather glorious past in IBM VM/CMS.
restriction ('only root can become another user', hence su/sudo, only
root can open certain ports,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:58 AM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > A plan9 terminal can run programs, and can have a local storage file
> > system, with multiple users.
>
> i think this is misleading. while the fs running on the terminal can have
> multiple users, it is not true that y
>> A plan9 terminal can run programs, and can have a local storage file
>> system, with multiple users.
>
> i think this is misleading. while the fs running on the terminal can have
> multiple users, it is not true that you can have multiple users using
> the cpu resources of a terminal concurren
> A plan9 terminal can run programs, and can have a local storage file
> system, with multiple users.
i think this is misleading. while the fs running on the terminal can have
multiple users, it is not true that you can have multiple users using
the cpu resources of a terminal concurrently.
you
> So essentially there shouldn't be a problem with mounting on a single
> "public" namespace
namespaces are not public in the sense that they are visible to all
processes.
> as long as there is one user on the system.
since this started out as a discussion of terminals, i should point out
tha
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, sqweek. The second golden Golden Apple with καλλιστι on it is
> totally yours. The first one went to Russ Cox.
>
>> You don't care who mounts what where, because the rest of the system
>> doesn't notice the na
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> take it easy on the porn and get some real sex, eris. you're way too
>> angry.
>
> Sir, yessir! The Marines don't do Japanese, sir!
Clearly you've never been to Iwakuni.
I was going to give it a rest. Really. But I couldn't overcome my bad
habits. They outnumber me ten to one ;-)
You're right; it isn't. Is that good or bad? What about in an office
environment? Same answer there?
Plan 9's aptitude for becoming easily distributed--that is, becoming
decentraliz
Not (currently) a Plan 9 user, but I gotta chime in:
It seems the security ascribed to disposable machines comes from that "user
data" is stored on a different, presumably safer, machine in, for example,
some sort of data warehouse at a data center. This isn't a new
idea--actually, it's _very
I'm sorry, but this needs a comment.
On Aug 20, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Eris Discordia wrote:
As Pietro demonstrated, no interface configuration is necessary here.
Only because the concept is hidden in Plan 9, though I don't know
how. _Someone_ or _something_ has to decide whether to route your
Thank you, sqweek. The second golden Golden Apple with καλλιστι on
it is totally yours. The first one went to Russ Cox.
You don't care who mounts what where, because the rest of the system
doesn't notice the namespace change.
So essentially there shouldn't be a problem with mounting on a sin
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:58 AM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You only need a cpu
>> server if you want to let other machines run processes on your
>> machine. You only need an auth server if you want to serve resources
>> to a remote machine.
>
> i don't think this is accurate.
>
>
> You only need a cpu
> server if you want to let other machines run processes on your
> machine. You only need an auth server if you want to serve resources
> to a remote machine.
i don't think this is accurate.
You only need a cpu server if you want to let /multiple users/ run
processes on your
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No. Private namespaces.
>
> And how does that solve the problem of whom to trust with mounting?
You don't care who mounts what where, because the rest of the system
doesn't notice the namespace change. But it sounds li
On 8/20/08, Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ACLs were invented long ago.
yes, I like clean and simple solutions too.
iru
On 8/20/08, Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Code page 1252, ANSI Latin I. Presumably the one most widely used.
Thanks. It was intended as a rhetorical question though.
Gr. Sander.
> --On Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:44 AM +0200 Sander van Dijk
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 8/
Code page 1252, ANSI Latin I. Presumably the one most widely used.
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:44 AM +0200 Sander van Dijk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/20/08, Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] Figured it could as well be 8-bit ASCII.
Which one?
The ascii that is 8 bits is not the true ascii.
I answered that one.
No. Private namespaces.
And how does that solve the problem of whom to trust with mounting? Or with
configuring a network interface? If someone has access to, say, eth0 then
they have access to eth0. No amount of privat
Read the rest of the paragraph you're responding to. Or "stop feeding the
troll" as the big bosses advised you.
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:12 AM +0100 matt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the Plan 9 way of solving that? Trusting the user at the
terminal?
yes, no other things r
However, this is just wrong. NT was Unicode from the beginning, even
at the kernel level.
You're right. My fault. MSDN says NT was Unicode from the beginning.
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2008 7:56 AM -0400 Robert William Fuller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eris Discordia wrote:
MS-DOS never
twenty years ago i was asked by a journalist to similarly explain why
i was using UNIX.
i ended up saying "UNIX says screw you, i agree". it was one of the
few random comments he didn't print.
no 9fan needs to ask. they just get the job done because they know
that what they are doing is much more
Eris Discordia wrote:
MS-DOS never had Unicode support. Neither did any Windows version up to
3.1, NT 3.5, and 95. NT 4 introduced it into the Microsoft sphere in
1996. In 5-6 years--from 1996 to 2001--Windows surpassed Plan 9 in
Unicode handling, in all practical aspects.
I'm pretty far from
What's the Plan 9 way of solving that? Trusting the user at the terminal?
yes, no other things required, you fail (as per usual)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wow. Does memorising codepoints fall under your job description aswell?
>
> No. I looked it up in Microsoft Windows' Character Map. Saw it was below
> 255. Knew UTF-8 corresponds to ASCII in lower character codes (not su
If Mr. Edison thought a bit more, he wouldn't have to sweat so much.
But it was Tesla who died in poverty, I remember. And it's his spectre
that's attracting the "Tesla coil" conspiracy theories. Not to mention the
horrendous amount of baseless claims around his inventions and discoveries.
Ed
I don't get this, ™ is the unicode character 2122, not ASCII. I agree
it could be generated on a MS-DOS pretty much any byte sequence could
be, but I doubt even DOS 6.22 had unicode support, so you would have to
translate it to a code page reprisentation and load the correct fonts.
You're right
On 8/20/08, Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...] Figured it could as well be 8-bit ASCII.
Which one?
Wow. Does memorising codepoints fall under your job description aswell?
No. I looked it up in Microsoft Windows' Character Map. Saw it was below
255. Knew UTF-8 corresponds to ASCII in lower character codes (not sure
7-bit or 8-bit). Figured it could as well be 8-bit ASCII.
ifconfig: only
That stack has been implemented in vim. There're nearly 500 different
syntax matching and highlighting schemes for vim, and there's a simple
language for writing your own schemes. Why not use vi?
To paraphrase Tesla :
If Mr. Edison thought a bit more, he wouldn't have to sweat so much.
None of the above, I write embedded code, my employer has a clear enough
vision to allow me to use whatever OS I like, provided I get the job in
hand done, which I clearly do.
You have a _very_ flexible employer there.
I'am afraid I am not willing to discuss the details of my job with you,
how
style(6) says not to convert tabs to spaces.
I see. People on Plan 9 are "told" which characters they "should" or
"shouldn't" use in their text. Great!
An awk program can do this. The idea is to interpret tags as they come in
the form of a stack:
codestack
Enlighten me, then. Revealing a date of commencement won't comprise a
breach of non-disclosure, would it?
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:34 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia.
as i suspected, you're here for therapy.
_Intense_ therapy.
i can see you're bitter.
Not very much. The "researching" and "submitting" and hoyvin' mayvin' is
going to be my bane, too. In a different field. Namely, differential
geometry. More specifically, Finsler geometry. To be exact, fin
Oh, I'm waiting for a phone call before bed. What the hell.
Sleep tight. Every night.
My job includes some programming, some document writing, lots of reading.
Programming _for_ Plan 9? Document writing _for_ Plan 9? Reading _about_
Plan 9?
I'm, of course, benignly assuming you create "us
therapy?
_Intense_ therapy.
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:12 PM -0700 Skip Tavakkolian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ms. Discordia, if you don't like it here why do you stay?
therapy?
should be "Just stay away from Acme if you aren't lucky enough to be
stuck with Plan 9".
Could be. Only _luck_ could make you that miserable; reason does a better
job. Also, you could be a little funnier.
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:11 PM -0700 Skip Tavakkolian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Thank you."
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:13 PM -0300 Iruata Souza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
eris, I agree, thanks.
iru
No, that's not the UNIX philosophy. That's the X/Linux/GNU philosophy. Go
read "Program Design in the UNIX Environment" by Kernighan and Pike to
see what I mean.
Get educated. Don't you even know where X came from?
Just a funny idea: have you noticed that the "Kernighan, Pike, Ritchie,
Thomspo
Did your language training involve being taught the difference between a
work/task and a job/profession?
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:08 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
// Others, like me, have some "petty" work to do. Like knowing which
// character on which line they're editing or cont
> Steve Simon's trademark character, I presume, was generated by
> [Alt]+0153--you call [Alt] an "Option" key, right?
nope, Alt,T,M
> Well below 255, it's
> just extended/8-bit ASCII. Not right-to-left, not even out of ISO 8859. You
> could generate that character even on MS-DOS.
I don't get
> 1. Maintaining a Plan 9 system?
> 2. Programming a Plan 9 system?
> 3. Researching a Plan 9 system?
> 4. Or you got some job other than jobs created _around_ Plan 9 and you use
> Plan 9?
None of the above, I write embedded code, my employer has a clear enough vision
to allow me to use whatever
Eris Discordia schrieb:
Been there, done that.
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:00 PM -0400 Pietro Gagliardi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have an idea, Eris. Why don't you fuck off and actually USE Plan 9 for
once?
"Unspeakable horrors from outer space paralyze the living and resurr
Been there, done that.
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:00 PM -0400 Pietro Gagliardi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have an idea, Eris. Why don't you fuck off and actually USE Plan 9 for
once?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Simon's trademark character, I presume, was generated by [Alt]+0153
Wow. Does memorising codepoints fall under your job description aswell?
> $ curl gopher://tokyo.ac.jp/a/b/r.tokyo.jpg
> $ ifconfig cellnetif num
We've seen that, and go to band practice. Tell us all about. Just
keep up the therapy and the medication.
brucee
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a few other bits of relevance to the original topic:
>
> On Aug 19, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Wendell xe w
Just a few other bits of relevance to the original topic:
On Aug 19, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Wendell xe wrote:
07. Automatic insertion of spaces for tabs
style(6) says not to convert tabs to spaces.
11. Bookmarks
If you know what text the bookmark will point to, make a comment on
the line above
Pietro why don't you shut up? You annoy my dog.
brucee
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geoff! Why not let Eris read your paper on Why Plan 9 Matters?
Geoff! Why not let Eris read your paper on Why Plan 9 Matters?
Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia.
When in doubt say something's shitty and try somother OS. You'll be back.
Others have tried and failed with your strategy.
brucee
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, you justify your salary, dear Sir. I honestly respect you for having
>> written th
> No, you justify your salary, dear Sir. I honestly respect you for having
> written the nemo book--you're nemo after all. That, however, won't change
> my stance on Plan 9 and the 9people.
as i suspected, you're here for therapy.
> You have nothing else but "researching" OS's and "submitting
>> Ms. Discordia, if you don't like it here why do you stay?
>
> therapy?
here is the scary.devil.monastery of old systems programmers, after all. :)
> Just stay away from Acme if you aren't stuck with Plan 9.
should be "Just stay away from Acme if you aren't lucky enough to be
stuck with Plan 9".
> Ms. Discordia, if you don't like it here why do you stay?
therapy?
// Bite if you please. Hook, line, and sinker ;-)
Oh, I'm waiting for a phone call before bed. What the hell.
My job has nothing to do with your 1-3. I agree with Steve exactly: I
use Plan 9 because it allows me to get my job done easier. My job
includes some programming, some document writing, l
eris, I agree, thanks.
iru
// Others, like me, have some "petty" work to do. Like knowing which
// character on which line they're editing or controlling how long their
// lines of text get, _without_ resorting to acrobatics.
Wait, your *job* is knowing where editor cursors are and how long
lines are? Wow, that really sucks
On Aug 19, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Eris Discordia wrote:
No, that's not what I said. I said that Plan 9 obeys the UNIX
philosophy,
not that it was UNIX. GNU obeys this philosophy (up to the point of
where
to draw the lines on the size of tools). And to some extent, Windows
(Windows Movie Maker doe
I have an idea, Eris. Why don't you fuck off and actually USE Plan 9
for once?
No, that's not what I said. I said that Plan 9 obeys the UNIX philosophy,
not that it was UNIX. GNU obeys this philosophy (up to the point of where
to draw the lines on the size of tools). And to some extent, Windows
(Windows Movie Maker doesn't call up another computer now, does it?)
I guess "t
take it easy on the porn and get some real sex, eris. you're way too
angry.
Sir, yessir! The Marines don't do Japanese, sir!
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:31 PM -0300 Iruata Souza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wrong
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wrong on so many levels.
>
> Go read the responses 9people gave the original poster. You'll see why it's
> _right_ on so many levels.
>
>> Plan 9 obeys the UNIX way: tools that make jobs simpler.
>
> A UNIX better than UN
>Is it sam that attaches a file named "winmail.dat" to your emails?!
No, though this has been discussed here before. It's a result of the fact that
my e-mail is hosted on an Exchange server.
winmail.dat gets generated to pass formatting data between OWA (which I use)
and Outlook. It unfortunat
Evidently not... (Or you'd be doing it now).
Petty work is _petty_, you see. They give you some breaks during which you
come to desolate mailing lists and upload enlightening orations. I know,
it's a pretty miserable life--my life.
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:36 PM -0700 Jonathan Cast
Yes, try that. Sam has an "edge" over vi by being a desperate half-clone of
ed.
Is it sam that attaches a file named "winmail.dat" to your emails?!
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:03 PM -0700 Benjamin Huntsman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You might give Sam a try. I'm still working my way up
thanks for setting me straight. for some reason, i thought my company
had shipped several thousand units based on plan 9. i don't know what
would have given me that idea.
Somebody would make a bad choice anyway. Microsoft shipped "thousands" of
copies of Microsoft Bob before they learnt about
I'm cool.
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:46 PM -0300 "Federico G. Benavento"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
relax
--
Federico G. Benavento
On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Eris Discordia wrote:
Plan 9 obeys the UNIX way: tools that make jobs simpler.
A UNIX better than UNIX? I thought that was just the thing 9people
claimed to be past. Didn't I hear someone saying, "Plan 9 is not
UNIX?" Ahem... GNU's Not UNIX, too, nah?
No, that
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 7. sed 's/ //g' file > file2 && mv file2 file
>
> rest in peace file2.
>
> iru
>
We barely knew you?
Its because I want to "Get my job done"™ that I use plan9.
Bite if you please. Hook, line, and sinker ;-)
What's your job?
1. Maintaining a Plan 9 system?
2. Programming a Plan 9 system?
3. Researching a Plan 9 system?
4. Or you got some job other than jobs created _around_ Plan 9 and you use
Wrong on so many levels.
Go read the responses 9people gave the original poster. You'll see why it's
_right_ on so many levels.
Plan 9 obeys the UNIX way: tools that make jobs simpler.
A UNIX better than UNIX? I thought that was just the thing 9people claimed
to be past. Didn't I hear som
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 00:27 +0100, Eris Discordia wrote:
> No, you justify your salary, dear Sir. I honestly respect you for having
> written the nemo book--you're nemo after all. That, however, won't change
> my stance on Plan 9 and the 9people. You have nothing else but
> "researching" OS's an
No, you justify your salary, dear Sir. I honestly respect you for having
written the nemo book--you're nemo after all. That, however, won't change
my stance on Plan 9 and the 9people. You have nothing else but
"researching" OS's and "submitting" papers. That "justifies" your 9life.
Others, like
Ms. Discordia, if you don't like it here why do you stay?
"Just lurking," I overheard the "hackers" say.
--On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:12 PM -0600 andrey mirtchovski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ms. Discordia, if you don't like it here why do you stay?
You might give Sam a try. I'm still working my way up to Acme too, but Sam has
an edge over vi for me... ...Might be nice if there was an option to open a
document in a default window though, but if it were a big enough concern, I've
got the source and could make the change... :)
-Ben
<>
relax
--
Federico G. Benavento
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
