I've already seen the link, looked at it...
Thankx, I'll try it ..
ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 18:37, Jens Staal :
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:07:51PM +0200, Yury Chumak wrote:
> > And about APExp also asking.. I haven't heard of APExp before. Doesnt
> > googling anything.. Is it a development/fork o
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:07:51PM +0200, Yury Chumak wrote:
> And about APExp also asking.. I haven't heard of APExp before. Doesnt
> googling anything.. Is it a development/fork of APE?? In any case,
> it's also interesting to look at it.
It is basically a fork of APE from 9front, but changed to
Thanks for the link - I didn't see the post ..
ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 18:03, Mouad All :
>
> Hmm.. some formatting issues there.. Same text in attach..
>
>
> Thanks for the notes.
>
> It turns out that CFront is alive??!! Great.. Could you give me a link
> to its current versions - I'd really like
And about APExp also asking.. I haven't heard of APExp before. Doesnt
googling anything.. Is it a development/fork of APE?? In any case,
it's also interesting to look at it.
As for gcc, I worked with early versions (v.3.0.0). And in early
versions, problems with C++ were discovered. There was no po
> Hmm.. some formatting issues there.. Same text in attach..
Thanks for the notes.
> It turns out that CFront is alive??!! Great.. Could you give me a link
to its current versions - I'd really like to try what it's capable of
now.. And APExp also..
The developer of APExp Jens Staal posted its li
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 05:43:56PM +0200, Yury Chumak wrote:
> I asked about the C++ part because I wanted to understand whether I
> screwed something up in the source code, or whether the C++ in your
> source code didn't work from the start.
> It turns out that CFront is alive??!! Great.. Could yo
I asked about the C++ part because I wanted to understand whether I
screwed something up in the source code, or whether the C++ in your
source code didn't work from the start.
It turns out that CFront is alive??!! Great.. Could you give me a link
to its current versions - I'd really like to try wha
Hmm.. some formatting issues there.. Same text in attach..
ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 15:21, :
>
> Once I tried to rebuild your sources in 9Front but it didn't work. I
> had to modify the sources a little, add wrappers for APE, something
> else (I don't remember everything). I achieved to rebuild it it
It was long time ago - dont remember detailsnow.. But I have my
personal notes that was written during rebuild process trying.. Put it
here:
https://9f.sphynkx.org.ua/wiki/gcc
Sorry they are in russian but it may be translate via google-translate..
ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 15:21, :
>
> Once I tried t
> Once I tried to rebuild your sources in 9Front but it didn't work. I
had to modify the sources a little, add wrappers for APE, something
else (I don't remember everything). I achieved to rebuild it itself,
but C++ part doesn't work there.
I would appreciate it if you point me to what you modifie
The Cfront is work-in-progress in APExp. I verify that each release builds
from scratch on a clean 9front amd64 VM.
Between releases, there can be breakage.
Den ons 11 dec. 2024 13:37Yury Chumak skrev:
> Once I tried to rebuild your sources in 9Front but it didn't work. I
> had to modify the so
Once I tried to rebuild your sources in 9Front but it didn't work. I
had to modify the sources a little, add wrappers for APE, something
else (I don't remember everything). I achieved to rebuild it itself,
but C++ part doesn't work there.
Taking this opportunity, I would like to ask - under what c
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 11:09, wrote:
>
> At least in the old plan9 port of gcc https://9p.io/sources/extra/gcc/ the
> script p9config had --enable-languages'=c,c++' in it that you can modify,
> that is why I wanted to know how the compilation of
> https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-arc
At least in the old plan9 port of gcc https://9p.io/sources/extra/gcc/ the
script p9config had --enable-languages'=c,c++' in it that you can modify, that
is why I wanted to know how the compilation of
https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive-downloads/v2/code.google.com/ports2plan9/gc
One thing to bear in mind is that it is not just the compiler you need
to get working for a given language, but the runtime environment as well.
If the porting work did not cover the runtime libraries for those
languages, you may still have some work to do for that.
On 12/11/24 03:44, mouad-
Thanks for your reply.
How can I compile
https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive-downloads/v2/code.google.com/ports2plan9/gcc-4.5.4-p9-2-pth-src.tar.bz2
for i386 on 9front?
Unlike the very old version https://9p.io/sources/extra/gcc/ for plan9, there
is no p9config script or similar
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:07:09AM -0500, mouad-...@outlook.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to compile an older version of gcc in 9front to use the gnu
> pascal and gnu fortran 77 compilers?
>
> I have found an older version of gcc for i386 at https://code.google.com/
> archive/p/ports2pla
Hello,
Is it possible to compile an older version of gcc in 9front to use the gnu
pascal and gnu fortran 77 compilers?
I have found an older version of gcc for i386 at
https://code.google.com/archive/p/ports2plan9/downloads but I don't know if it
will actually work nowadays.
There are convert
18 matches
Mail list logo
