I've already seen the link, looked at it... Thankx, I'll try it .. ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 18:37, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:07:51PM +0200, Yury Chumak wrote: > > And about APExp also asking.. I haven't heard of APExp before. Doesnt > > googling anything.. Is it a development/fork of APE?? In any case, > > it's also interesting to look at it. > > It is basically a fork of APE from 9front, but changed to be built > "portably" (so in a local check out directory) without overwriting the > system utilities. > > The compiler has several patches and several utilities have been > replaced (often with GNU utilities, like gmake, gawk, flex, byacc, GNU > m4, ...) and some common dependencies are pre-packaged/included > > everything can be built by running mk install in the root of the > checkout. > > Then to work with it, you basically just run ./apexp-sh to mount all the > directories and make a APExp namespace where you can start building *nix > applications. > > > As for gcc, I worked with early versions (v.3.0.0). And in early > > versions, problems with C++ were discovered. There was no point in > > moving forward until the issue with C++ was resolved. > > > > ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 17:51, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 05:43:56PM +0200, Yury Chumak wrote: > > > > I asked about the C++ part because I wanted to understand whether I > > > > screwed something up in the source code, or whether the C++ in your > > > > source code didn't work from the start. > > > > It turns out that CFront is alive??!! Great.. Could you give me a link > > > > to its current versions - I'd really like to try what it's capable of > > > > now.. And APExp also.. > > > > > > > > > > No it is a very old plan9 port that I copied from /n/sources > > > > > > I thought you were asking about the APExp. For the gcc I don't remember > > > really what I got to build in the 4.5 port. For GCC, you basically need > > > an earlier GCC to build the newer one so I started off with the old gcc > > > 3 binary port and upgraded it gradually. > > > > > > This was a long time ago however. > > > > > > > > > > ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 15:22, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > The Cfront is work-in-progress in APExp. I verify that each release > > > > > builds from scratch on a clean 9front amd64 VM. > > > > > > > > > > Between releases, there can be breakage. > > > > > > > > > > Den ons 11 dec. 2024 13:37Yury Chumak <sfy...@gmail.com> skrev: > > > > >> > > > > >> Once I tried to rebuild your sources in 9Front but it didn't work. I > > > > >> had to modify the sources a little, add wrappers for APE, something > > > > >> else (I don't remember everything). I achieved to rebuild it itself, > > > > >> but C++ part doesn't work there. > > > > >> > > > > >> Taking this opportunity, I would like to ask - under what conditions > > > > >> did you build - a clean Plan9 or a ported environment or something > > > > >> else?? And did the C++ part work for you?? > > > > >> > > > > >> ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 10:19, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com>: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:07:09AM -0500, mouad-...@outlook.com > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> > > Hello, > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Is it possible to compile an older version of gcc in 9front to > > > > >> > > use the gnu > > > > >> > > pascal and gnu fortran 77 compilers? > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > I have found an older version of gcc for i386 at > > > > >> > > https://code.google.com/ > > > > >> > > archive/p/ports2plan9/downloads but I don't know if it will > > > > >> > > actually work > > > > >> > > nowadays. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The GCC port probably still works, but only for i386. I have > > > > >> > abandoned > > > > >> > that track a bit and am now more interested in the transpilers > > > > >> > since > > > > >> > they (theoretically) would work on all architectures supported by > > > > >> > the C > > > > >> > compilers. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > There are converters like p2c and f2c, but they are limited in > > > > >> > > comparison to a > > > > >> > > compiler. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I have integrated f2c and p2c in APExp, and I hope to integrate > > > > >> > even > > > > >> > more transpilers there. I have not had time to play with it > > > > >> > lately, but > > > > >> > I see my APExp project as a "spiritual successor" to ports2plan9 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > https://github.com/staalmannen/APExp > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > So please any advice or guidance would be much appreciated. > > > > >> > > 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery > > > > >> > > options Permalink > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Sphynkx > > > > > > > > > > 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery options > > > > > Permalink > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sphynkx > > > > > > -- > > Sphynkx
-- Sphynkx ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T41cf38050bd5915d-M131d133d22b03e666da17e37 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
