And about APExp also asking.. I haven't heard of APExp before. Doesnt googling anything.. Is it a development/fork of APE?? In any case, it's also interesting to look at it. As for gcc, I worked with early versions (v.3.0.0). And in early versions, problems with C++ were discovered. There was no point in moving forward until the issue with C++ was resolved.
ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 17:51, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 05:43:56PM +0200, Yury Chumak wrote: > > I asked about the C++ part because I wanted to understand whether I > > screwed something up in the source code, or whether the C++ in your > > source code didn't work from the start. > > It turns out that CFront is alive??!! Great.. Could you give me a link > > to its current versions - I'd really like to try what it's capable of > > now.. And APExp also.. > > > > No it is a very old plan9 port that I copied from /n/sources > > I thought you were asking about the APExp. For the gcc I don't remember > really what I got to build in the 4.5 port. For GCC, you basically need > an earlier GCC to build the newer one so I started off with the old gcc > 3 binary port and upgraded it gradually. > > This was a long time ago however. > > > > ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 15:22, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > The Cfront is work-in-progress in APExp. I verify that each release > > > builds from scratch on a clean 9front amd64 VM. > > > > > > Between releases, there can be breakage. > > > > > > Den ons 11 dec. 2024 13:37Yury Chumak <sfy...@gmail.com> skrev: > > >> > > >> Once I tried to rebuild your sources in 9Front but it didn't work. I > > >> had to modify the sources a little, add wrappers for APE, something > > >> else (I don't remember everything). I achieved to rebuild it itself, > > >> but C++ part doesn't work there. > > >> > > >> Taking this opportunity, I would like to ask - under what conditions > > >> did you build - a clean Plan9 or a ported environment or something > > >> else?? And did the C++ part work for you?? > > >> > > >> ср, 11 дек. 2024 г. в 10:19, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com>: > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:07:09AM -0500, mouad-...@outlook.com wrote: > > >> > > Hello, > > >> > > > > >> > > Is it possible to compile an older version of gcc in 9front to use > > >> > > the gnu > > >> > > pascal and gnu fortran 77 compilers? > > >> > > > > >> > > I have found an older version of gcc for i386 at > > >> > > https://code.google.com/ > > >> > > archive/p/ports2plan9/downloads but I don't know if it will actually > > >> > > work > > >> > > nowadays. > > >> > > > >> > The GCC port probably still works, but only for i386. I have abandoned > > >> > that track a bit and am now more interested in the transpilers since > > >> > they (theoretically) would work on all architectures supported by the C > > >> > compilers. > > >> > > > >> > > There are converters like p2c and f2c, but they are limited in > > >> > > comparison to a > > >> > > compiler. > > >> > > > >> > I have integrated f2c and p2c in APExp, and I hope to integrate even > > >> > more transpilers there. I have not had time to play with it lately, but > > >> > I see my APExp project as a "spiritual successor" to ports2plan9 > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/staalmannen/APExp > > >> > > > >> > > So please any advice or guidance would be much appreciated. > > >> > > 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery options > > >> > > Permalink > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Sphynkx > > > > > > 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery options > > > Permalink > > > > > > -- > > Sphynkx -- Sphynkx ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T41cf38050bd5915d-M526f5b4089eb42c56f520886 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
