Re: Unable to update/upgrade Fedora-16 due to yum Transaction error
Thanks Kevin. On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > > On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin: > > On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha: > > Dear Friends, > > > While upgrading through "Yumex" ,everything is running well,except a problem > is > occurring while upgrading packages. > > 19:46:52 : YUM: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, > key ID 8296fa0f: NOKEY > /19:46:52 : ERROR: Error in yum Transaction : Public key for > npapi-vlc-1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17.x86_64.rpm is not > installed/ > > How to rectify the error in yum Transaction,on the last line.Please Help me. > > this package must not be in the F16 repo and i guess this is already fixed > throw away yumex and type "yum cleanall && yum upgrade" in a root-shell if > you do not want to wait > > > Install the public key or turn on "no GPG check" under options in Yumex. > > Kevin > > why in the world do you give such TOTALLY WRONG advises > after a correct answer? > > a) .fc17 is not intented to be for F16 > b) "noGPG check" generally to set is a dumb action > > > > > > > Hmm, interesting question. > > I'm guessing, based on what's missing in his yumex output (you did > notice that he had trimmed some stuff out of the middle, right) that he has > libvlc installed and has, at some point in the past, installed the > npapi-vlc plugin for libvlc rpm and, perhaps, we're not seeing an update > request for libvlc (due to his trimming the output) which may also require, > possibly, an update for npapi-vlc. He does have > rpmfusion-free-rawhide-source as one of his active repositories, which is > where the source for npapi-vlc comes from. > > So no, it's *not* in the F16 repo and perhaps no, it's not already fixed > since there's nothing to fix and perhaps he enjoys using yumex so your > asinine comment to "throw away yumex" doesn't help matters at all and yes, > you are correct that .fc17 is not "intented" (intended, BTW) to be for F16 > but, be that as it may, it still was picked up, probably as a result of > some dependency checking that was done. > > Oh, and by the way, it's "advice", not advises, and your "correct answer" > was not necessarily correct at all, just your shooting your mouth off > without doing any actual research as to what may have occurred. If you > can't offer semi-knowledgeable advice, don't attack people who do. > > Kevin > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to update/upgrade Fedora-16 due to yum Transaction error
Agreed Friends,about the comments. I request you people,not to make a war of words amongst each other. I Thank very much to: Reindl Harald; Kevin Martin; Joe Zeff ;for the valuable suggestions given by you. I did uncheck/disable the Fedora "Rawhide" repos.,along with all the "Test Updates" repos. from Fedora using "Apper"(A fantastic Tool). MY UPDATE/UPGRADE problem has been solved( ~95 %).I mean after unchecking some package tools from the update list,my UPDATE/UPGRADE was SUCCESSFUL. The only gripe being I can't update "vlc",which is available in the list . What about the "ATrpms" repositories? I've disabled it earlier...should I enable it? The dependency problem and repository configuration is a headache in this overall Best,stable,solid "FEDORA 16" Linux distro. -kaushik On 1/28/12, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/27/2012 11:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> without EXPLICIT warning that it is generally not a good idea and >> why tjhere may be enough uneducated users who starts thinking >> "well if something does not run disbale gpgcheck is a solution" >> > > I agree that the only time skipping the check is a good idea is if > you've done the research to make sure that it's a known problem and the > package is OK. In this case, I know that there's an ongoing issue with > rpmfusion, and can recommend it with confidence if (and only if) the > package in question is from rpmfusion. I don't recommend turning it off > for your complete update/upgrade for obvious reasons. > >> a fc17 package has nothing to search in a F16 setup and so there >> should be no single help to install it with any workaround >> > > Agreed. > >> this package has to be reported as a bug and not forced >> to be updated with or without gpgcheck >> > > In this case, I'd not noted that it was an F17 package and was just > thinking about the gpg issue. Thanx for catching that. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to update/upgrade Fedora-16 due to yum Transaction error
x86_64 0-3.fc16 _local 78 k libreplaygain x86_64 0.9.1-0.1.svn453.fc16 _local 8.4 k musepack-tools x86_64 sv8-3.svn435.fc16 _local 108 k vlc x86_64 1.1.13-74.fc16 _local 9.1 M xosdx86_64 2.2.14-14.fc15 _local 47 k Transaction Summary = Install 6 Packages Upgrade 5 Packages Total download size: 12 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Setting up and reading Presto delta metadata - Total 39 MB/s | 12 MB 00:00 warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 8296fa0f: NOKEY Public key for npapi-vlc-1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17.x86_64.rpm is not installed [root@localhost kgtaban]# How do I proceed regarding the above matter? Thanks to all Fedora Friends. -Kaushik On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 28.01.2012 06:11, schrieb Kaushik Guha: > > I did uncheck/disable the Fedora "Rawhide" repos > > why were they enabled? > this is a road to hell! > > > What about the "ATrpms" repositories? I've disabled it > > earlier...should I enable it? > > only if you want to kill yur system over the long > > ATrpms is known to replace base-packages with own versions > and sometimes other packaging (sub-packages) as the original > one and sooner or later this will end in massive depsolv > troubles - the only good at ATrpms is that after some time > if you want get rid of the troubles you are learning > how to deal with "rpm -e --nodpes" and what packages > you must not remove and after all that you know all > core packages by her first name (i was there years ago) > > you should avoid to enable as much repos as you can find > in case of repos "more helps more" is totally wrong > > your current problems are coming from enable things you > are not knowing what they are (rawhide as best example) > > rawhide is the devel-tree and currently F17 and was > never designed for machines which should work all the time > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Community, Kaushik Guha has invited you to open a Gmail account
I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's an invitation to create an account. You're Invited to Gmail! Kaushik Guha has invited you to open a Gmail account. Gmail is Google's free email service, built on the idea that email can be intuitive, efficient, and fun. Gmail has: *Less spam* Keep unwanted messages out of your inbox with Google's innovative technology. *Lots of space* Enough storage so that you'll never have to delete another message. *Built-in chat* Text or video chat with Kaushik Guha and other friends in real time. *Mobile access* Get your email anywhere with Gmail on your mobile phone. You can even import your contacts and email from Yahoo!, Hotmail, AOL, or any other web mail or POP accounts. Once you create your account, Kaushik Guha will be notified of your new Gmail address so you can stay in touch. Learn more<http://mail.google.com/mail/help/intl/en/about.html>or get started<http://mail.google.com/mail/a-c512df06bb-08ed44660c-i4OmTQ7Oht4eK_dw0BHoOmQtMls> ! Sign up<http://mail.google.com/mail/a-c512df06bb-08ed44660c-i4OmTQ7Oht4eK_dw0BHoOmQtMls> Google Inc. | 1600 Ampitheatre Parkway | Mountain View, California 94043 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to update/upgrade Fedora-16 due to yum Transaction error
To Aaron Konstan: Well, "apper" is the actual name represented as per Fedora16,now this user's community gmail space is not for programming as we all know,I think, typos,lower-upper case letter mixing, doesn't affect much.Though you are correct that we should be true about information & facts. To Frank,Kevin,Reindl,John...Friends: I actually wanted to enable the repos. list(not all),since I want to *UPGRADE *this distro Fedora16(64-bit) to Fedora 17(64-bit)(due to launch in May/June 2012)without losing any files,applications,tools etc. until installed here now. I *do not intend* for a *CLEAN INSTALL* like Ubuntu distros. I am a noob you see my Friends,regarding the indepth system of Fedora,though am familiar with various applications and tools used in GNU/Linux OS.I always try to learn by seeking your Help-Friends,and never mind about *"sarcasam"* or *"lectures"* till they remain at a confined * "positive"* level and does not *cross* the limits. Thank you all -Kaushik Guha On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 10:41 +0530, Kaushik Guha wrote: > > I did uncheck/disable the Fedora "Rawhide" repos.,along with all the > > "Test Updates" repos. from Fedora using "Apper"(A fantastic Tool). > Since everone else shares the things that bug them let me join the > crowd. > > The name of the program from a Fedora point of view is apper nor Apper, > despite what it says in the title of the GUI window that appears. > -- > === > ... the MYSTERIANS are in here with my CORDUROY SOAP DISH!! > === > Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to update/upgrade Fedora-16 due to yum Transaction error
Currently I am at ease with KDE,and I am in it while I write this.Occasionally I use LXDE also,but GNOME-3.x seems to be uneasy with* me *at least. I've stated earlier,that it was my mistake to enable most of the repos. in the repos list. I had already disabled all "rawhide" repos and also the "ATrpms" repo in the list. In fact I read earlier in the Fedora main site stating,that rawhides are in development stages for dev. purposes ,releases and testing. Previously,while enabling the repos,I WAS CAREFUL not to enable rawhide or testing repos. as such,but due to fault of my lack in concentration while I was meddling the repos list,I enabled those repos without realising the consequences. Sorry, Friends. On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 28/01/12 16:11, Kaushik Guha wrote: > >> To Frank,Kevin,Reindl,John...**Friends: I actually wanted to enable the >> repos. list(not all),since I want to *UPGRADE *this distro >> >> Fedora16(64-bit) to Fedora 17(64-bit)(due to launch in May/June >> 2012)without losing any files,applications,tools etc. until installed >> here now. >> > > Fot the moment dont, > as Fedora 17 is not stable enough curerently, > with the move to /usr/* currently being tested. > Wait until F17 is branched to upgrade. > Do you use KDE, Gnome, Xfec, Lxde. > or a combination ot them all? > > > > -- > Regards, > > Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject > UTF_8 Encoded > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/users<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users> > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Mailing_list_guidelines<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines> > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to update/upgrade Fedora-16 due to yum Transaction error
Thanks,Frank.I followed your advice,and after erasing the* npapi-vlc*package along with the *whole of vlc-core package*,system has come to its stability(regarding updates/upgrades) as it seems. If I want to freshly install vlc package,shouid I use *YUM* or through * apper?* I want the whole libraries,plugins,etc. the full package of vlc. On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 28/01/12 16:36, Kaushik Guha wrote: > >> Currently I am at ease with KDE,and I am in it while I write >> this.Occasionally I use LXDE also,but GNOME-3.x seems to be uneasy >> with*me *at least. >> >> I've stated earlier,that it was my mistake to enable most of the repos. >> in the repos list. >> I had already disabled all "rawhide" repos and also the "ATrpms" repo in >> the list. >> In fact I read earlier in the Fedora main site stating,that rawhides are >> in development stages for dev. purposes ,releases and testing. >> > > F17 will be branched according to this schedule, excluding slips: > https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Releases/17/Schedule<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/17/Schedule> > > It is alos a good idea to join the announce list: > https://lists.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/announce<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/announce> > low email count, important stuff ounly. > > > -- > Regards, > > Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject > UTF_8 Encoded > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/users<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users> > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Mailing_list_guidelines<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines> > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to update/upgrade Fedora-16 due to yum Transaction error
To Mr. Paul Allen Newell: Sir,it was a legit request .But I do honour and respect people's privacy.Sir,I am removing your name from my Google+ circle as you suggested on the mail.Also,remember I do not have any malicious intentions as such. From -Kaushik Guha. On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 21:41 +0530, Kaushik Guha wrote: > > To Aaron Konstan: Well, "apper" is the actual name represented as per > > Fedora16,now this user's community gmail space is not for programming > > as we all know,I think, typos,lower-upper case letter mixing, doesn't > > affect much.Though you are correct that we should be true about > > information & facts. > I don't want to be a pain about this. But part of this list is designed > to inform thingws about Fedora that they may not know. Linux is case > sensitive so that calling the program Apper adds the confusion of the > list members who are trying to find the function. > > Another gotcha of this program comes from the fact that it is a KDE > program. If you try to use the Add and Remove option under Gnome it > tries to remove a program. Can you guess what program it tries to > remove? If you guessed apper you win the prize. > -- > === > Chicago law prohibits eating in a place that is on fire. > === > Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to update/upgrade Fedora-16 due to yum Transaction error
My problem is gone. *I can update/upgrade packages onto my Fedora 16(x86_64) OS at ease.* I thank all my Friends for their valuable suggestions and advice regarding configuring(choosing) correctly the repositories from the repos list,and to erase or deselect certain packages which were providing dependency problems and errors. I have read the "Mailing list guidelines", in Fedora Project, and shall follow the rules as stated there. Thank you all.Thanks to the Fedora community. [solved] -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re:Auto Bug reporting tool in KDE-4.7
Hello KDE Team, I am using Fedora 16(x86_64) version,with the Default Desktop being "KDE PLasma Workspace 4.7". Everything is functional and running smoothly,except such messages:- *google-chrome-stable Process /opt/google/chrome/chrome was killed by signal 11(SIGSEGV) 2012-01-29 22:25 *The installed* google-chrome *is of version * 16.0.912.77 *This type of message also occurs while I run* "vlc" mediaplayer *which is of version *1.1.13* The Luggage The message box pops up in "Automatic Bug Reporting Tool" as Header of the message box. Please,Help me regarding this. From -Kaushik Guha -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to upgrade again,some tools and applications!!!
Hello Fedora Friends users community, I had adjusted and configured my repos.list according to your advice,and got fruitful results. *But please see this,and help me out of the problem*:- [root@localhost ~]# yum upgrade Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, dellsysid, downloadonly, etckeeper, : fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, fusioninventory-agent, keys, langpacks, : list-data, local, merge-conf, post-transaction-actions, presto, priorities, : protectbase, ps, puppetverify, refresh-packagekit, refresh-updatesd, remove-with- : leaves, rpm-warm-cache, security, show-leaves, tmprepo, tsflags, upgrade-helper, : verify, versionlock Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: fedora.iitm.ac.in * fedora-debuginfo: ftp.kddilabs.jp * fedora-source: ftp.kddilabs.jp * rpmfusion-free: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-free-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-free-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-free-updates-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-free-updates-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-nonfree-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * updates: fedora.iitm.ac.in * updates-debuginfo: ftp.kddilabs.jp * updates-source: ftp.kddilabs.jp Skipping filters plugin, no data 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Setting up Upgrade Process Resolving Dependencies Skipping filters plugin, no data --> Running transaction check ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:10.0-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 0:0.10.22-2.fc16.1 will be updated ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 0:0.10.22-2.fc16.2 will be an update ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:0.9.7.1-1.fc16 will be updated --> *Processing Dependency: libvpx.so.0()(64bit) for package: libavcodec53-0.9-52.fc16.x86_64* ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:1.0.0-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:10.0-1.fc16 will be an update --> Running transaction check ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:0.9.7.1-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:1.0.0-1.fc16 will be an update --> *Processing Dependency: libvpx.so.1()(64bit) for package: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.22-2.fc16.2.x86_64* --> *Processing Dependency: libvpx.so.1()(64bit) for package: xulrunner-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64* --> Running transaction check ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated *Packages skipped because of dependency problems*: firefox-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.22-2.fc16.2.x86_64 from updates libvpx-1.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates xulrunner-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates [root@localhost ~]# What are the dependency problems? Is it something to do with libvpx.so.0()(64-bit)? How do I proceed? -Kaushik Guha -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
