Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

[Barry]

> On 23 Jan 2025, at 17:53, Robert Nichols via users 
>  wrote:
> 
> qgnomeplatform-qt5

Try removing conflicting packages like qgnomeplatform-qt5 and see if the 
upgrade will run. Check only a small number of packages will be removed.
You can always reinstall any app that got removed after the upgrade has 
succeeded.

Barry


-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

[Jeffrey Walton]

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 12:52 PM Robert Nichols via users
 wrote:
>
> I am trying to upgrade my laptop to Fedora 41, but I cannot get a clean 
> update state in the current Fedora 40. I ran "dnf update" successfully and it 
> installed many updates including a new kernel. After a reboot, much to my 
> surprise dnfdragora reported 18 updates available. Running "dnf update" again 
> resulted in installation of most of these, but also reported:
>
>   Problem 1: package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from @System 
> requires qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can 
> be installed
>- package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
> qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from @System
>- package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
> qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from updates
>- cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64
>- cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch
>   Problem 2: problem with installed package 
> qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64
>- package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires 
> qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can be 
> installed
>- package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from updates requires 
> qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can be 
> installed
>- package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
> qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from @System
>- package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
> qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from updates
>- cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> qt6-qtbase-common-6.7.2-6.fc40.noarch
>
> I have tried "dnf update --allowerasing", "dnf update --obsoletes", and even 
> "dnf autoremove", but nothing gets rid of these problems.
>
> I have made no changes to any of the config files in fedora-repos-40-2.noarch.
>
> I am very reluctant to attempt an upgrade to Fedora 41 with the system not in 
> a cleanly updated state. What to do??

You should follow the instructions provided at
.
The process does not include using dnfdragora.

Jeff
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

[Michael D. Setzer II via users]

On 23 Jan 2025 at 11:52, Robert Nichols via users wrote:

To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Update failure in Fedora 40
Date sent:  Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:52:25 -0600
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

From:   Robert Nichols via users 

Copies to:  Robert Nichols 

I had similar errors on my Fedora 40 laptops.

For me fix was to remove 
dnf remove  qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64

It showed as only removing that one program with no other issues.

Then ran the dnf update and it installed those updates and a lot of 
others.

At least on my setup, that was all it took.


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 mailto:msetze...@gmx.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++



-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

[Todd Zullinger]

Robert Nichols via users wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade my laptop to Fedora 41, but I cannot get a clean 
> update state in the current Fedora 40. I ran "dnf update" successfully and it 
> installed many updates including a new kernel. After a reboot, much to my 
> surprise dnfdragora reported 18 updates available. Running "dnf update" again 
> resulted in installation of most of these, but also reported:
> 
>  Problem 1: package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from @System 
> requires qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can 
> be installed
>   - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
> qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from @System
>   - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
> qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from updates
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch
>  Problem 2: problem with installed package 
> qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64
>   - package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires 
> qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can be 
> installed
>   - package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from updates requires 
> qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can be 
> installed
>   - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
> qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from @System
>   - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
> qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
> qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from updates
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> qt6-qtbase-common-6.7.2-6.fc40.noarch
> 
> I have tried "dnf update --allowerasing", "dnf update --obsoletes", and even 
> "dnf autoremove", but nothing gets rid of these problems.
> 
> I have made no changes to any of the config files in fedora-repos-40-2.noarch.
> 
> I am very reluctant to attempt an upgrade to Fedora 41 with the system not in 
> a cleanly updated state. What to do??

This looks similar to the "Fails to install" bug which was
filed today (but said to be a non-issue by the maintainer):

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2341710

If the package is to be obsoleted, it seems to me that the
qt5 subpackage also needs to be obsoleted.  Ignoring this
for the duration of F40 would seem to be inappropriate, IMO.

Perhaps someone affected will care to update that ticket to
note that the obsolets appear to be incomplete, at least.

-- 
Todd


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Update failure in Fedora 40

[Robert Nichols via users]

I am trying to upgrade my laptop to Fedora 41, but I cannot get a clean update state in the current 
Fedora 40. I ran "dnf update" successfully and it installed many updates including a new 
kernel. After a reboot, much to my surprise dnfdragora reported 18 updates available. Running 
"dnf update" again resulted in installation of most of these, but also reported:

 Problem 1: package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from @System 
requires qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can 
be installed
  - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from @System
  - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from updates
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch
 Problem 2: problem with installed package 
qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64
  - package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires 
qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from updates requires 
qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from @System
  - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes 
qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by 
qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from updates
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
qt6-qtbase-common-6.7.2-6.fc40.noarch

I have tried "dnf update --allowerasing", "dnf update --obsoletes", and even "dnf 
autoremove", but nothing gets rid of these problems.

I have made no changes to any of the config files in fedora-repos-40-2.noarch.

I am very reluctant to attempt an upgrade to Fedora 41 with the system not in a 
cleanly updated state. What to do??

--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.


--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

[Robert Nichols via users]

On 1/23/25 12:29, Jeffrey Walton wrote:

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 12:52 PM Robert Nichols via users
 wrote:


I am trying to upgrade my laptop to Fedora 41, but I cannot get a clean update state in the current 
Fedora 40. I ran "dnf update" successfully and it installed many updates including a new 
kernel. After a reboot, much to my surprise dnfdragora reported 18 updates available. Running 
"dnf update" again resulted in installation of most of these, but also reported:



You should follow the instructions provided at
.
The process does not include using dnfdragora.


I never actually _used_ dnfdragora. I just saw its notification letting me know 
that updates were available. I always use dnf from the command line to do the 
actual updates.

I was following the upgrade procedure from 
docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/, but because 
of the failure I didn't get as far as performing the actual system upgrade.

--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.

--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue