Re: 44/8
> On Jul 23, 2019, at 18:44, Owen DeLong wrote: > > Not entirely true. A lot of 44/8 subnets are used for transporting amateur > radio information across the internet and/or for certain limited applications > linking amateur radio and the internet. In the mid 90's we (an ISP) announced the space for WI's packet community. If it didn't need internet connectivity, you wouldn't need the IP addresses, necessarily. Also, from the AMPR website: https://www.ampr.org/about/ "We don’t sell addresses; you might consider an AMPRNet allocation to be in the nature of an extended loan of IP space, which is, of course, subject to our Terms of Service." And of course, from: https://www.ampr.org/terms-of-service/ > 5. What You may not do > > You may NOT sell, exchange, transfer, or otherwise obtain anything of value > for the address(es). You are not permitted to use the address(es) for > commercial purposes, nor in a manner which would be to the detriment of the > AMPRNet or to Amateur Radio. > > 6. What You are agreeing to > > All address(es) licensed to You remain the sole and exclusive property of > ARDC. You do not obtain any rights, title, or interest in the address(es) nor > in the AMPRNet. > > You may not assign any monetary value to the addresses. ... > 8. Definitions > > “Amateur”, “ham”, “operator”, means a person or group licensed under the > terms of the Amateur Radio Service as defined by the International > Telecommunication Union (ITU) as implemented by their country’s government, > e.g., in the USA, under 47CFR97. > > “AMPRNet” means the network 44/8; that is, all Internet IP addresses from > 44.0.0.0 through 44.255.255.255. And also from: http://wiki.ampr.org/wiki/Main_Page > Since its allocation to Amateur Radio in the mid-1980's, Internet network 44 > (44.0.0.0/8), known as the AMPRNet™, ... > • This page was last edited on 5 April 2014, at 04:32. They certainly seem to be claiming to have ownership of something not assigned to them, and in conflict with their own stated TOS. What seems additionally strange is that according to the addressing agreement from 1986, according to wikipedia, "The allocation plan agreed in late-1986 mandated 44.0/9 (~8 million addresses) for use within the United States, under Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations;[6] and mandated 44.128/9 (~8 million addresses) for the Rest-of-World deployment, outside of FCC regulations.[6]"
Re: OT: Tech bag
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 11:19:08AM -0500, Hunter Fuller wrote: > This one has since been released, and it has a laptop compartment. My Yeah, I definitely look for some sort of laptop compartment. If not padded on its own, I stick the laptop into a padded sleeve. I run one of these: https://tacticalgear.com/511-all-hazards-prime-backpack-black And subdivide for a particular loadout with various smaller cases like: https://countycomm.com/collections/view-all-storage-products/products/apx-multi-purpose-dual-zip-case-by-maratac or something similar to these: https://www.casesbysource.com/category/soft-padded-cases Unfortunately Deep Outdoors, who made a number of great soft-sided padded cases has gone out of business...
Re: What can ISPs do better? Removing racism out of internet
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:24:55PM -0400, Bryan Fields wrote: > contract. This scares the shit out of me as a customer; could cloudflare > decide to give me no notice and shut my services off? So much for the "free-speech absolutist".
Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11
> On Oct 21, 2016, at 17:39, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > P.S. To all of you Ayn Rand devotees out there who still vociferously > argue that it's nobody else's business how you monitor or police your > "private" networks, and who still refuse to take even minimalist steps What does Ayn Rand have to do with it? She would hardly countenance incompetence.
Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:53:41AM -0800, Kasper Adel wrote: > Would this be an acceptable offering in today's IT from different type of > Enterprises (Minux the Googles, Facebooks...etc) ? The comments from others on this thread have some good points to make, but in my experience, even at places that outsource to SaaS, a black box on the internal network isn't going to fly. Cheers, -j
Re: California fires: smart speakers and emergency alerts
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:31:31PM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote: > That’s about 1.85 meter wavelength, so a quarter wave antenna would be pretty > large. I’m sure the RF engineers can come up with a way to listen > effectively without a huge antenna. For 162Mhz, a 1/4 wave antenna would have a vertical radiating element of around 17". However, for receive only purposes, it's not necessary that the antenna be resonant. You can demonstrate this yourself with any FM radio and a paperclip. Cheers, -j
Re: Rising sea levels are going to mess with the internet
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 03:49:13PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > Compound interest is a bitch. Sure is, but a numerically fixed change YoY is not compound interest.
Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
> On Jan 12, 2019, at 08:14, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote: > My solution is intended for clients. A client should decide whether to > transmit mails in clear text or not. You should spend some time doing research by reading RFCs, and doing a little searching on the internet. Your proposal, would, canonically be called SMTPS. If you put that into a search engine, you'll find not only is it deprecated, but has an assigned port number of 465. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTPS
Re: (Netflix/GlobalConnect a/s) Scheduled Open Connect Appliance upgrade is starting
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 06:01:24PM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote: > That's the primary reason I am plain text only: people that think > they're being whimsical by picking fonts and colors that are hard to read. Now if only we could get everyone to stop top-posting.
Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk...
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 06:46:07PM +0100, Tei wrote: > Is very hard to replace a open protocol, wrapping may work if the > protocol is mostly abandoned (IRC) but thats not the case for email. IRC is far from abandonded. There are lots of very active networks, 2 of which I use continously. But, it's been a week of non-NANOG talk, so Cheers, -j
Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 19:26, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > I was thinking more of the guy who was convinced that each octet in an IPV4 > address could store 0 through 256. That's what the overflow flag is for, right?
Re: Conference Videos
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:52:01PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: > Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any > sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even > vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a > catastrophic effect on conference attendance. Check out the Openstack Summits, a conference that records *everything*, and attendence keeps going up. Cheers, -j
Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 14:33, Matt Hoppes > wrote: > > Had a previous employee or I discovered it on the network segment after we > had some weird routing issues and had to get that cleaned up. I don't know > why anyone would do that when there is tons of private IP space. Unless there isn't.. I've worked at more than one company that had used up all the private space. Then you have the cases where some M&A causes overlapping IP space. In addition, you'd also be surprised how many people just assign the entire 10/8 space into a flat IP space. -j
Re: non operational question related to IP
On Nov 22, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Greg Whynott wrote: anyone happen to know how the OS's are interpreting the 010? doesn't appear work out in base[2-10] (1010,101,22,20,14,13,12,11,10,A) Looks base 8 to me. -j
Re: wikileaks unreachable
On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has Reported they were under attack: http://bgg.lv/h2pmsd
Re: Mastercard problems
On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:30 PM, andrew.wallace wrote: I would say the attack falls under the jurisdiction of the US secret service since this is an attack on the financial system. "Today the agency's primary investigative mission is to safeguard the payment and financial systems of the United States." --- secretservice.gov Yikes.. you consider a private company's business to be the financial and payment system of the United States? -j
Re: How to catch a cracker in the US?
On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:24 PM, William Herrin wrote: > I'm afraid my google-fu doesn't reach back to the 1960's. You don't > happen to have a handy reference do you? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_%28term%29
Re: airgap / negligent homicide charge
On Nov 14, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote: > And here's a quote from a legal textbook: > in this area of the law to those of the public. In other > words, society may require of a person not to be awkward If only that were more generally true. -j
Re: [tor-talk] William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
On Nov 30, 2012, at 7:20 PM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > As well you could be, because you appear to have the same name as a > registered sex offender: Hey, that's a fun game: http://www.sexoffenderin.com/reg77161/william_a_simpsonmugshot.htm
Re: cable markers for marine environments
On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > My preference is for a direct printing system rather than stock card markers. Don't bother. Unless something revolutionary has come out recently, attach-on-to products are the only way to go. In my experience all the labels have to be maintained along with everything else that's in contact with that environment/liquid. Use something plastic, larger is better, and plan to be able to replace them as necessary. Cheers, -j
Re: Whois data compromised?
On Jun 26, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Eric Rosenberry wrote: > Not sure where this data got injected into the system (or who knows, > perhaps it's a DNS injection attack or something), but this certainly is It's an old trick, been around forever. You just register some random A record with a registrar. Same thing happens for google.com, microsoft.com, probably every big company. Cheers, -j
Re: FYI Netflix is down
On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:23 AM, david raistrick wrote: > When the hardware is outsourced how would you propose testing the > non-software components? They do simulate availability zone issues (and AZ > is as close as you get to controlling which internal power/network/etc grid > you're attached to). We all know what netflix *says* they do, but they *did* have an outage. -j
Re: FYI Netflix is down
On Jul 2, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Paul Graydon wrote: > back-plane / control-plane was unable to cope with the requests. Netflix > uses Amazon's ELB to balance the traffic and no back-plane meant they were > unable to reconfigure it to route around the problem. Someone needs to define back-plane/control-plane in this case. (and what wasn't working) During the height of the problems, what I saw was a Netflix A record pointing at a broken ELB. If there was an ELB to point to in another AZ, it wouldn't take anything from Amazon to change that A record, as Netflix uses ultradns. -j
Re: FYI Netflix is down
On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:20 PM, david raistrick wrote: > Amazon resources are controlled (from a consumer viewpoint) by API - that API > is also used by amazon's internal toolkits that support ELB (and RDS..). > Those (http accessed) API interfaces were unavailable for a good portion of > the outages. Right, and other toolkits like boto. Each AZ has a different endpoint (url), and as I have no resources running in East, I saw no problems with the API endpoints I use. So, as you note, US-EAST Region was "not controllable". > I know nothing of the netflix side of it - but that's what -we- saw. (and > that caused all us-east RDS instances in every AZ to appear And, if you lose US-EAST, you need to run *somewhere*. Netflix did not cutover www.netflix.com to another Region. Why not is another question. -j
Re: FYI Netflix is down
On Jul 2, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Rodrick Brown wrote: > People are acting as if Netflix is part of some critical service they stream > movies for Christ sake. Some acceptable level of loss is fine for 99.99% of > Netflix's user base just like cable, electricity and running water I suffer a > few hours of losses each year from those services it suck yes, is it the end > of the world no.. You missed the point.
Re: FYI Netflix is down
On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:11 AM, Dan Golding wrote: > Also, I don't think there is an acceptable level of downtime for water. > Neither do water utilities. I remember a certain conversation I had with a web-developer. We were talking about "zero downtime releases". He thought it was acceptable if the website went down for 15 minutes, "because people will just come back". Naturally, he was not as forgiving about the idea that his bank might think the same way, or that I might provide DB or server uptimes with that kind of reliability. Downtime will kill some companies, and not others. Twitter certainly survived their fail-whale period. But then, no one pays for twitter. -j
Re: FYI Netflix is down
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Dan Golding wrote: > This happens all the time. Not saying Netflix is doing this, but lots of > other folks are. It’s a trap that’s easy to fall into. Especially with Netflix did the reverse. The moved *to* Amazon, so they could do "noops".
Re: Software Defined Networking
> On Sep 4, 2015, at 07:40, Rod Beck wrote: > > Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself? What do you mean when you say “software defined networking”? Do you have a particular problem or use case you are approaching? Cheers, -j
Re: VUDU thinks my network is out of the country
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 08:46, Brett A Mansfield > wrote: > > I need a good contact at VUDU. I have several customers that use it that > cannot. They gave us a workaround where each and every individual customer > needs to call in and get their IP unblocked, but they aren't unblocking them > anymore. Who were you talking to previously? Cheers, -j
Re: [TECH] Pica8 & Cumulus Networks
> On Nov 1, 2015, at 23:53, Yoann THOMAS wrote: > Under a Cloud project I ask myself to use equipment based on the Pica8 or > Cumulus Networks. We’ve had some great conversations with Cumulus, but more generally, I think you need to look at the cloud project’s goals. Those should help inform your decision making process. Specifically, what are your SDN and generally, networking needs and use cases. > All in order to mount a Spine & Leaf architecture > > - Spine 40Gbps > - Leaf in 10Gbps In a new cloud deployment of any size, you probably want more than 10G to the compute servers, especially if you’re carrying storage traffic. > > Someone of you there a feedback on this equipment. > > Regards, > > Yoann THOMAS > CTO - Castle-IT Cheers, -j
Re: Broadband Router Comparisons
> On Dec 27, 2015, at 17:56, Mike wrote: > The device would be cisco or juniper branded, internal redundancy / failover > features to allow hitless upgrades or module failures, have dual (preferably, After the last week or so, I wouldn’t trust a service provider who insisted on installing juniper at my site.
Re: Broadband Router Comparisons
> On Dec 27, 2015, at 09:43, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > Hence: https://on.google.com/hub/ The device looks cool, and sounds cool, but what data does google end up with, and what remote management can they do? Their policy pages aren’t exactly clear, and they’ve mishandled personal data a number of times previously.
Re: de-peering for security sake
> On Dec 26, 2015, at 12:34, Owen DeLong wrote: > > Also, note that the only difference between a good long passphrase and a > private key is, > uh, wait, um, come to think of it, really not much. Are you equating a long PSK with PKE? They’re quite different.
Re: Broadband Router Comparisons
> On Dec 27, 2015, at 20:00, Keith Medcalf wrote: > They end up with ALL the data they can capture; they have COMPLETE management > control; and, can execute whatever code they want, without your prior > approval or choice, on the device at any time they please, including > permanent changes in the software and configuration. What’s what I assume as well. This makes it, and the nest, and any related devices unwelcome.
Re: Verizon E-Mail Contact
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 14:39, Brielle Bruns wrote: > > On 1/18/16 10:38 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote: >> visit 550 http://www.verizon.net/whitelist and request removal of the >> block. 160118) > It's really really hard to contact your support department, Verizon, if you > have the same filters in place on your whitelist@ address as you do on the > rest of your e-mail addresses. Also, "The requested URL /whitelist/ was not found on this server.”
Re: Google Contact
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 09:40, Adam Loveless wrote: > > Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address space > has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captchas for them now. Is that the capture that happens in front of certain websites? I had that happen for two totally unrelated IP blocks. They eventually cleared within a day or two, but I think they’re having problems with the detection systems. The captcha also didn’t work right for the site I was trying to access (hackernews).
Re: Thank you, Comcast.
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 06:31, Keith Medcalf wrote: > > ISP's should block nothing, to or from the customer, unless they make it > clear *before* selling the service (and include it in the Terms and > Conditions of Service Contract), that they are not selling an Internet > connection but are selling a partially functional Internet connection (or a > limited Internet Service), and specifying exactly what the built-in > deficiencies are. Absolutely. It’s funny that a group that worries about about net neutrality and whinges about T-Mobile’s zero-rating certain video sources is perfectly fine with blindly blocking *ports*, without even understanding if it’s legitimate traffic. > Deficiencies may include: > port/protocol blockage toward the customer (destination blocks) > port/protocol blockage toward the internet (source blocks) > DNS diddling (filtering of responses, NXDOMAIN redirection/wildcards, etc) This would be a big reason to point to a different DNS... > Traffic Shaping/Policing/Congestion policies, inbound and outbound > > Some ISPs are good at this and provide opt-in/out methods for at least the > first three on the list. Others not so much.
Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
> On Feb 27, 2015, at 08:11, Stephen Satchell wrote: > > transcription on an old Underwood Portable that had seen much, much > better days. You’d think they could afford a new typewriter or two with all of the Universal Service fees they’ve been collecting and not providing.
Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 14:20, Ca By wrote: > Dear Amazon, Twitter, Ebay, and Reddit -- please consider this your > personal invitation to introduce IPv6 to your service. Skype doesn’t appear to have any IPv6 infrastructure. -j
Re: gmail security is a joke
> On May 27, 2015, at 11:22, John R. Levine wrote: > As I've said a couple of times already, but perhaps without the capital > letters, from a security point of view, generating a NEW PASSWORD and sending > it in cleartext is no worse than sending you a one time reset link. Either > way, if a bad guy can intercept your mail, you lose. Well, no… a one time reset link is infinitely better than sending a cleartext password, assuming you don’t have to immediately change the password. A reset link, being usable once, means that you can detect if an attacker has already used it. If you use it first, the attacker has a useless link. If an attacker gets a cleartext password, you probably can’t detect interception. Cheers, -j
Re: Lists of VPN exit addresses?
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 05:08, Roland Dobbins wrote: > Another thought is governmentally-driven censorship, something else I > encounter a lot in my travels. I was talking a few weeks ago with a developer type from China who said something to the effect of “Hosted X is a problem because while developer types have experience getting around firewalls, [manager types] do not…”
Re: Lists of VPN exit addresses?
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 17:25, Roland Dobbins wrote: > > Yes, we all know that technical people can generally get around these sorts > of blocks, and non-technical people all too often can't. > > The majority of people aren't technical (using Facebook and Instagram all day > <> technical). I thought your point was that you encounter governmentally-driven censorship frequently in your travels, and you were in favor of making it easier to get around it. The need for this was what my anecdote was meant to illustrate.
Re: ARIN IPV4 Countdown
> On Jul 14, 2015, at 16:09, Curtis Maurand wrote: > > i think IPV6 adoption is going to be very slow. It's very difficult for the > layman to understand and that contributes to the slow rate of uptake. Who is the layman in this story? Almost every system I work with at home and in the datacenter has IPv6 turned on by default. If someone wandered through those networks, and started turning on IPv6 infrastructure so that they started getting IPv6 addresses, my bet is that most of the java-based applications would already be bound to the stacks in such a way that they would just start sending traffic over IPv6. I base this on the fact that any number of developers have been confused by “::” being somewhere in their world now. Those people don’t care about the network, or IPv4 vs IPv6. It would just work. Now, if layman == Network Operators, and Networking people at Corporations, well, there you might be right. Cheers, -j
Re: Data Center operations mail list?
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote: > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain. Nad Cog?
Re: Solar Flux
On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:37 AM, todd glassey wrote: Barbie is "geek girl" or "Engineer Barbie" the idea that being a geek is offensive may have finally been put to death as it should have 20 years ago. Of course, Joel used the word "nerd", so.. So, does anyone actually talk about networks on nanog anymore? -j
Re: FCC dealt major blow in net neutrality ruling favoring, Comcast
On Apr 12, 2010, at 1:05 PM, Richard Bennett wrote: You're speculating that ITIF gets funding from Comcast, and therefore If only the ITIF released information about their funding sources. So, does Comcast contribute funds or otherwise sponsor ITIF? Does Google, Intel, or Microsoft? Cheers, -j
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 50
On Jul 19, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote: The single host/box had bomb making info and hit lists. Yeah, I'd shut it down too if it was on my network. Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 As would any reasonable operator. Or maybe it would have been better to not destroy a known source, and work with the FBI to maximize its value. Cutting it off like that was short-sighted and stupid. -j
Re: RIP Justification
On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Ricky Beam wrote: The 1% where it was a necessary evil... dialup networking where the only routing protocol supported was RIP (v2) [netblazers] -- static IP clients had to be able to land anywhere -- but RIP only lived on the local segment, OSPF took over network-wide. (Later MaxTNT's were setup with OSPF I remember RIP across chassis for the TotalControl bonded dialup stuff, and as you mention, static IPs, but I haven't seen it in serious use for a long time. Cheers, -j
Re: What must one do to avoid Gmail's overachieving spam filtering?
On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Daniel Seagraves wrote: On Sep 29, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Ryan Hayes wrote: Can you please not use the word "retarded" in a pejorative sense? The word "please" is probably not required, since using that word in this manner is prosecutable hate speech in some jurisdictions. Really? Where? Seems to me equating "retarded" used as an adjective to say, speech of the KKK seems... lame. Also, "retarded" was applied to software, which to date, has not been entered as a protected group. -j
Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
On Aug 26, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Roy wrote: I think it has become obvious that the correct definition of broadband depends on the users location. A house in the boonies is not going to get fiber, Perhaps the minimum acceptable bandwidth should vary by area. A definition of "area" could be some sort of user density Except this is exactly what happened. The players with vested interests were allowed a sort of "first refusal" on projects. In areas where they had lots of customers, they passed on the projects. So, we find that in urban areas, you can't get fiber in the home, but there are countless rural farms and homes that have fiber just lying around. I have an acquaintance 60 miles from the closest commercial airport in TN, telling me about the fiber internet he has. -j
Re: Issues with Gmail
On Sep 1, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Dominic J. Eidson wrote: It appears to be much more a problem with gmail (the MUA) than gmail (the MDA). Gmail/imap appears to be working fine, at least from AUS. Same thing here in the US. Pop/Imap access remains solid. I never use the web interface. -j
Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: I'm not following you here -- which party has the right of first refusal? The incumbent companies (generally, a LEC or cable company) are able to refuse projects and also effectively prevent buildouts and upgrades from being done by a 3rd party. However, I have seen reports that in a few areas, municipalities are starting to win lawsuits against them (in apparently the long appeals process). urban area receives no USF, and is not able to financially justify it even with a dense customer base. That might apply to fiber, but even speed upgrades (Newer DSL services) are apparently subject to the same refusal process, but the rules are different across the country, too. -j
Re: Rackspace outage
On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Justin T. Sharp wrote: Rackspace seems to have a severe routing loop, which appears to have taken a lot of sites down. Does anyone have any information on this? http://status.mosso.com/2009/12/cloud-sites-dfw-investigating-current-issue.html
Re: Mitigating human error in the SP
On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: We have solved 98% of this with standard configurations and templates. To deviate from this requires management approval/exception approval after an evaluation of the business risks. I would also point Chad to this book: http://bit.ly/cShEIo (Amazon Link to Visual Ops). It's very useful to have your management read it. You may or may not be able to or want to use a full ITIL process, but understanding how these policies and procedures can/should work, and using the ones that apply makes sense. Change control, tracking, and configuration management are going to be key to avoiding mistakes, and being able to rapidly repair when one is made. Unfortunately, most management that demands No Tolerance, Zero Error from operations won't read the book. Good luck.. I'd bet most of the people on this list have been there one time or another. Cheers, -j
Re: NEED ANY LINK OR SAMPLE TEMPLATE FOR ROUTINE NETWORK (ISP) MAINTENANCE PLAN
On Mar 16, 2010, at 4:55 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: Weekly? Is that your secret? Most of us just do a massive clean-up once a year - the next one is just 15 days away. Maybe that's the problem - go I still have a box of the plastic covers to put on the ends of the cables when the internet lines are cleaned. Our series of tubes are never clogged, but sometimes some dust gets blown out.
Re: Raised floor, Solid floor... or carpet?
On Apr 1, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Brandon Kim wrote: Wouldn't a carpet be bad for possible fires/flames or sparks? Looks like they got 2, now... -j
Word Usage (was Re: Elad Cohen)
For the record: Slander is false *spoken* statements. Libel is false *written* statements. HTH, HAND.
