> On Dec 27, 2015, at 17:56, Mike <mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com> wrote:

> The device would be cisco or juniper branded, internal redundancy / failover 
> features to allow hitless upgrades or module failures, have dual (preferably, 

After the last week or so, I wouldn’t trust a service provider who insisted on 
installing juniper at my site.

Reply via email to