Bug#325421: Crashes in /usr/bin/guile-1.6: solved

[Martijn Pieters]

Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:

I'm unable to reproduce this on my system.

What is your GTK theme (for gnome-1) set to?


G26. And indeed, if I switch to Industrial the crash is no longer 
reproducable. This should probably be reassigned to that theme then.


Thanks!

Martijn Pieters


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#325472: libaqhbci-qt-tools: uninstallable

[Thomas Viehmann]

The package will be removed from the archive shortly.

Kind regards

T.

Hendrik Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Package: libaqhbci-qt-tools
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   libaqhbci-qt-tools: Depends: libaqbanking0 but it is not installable
>   Depends: libaqhbci2 but it is not going to be installed
>   Depends: libgwenhywfar17 (>= 1.11.0) but it is not 
> installable
>   Depends: libktoblzcheck1 but it is not installable
>   Depends: libofx1 but it is not installable
>   Depends: libosp4 (>= 1.5.1.0-1) but it is not 
> installable
> E: Broken packages
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
>
>

Processed: (no subject)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package revelation
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: revelation

> close 306901
Bug#306901: revelation: can not be upgraded due to an error on removal
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kai Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> close 307764
Bug#307764: FTBFS subsequent builds
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 319509 is grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> severity 319509 grave
Bug#319509: python2.4-psycopg: fails to be installed by apt-get/dpkg
Severity set to `grave'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325520: m17n-lib: FTBFS: missing build-depends on libgd2-dev

[Duck]

Package: m17n-lib
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: Serious


Coin,

Here is the end of the build log, showing the missing build-dep :

cc -g -Wall -O2 -DDLOPEN_SHLIB_EXT=\".so.0\" -o .libs/m17n-dump mdump.o
linebreak.o  -lgd ../src/.libs/libm17n-core.so -L/usr/lib
../src/.libs/libm17n.so ../src/.libs/libm17n-gui.so
/usr/lib/libfribidi.so /usr/lib/libotf.so /usr/lib/libfreetype.so
-lfontconfig /tmp/m17n-lib-1.2.0/src/.libs/libm17n.so
/tmp/m17n-lib-1.2.0/src/.libs/libm17n-core.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so -lz
-lm -ldl
mdump.o: In function `dump_image':
/tmp/m17n-lib-1.2.0/example/mdump.c:415: undefined reference to
`gdImagePng'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


-- 
Marc Dequènes (Duck)


pgpcYMQxb6LW1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#325522: libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib

[Gerfried Fuchs]

Package: libweather-com-perl
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1.

Hi!

 From reading your package description I wonder:

,---> quote <---
| Notice: To use the weather.com's service you have to register at
| weather.com first.
`---> quote <---

 From the policy:

   In addition, the packages in _main_
  * must not require a package outside of _main_ for compilation or
execution

 Though it speaks of "require a package" (and goes to the extend of
package dependencies) I would still see that the package shouldn't
need some registration at some site to be useable.  Or do you think
the package would be useable in any way without the weather.com
registration?

 So long,
Alfie
-- 
 Streich den wein und ersetz ihn durch foo
 Und das kann man trinken?
 klar, foo gibts an jeder bar :)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: should refuse to start, not abort upgrade

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
> rebooted.  udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
> not 2.6.12.  preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.
If you think you have a better idea, feel free to explain it.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Can this be resolved by some dependancies and conflicts?
This is supposed to be a FAQ: packages cannot have explicit dependencies
on kernel packages.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#321690: marked as done (synaptic: Segmentation fault (powerpc ibook G4))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:26:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321690: synaptic: Segmentation fault (powerpc ibook G4)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 22:07:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 15:07:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailfe16.tele2.fr (swip.net) [212.247.155.236] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1WpX-00048B-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:07:47 -0700
X-T2-Posting-ID: WiVWjBLUzApqRSJ6HjW2DwHYtIkfdnpfJm1ZTTtKVuc=
Received: from [83.177.232.73] (HELO localhost.localdomain)
  by mailfe16.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4)
  with ESMTP id 4425391; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:07:43 +0200
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 631B56F600; Sun,  7 Aug 2005 00:07:37 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bin Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: synaptic: Segmentation fault (powerpc ibook G4)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:07:37 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: synaptic
Version: 0.57.4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

After upgrade to 0.57.4 (powerpc), synaptic doesn't start. 
I get a "Segmentation fault".

Best regards,
Bin


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc5.20050804
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages synaptic depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6 0.6.40.1   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.1-2   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-3  GCC support library
ii  libglade2-0   1:2.5.1-2  library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.6-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libncurses5   5.4-9  Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstdc++64.0.1-3The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libvte4   1:0.11.13-4Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxft2   2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxml2   2.6.20-1   GNOME XML library
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0-2  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  scrollkeeper  0.3.14-10  A free electronic cataloging syste
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-3  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages synaptic recommends:
ii  deborphan 1.7.16 Find orphaned libraries
ii  gksu  1.3.1-2graphical frontend to su
pn  libgnome2-perl (no description available)

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 321690-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 08:27:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 01:27:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9ezG-0001lC-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 01:27:26 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2005 08:26:55 -
Received: from ip181.135.1511I-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO top.ping.de) 
[62.143.135.181]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 29 Aug 2005 10:26:55 +0200
X-Authenticated: #18895133
Received: by top

Bug#325528: libm17n-0: segfaults with mgp, rendering it unusuable

[Duck]

Package: libm17n-0
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: grave


Coin,

As mgp is a major rdepends for libm17n-0 and very few programs use this
library, having mgp unusuable because of it is more than important, thus
such a severity.

Using any sample file provided with mgp resulted in a segfault after
rendering background, so i guess when rendering text. See the attached
backtrace showing segfault occuring deep in libm17n (which made me
report on libm17n-0 instead of mgp).

Starting program: /usr/X11R6/bin/mgp sample.mgp

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7747fa9 in xfont_registry_list (frame=0x82be438, registry=0x8295d28) at 
m17n-X.c:560
560 MLIST_APPEND1 (xfont_table, fonts, font, MERROR_WIN);
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb7747fa9 in xfont_registry_list (frame=0x82be438, registry=0x8295d28) at 
m17n-X.c:560
#1  0xb77482c4 in xfont_select (frame=0x82be438, spec=0x82a27d8, 
request=0xbfbf88b6, limited_size=0) at m17n-X.c:622
#2  0xb7c30ee3 in mfont__select (frame=0x82be438, spec=0x82a27d8, 
request=0xbfbf88b6, limited_size=0, layouter=0x0) at font.c:1084
#3  0xb7c3c048 in realize_font_group (frame=0x82be438, request=0x82ce980, 
font_group=0x82ceb78, size=0) at fontset.c:324
#4  0xb7c3cbad in try_font_group (realized=0x82ce978, font_group=0x82ceb78, 
g=0xbfbf89e8, num=0xbfbf8a98, size=0) at fontset.c:513
#5  0xb7c3cfb4 in mfont__lookup_fontset (realized=0x82ce978, g=0xbfbf89e8, 
num=0xbfbf8a98, script=0x8356b68, language=0x823f998, charset=0x0, size=0)
at fontset.c:600
#6  0xb7c2dc84 in mface__realize (frame=0x82be438, faces=0x0, num=1, size=0) at 
face.c:655
#7  0xb7c2e1cb in mface__update_frame_face (frame=0x82be438) at face.c:768
#8  0xb7c48bcb in mframe (plist=0x82bdcf0) at m17n-gui.c:686
#9  0x08077a04 in M17N_draw_string (state=0x81047c0, cp=0x823c2d8) at m17n.c:528
#10 0x08056b4a in process_direc (state=0x81047c0, seenpause=0xbfbfad3c) at 
draw.c:755
#11 0x080584d0 in draw_page (state=0x81047c0, lastcp=0x0) at draw.c:321
#12 0x08058616 in cache_page (state=0x81047c0, page=1) at draw.c:4259
#13 0x080586ea in predraw (state=0x808ee80) at draw.c:4418
#14 0x0804dbdb in main_loop (start_page=1) at mgp.c:781
#15 0x0804fb81 in main (argc=2, argv=Variable "argv" is not available.
) at mgp.c:481


-- 
Marc Dequènes (Duck)


pgphfXVQQTfEk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#325527: alsaplayer-common depends on unavailable liboggflac1

[Noel Köthe]

Package: alsaplayer-common
Version: 0.99.76-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hello,

alsaplayer-common depends on liboggflac1 but this package/lib is removed
from sid.
The name is now liboggflac3 so a rebuild against liboggflac-dev
(1.1.2-3) should fix this problem.

thx.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages alsaplayer-common depends on:
ii  alsaplayer-esd [alsaplayer-o 0.99.76-6   PCM player designed for ALSA (ESD 
ii  alsaplayer-gtk [alsaplayer-i 0.99.76-6   PCM player designed for ALSA (GTK 
ii  libc62.3.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libflac6 1.1.1-5.2   Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.1-6   GCC support library
ii  libid3tag0   0.15.1b-7   ID3 tag reading library from the M
ii  libmad0  0.15.1b-2.1 MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libmikmod2   3.1.11-a-6  A portable sound library
ii  libogg0  1.1.2-1 Ogg Bitstream Library
ii  liboggflac1  1.1.1-5.2   Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libsndfile1  1.0.11-1Library for reading/writing audio 
ii  libstdc++6   4.0.1-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libvorbis0a  1.1.0-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile3   1.1.0-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-3   compression library - runtime

alsaplayer-common recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 325471 is serious, severity of 325511 is serious, merging 325471 325511

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> severity 325471 serious
Bug#325471: libc6: Error in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh at line 100
Severity set to `serious'.

> severity 325511 serious
Bug#325511: libc6: bashisms in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh script
Severity set to `serious'.

> merge 325471 325511
Bug#325471: libc6: Error in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh at line 100
Bug#325511: libc6: bashisms in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh script
Merged 325471 325511.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Did you really need to make such a mess about this ?
Yes, but thank you for asking about it.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Sven Luther]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:22:59AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Can this be resolved by some dependancies and conflicts?
> This is supposed to be a FAQ: packages cannot have explicit dependencies
> on kernel packages.

While doing breakage things in the postinst is allowed ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Sven Luther]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:46:49AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Package: udev,linux-2.6
> Severity: grave
> 
> udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12 should enter testing at the same
> time.
> If udev is first it will refuse to be upgraded (or install but disable
> itself on new installs), if the kernel is first some udev rules
> (at least the ones referencing sysfs attributes) will not work.
> 
> Monitor the situation at:
> 
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=linux-2.6
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=udev
> 
> and close this bug when both packages will be ready to enter testing
> at the same time.

Alsa-utils in testing currently doesn't install with udev in testing, and
furthermore upgrades of udev is utherly broken.

Udev installation will die when running a kernel >2.6.12, but old udev will be
broken when running a 2.6.12 kernels as far as i understand, this leads to a
udev created circular deadlock, which is much less than user friendly, and
which should be solved in a nicer manner.

MAybe you could have udev install complete when upgrading to 2.6.12/new udev,
but not be activated or such.

Did you really need to make such a mess about this ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324473: mozilla-firefox: 1.0.4-2sarge2 segfaults at startup

[MeDon]

Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2sarge2
Followup-For: Bug #324473


Hi, I have also lot of problems with 1.0.4-2sarge2. E.g. gmailnotifier has
stopped working. If I try to install it from
http://nexgenmedia.net/extensions/, then the mozilla crashes in the end of
instalation.




-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-medon.2
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on:
ii  debianutils2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  fontconfig 2.3.1-2   generic font configuration library
ii  libatk1.0-01.8.0-4   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-22  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2   generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6   2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc11:3.4.3-13GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.6.4-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-02.6.4-3   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libidl00.8.5-1   library for parsing CORBA IDL file
ii  libjpeg62  6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libkrb53   1.3.6-2sarge2 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libpango1.0-0  1.8.1-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft22.1.7-1   FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System printing extension
ii  libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  psmisc 21.5-1Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  xlibs  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: should refuse to start, not abort upgrade

[Sven Luther]

On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:08:17PM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> 
> In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
> rebooted.  udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
> not 2.6.12.  preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.

Indeed, this whole situation is a mess, udev should be fixed to behave less
stupidly in such cases, which will most assuredly break sarge->etch upgrades.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: should refuse to start, not abort upgrade

[Sven Luther]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:27:09AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
> > rebooted.  udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
> > not 2.6.12.  preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.
> If you think you have a better idea, feel free to explain it.

Have a compatibility udev maybe ? Also you have to remember, that some people
like or need to run two sets of kernels.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Sven Luther]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:54:59AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Did you really need to make such a mess about this ?
> Yes, but thank you for asking about it.

Well, badly worded maybe :), but i think your RC bug on the kernel without
prior discussion may have been somewhat rude.

Anyway, i was expecting some explanation about the reason why this mess
happened, especially in the light of you asking for help on a neater solution.

In any case, i belive the current situation, in that it breaks the sarge->etch
migration, will have to be fixed down the line, so we should maybe best do it
now cleanly.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325397: marked as done ([amd64] Crash X sometimes with powernow-k8)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:59:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325397: [amd64] Crash X sometimes with powernow-k8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2005 11:11:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 04:11:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 59-171-177-165.rev.home.ne.jp (localhost) [59.171.177.165] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9L4L-0001Zc-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 04:11:22 -0700
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1E9L4I-0003SR-4d
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:11:18 +0900
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:11:17 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [amd64] Crash X sometimes with powernow-k8
From: Kyuma Ohta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.52 on Emacs 22.0.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

  When using powernowd (or other powercontroller) with powernow-k8
kernel driver, some process wat using X is crashed  with X server
with kernel oops with below message:

I'm using kernel 2.6.11 or later (Now,2.6.13-rc7) ,
this issue is happend with powernowd sometimes,
but I'm not using powernowd (or another power controller),
this issue han *not* happened.

I'm running system on MSI K8T Neo2 (VIS K8T800) with 
nVidia GeForce 5200FX and Athlon64 3000+.

Regards,
Ohta
---
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724581] Unable to handle kernel NULL 
pointer dereference at 0103 RIP: 
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724587] {sk_free+49}
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724596] PGD 1615a067 PUD 67c5067 PMD 0 
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724600] Oops:  [1] 
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724602] CPU 0 
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724603] Modules linked in: w83627hf 
i2c_viapro i2c_isa i2c_dev nvidia deflate zlib_deflate twofish serpent 
aes_x86_64 blowfish des sha256 sha1 crypto_null lp ipt_TOS ipt_MASQUERADE 
ipt_REJECT ipt_LOG ipt_state ipt_pkttype ipt_CONNMARK ipt_MARK ipt_connmark 
ipt_owner ipt_recent ipt_iprange ipt_physdev ipt_multiport ipt_conntrack 
iptable_mangle ip_nat_irc ip_nat_tftp ip_nat_ftp iptable_nat ip_conntrack_irc 
ip_conntrack_tftp ip_conntrack_ftp iptable_filter ip_tables ipv6 parport_pc 
parport pcspkr w83627hf_wdt i2c_sensor saa7115 upd64083 upd64031a mpg600gr 
saa717x ivtv i2c_algo_bit tvaudio tuner saa7134 video_buf v4l2_common 
v4l1_compat i2c_core ir_common videodev snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi 
snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_via82xx snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss 
snd_pcm snd_timer snd_page_alloc snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd 
soundcore psmouse r8169 tg3 sbp2 tsdev joydev evdev usbhid usblp
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724641] Pid: 14467, comm: gnome-panel 
Tainted: P  2.6.13-rc7-gcc402
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724645] RIP: 0010:[] 
{sk_free+49}
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724651] RSP: 0018:810016563c28  
EFLAGS: 00010206
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724654] RAX: 0001 RBX: 
81001c828c00 RCX: 
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724657] RDX:  RSI: 
81001d1d5080 RDI: 00ff
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724660] RBP:  R08: 
 R09: 
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724664] R10:  R11: 
80196760 R12: 81001c828ce0
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724667] R13:  R14: 
0001 R15: 
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724671] FS:  40800960() 
GS:80720800() knlGS:556ea6c0
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724674] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  
CR0: 8005003b
Aug 27 06:45:04 melchior kernel: [ 3261.724677] CR2: 0103 CR3: 
3df26000 CR4: 06e0
Aug 27 

Bug#325532: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))

[Steve Langasek]

Package: mozilla
Severity: serious

The current mozilla package fails to build on alpha, arm, and ia64
because it uses __attribute__((unused)) to mark static functions that
are called only from assembly routines.  As of gcc 3.1,
__attribute__((used)) exists for marking static functions that are used;
as of gcc 4.0, __attribute__((unused)) still suppresses compiler
warnings about unused static functions, but it does *not* prevent the
compiler from optimizing them away.

The attached patch should fix this failure for all three architectures.
It has only been tested on alpha, and each architecture has its own
implementation for this bit of code, but this patch fixes all uses of
__attribute__((unused)), so it should be sufficient.  (FWIW, one other
architecture -- i386 -- already uses ((used)) in the code...)

Since this bug is in the XPCOM code, it also affects other packages that
build copies of XPCOM.  I'll clone this bug off to them as soon as I
have a bug number back.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
diff -ur 
mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_alpha.cpp 
mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_alpha.cpp
--- mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_alpha.cpp   
2005-08-28 20:01:29.0 -0700
+++ mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_alpha.cpp
2005-08-28 02:36:43.0 -0700
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@
 /* Prototype specifies unmangled function name and disables unused warning */
 static void
 invoke_copy_to_stack(PRUint64* d, PRUint32 paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* s)
-__asm__("invoke_copy_to_stack") __attribute__((unused));
+__asm__("invoke_copy_to_stack") __attribute__((used));
+
 
 static void
 invoke_copy_to_stack(PRUint64* d, PRUint32 paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* s)
diff -ur mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_arm.cpp 
mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_arm.cpp
--- mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_arm.cpp
2002-03-04 22:35:50.0 -0800
+++ mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_arm.cpp 2005-08-28 
02:46:41.0 -0700
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@
 #endif
 
 /* Specify explicitly a symbol for this function, don't try to guess the c++ 
mangled symbol.  */
-static nsresult PrepareAndDispatch(nsXPTCStubBase* self, uint32 methodIndex, 
PRUint32* args) asm("_PrepareAndDispatch");
+static nsresult PrepareAndDispatch(nsXPTCStubBase* self, uint32 methodIndex, 
PRUint32* args) asm("_PrepareAndDispatch")
+__attribute((used))__;
 
 static nsresult
 PrepareAndDispatch(nsXPTCStubBase* self, uint32 methodIndex, PRUint32* args)
diff -ur mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_ffi.cpp 
mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_ffi.cpp
--- mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_ffi.cpp
2005-08-28 20:01:30.0 -0700
+++ mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_ffi.cpp 2005-08-28 
02:45:42.0 -0700
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
 }
 
 static void xptc_dispatch (ffi_cif *, void *, void **, void *, void *)
- __asm__("xptc_dispatch") __attribute__((unused));
+ __asm__("xptc_dispatch") __attribute__((used));
 
 static void
 xptc_dispatch (ffi_cif *common_cif, void *retp, void **common_args,
diff -ur 
mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_linux_alpha.cpp 
mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_linux_alpha.cpp
--- mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_linux_alpha.cpp
2005-08-28 20:01:29.0 -0700
+++ mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_linux_alpha.cpp 
2005-08-28 02:37:54.0 -0700
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
 /* Prototype specifies unmangled function name and disables unused warning */
 static nsresult
 PrepareAndDispatch(nsXPTCStubBase* self, uint32 methodIndex, PRUint64* args)
-__asm__("PrepareAndDispatch") __attribute__((unused));
+__asm__("PrepareAndDispatch") __attribute__((used));
 
 static nsresult
 PrepareAndDispatch(nsXPTCStubBase* self, uint32 methodIndex, PRUint64* args)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Sven Luther]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:04:18AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Well, badly worded maybe :), but i think your RC bug on the kernel without
> > prior discussion may have been somewhat rude.
> It was discussed with vorlon.

Vorlon is not the kernel team however.

> > Anyway, i was expecting some explanation about the reason why this mess
> > happened, especially in the light of you asking for help on a neater 
> > solution.
> I am not actually asking for help, because I have spent a large quantity
> of my time dealing with this and so far I believe that there are no
> better solutions. But I am allowing people who think they know better to
> propose other solutions (at the obvious risk of being flamed if they did
> not do their homeworks first).

Thanks all the same for that much cooperation.

What do you think of having two udev packages, which are parallely
installable, and one would work for <2.6.12 and the other for >>2.6.12 ?

> > In any case, i belive the current situation, in that it breaks the 
> > sarge->etch
> It does not. The agreed transition procedure is:
>  * upgrade the kernel

Which breaks currently installed udev.

>  * reboot
>  * upgrade udev

This is definitively not a user-friendly procedure.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > It was discussed with vorlon.
> Vorlon is not the kernel team however.
But he is the one who decides when packages should or should not go in
testing, which is what this bug is about.

> What do you think of having two udev packages, which are parallely
> installable, and one would work for <2.6.12 and the other for >>2.6.12 ?
Please *first* read the closed udev bugs about this and *then* propose
solutions.

> >  * upgrade the kernel
> Which breaks currently installed udev.
Only partially, it will work enough to allow rebooting and upgrading.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325484: should refuse to start, not abort upgrade

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Have a compatibility udev maybe ? Also you have to remember, that some people
It could not work in an acceptable way.
Please read the huge past threads about this.

> like or need to run two sets of kernels.
And I want a pony.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, badly worded maybe :), but i think your RC bug on the kernel without
> prior discussion may have been somewhat rude.
It was discussed with vorlon.

> Anyway, i was expecting some explanation about the reason why this mess
> happened, especially in the light of you asking for help on a neater solution.
I am not actually asking for help, because I have spent a large quantity
of my time dealing with this and so far I believe that there are no
better solutions. But I am allowing people who think they know better to
propose other solutions (at the obvious risk of being flamed if they did
not do their homeworks first).

> In any case, i belive the current situation, in that it breaks the sarge->etch
It does not. The agreed transition procedure is:
 * upgrade the kernel
 * reboot
 * upgrade udev

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Bastian Blank]

reassign 325484 udev
retitle 325484 udev lacks sarge->etch upgrade path
thanks

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:46:49AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12 should enter testing at the same
> time.

You have to provide a proper sarge->etch upgrade path. This bug is the
sign of lack this path.

Bastian

-- 
... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get
to know each other.
-- Kirk, "Elaan of Troyius", stardate 4372.5


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325522: libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib

[Christoph Haas]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:01:38AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>  From reading your package description I wonder:
> 
> ,---> quote <---
> | Notice: To use the weather.com's service you have to register at
> | weather.com first.
> `---> quote <---
> 
>  From the policy:
> 
>In addition, the packages in _main_
>   * must not require a package outside of _main_ for compilation or
> execution
> 
>  Though it speaks of "require a package" (and goes to the extend of
> package dependencies) I would still see that the package shouldn't
> need some registration at some site to be useable.  Or do you think
> the package would be useable in any way without the weather.com
> registration?

I get your point and understand your concerns. And it's true that the
package is useless without a registration at weather.com. It's a
borderline case though. Obviously the package does not depend on a
software package that is not in 'main'. So my personal opinion is: it
should stay in main.

My arguments:
- a package is not automatically contrib just because it uses
  an internet service that is "non-free"
- libnet-google-perl is in main although Google in non-free
- aj showed me this ancient thread dealing with the issue:
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/1999/05/msg4.html
- ICQ clients are in main although ICQ servers are closed-source
  and require registration at AOL

If you agree then please close this bug report. I would not like to
have this flamewar'ed on debian-devel since it has been discussed
before in depth and length. And there was a slight majority for keeping
such packages in 'main'.

Thanks.

 Christoph



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: clone for thunderbird and firefox

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 325532 -1 -2
Bug#325532: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
Bug 325532 cloned as bugs 325535-325536.

> reassign -1 mozilla-firefox/1.0.4-2
Bug#325535: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla' to `mozilla-firefox/1.0.4-2'.

> reassign -2 mozilla-thunderbird/1.0.2-3
Bug#325536: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla' to `mozilla-thunderbird/1.0.2-3'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325522: marked as done (libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:49:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325522: libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 08:01:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 01:01:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-133-100-49.clients.your-server.de (mail.biedermanns.com) 
[213.133.100.49] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9eaW-0005pq-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 01:01:52 -0700
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] 
helo=tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at)
by mail.biedermanns.com with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian))
id 1E9ei7-0006nN-DT
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:09:45 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E9eaJ-00076I-AH
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:01:39 +0200
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:01:38 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved 
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) 
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8. quote <---
| Notice: To use the weather.com's service you have to register at
| weather.com first.
`---> quote <---

 From the policy:

   In addition, the packages in _main_
  * must not require a package outside of _main_ for compilation or
execution

 Though it speaks of "require a package" (and goes to the extend of
package dependencies) I would still see that the package shouldn't
need some registration at some site to be useable.  Or do you think
the package would be useable in any way without the weather.com
registration?

 So long,
Alfie
-- 
 Streich den wein und ersetz ihn durch foo
 Und das kann man trinken?
 klar, foo gibts an jeder bar :)

---
Received: (at 325522-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 09:49:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 02:49:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-133-100-49.clients.your-server.de (mail.biedermanns.com) 
[213.133.100.49] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9gGv-0006Uo-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:49:45 -0700
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] 
helo=tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at)
by mail.biedermanns.com with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian))
id 1E9gOe-0007Cu-RX; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:57:48 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E9gGG-0007s3-Ga; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:49:04 +0200
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:49:03 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#325522: libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved 
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) 
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8. [2005-08-29 11:26]:
> My arguments:
> - a package is not automatically contrib just because it uses
>   an internet service that is "non-free"

 Yes, you are right. Sorry for, erm, a bit of overreacting. It's just
the same like any AIM/MSN/ICQ client we have around...

 Sorry for the inconvenience.

>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/1999/05/msg4.html
> If you agree then please close this bug report. I would not like to
> have this flamewar'ed on debian-devel since it has been discussed
> before in depth and length. And there was a slight majority for keeping
> such packages in

Processed: mumble

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 325535 mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2
Bug#325535: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-firefox/1.0.4-2' to `mozilla-firefox'.

> reassign 325536 mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.2-3
Bug#325536: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-thunderbird/1.0.2-3' to 
`mozilla-thunderbird'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Sven Luther]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:15:22AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > It was discussed with vorlon.
> > Vorlon is not the kernel team however.
> But he is the one who decides when packages should or should not go in
> testing, which is what this bug is about.

Yeah, sure, whatever ...

> > What do you think of having two udev packages, which are parallely
> > installable, and one would work for <2.6.12 and the other for >>2.6.12 ?
> Please *first* read the closed udev bugs about this and *then* propose
> solutions.

Well, i know you close RC bugs on a whim, so ...

> > >  * upgrade the kernel
> > Which breaks currently installed udev.
> Only partially, it will work enough to allow rebooting and upgrading.

In all cases ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325504: bashisms

[Adrian Bridgett]

Just a quick note to say that the sed patch has a typo in it (the
close curly brace).

Adrian
-- 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -*-  GPG key available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux - the maintainable distribution   -*-  www.debian.org
Avoid working with children, animals and Microsoft "operating" systems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > > >  * upgrade the kernel
> > > Which breaks currently installed udev.
> > Only partially, it will work enough to allow rebooting and upgrading.
> In all cases ? 
AFAIK, yes.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:26:09AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> reassign 325484 udev
> retitle 325484 udev lacks sarge->etch upgrade path
> thanks

> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:46:49AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12 should enter testing at the same
> > time.

> You have to provide a proper sarge->etch upgrade path. This bug is the
> sign of lack this path.

Requiring that users reboot to 2.6.12 before installing the new version
of udev from etch *is* a valid upgrade path.  There were similar upgrade
path choices that had to be made for woody->sarge on some archs due to
kernel/glibc incompatibilities between versions; the udev upgrade path
provided is not really any different than that, and unless someone can
show a working implementation for udev that doesn't require this, I
don't intend to second-guess Marco on this issue.

Of course, we want udev 0.060 and linux-2.6 to be available at the same
time in each suite, because dealing with the udev preinst failure is
still disruptive -- we want users to install the kernel update *first*.
This bug was opened to ensure that.  Marco, since it looks like udev is
going to be ready to go into testing before linux-2.6, and the breakage 
of new udev with old kernel is much worse than the breakage of old udev
with new kernel, I think it would be a good idea to keep a bug open on
udev for right now, even if the kernel maintainers object to having it
listed against linux-2.6.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Frans Pop]

On Monday 29 August 2005 11:06, Sven Luther wrote:
> >  * reboot
> >  * upgrade udev
>
> This is definitively not a user-friendly procedure.

In effect this means that any user having udev installed will have to put 
udev on hold. Because of versioned dependencies on udev, this will 
probably make a lot of other installed packages not upgradable.

The kernel is likely going to be upgraded automatically because users will 
be using the kernel-image-2.6-xxx packages.

So we're going to have another release with a very elaborate upgrade 
procedure in the release notes (which a lot of users, especially desktop 
users, don't read anyway)?

I agree with Sven. This is definitely not user-friendly.
If this really does have to happen this way, the user should be somehow 
presented with instructions to do this properly during the upgrade.

Cheers,
FJP


pgp4zU8gjfDc8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#325543: vorbis-tools: uninstallable because of missing libflac6 and liboggflac1

[Domenico Andreoli]

Package: vorbis-tools
Version: 1.0.1-1.4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

hi,

  this package is not installable because it depends on libflac6 and
liboggflac1. both these packages are not in sid any more. please rebuild.

cheers
domenico

-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In effect this means that any user having udev installed will have to put 
> udev on hold.
No, if the kernel has not been upgraded yet then preinst will fail.

> If this really does have to happen this way, the user should be somehow 
> presented with instructions to do this properly during the upgrade.
Sure, this can be arranged when we will be closer to the release.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325544: easytag: uninstallable because of missing libflac6

[Domenico Andreoli]

Package: easytag
Version: 1.99.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

hi,

  this package is not installable because it depends on libflac6.
libflac6 is not in sid any more. please rebuild.

this bug does not apply on hppa port where easytag depends on libflac7.

cheers
domenico

-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323096: marked as done (xcruise: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libxp-dev')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 03:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323096: fixed in xcruise 0.30-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 17:43:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 10:43:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d009010.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.9.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4MVk-0003Vd-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:43:04 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E4MVi-0007lZ-DF; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:43:02 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xcruise: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libxp-dev'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:43:02 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xcruise
Version: 0.30-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'xcruise' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

gcc -o xcruiser -g -Wall  -L/usr/X11R6/lib   MainScreen.o xcruiser.o draw.o 
zone.o vec3.o info.o -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXpm -lXp -lXext -lX11   -lm  
 
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXp
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [xcruiser] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/xcruise-0.30'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libxp-dev'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xcruise-0.30/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/xcruise-0.30/debian/control 2005-08-14 17:38:10.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2005-08-14 17:37:56.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: games
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libxaw7-dev (>= 4.3.0-7), xutils
+Build-Depends: debhelper, libxp-dev, libxaw7-dev (>= 4.3.0-7), xutils
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: xcruise

---
Received: (at 323096-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 10:49:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 03:49:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9hAP-0005HT-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 03:47:05 -0700
From: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323096: fixed in xcruise 0.30-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 03:47:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xcruise
Source-Version: 0.30-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xcruise, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xcruise_0.30-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xcruise/xcruise_0.30-6.diff.gz
xcruise_0.30-6.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xcruise/xcruise_0.30-6.dsc
xcruise_0.30-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xcruise/xcruise_0.30-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xcruise package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:27:24 +0200
Source: xcruise
Binary: xcruise
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.30-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xcruise- Fly about a 3D-formed file system
Closes: 32309

Bug#325549: gfpoken: FTBFS: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: gfpoken
Version: 0.25.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'gfpoken' on unstable,
I get the following error:

if gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" 
-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"gfpoken\" 
-DVERSION=\"0.25\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 
-DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 
-DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_FCNTL_H=1 
-DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_SOCKET=1 -DHAVE_STRTOL=1  -I. -I.
-I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -Wall -W 
-Werror -MT dialog.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/dialog.Tpo" -c -o dialog.o dialog.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/dialog.Tpo" ".deps/dialog.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/dialog.Tpo"; 
exit 1; fi
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
dialog.c: In function 'initlevel':
dialog.c:65: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 
'long unsigned int'
dialog.c: In function 'loadlevel':
dialog.c:205: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 
'long unsigned int'
make[1]: *** [dialog.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/gfpoken-0.25.dfsg.1/gfpoken-0.25'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

With the attached patch 'gfpoken' can be compiled with gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gfpoken-0.25.dfsg.1/debian/code.patch ./debian/code.patch
--- ../tmp-orig/gfpoken-0.25.dfsg.1/debian/code.patch   2005-08-29 
10:49:12.0 +
+++ ./debian/code.patch 2005-08-29 10:49:01.0 +
@@ -557,3 +557,48 @@
if ((remotesock = accept(localsock, (struct sockaddr *)&remoteaddr, 
&clientlen)) == -1) {
  switch (errno) {
  case EWOULDBLOCK:
+diff -urN tmp/dialog.c gfpoken-0.25/dialog.c
+--- tmp/dialog.c   2005-08-29 10:47:02.0 +
 gfpoken-0.25/dialog.c  2005-08-29 10:47:51.0 +
+@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
+   if (invisigrid) free(invisigrid); invisigrid = (obj *)calloc(gridx*gridy, 
sizeof(obj));
+   if (markgrid) free(markgrid); markgrid = (obj *)calloc(gridx*gridy, 
sizeof(obj));
+   if (!(grid && invisigrid && markgrid)) {
+-fprintf(stderr, "Insufficient memory for allocating level; needed %d 
bytes\n",
++fprintf(stderr, "Insufficient memory for allocating level; needed %ld 
bytes\n",
+   3*gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj));
+ exit(1);
+   }  
+@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
+   if (invisigrid) free(invisigrid); invisigrid = (obj 
*)malloc(gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj));
+   if (markgrid) free(markgrid); markgrid = (obj 
*)malloc(gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj));
+   if (!(grid && invisigrid && markgrid)) {
+-fprintf(stderr, "Insufficient memory for allocating level; needed %d 
bytes\n",
++fprintf(stderr, "Insufficient memory for allocating level; needed %ld 
bytes\n",
+ 3*gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj));
+ exit(1);
+   }  
+diff -urN tmp/main.c gfpoken-0.25/main.c
+--- tmp/main.c 2005-08-29 10:47:02.0 +
 gfpoken-0.25/main.c2005-08-29 10:48:10.0 +
+@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@
+   tmpgrid = (obj *)malloc(gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj));
+   tmpinvisigrid = (obj *)malloc(gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj));
+   if (!(tmpgrid && tmpinvisigrid)) {
+-fprintf(stderr, "Insufficient memory for allocating temporary data; 
needed %d bytes\n",
++fprintf(stderr, "Insufficient memory for allocating temporary data; 
needed %ld bytes\n",
+   2*gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj));
+ if (netmode) {
+   netsend('N');
+diff -urN tmp/multi.c gfpoken-0.25/multi.c
+--- tmp/multi.c2005-08-29 10:47:02.0 +
 gfpoken-0.25/multi.c   2005-08-29 10:48:23.0 +
+@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@
+ if (invisigrid) free(invisigrid); invisigrid = (obj 
*)malloc(gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj)); /* will be completely filled */
+ if (markgrid) free(markgrid); markgrid = (obj *)calloc(gridx*gridy, 
sizeof(obj));
+ if (!(grid && invisigrid && markgrid)) {
+-  fprintf(stderr, "Insufficient memory for allocating level; needed %d 
bytes\n",
++  fprintf(stderr, "Insufficient memory for allocating level; needed %ld 
bytes\n",
+ 3*gridx*gridy*sizeof(obj));
+   exit(1);
+ }


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314633: marked as done (libaqhbci-qt-tools: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'QWidget*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:40:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages libaqhbci, libaqhbci-qt-tools have been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 14:45:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 07:45:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d027074.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.27.74] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjI5s-0008U7-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:45:16 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DjI5n-0005qT-RU; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:45:14 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libaqhbci-qt-tools: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'QWidget*' to 
'unsigned int' loses precision
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:45:14 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libaqhbci-qt-tools
Version: 1.0.4.99+1.0.5beta-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'libaqhbci-qt-tools' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

/usr/include/qt3/qfiledialog.h:78: warning: 'class QFilePreview' has virtual 
functions but non-virtual destructor
wizard.cpp: In member function 'bool Wizard::_doPage(QWidget*)':
wizard.cpp:337: error: cast from 'QWidget*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision
wizard.cpp: In member function 'virtual void Wizard::reject()':
wizard.cpp:403: error: cast from 'QWidget*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision
make[7]: *** [wizard.lo] Error 1
make[7]: Leaving directory 
`/libaqhbci-qt-tools-1.0.4.99+1.0.5beta/src/libs/dialogs'

With the attached patch 'libaqhbci-qt-tools' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN 
../tmp-orig/libaqhbci-qt-tools-1.0.4.99+1.0.5beta/src/libs/dialogs/wizard.cpp 
./src/libs/dialogs/wizard.cpp
--- 
../tmp-orig/libaqhbci-qt-tools-1.0.4.99+1.0.5beta/src/libs/dialogs/wizard.cpp   
2005-04-14 06:32:09.0 +0200
+++ ./src/libs/dialogs/wizard.cpp   2005-06-17 15:10:12.0 +0200
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
   }
 
   if (rv) {
-DBG_NOTICE(0, "Pushing page %08x", (unsigned int)p);
+DBG_NOTICE(0, "Pushing page %lx", (unsigned long)p);
 _pagesDone.push_front(p);
   }
   return rv;
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@
 bool rv;
 
 p=_pagesDone.front();
-DBG_NOTICE(0, "Undoing page %08x", (unsigned int)(p));
+DBG_NOTICE(0, "Undoing page %lx", (unsigned long)(p));
 rv=_undoPage(p);
 if (!rv)
   _pagesDone.pop_front();

---
Received: (at 314633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 11:40:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 04:40:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server.beamnet.de [62.75.155.124] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9i0Y-0005HP-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 04:40:58 -0700
Received: from phpgroupware.vomhagen.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
(sasl authenticated)
by server.beamnet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC91231658F;
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:40:52 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: [134.2.62.240]
From: "Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Packages libaqhbci, libaqhbci-qt-tools have been removed
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:40:52 +
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: AngleMail for phpGroupWare (http://www.phpgroupware.org) v 0.9.16.005
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Hi,

I'm closing these bugs because the packages have been removed due to a ch=
ange
in (upstream's and Debian's) packaging of AqBanking and AqHBCI.
The reported bugs (those not being Debian-specific) have been fixed upstr=
eam,
so your 

Bug#321578:

[Michael Wardle]

I was just hit by this in Etch after an update, upgrade.

mysql-server 4.0.24-10 seems to be the current version and
mysql-server-4.1 does not yet replace mysql-server 4.0.

Is this something that was not caught when this issue was resolved, or
is there something still coming down the line for Etch?

% apt-cache policy mysql-server mysql-common
mysql-server:
  Installed: 4.0.24-10
  Candidate: 4.0.24-10
  Version Table:
 *** 4.0.24-10 0
500 ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au etch/main Packages
500 http://mirror.pacific.net.au etch/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
mysql-common:
  Installed: 5.0.7beta-1
  Candidate: 5.0.7beta-1
  Version Table:
 *** 5.0.7beta-1 0
500 ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au etch/main Packages
500 http://mirror.pacific.net.au etch/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325468: polygen: ignores umask

[Enrico Zini]

On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 13, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > Oh!  That's a bad bug, security-related, critical severity.  Could you
> > please report it?
> 
> Sorry about the delay.  I can't see quite how the exploit would
> work, even as a "grave" user-versus-user attack, but it smells
> vaguely of buffer-overflow risk as well as being a violation of
> policy 10.9 and generally bad behaviour.

Thanks for reporting.  I pinged upstream pointing him at the report, I
hope he gets back to me quickly.

It can surely be used to fill up disk space on a DoS attack.  I don't
know anything about Ocaml's serialisations methods so I can't say if
this could be exploited to cause a buffer overflow.

In the meantime, the problem seems to be in io.ml, line 65:

 Unix.chmod tmp 0o666;

I've asked upstream if he can see any problems in just removing that
line.


Ciao,

Enrico

--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325472: marked as done (libaqhbci-qt-tools: uninstallable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:40:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packages libaqhbci, libaqhbci-qt-tools have been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2005 22:04:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 15:04:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9VGJ-00052S-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:04:24 -0700
Received: from gienah.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.176] helo=gienah.enyo.de)
by albireo.enyo.de with esmtp id 1E9VGH-0003kA-GS; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 
00:04:21 +0200
Received: from hendrik by gienah.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1E9VGP-0001xp-Jh; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:04:29 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Hendrik Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libaqhbci-qt-tools: uninstallable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:04:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Enyo-Status: sender=212.9.189.176 asn=12374 hflags=h mflags=
Enyo-Status-Host-Flags: h
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libaqhbci-qt-tools
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libaqhbci-qt-tools: Depends: libaqbanking0 but it is not installable
  Depends: libaqhbci2 but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: libgwenhywfar17 (>= 1.11.0) but it is not 
installable
  Depends: libktoblzcheck1 but it is not installable
  Depends: libofx1 but it is not installable
  Depends: libosp4 (>= 1.5.1.0-1) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

---
Received: (at 325472-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 11:40:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 04:40:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server.beamnet.de [62.75.155.124] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9i0Y-0005HP-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 04:40:58 -0700
Received: from phpgroupware.vomhagen.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
(sasl authenticated)
by server.beamnet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC91231658F;
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:40:52 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: [134.2.62.240]
From: "Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Packages libaqhbci, libaqhbci-qt-tools have been removed
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:40:52 +
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: AngleMail for phpGroupWare (http://www.phpgroupware.org) v 0.9.16.005
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Hi,

I'm closing these bugs because the packages have been removed due to a ch=
ange
in (upstream's and Debian's) packaging of AqBanking and AqHBCI.
The reported bugs (those not being Debian-specific) have been fixed upstr=
eam,
so your contribution has not been lost.

Kind regards

Thomas
--
Thomas Viehmann, Debian AqHBCI maintainer, http://thomas.viehmann.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Sven Luther]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:06:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:26:09AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > reassign 325484 udev
> > retitle 325484 udev lacks sarge->etch upgrade path
> > thanks
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:46:49AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12 should enter testing at the same
> > > time.
> 
> > You have to provide a proper sarge->etch upgrade path. This bug is the
> > sign of lack this path.
> 
> Requiring that users reboot to 2.6.12 before installing the new version
> of udev from etch *is* a valid upgrade path.  There were similar upgrade
> path choices that had to be made for woody->sarge on some archs due to
> kernel/glibc incompatibilities between versions; the udev upgrade path
> provided is not really any different than that, and unless someone can
> show a working implementation for udev that doesn't require this, I
> don't intend to second-guess Marco on this issue.

BTW, you are aware of the etch situation concerning alsa-utils and udev not
being co-installable ?

> Of course, we want udev 0.060 and linux-2.6 to be available at the same
> time in each suite, because dealing with the udev preinst failure is
> still disruptive -- we want users to install the kernel update *first*.

I don't understand this, if having the wrong udev for your kernel is only
minorly disruptiuve, why this anoying preinst rule ? I mean, i have tried to
do a couple of times in the past days and upgrade from sarge to sid kernels,
and always udev complained when i upgraded kernels, while they should have
been installed both at the same time.

> This bug was opened to ensure that.  Marco, since it looks like udev is
> going to be ready to go into testing before linux-2.6, and the breakage 
> of new udev with old kernel is much worse than the breakage of old udev
> with new kernel, I think it would be a good idea to keep a bug open on
> udev for right now, even if the kernel maintainers object to having it
> listed against linux-2.6.

It would also be nice for Marco to be a bit more cooperative next time such
situation arise.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325557: pdsh_1.7-6-9(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k

[Stephen R Marenka]

Package: pdsh
Version: 1.7-6-9
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid


pdsh fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.


A full buildd log is available at 


Other buildd logs may be available at 


--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: merge

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> merge 325549 323652
Bug#323652: gfpoken: FTBFS: dialog.c:65: warning: format '%d' expects type 
'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
Bug#325549: gfpoken: FTBFS: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has 
type 'long unsigned int'
Merged 323652 325549.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325553: apache2-mpm-perchild breaks PHP4 installtion of libapache2-mod-php4

[Jürgen Sauer]

Package: apache2-mpm-perchild
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

It is impossible to install apache2-mpm-perchild and libapache2-mod-php4
together.

For Webhosting it is nessessary to us her to use AssignUserID which is a
apache2 option in apache2-mpm-perchild to upload things into the
customers own webspace and beeing able to divide users and their
webspaces.

apache2-mpm-perchild kicks out libapache2-mod-php4 during install!

greetings 
J. Sauer

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.9-ax
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325556: ufraw_0.4+cvs20050818-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k

[Stephen R Marenka]

Package: ufraw
Version: 0.4+cvs20050818-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid


ufraw fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.


A full buildd log is available at 


Other buildd logs may be available at 


--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup

[Carsten Luedtke]

Hi

I took further investigation of the problem and it looks like I found
the cause for this crash on my system. It's an issue with the name of a
file in my home dir. 

I could reproduce it several times, and I'm sure it's the cause of this.
The original file name was:

70's - Working At The Carwash.mp3

It's the only .mp3 file in my home and as I started gnomad2 with the
MALLOC_CHECK_=0 parameter i could see it in the music list but the
artist name was just 's. I did cut the 70' from the beginning but it did
still crash. Then I renamed the file to:

Working At The Carwash.mp3

And it didn't crash anymore. Now my user name is listed as artist - but
it works.

Cheers
Carsten


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#325549: gfpoken: FTBFS: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'

[Bas Wijnen]

This bug had already been reported.  I have merged the reports.

The previous report used %z as a solution, not %ld.  I think that is more
appropriate, as the arguments are all of type size_t.  A new package with that
patch should enter unstable soon.

Thanks for reporting this bug,
Bas Wijnen

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325562: zope-textindexng2_1:2.2.0-1(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k

[Stephen R Marenka]

Package: zope-textindexng2
Version: 1:2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid


zope-textindexng2 fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.


A full buildd log is available at 


Other buildd logs may be available at 


--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325563: pyopenal_0.1.5-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k

[Stephen R Marenka]

Package: pyopenal
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid


pyopenal fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.


A full buildd log is available at 


Other buildd logs may be available at 


--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325564: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k

[Stephen R Marenka]

Package: soya
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid


soya fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.


A full buildd log is available at 


Other buildd logs may be available at 


--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325570: gv: Fails to show Postscript files generated with LaTeX

[Jacob Sparre Andersen]

Package: gv
Version: 1:3.6.1-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Several Postscript files generated with LaTeX which I have previously
been able to view with `gv` now only result in empty pages (the right
number of then) and an empty error message box.

Some Postscript files generated with other programs just result in
empty pages (no error message box).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
Locale: LANG=fo_FO.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=fo_FO.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages gv depends on:
ii  gs8.15-3 Transitional package
ii  gs-gpl [gs]   8.15-3 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int
ii  libc6 2.3.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxmu6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxpm4   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X pixmap library
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xaw3dg1.5+E-8Xaw3d widget set
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m

gv recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325567: gem: FTBFS (amd64): 'quicktime_supported_video' was not declared in this scope

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: gem
Version: 1:0.90.0-17
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'gem' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:

g++ -c -fPIC -g -Wall -O2  -I/usr/include/freetype2   -I..  -I/usr/include/FTGL 
 pix_a_2grey.cpp -o pix_a_2grey.o
In file included from filmQT4L.cpp:17:
../Pixes/filmQT4L.h:23:33: error: quicktime/quicktime.h: No such file or 
directory
../Pixes/filmQT4L.h:24:35: error: quicktime/colormodels.h: No such file or 
directory

With the attached patch 'gem' can be compiled on amd64.

The patch also contains a fix for the "non-PIC" problem #324339.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gem-0.90.0/debian/patches/04_quicktime_headers.patch 
./debian/patches/04_quicktime_headers.patch
--- ../tmp-orig/gem-0.90.0/debian/patches/04_quicktime_headers.patch
1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ ./debian/patches/04_quicktime_headers.patch 2005-08-29 12:14:33.0 
+
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+diff -urN ../gem-0.90.0/src/Pixes/filmQT4L.h gem-0.90.0/src/Pixes/filmQT4L.h
+--- ../gem-0.90.0/src/Pixes/filmQT4L.h 2003-10-07 08:58:57.0 +
 gem-0.90.0/src/Pixes/filmQT4L.h2005-08-29 12:06:38.0 +
+@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
+ #include 
+ 
+ #ifdef HAVE_LIBQUICKTIME
+-#include 
+-#include 
++#include 
++#include 
+ #endif // QT
+ 
+ /*-
+diff -urN ../gem-0.90.0/src/Pixes/pix_filmLinux.h 
gem-0.90.0/src/Pixes/pix_filmLinux.h
+--- ../gem-0.90.0/src/Pixes/pix_filmLinux.h2003-10-10 11:09:04.0 
+
 gem-0.90.0/src/Pixes/pix_filmLinux.h   2005-08-29 12:06:38.0 
+
+@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
+ 
+ #include "Pixes/pix_film.h"
+ #ifdef HAVE_LIBQUICKTIME
+-#include 
+-#include 
++#include 
++#include 
+ #endif // QT
+ #ifdef HAVE_LIBMPEG3
+ #include 
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gem-0.90.0/debian/patches/01_buildsys.patch 
./debian/patches/01_buildsys.patch
--- ../tmp-orig/gem-0.90.0/debian/patches/01_buildsys.patch 2005-08-29 
12:21:19.0 +
+++ ./debian/patches/01_buildsys.patch  2005-08-29 12:17:55.0 +
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
 +
 +AC_CHECK_LIB(aviplay,main)
 +
-+AC_CHECK_LIB(dts,main)
++AC_CHECK_LIB(dts_pic,main)
 +
 +# avcodec and avformat need a stupid Debian hack (the _pic part)
 +
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
 +AC_CHECK_LIB(dv,main) 
 +AC_CHECK_LIB(ftgl,main,
 +  AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LIBFTGL)
-+  INCLUDES="$INCLUDES -I/usr/include/FTGL" && LIBS="-lftgl $LIBS")
++  INCLUDES="$INCLUDES -I/usr/include/FTGL" && LIBS="-lftgl_pic $LIBS")
 +
 +AC_CHECK_LIB(vorbisenc, vorbis_encode_init)
 +AC_CHECK_LIB(vorbis, vorbis_info_init)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298731: closed

[Philipp Meier]

closed 5.1.5rc2

thanks

Close in new package release by disabled validation.
-- 
Philipp Meier - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q: Why is top posting bad?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#325571: Evolution crashes on startup

[David Hugh-Jones]

Package: evolution
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: grave

Evolution crashes after startup and gives the usual Gnome crash dialog. 

This first happened after allowing evolution 2.2 to delete my old
evolution folders. Now it happens whenever I start evolution.

Here's the output from "gdb evolution" (just the ordinary binary, HTH;
I have replaced repeated "(no debugging symbols found)" with "..."):

Starting program: /usr/bin/evolution
(no debugging symbols found)
...
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1073876704 (LWP 8665)]
(no debugging symbols found)
...
(no debugging symbols found)
es menu class init
(no debugging symbols found)
...
(no debugging symbols found)
adding hook target 'source'
(no debugging symbols found)
...
(no debugging symbols found)
[New Thread 1088248752 (LWP 8671)]
[New Thread 1118202800 (LWP 8673)]
[New Thread 1126595504 (LWP 8674)]
[Thread 1118202800 (LWP 8673) exited]
[New Thread 1118202800 (LWP 8675)]
[Thread 1126595504 (LWP 8674) exited]
[Thread 1118202800 (LWP 8675) exited]
---Type  to continue, or q  to quit---

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1073876704 (LWP 8665)]
0x420e517a in e_canvas_hide_tooltip () from /usr/lib/libgal-2.4.so.0
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Program exited with code 01.

cheers

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Of course, we want udev 0.060 and linux-2.6 to be available at the same
> > time in each suite, because dealing with the udev preinst failure is
> > still disruptive -- we want users to install the kernel update *first*.
> I don't understand this, if having the wrong udev for your kernel is only
> minorly disruptiuve, why this anoying preinst rule ? I mean, i have tried to
Because the opposite is not true, and recent udev versions do not work
with old kernels.

> It would also be nice for Marco to be a bit more cooperative next time such
> situation arise.
I think I have been very cooperative, but I'm not going to be the
scapegoat of people who did not bother investigating how udev works.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325577: stella: FTBFS: Please change the Build-Depends to 'libslang2-dev'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: stella
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'stella' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

Setting up libslang1 (1.4.9dbs-10) ...

Setting up libslang1-dev (1.4.9dbs-10) ...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Build-dependencies for stella could not be satisfied.
Note, selecting libslang1-dev instead of slang1-dev
libslang1-dev is already the newest version.

Please change the missing Build-Depends from 'slang1-dev' to
'libslang2-dev' in debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/stella-1.4.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/stella-1.4.1/debian/control 2005-08-29 15:18:33.0 
+0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-08-29 15:17:07.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Tom Lear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1.1
-Build-Depends: debhelper, libsdl1.2-dev, libpng3-dev, slang1-dev, 
libgpmg1-dev, zlib1g-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper, libsdl1.2-dev, libpng3-dev, libslang2-dev, 
libgpmg1-dev, zlib1g-dev
 
 Package: stella
 Architecture: any


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

[Sven Luther]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:04:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > Of course, we want udev 0.060 and linux-2.6 to be available at the same
> > > time in each suite, because dealing with the udev preinst failure is
> > > still disruptive -- we want users to install the kernel update *first*.
> > I don't understand this, if having the wrong udev for your kernel is only
> > minorly disruptiuve, why this anoying preinst rule ? I mean, i have tried to
> Because the opposite is not true, and recent udev versions do not work
> with old kernels.

Ah, ok.

> > It would also be nice for Marco to be a bit more cooperative next time such
> > situation arise.
> I think I have been very cooperative, but I'm not going to be the
> scapegoat of people who did not bother investigating how udev works.

Well, i meant cooperative, as in discussing this kind of things in the
debian-kernel mailing list, which is the natural place for it, don't you think
?

Just make sure you think about this next time, ok ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#317082: Status report?

[GOTO Masanori]

At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:16:14 -0400,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> #317082 is "moreinfo".  Has a decision been made on how to fix this?
> If not, frankly it should be downgraded to "important", because it only
> hurts biarch -- meaning it isn't actually a blocker for any single
> subarchitecture -- and that's not nearly as bad as holding up
> every package on every single arch.

In glibc side, I added lib64gcc1 for s390x Depends in 2.3.5-4.  So
it's probably OK to split this report for glibc and dpkg.  But, the
actual fix for dpkg is under discussion, and I would like to keep
discussing about it.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324167: marked as done (OpenVPN 2.0-1 vulnerabilities)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324167: fixed in openvpn 2.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2005 16:59:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 09:59:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sailormoon.luusa.org [212.201.68.186] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6WhA-0002aA-00; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:59:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.luusa.org [127.0.0.1])
by sailormoon.luusa.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A8AD6962
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 18:59:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sailormoon.luusa.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (sailormoon.luusa.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 
10024)
with LMTP id 17677-02 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 20 Aug 2005 18:59:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from leh.stw-bonn.de (leh.stw-bonn.de [212.201.70.10])
by sailormoon.luusa.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3639DD6961
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 18:59:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OpenVPN 2.0-1 vulnerabilities
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 18:59:40 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at luusa.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openvpn
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security, fixed-upstream

OpenVPN 2.0-1 contains serveral security related problems as described in 
CAN-2005-2531 CAN-2005-2532 CAN-2005-2533 CAN-2005-2534.
Fixed upstream in Version 2.0.1, changelog avaible here: 
http://openvpn.net/changelog.html


---
Received: (at 324167-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 14:18:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 07:18:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9kRf-0005pR-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:17:07 -0700
From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324167: fixed in openvpn 2.0.2-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7

Source: openvpn
Source-Version: 2.0.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openvpn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openvpn_2.0.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openvpn/openvpn_2.0.2-1.diff.gz
openvpn_2.0.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openvpn/openvpn_2.0.2-1.dsc
openvpn_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openvpn/openvpn_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
openvpn_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/o/openvpn/openvpn_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openvpn 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:05:49 +0200
Source: openvpn
Binary: openvpn
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 openvpn- Virtual Private Network daemon
Closes: 30978

Bug#325484: should refuse to start, not abort upgrade

[Ryan Underwood]

> It could not work in an acceptable way.
> Please read the huge past threads about this.

Could you provide a ML link, or perhaps record the points of the debate
into README.Debian or something similar?  This isn't some discussion I
follow, but it just happened to bite me when upgrading udev so that alsa
could be upgraded.

-- 
Ryan Underwood, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: netpipe: FTBFS

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 323744 +patch
Bug#323744: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on mpich
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: readline double-free problem

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 304604 critical
Bug#304604: perl: heap corruption causes installation of other packages to fail 
(debconf is aborting) with new glibc
Bug#322746: glibc detected *** double free or corruption
Bug#323849: locales: error on install: double free or corruption
Severity set to `critical'.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325468: marked as done (polygen: ignores umask)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325468: fixed in polygen 1.0.6-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2005 21:41:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 14:41:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9Utp-lK-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:41:09 -0700
Received: from xibalba.demon.co.uk ([80.176.227.229])
by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1E9Uop-0008Ja-Iz
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:35:59 +
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:41:52 +0100
From: Justin B Rye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: polygen: ignores umask
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: polygen
Version: 1.0.6-7
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole

/var/lib/dpkg/info/polygen-data.postinst invokes /usr/bin/polygen on
all its /usr/share/polygen/*/*.grm data files to create corresponding
.grm.o files.  Unfortunately polygen ignores the umask and creates
all these output files with a mode of 0666.

On Sat, Aug 13, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Oh!  That's a bad bug, security-related, critical severity.  Could you
> please report it?

Sorry about the delay.  I can't see quite how the exploit would
work, even as a "grave" user-versus-user attack, but it smells
vaguely of buffer-overflow risk as well as being a violation of
policy 10.9 and generally bad behaviour.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.hurakan
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages polygen depends on:
ii  ocaml-base-nox [ocaml-base-no 3.08.3-3   Runtime system for ocaml bytecode

-- no debconf information
-- 
JBR
Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing)

---
Received: (at 325468-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 15:08:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 08:08:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9l9B-0006qg-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:02:05 -0700
From: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325468: fixed in polygen 1.0.6-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:02:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: polygen
Source-Version: 1.0.6-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
polygen, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

polygen-data_1.0.6-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/polygen/polygen-data_1.0.6-8_all.deb
polygen_1.0.6-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/polygen/polygen_1.0.6-8.diff.gz
polygen_1.0.6-8.dsc
  to pool/main/p/polygen/polygen_1.0.6-8.dsc
polygen_1.0.6-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/polygen/polygen_1.0.6-8_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated polygen package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:51:08 +0200
Source: polygen
Binary: polygen-data

Bug#323744: netpipe: FTBFS

[Andreas Jochens]

tags 323744 +patch
thanks

The attached patch changes the Build-Depends from 'mpich' to
'libmpich1.0-dev' in debian/control. This fixes the problem.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/netpipe-3.6.2/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/netpipe-3.6.2/debian/control2005-08-29 16:57:12.0 
+0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-08-29 16:56:53.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: lam4-dev, mpich, pvm-dev,debhelper ( >= 4 )
+Build-Depends: debhelper, lam4-dev, libmpich1.0-dev, pvm-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: netpipe-tcp


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325588: kile crashes on auto-save, incurring data loss

[Johannes Wiedersich]

Package: kile
Version: 1:1.7.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

When two or more tabs in kile are opened and the autosave option is enabled 
(default configuration), kile crashes if 
- one is typing text at the moment of autosave
- another tab (or several other tabs) exists that contains unsaved data. 

The data of the active tab is saved, changes of other tabs are lost. Kile 
doesn't react to any input and has to be killed (killall kile). 

workaround: deactivate the autosave option and save manually (or by frequently 
compiling your document). 

Since this behaviour can become quite annoying and since one is required to 
restart kile and reenter all text since last save/autosave it might be very 
desirable 
to get a fix via security updates.

This bug was reproduced on several current and up-to-date Debian Sarge 
installations. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages kile depends on:
ii  kdelibs4   4:3.3.2-6.1   KDE core libraries
ii  konsole4:3.3.2-1 KDE X terminal emulator
ii  libart-2.0-2   2.3.17-1  Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-22  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0c1022.7.0-6   client library to control the FAM
ii  libgcc11:3.4.3-13GCC support library
ii  libice64.3.0.dfsg.1-14   Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11   0.5.13-1.0GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libjpeg62  6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii  libpcre3   4.5-1.2   Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt  3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxrender10.8.3-7   X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  tetex-bin  2.0.2-30  The teTeX binary files
ii  xlibs  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325587: gftp: Segfault while trying to get any file

[Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)]

Package: gftp
Version: 2.0.18-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

If I go to any ftpsite (i.e) ft.kernel.org), then browse the directories and
click the left arrow to download a file, then gftp crashes with a segfault.

Jean-Luc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-k8-8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages gftp depends on:
ii  gftp-gtk  2.0.18-8   X/GTK+ FTP client
ii  gftp-text 2.0.18-8   colored FTP client using GLib

gftp recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323366: marked as done (SECURITY: XML::RPC remote code injections (CAN-2005-2498))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:32:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323366: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 09:36:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 02:36:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from office-gw.westend.com (xeniac.intern) [212.117.64.2] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4xrs-0001vv-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:36:24 -0700
Received: by xeniac.intern (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0579F370005; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:36:22 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SECURITY: XML::RPC remote code injections (CAN-2005-2498)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:36:22 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Hello

A security flaw in XML::RPC has become known. From the version numbers
it seems to affect Debian. (I did not check which distributions and packages
exactly though).

More information is available here:

http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-2498
(not yet)


Advisory: PEAR XML_RPC Remote PHP Code Injection Vulnerability
Application: PEAR XML_RPC <= 1.3.3
Severity: A malformed XMLRPC request can result in execution
  of arbitrary injected PHP code
References: http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_142005.66.html


Advisory: PHPXMLRPC Remote PHP Code Injection Vulnerability
Application: PHPXMLRPC <= 1.1.1
Severity: A malformed XMLRPC request can result in execution
  of arbitrary injected PHP code
References: http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_152005.67.html

bye,

-christian-



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set 
to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages php4 depends on:
ii  libapache-mod-php4   4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-common  4:4.3.10-15 Common files for packages built fr

-- debconf information excluded

---
Received: (at 323366-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 15:40:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 08:40:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9lcS-0003Pt-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:32:20 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323366: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-16
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:32:20 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: php4
Source-Version: 4:4.3.10-16

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
php4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libapache-mod-php4_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/libapache-mod-php4_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
libapache2-mod-php4_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/libapache2-mod-php4_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-cgi_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-cgi_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-cli_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-cli_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-common_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-common_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-curl_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-curl_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-dev_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-dev_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-domxml_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/p

Bug#316447: marked as done (remote code execution in PEAR::XML_RPC)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:32:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316447: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2005 23:10:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 16:10:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ipx-190-250-190-80.ipxserver.de (mein-horde.de) [80.190.250.190] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Do8BC-0003iz-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:10:46 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mein-horde.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250382EC016
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  1 Jul 2005 01:10:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mein-horde.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (ipx10645 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 22031-01 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 01:10:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.150.10] (port-212-202-174-167.dynamic.qsc.de 
[212.202.174.167])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mein-horde.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2AC2EC008
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  1 Jul 2005 01:10:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 01:10:41 +0200
From: Martin Lohmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: remote code execution in PEAR::XML_RPC
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mein-horde.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: php4-pear
Version: 4.3.10-15
Tags: Security

Hi,

there is a problem with PEAR::XML_RPC, please have a look at
http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory-022005.php ,
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1921 and
http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:109

by, Martin
- --

Powered by Debian GNU / Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCxHvwOvJj+wS6JuIRAl4SAKCYw7axZzje0ybXrLUGVCr+zxznkQCgyoyX
NIjMZUymsUQOw4cbM/NJjQs=
=Sb2Y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 316447-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 15:43:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 08:43:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9lcS-0003Pr-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:32:20 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#316447: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-16
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:32:20 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: php4
Source-Version: 4:4.3.10-16

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
php4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libapache-mod-php4_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/libapache-mod-php4_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
libapache2-mod-php4_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/libapache2-mod-php4_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-cgi_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-cgi_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-cli_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-cli_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-common_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-common_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-curl_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-curl_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-dev_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-dev_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-domxml_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/php4-domxml_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
php4-gd_4.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4/

Bug#325570: gv: Fails to show Postscript files generated with LaTeX

[Jacob Sparre Andersen]

Martin Godisch wrote:

> I'm sorry, but I'm unable to reproduce your problem. Are
> you able to reproduce it on another system?

No.  I haven't gotten any other systems running
Debian/unstable.

> Are you able to show the postscript files directly using
> gs?

Apparently not:

[ 5:25] hugin.crs4.it:% gs Ada/Programmer/Tysk-etuder/diplom.ps
GPL Ghostscript 8.15 (2004-09-22)
Copyright (C) 2004 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA.  All rights reserved.
This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.
zsh: segmentation fault  gs Ada/Programmer/Tysk-etuder/diplom.ps
[ 5:25] hugin.crs4.it:%

Could it be that the real error in `gv` is that it doesn't
report anything useful if `gs` goes down with a segmentation
fault?

> What happens, when you change to another gs (gs-afpl,
> gs-esp)?

"gs-afpl" doesn't seem to exist for Debian/unstable.

"gs-eps" seems to work.  And now that I have installed
"gs-eps", `gv` works again.

Thanks,

Jacob
-- 
Would you also prefer not to have had to read Victor Hugo?
Vote for EU software patents!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/comment/story/0,12449,1510566,00.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup

[Shaun Jackman]

package gnomad2
tag 324865 +confirmed
thanks

Woo! Nice catch. I can reproduce this bug with your instructions. It
only crashes if I have glibc (libc6) 2.3.5-4 installed. With glibc
2.3.2.ds1-22 installed, it does not crash.

Cheers,
Shaun

-- Forwarded message --
From: Carsten Luedtke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 29 août 2005 05:14
Subject: Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi

I took further investigation of the problem and it looks like I found
the cause for this crash on my system. It's an issue with the name of a
file in my home dir.

I could reproduce it several times, and I'm sure it's the cause of this.
The original file name was:

70's - Working At The Carwash.mp3

It's the only .mp3 file in my home and as I started gnomad2 with the
MALLOC_CHECK_=0 parameter i could see it in the music list but the
artist name was just 's. I did cut the 70' from the beginning but it did
still crash. Then I renamed the file to:

Working At The Carwash.mp3

And it didn't crash anymore. Now my user name is listed as artist - but
it works.

Cheers
Carsten


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDEvw/K569vX68PzgRAmITAKD2W8gmg14yM0lntYn80FWMNXfDnACg4BqN
ijx9jCkS32fKNHQ8d2D5kXE=
=+Fjz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#298731: marked as done (jetty: Reference to servlet2.4 schema affects Jetty startup)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:38:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closed 5.1.5rc2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 16:13:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 08:13:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from quebec-hse-ppp230941.qc.sympatico.ca (infonium.ca) 
[69.159.205.43] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D93oV-0003Gr-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 08:13:35 -0800
Received: from jlawrenc by infonium.ca with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1D93zW-00069k-TO; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 08:24:58 -0800
From: Jay Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: jetty: Reference to servlet2.4 schema affects Jetty startup
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:24:58 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: jetty
Version: 5.0.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The webdefault.xml references:
 http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd

Which in turn references a few other schema documents ... including
 http://www.ibm.com/webservices/xsd/j2ee_web_services_client_1_1.xsd 

Unfortunately our friends at IBM appear to have removed this document.
:-/

This causes an error in loading configuration files of Jetty and
therefore Jetty fails to start properly.

Workarounds include:
 adding: org.mortbay.xml.XmlParser.NotValidating=true
 to start.config

 which bypasses the schema validation which is on by default

Or
 include libservlet2.4-java - which I don't believe exists

Or
 jetty 5.1.3 appears to have the correct schema documents onboard in its
 source.

However - users of the stock jetty deb packages will get a nostart
situation (or at least I think so - we tried several purge and
reinstalls - same result each time)

log snapshot follows:

16:15:29.701 WARN!! [main]
org.mortbay.xml.XmlParser$Handler.fatalError(XmlParser.java:325) >48>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.ibm.com/webservices/xsd/j2ee_web_services_client_1_1.xsd
lin
e:428 col:106 : org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The reference to entity
"ca" must end with the ';' delimiter.
16:15:29.704 WARN!! [main]
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.WebApplicationContext.start(WebApplicationContext.java:455)
>10> Configuration error on file:/usr/share/jetty/webapps/roo
t/
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The reference to entity "ca" must end
with the ';' delimiter.
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(Unknown
Source)
at javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:345)
at org.mortbay.xml.XmlParser.parse(XmlParser.java:206)
at org.mortbay.xml.XmlParser.parse(XmlParser.java:224)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.XMLConfiguration.configureDefaults(XMLConfiguration.java:93)

... etc.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jdev.infonium.ca 2.4.27-run-k7 #1 Tue Feb 1 12:17:27 EST 2005 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages jetty depends on:
ii  adduser3.47  Add and remove users and groups
ii  libcommons-logging-java1.0.4-2   The commmon wrapper interface for 
ii  libmx4j-java   2.0.1-2   An open source implementation of t
ii  libservlet2.3-java 4.0-2 Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2 Java class
ii  libtomcat4-java4.0.3-3woody3 Java Servlet engine -- core librar
ii  libxerces2-java2.0.1-1   Validating XML parser for Java
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4 [j2re1.4] 1.4.2+06  Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, 
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4 [j2sdk1.4]1.4.2+06  Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, 
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4 [java-compile 1.4.2+06  Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, 
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4 [java2-compil 1.4.2+06  Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, 
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4 [java2-runtim 1.4.2+06  Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, 
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4debian [j2sdk1 0.14  Debian specific parts of Java(TM) 
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4debian [java-c 0.14  Debian specific parts of Java(TM) 
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4debian [java2- 0.14  Debian specific parts of Java(TM) 
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4debian [java2- 0.14  

Processed: Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package gnomad2
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnomad2

> tag 324865 +confirmed
Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: confirmed

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298731: close 5.1.5rc2

[Philipp Meier]

close 5.1.5rc2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325590: licq: FTBFS: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'CMsgViewTips' with no type

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: licq
Version: 1.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'licq' on unstable, I get the following error:

/usr/share/qt3/include/qtooltip.h:86: warning: 'class QToolTip' has virtual 
functions but non-virtual destructor
messagebox.h:48: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'CMsgViewTips' with no 
type
messagebox.h:48: error: expected ';' before '*' token

With the attached patch 'licq' can be compiled with gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/licq-1.3.0/plugins/qt-gui/src/messagebox.h 
./plugins/qt-gui/src/messagebox.h
--- ../tmp-orig/licq-1.3.0/plugins/qt-gui/src/messagebox.h  2001-11-22 
20:27:00.0 +
+++ ./plugins/qt-gui/src/messagebox.h   2005-08-29 15:26:19.0 +
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 
 class CUserEvent;
 class MsgView;
+class CMsgViewTips;
 
 
//=UserViewItem
 class MsgViewItem : public QListViewItem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325592: kdebase-data: upgrading to 4:3.4.2-1 with kdebase 4:3.3.2-1 breaks kcontrol

[Josh Metzler]

Package: kdebase-data
Version: 4:3.4.2-1
Severity: serious

A user reported in #debian-kde that his kcontrol was empty of modules.  I lead 
him through downgrading kdebase-data to 4:3.3.2-1 and that fixed it.  I then 
reproduced by upgrading kdebase-data to 4:3.4.2-1 on a stock sid system (all 
of kde still at 3.3.2).  kcontrol is now empty of modules.

It seems that kdebase-data needs the same version dependency on kdebase that 
kdelibs-data needed on kdelibs4.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325587: [backtrace] gftp: Segfault while tryingto get any file

[Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)]

Hi,

I've recompiled gftp-gtk unstripped and ran it in gdb. Here si the  
backtrace :


aProgram received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 46912538556416 (LWP 31842)]
0x2c3299f0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x2c3299f0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x2c329726 in strdup () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x00421446 in gftp_copy_request (req=0x7065f0) at misc.c:585
#3  0x00419def in transfer_window_files (fromwdata=0x54cb00,
towdata=0x54ca20) at transfer.c:107
#4  0x0040e871 in list_doaction (wdata=0x54cb00) at  
gftp-gtk.c:673
#5  0x2b9b63c0 in g_closure_invoke () from  
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0

#6  0x2b9c4f2c in g_signal_stop_emission ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7  0x2b9c63ec in g_signal_emit_valist ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8  0x2ad2cd1c in gtk_signal_emit () from  
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9  0x2ac5723d in gtk_clist_moveto () from  
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0

#10 0x2ace8ecb in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 0x2b9b63c0 in g_closure_invoke () from  
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0

#12 0x2b9c50ab in g_signal_stop_emission ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 0x2b9c6127 in g_signal_emit_valist ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 0x2b9c67a3 in g_signal_emit () from  
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0

#15 0x2adc10b5 in gtk_widget_activate ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
---Type  to continue, or q  to quit---
#16 0x2ace731b in gtk_propagate_event ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 0x2ace777e in gtk_main_do_event ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 0x2b02268c in _gdk_events_queue ()
   from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 0x2bd1946d in g_main_context_dispatch ()
   from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#20 0x2bd1c60f in g_main_context_check ()
   from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#21 0x2bd1c8ba in g_main_loop_run () from  
/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0

#22 0x2ace6b80 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 0x00410355 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7f873f08) at  
gftp-gtk.c:1339

(gdb)


Regards

Jean-Luc


pgpXgXDSdEZtU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#325587: marked as done (gftp: Segfault while trying to get any file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325587: fixed in gftp 2.0.18-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 15:22:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 08:22:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp10.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.21] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9lSn-JD-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:22:22 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1008.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 70BFD280015A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:21:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette 
(ADijon-256-1-45-181.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.188.181])
by mwinf1008.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 81A42280016E;
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:21:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1E9lS1-0006JD-0B; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:21:33 +0200
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (tangerine [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 20222-10; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:21:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jean-luc by tangerine.coulon.evette with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E9lRs-0006J1-Cm; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:21:24 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gftp: Segfault while trying to get any file
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:21:24 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at coulon.evette
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gftp
Version: 2.0.18-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

If I go to any ftpsite (i.e) ft.kernel.org), then browse the directories and
click the left arrow to download a file, then gftp crashes with a segfault.

Jean-Luc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-k8-8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages gftp depends on:
ii  gftp-gtk  2.0.18-8   X/GTK+ FTP client
ii  gftp-text 2.0.18-8   colored FTP client using GLib

gftp recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 325587-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 16:20:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 09:20:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9mJk-00026g-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:17:04 -0700
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325587: fixed in gftp 2.0.18-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gftp
Source-Version: 2.0.18-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gftp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gftp-common_2.0.18-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gftp/gftp-common_2.0.18-9_i386.deb
gftp-gtk_2.0.18-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gftp/gftp-gtk_2.0.18-9_i386.deb
gftp-text_2.0.18-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gftp/gftp-text_2.0.18-9_i386.deb
gftp_2.0.18-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gftp/gftp_2.0.18-9.diff.gz
gftp_2.0.18-9.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gftp/gftp_2.0.18-9.dsc
gftp_2.0.18-9_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gftp/gftp_2.0.18-9_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previou

Processed: Re: Bug#325570: gv: Fails to show Postscript files generated with LaTeX

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 325570 gs-gpl
Bug#325570: gv: Fails to show Postscript files generated with LaTeX
Bug reassigned from package `gv' to `gs-gpl'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xawtv 3.94-1.0

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 298171 + fixed
Bug#298171: xawtv: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'snapbase' 
follows non-static declaration
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> tag 300363 + fixed
Bug#300363: xawtv: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> tag 314790 + fixed
Bug#314790: [l10n] Initial Czech translation of xawtv debconf messages
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: fixed

> tag 317579 + fixed
Bug#317579: Please rebuild against libaa / slang2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 324235 + fixed
Bug#324235: INTL:vi Vietnamese translation for xawtv (and a query :) )
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: fixed

> tag 325044 + fixed
Bug#325044: build-depends on obsolete aalib1-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325504: better patch

[Decklin Foster]

Here is a revised version of the patch which replaces the bash
substitution with a POSIX substitution that will work in both bash and
dash.

--- glibc.sh.orig   2005-08-29 13:29:42.0 -0400
+++ glibc.sh2005-08-29 13:33:19.0 -0400
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
 # Note that parisc64 kernel version scheme is "`uname -r`-64".
 if [ "$realarch" = parisc64 ]
 then
-   if [ $kernel_ver = ${kernel_ver/pa/} ]
+   if [ $kernel_ver = ${kernel_ver#pa} ]
then
if dpkg --compare-versions "$kernel_ver" lt 2.4.19-64
then

-- 
things change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325602: g-wrap: FTBFS: Please Build-Depend on 'libffi4-dev' instead of 'libffi3-dev'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: g-wrap
Version: 1.9.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'g-wrap' on unstable,
I get the following error:

Building g-wrap unstable main amd64...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Package libffi3-dev has no installation candidate
E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for g-wrap: libffi3-dev
Package libffi3-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

Please Build-Depend on 'libffi4-dev' instead of 'libffi3-dev' to fix this.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/g-wrap-1.9.6/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/g-wrap-1.9.6/debian/control 2005-08-29 19:41:38.0 
+0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-08-29 19:41:25.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), cdbs, automake1.9, autoconf, libtool, 
texinfo, guile-1.6-dev, guile-1.6-slib, guile-library (>= 0.1.1), 
libglib1.2-dev, libffi3-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), cdbs, automake1.9, autoconf, libtool, 
texinfo, guile-1.6-dev, guile-1.6-slib, guile-library (>= 0.1.1), 
libglib1.2-dev, libffi4-dev
 
 Package: g-wrap
 Architecture: any


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324617: mozilla-firefox: side-bar segfaults

[Chad Walstrom]

Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2sarge2

I've also gotten mozilla to reliably crash when trying to view the
sidebar, regardless if it's history or bookmarks.  I removed
mozilla-tabextensions (1.14.2005040701-1) and it quit crashing.  So,
this bug should probably be refiled against mozilla-tabextensions.

Test it to make certain, though.

-- 
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.wookimus.net/
   assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Processed: Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package gnomad2
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnomad2

> tag 324865 -unreproducible
Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup
Tags were: confirmed unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325602: g-wrap: FTBFS

[Andreas Jochens]

The previous patch was incomplete, sorry.

The attached patch also replaces 'libffi3-dev' with 'libffi4-dev' in
the 'Depends' of the 'g-wrap' binary package.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/g-wrap-1.9.6/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/g-wrap-1.9.6/debian/control 2005-08-29 20:00:43.0 
+0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-08-29 20:00:37.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), cdbs, automake1.9, autoconf, libtool, 
texinfo, guile-1.6-dev, guile-1.6-slib, guile-library (>= 0.1.1), 
libglib1.2-dev, libffi3-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), cdbs, automake1.9, autoconf, libtool, 
texinfo, guile-1.6-dev, guile-1.6-slib, guile-library (>= 0.1.1), 
libglib1.2-dev, libffi4-dev
 
 Package: g-wrap
 Architecture: any
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 Package: libgwrap-runtime0-dev
 Section: libdevel
 Architecture: any
-Depends: libgwrap-runtime0 (= ${Source-Version}), guile-1.6-dev, libffi3-dev, 
libc6-dev
+Depends: libgwrap-runtime0 (= ${Source-Version}), guile-1.6-dev, libffi4-dev, 
libc6-dev
 Conflicts: libgwrapguile-dev
 Replaces: libgwrapguile1 (<< 1.3.4-13)
 Description: scripting interface generator for C - development files


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325605: dhcp3-server core dumps when receiving a request on sparc64

[Sebastien Bernard]

Package: dhcp3-server
Version: 3.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

dhcp3-server do a sigsegv each time a client send a request for a lease.
Recompiling the package with gcc-3.3 fix the problem.
core dumps seems to be a miscompilation from gcc-4.0.1.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6-smp
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages dhcp3-server depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.57   Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils 2.14.1   Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dhcp3-common3.0.2-3  Common files used by all the dhcp3
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

dhcp3-server recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
* dhcp3-server/new_auth_behavior:
* dhcp3-server/interfaces: eth0
* dhcp3-server/config_warn:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#265399: marked as done (maildrop: Errors opening maildirs are always treated as "permission denied")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265399: fixed in maildrop 1.5.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2004 23:29:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 12 16:29:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk [80.71.3.114] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BvP0z-RH-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:29:45 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B5879EDD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:29:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (kerouac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 12030-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:29:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 2507879E62; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:29:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: by misnomer.z273.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9460D44A9C; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:29:28 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:29:28 +0100
From: Brian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: maildrop: Errors opening maildirs are always treated as "permission 
denied"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at projectcolo.org.uk
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: maildrop
Version: 1.5.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

When delivering to a maildir an error encountered while opening the
maildir is treated as "permission denied", by exiting maildrop with code
77 (EX_NOPERM).  This typically causes the MTA to bounce the mail.  For
example, when a mail filesystem on a machine I use ran out of inodes all
of the mail maildrop attempted to deliver to that filesystem was bounced
with the message

  permission denied. Command output: maildrop: /home//Maildir/:
  No space left on device

when it should have been left in postfix's queue for delivery when the
problem was resolved.

The cause appears to be line 155 in maildrop/deliver.C:

 153 if ( deliver_maildir.MaildirOpen(mailbox, deliver_file,
 154 maildrop.msgptr->MessageSize()) < 0)
 155 throw 77;

Changing that to "throw 75" should result in the desired temporary
failure.  (If there actually is an error condition when 77 should be
given as the exit code then a more complicated solution will be
required.)

  Brian Campbell

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8

Versions of packages maildrop depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-13GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.1-5   GCC support library
ii  libgdbm3 1.8.3-2 GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.4-6sarge1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  postfix [mail-transport- 2.1.3-1 A high-performance mail transport 

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 265399-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 18:19:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 11:19:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9oBr-0001yl-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#265399: fixed in maildrop 1.5.3-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian

Bug#325135: marked as done (maildrop: lockmail doesn't drop privileges (CAN-2005-2655))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325135: fixed in maildrop 1.5.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2005 10:33:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 26 03:33:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx01.hinterhof.net [83.137.99.114] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E8bWc-0006bT-00; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 03:33:30 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mx01.hinterhof.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98BF11041
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:36:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dp.roam.hinterhof.net (p54A7A5C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 
[84.167.165.201])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "dp.roam.hinterhof.net", Issuer "hinterhofCA" (verified OK))
by mx01.hinterhof.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EB010A31
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:36:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dp.roam.hinterhof.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1C202266E9E; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:34:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:34:20 +0200
From: Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: maildrop: lockmail doesn't drop privileges
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf"
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: maildrop
Version: 1.5.3-1.1
Severity: critical
Justification: local privilege escalation
Tags: security sarge sid patch

Hi Josip,

I've already tried to contact you about this, but have not heard
from you. I'm filing it now to keep track. Please refer to message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for full details.

Short description: 
lockmail.maildrop (setgid mail) lets the user specify a program and
execvp()s it, but does not drop egid mail privilege before doing so.
This opens a trivial privilege escalation (see "poc") to group mail.

The bug affects 1.5.3-1.1 sarge/etch/sid and 1.8.1-2 in experimental,
and should be easy to fix: Just add setgid(getgid()) before the
execvp(). I tested the attached patch briefly and verified that it
builds and prevents this bug.

The bug appears to be specific to Debian, upstream doesn't
seem to install lockmail with a setgid flag.

cheers,
Max

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=poc

$ id
uid=1000(user) gid=1000(user) groups=1000(user)
$ lockmail.maildrop foo /bin/sh
$ id
uid=1000(user) gid=1000(user) egid=8(mail) groups=1000(user)

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="lockmail_setgid.diff"

--- liblock/lockmail.c~ 2005-06-01 21:43:06.273749472 +0200
+++ liblock/lockmail.c  2005-06-01 21:32:04.0 +0200
@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@
 
if (pid == 0)
{
+   setgid(getgid());
+
(void)caught();
execvp(argvec[0], argvec);
 

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--

---
Received: (at 325135-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 18:19:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 11:19:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9oBr-0001yn-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325135: fixed in maildrop 1.5.3-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: maildrop
Source-Version: 1.5.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is f

Bug#325135: maildrop: lockmail doesn't drop privileges

[Martin Schulze]

Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 10:22 +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 07:03:55PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > 
> > > >   Certainly.  Once the advisory is out I can make an upload if Joy
> > > >  hasn't already made one.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I can also do an upload; Joy already said I should comaintain, I've just
> > > been waiting for racke to do a new courier upload so that I can actually
> > > use maildrop (I have new maildrop packages in experimental that're just
> > > rotting away, waiting).
> > 
> >   I'll leave it to you then, unless you tell me differently.
> > 
> > Steve
> 
> I just uploaded 1.5.3-2 for sid; Joey & co, I've prepared stable
> packages (1.5.3-1.1.sarge.1) here:
> http://people.debian.org/~dilinger/security/maildrop/sarge/.  

Thanks, but I'm working on them already.

Regards,

Joey

-- 
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 324167

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 324167 sarge
Bug#324167: OpenVPN 2.0-1 vulnerabilities
Tags were: fixed-upstream security
Tags added: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325606: pyopengl: FTBFS: Build-Depends on 'python2.2-numeric' can not be satisfied in unstable

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: pyopengl
Version: 2.0.1.09-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'pyopengl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

Building dependency tree...
E: Package python2.2-numeric has no installation candidate
E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for pyopengl: python2.2-numeric
Package python2.2-numeric is not available, but is referred to by another 
package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

Please remove the Build-Depends on python2.2-numeric and python2.1-numeric
from debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325135: maildrop: lockmail doesn't drop privileges

[Andres Salomon]

On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 10:22 +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 07:03:55PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> 
> > >   Certainly.  Once the advisory is out I can make an upload if Joy
> > >  hasn't already made one.
> > > 
> > 
> > I can also do an upload; Joy already said I should comaintain, I've just
> > been waiting for racke to do a new courier upload so that I can actually
> > use maildrop (I have new maildrop packages in experimental that're just
> > rotting away, waiting).
> 
>   I'll leave it to you then, unless you tell me differently.
> 
> Steve

I just uploaded 1.5.3-2 for sid; Joey & co, I've prepared stable
packages (1.5.3-1.1.sarge.1) here:
http://people.debian.org/~dilinger/security/maildrop/sarge/.  


Joeyh, should I prepare something for testing?

As for experimental: Stefan, is there any chance of getting
courier-authlib 0.50 or 0.51 in sid within the next day or so?  Or do
you still feel it's too experimental for sid?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325504: sed patch

[Michael Spang]

Ah, I guess bash didn't trip over that typo during the update because it 
never entered that conditional.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325607: realtime-lsm: Module doesn't compile against 2.6.8-2-k7

[Nicholas Humfrey]

Package: realtime-lsm
Version: 0.1.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The 2.6.8-2 kernel (which is the default on sarge) does not 
have CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX enabled, which means it is not 
possible to use this module against the default stock kernel.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325528: libm17n-0: segfaults with mgp, rendering it unusuable

[Hidetaka Iwai]

tags 325528 unreproducible
thanks

Marc Dequènes (Duck) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Package: libm17n-0
> Version: 1.2.0-4
> Severity: grave
> 
> Using any sample file provided with mgp resulted in a segfault after
> rendering background, so i guess when rendering text. See the attached
> backtrace showing segfault occuring deep in libm17n (which made me
> report on libm17n-0 instead of mgp).

I can't reproduct this problem with mgp 1.11b-5 on the following
environment, so could you please give me more information?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k7
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libm17n-0 depends on:
ii  libanthy0 6724-1 Anthy runtime library
ii  libc6 2.3.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libfribidi0   0.10.5-3   Free Implementation of the Unicode
ii  libgd2-xpm2.0.33-2   GD Graphics Library version 2
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libotf0   0.9.3-1A Library for handling OpenType Fo
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxft2   2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxml2   2.6.20-1   GNOME XML library
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0-2  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  m17n-db   1.2.0-1a multilingual text processing lib
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-3  compression library - runtime

libm17n-0 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

regards,
--
 Hidetaka Iwai
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp2L7UjpyDSx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#325468: polygen: ignores umask

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:44:42PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:

> > On Sat, Aug 13, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > Oh!  That's a bad bug, security-related, critical severity.  Could you
> > > please report it?

> > Sorry about the delay.  I can't see quite how the exploit would
> > work, even as a "grave" user-versus-user attack, but it smells
> > vaguely of buffer-overflow risk as well as being a violation of
> > policy 10.9 and generally bad behaviour.

> Thanks for reporting.  I pinged upstream pointing him at the report, I
> hope he gets back to me quickly.

> It can surely be used to fill up disk space on a DoS attack.  I don't
> know anything about Ocaml's serialisations methods so I can't say if
> this could be exploited to cause a buffer overflow.

> In the meantime, the problem seems to be in io.ml, line 65:

>  Unix.chmod tmp 0o666;

> I've asked upstream if he can see any problems in just removing that
> line.

You probably want some way instead to ensure that such files are created
with 0644 mode if they're system-wide entries created by root; I see
that you've closed this bug with a changelog entry saying to set the
umask, but unless you're also setting the umask at some point there's no
guarantee that the root user's umask is sanely configured, either.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#325611: kid3: needs rebuild with libid3-3.8.3c2

[Per Hansen]

Package: kid3
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

*** Please type your report below this line ***

kid3 depends on libid3-3.8.3 but that package has been replaced by
libid3-3.8.3c2

I installed it with --force-depends and it works fine with the newer
libid3...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-kanotix-10
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages kid3 depends on:
ii  kdelibs4  4:3.3.2-6.1
ii  libart-2.0-2  2.3.17-1
ii  libc6 2.3.5-5
ii  libfam0c102   2.7.0-7
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-6
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
pn  libid3-3.8.3   (no description available)
ii  libidn11  0.5.18-1
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-1
ii  libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.4-3
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-5
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.6-9
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0-2
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-3

kid3 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature