Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:49:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325522: libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 08:01:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 01:01:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-133-100-49.clients.your-server.de (mail.biedermanns.com) 
[213.133.100.49] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E9eaW-0005pq-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 01:01:52 -0700
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] 
helo=tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at)
        by mail.biedermanns.com with esmtpsa 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian))
        id 1E9ei7-0006nN-DT
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:09:45 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E9eaJ-00076I-AH
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:01:39 +0200
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:01:38 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s 
!:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
{3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libweather-com-perl
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1.

        Hi!

 From reading your package description I wonder:

,-------------------------------> quote <-------------------------------
| Notice: To use the weather.com's service you have to register at
| weather.com first.
`-------------------------------> quote <-------------------------------

 From the policy:

   In addition, the packages in _main_
      * must not require a package outside of _main_ for compilation or
        execution

 Though it speaks of "require a package" (and goes to the extend of
package dependencies) I would still see that the package shouldn't
need some registration at some site to be useable.  Or do you think
the package would be useable in any way without the weather.com
registration?

 So long,
Alfie
-- 
<nforcer> Streich den wein und ersetz ihn durch foo
<Rhonda> Und das kann man trinken?
<nforcer> klar, foo gibts an jeder bar :)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325522-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 09:49:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 02:49:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-133-100-49.clients.your-server.de (mail.biedermanns.com) 
[213.133.100.49] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E9gGv-0006Uo-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:49:45 -0700
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] 
helo=tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at)
        by mail.biedermanns.com with esmtpsa 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian))
        id 1E9gOe-0007Cu-RX; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:57:48 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E9gGG-0007s3-Ga; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:49:04 +0200
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:49:03 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#325522: libweather-com-perl: package should live in contrib
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s 
!:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
{3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-29 11:26]:
> My arguments:
> - a package is not automatically contrib just because it uses
>   an internet service that is "non-free"

 Yes, you are right. Sorry for, erm, a bit of overreacting. It's just
the same like any AIM/MSN/ICQ client we have around...

 Sorry for the inconvenience.

>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/1999/05/msg00004.html
> If you agree then please close this bug report. I would not like to
> have this flamewar'ed on debian-devel since it has been discussed
> before in depth and length. And there was a slight majority for keeping
> such packages in 'main'.

 Thanks for digging up that thread, I'll keep it in my bookmarks.

 So long,
Alfie
--=20
-!- mode/#debian.de [+oo sesom XSnackWRK] by Alfie
 * Alfie . o O ( Nein, ich bin nicht da - bitte nicht anquatschen ;) )
                                        -- #debian.de

--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDEtoPMU96lewVKUIRApmTAJ42PK64BVIKjnqJ8rKdOt8Wz5jepwCgnD1q
uCOxSp1/fcSD1kxwD6rLGqo=
=VbtJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to