On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Zhenqiang Chen
wrote:
> On 28 January 2014 01:07, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Zhenqiang Chen
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks for comments.
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59837
>>>
>>> The patch with a test case is a
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Christian Bruel wrote:
> This patch improves the one sent previously,
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01159.html), to fix a few
> more failures in the testsuite that could arise with shrink-wrap and
> -fexceptions.
>
> To recall, the problem that i
Hi!
I've backported a few bugfixes to 4.8 branch, bootstrapped/regtested on
x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to branch.
Jakub
2014-03-06 Jakub Jelinek
PR preprocessor/60400
Backport from mainline
2013-06-24 Dehao Chen
* files.c (_cpp_stack_inc
Hi!
I've noticed a new -Wsign-compare warning on 4.8 branch, this
patch just changes the code to look like on the trunk.
This is all guarded with if (dist > 0), so the cast is harmless.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed
to trunk as obvious.
2014-03-06 Jakub Jelinek
Hi Guys,
I am applying the patch below to add libgcc functions to support
hardware multiplies on the MSP430.
Cheers
Nick
libgcc/ChangeLog
2014-03-06 Nick Clifton
* config/msp430/t-msp430 (LIB2ADD): Add lib2hw_mul.S
* config/msp430/lib2hw_mul.S: New: Hardware multiply
On 03/05/2014 06:15 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On 28 Feb 17:21, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I think it won't help that much - I still think this entire scheme
is likely to fail on nvptx. I'll try to construct an example at
some point.
One other thing about the split tables is that we don't have to
write a
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > The following patch addresses the common (?) issue of people
> > > > omitting -flto from the linker command-line which gets more
> > > > severe with GCC 4.9 where slim LTO objects are emitted by
Hi!
In r208376, I have committed a merge from trunk r208346 (2014-03-05) into
gomp-4_0-branch.
Grüße,
Thomas
pgp5yuo26q7hH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On 03/05/2014 10:47 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 5 March 2014 21:35, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Please put _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_DEFECTS (or whatever
it is we use elsewhere) in the comment, rather than just "DR 2106". I
think the point of that is to be able
On 6 March 2014 09:35, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> Agreed. I remember being sloppy about issues not relative to a released
> Standard.
Yes, if it's just a change from one draft to another then it's just
"work in progress" and not important to record that we've applied a
resolution.
> Well, in fact
This updates the -flto documentation regarding the changes in
option handling.
Comments?
Thanks,
Richard.
Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 208374)
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -8527,8 +8
2014-03-06 12:47 GMT+04:00 Bernd Schmidt :
> I don't see why you want the array of target descriptors - it would take
> some effort to construct, and as far as I can tell it's unnecessary. You
> can just pass a pointer to the corresponding descriptor to every
> GOMP_offload_register call.
>
> Once
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Paulo Matos wrote:
> On 05/03/2014 11:51, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominique Dhumieres
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Revision 208312 causes
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
>>
>>
>> Uhm. pointer comparison agai
Hi,
Please find below a patch which adds support for 64-bit doubles to the RL78
target.
This is largely based on the rx target port and uses similar option and
multilibs.
I will be posting the binutils and newlib part of this patch shortly.
Kindly review the same and let me know if OK to commit.
On 03/06/2014 12:11 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
Do I understand correctly, that you propose to do so:
extern void *_omp_host_func_table[];
extern void *_omp_host_var_table[];
extern void *_omp_host_funcs_end[];
extern void *_omp_host_vars_end[];
void *__OPENMP_TARGET_HOST__[]
__attribute__ ((visibi
Uros pointed me at PR libgcc/59339 where make install tries to install
the vtv_*.o files even if they aren't built, leading to install
warnings.
The following patch fixes this by ensuring that the files are only
installed if built.
Tested with make install in libgcc on x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu
--
On 06/03/2014 11:19, Richard Biener wrote:
I have reverted the patch for now.
Richard.
That's fine Richard, thanks. I got stuck with another issue in the
meantime but I will look at it again very soon.
--
Paulo Matos
Il 06/03/2014 12:55, Rainer Orth ha scritto:
Uros pointed me at PR libgcc/59339 where make install tries to install
the vtv_*.o files even if they aren't built, leading to install
warnings.
The following patch fixes this by ensuring that the files are only
installed if built.
Tested with make i
2014-03-06 15:53 GMT+04:00 Bernd Schmidt :
> No. I don't think we need a global constructor for registering
> __OPENMP_TARGET_HOST__ - this would unnecessarily bloat crtbegin/crtend. We
> also shouldn't need to have the target tables known outside of the image
> constructed by the mkoffload tools.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/03/2014 12:55, Rainer Orth ha scritto:
>
>> Uros pointed me at PR libgcc/59339 where make install tries to install
>> the vtv_*.o files even if they aren't built, leading to install
>> warnings.
>>
>> The following patch fixes this by en
While checking my TLS LD patch, I noticed that unlike on Solaris
10/x86, the @tlsldmplt configure test was failing on Solaris 11/x86 with
Sun ld. This went unnoticed since the Solaris 11 ld also supports the
TLS LD code sequence expected by GNU ld.
The failure happens because S11 ld is pickier th
I've separated the patch into 2: cost model tuning and load/store
groups parallelism.
SLM tuning was partially introduced in the patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00226.html
The patch introducing vectorization for load/store groups of size 3 attached.
Is it ok for stage1?
Change
Missed attachment.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> I've separated the patch into 2: cost model tuning and load/store
> groups parallelism.
> SLM tuning was partially introduced in the patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00226.html
> The patch introduc
2014-03-06 10:57 GMT+04:00 S, Pitchumani :
> Hi Denis,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Denis Chertykov [mailto:cherty...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:45 PM
>> 2014-03-03 13:34 GMT+04:00 S, Pitchumani :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Few AVR Xmega devices have specific instruction supp
> Although this patch is safe. I guess it could wait for stage 1 as right now
> we don't need this functionality.
>
> The patch is ok for the stage1 which is probably about a month away.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
Got it, thanks for your review :)
>
>
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Kito Che
Ping!
On 02/27/2014 11:44 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Ping!
On 02/20/2014 12:11 PM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Hello all,
Pinging this patch review request again. See previous messages quoted
below for details.
Regards,
Dimitris
On 02/13/2014 04:22 PM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
H
Hi!
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:55:28 +0100, I wrote:
> ../../map.c: In function 'main':
> ../../map.c:4:21: error: array type has incomplete element type
>extern struct foo s2[1];
> ^
> ../../map.c:8:11: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class
I'm resending this patch for constrained template parameters for
review. It's been languishing for a while without review and it has
some interesting features in the implementation (namely, resolution
mechanism or constrained template parameters).
Andrew
-- Forwarded message --
Fr
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:08:18PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > This does not happen for C++, because gcc/cp/decl2.c:cp_omp_mappable_type
> > catches the »type == error_mark_node« case -- so I suggest to do the same
> > generically/for C. OK to commit the following to trunk, once tested?
>
>
Hi!
As discussed in the PR, doing
make bootstrap-lean
make install
right now may fail (if host compiler is too old), or recompile various
objects of the compiler with system gcc before it is installed.
This happens because starting with the automatic dependency changes,
we have in gcc/.deps/*.Po l
Hi Paul,
> I am trying to respond to Mikael's comment that only kind=1 is handled. I'll
> use your patch as a basis.
actually the last version of the patch that I posted yesterday should
already handle that (and includes a kind=4 test case). But if you find
any remaining problems, please let me k
Hi,
> In that case, go for it! I am on vacation in Tenerife right now and have
> very limited access.
wow, in that case I guess you better enjoy your holidays ;)
> Please commit the patch to trunk.
Will do!
Thanks,
Janus
> On Mar 6, 2014 9:59 PM, "Janus Weil" wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>>
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The following patch addresses the common (?) issue of people
> > > > > omitting -flto from the linker command-line which gets more
> > > > > severe with GCC 4.9 where slim LTO object
>> Please commit the patch to trunk.
>
> Will do!
I have just committed the patch as r208386, thereby implementing
deferred-length character components on 4.9 trunk. One big plea to the
users: Please test this as soon as possible!
Cheers,
Janus
>> On Mar 6, 2014 9:59 PM, "Janus Weil" wrote:
>
In the non-lean case, would this mean a change to a header (i.e. you
edit it in the source tree) wouldn't cause a proper re-build if you
re-bootstrapped?
On 06/03/14 11:19, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Paulo Matos wrote:
On 05/03/2014 11:51, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominique Dhumieres
wrote:
Revision 208312 causes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
Uhm. pointer co
Hi,
This patch marks fira-loop-pressure as an optimization so it shows in
gcc --help=optimizers.
2014-03-06 Paulo Matos
* common.opt (fira-loop-pressure): Mark as optimization.
OK to commit?
--
PMatos
On 06/03/14 23:34, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
Hi,
This patch marks fira-loop-pressure as an optimization so it shows in
gcc --help=optimizers.
2014-03-06 Paulo Matos
* common.opt (fira-loop-pressure): Mark as optimization.
OK to commit?
Patch is attached.
--
PMatos
Index: gcc/common.op
I was doing some testing of an installed cross-compiler using the
test_installed script in contrib and I noticed that there was no way
to set the target_triplet in the site.exp script that test_installed
creates. This patch adds a new option (--target) that can be used to
set target_triplet in sit
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit:
My libgccjit port of GNU Octave's JIT was segfaulting due to corruption
of playback::location values when running Octave's JIT unittests. After
lots of debugging, I found that recording::locations in a parent context
weren't having their playback::locations clean
This patch to libgo fixes a rare but serious bug. The Go garbage
collector only examines Go stacks. When Go code calls a function that
is not written in Go, it first calls syscall.Entersyscall. Entersyscall
records the position of the Go stack pointer and saves a copy of all the
registers. If t
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> The GNU glibc qsort function will call malloc in some cases. That makes
> it unsuitable for libbacktrace, which is intended to work when called
> from a signal handler. This patch changes libbacktrace to use an
> internal qsort function.
I merged GCC trunk revision 208392 to the gccgo branch.
Ian
Il 06/03/2014 19:58, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
Hi!
As discussed in the PR, doing
make bootstrap-lean
make install
right now may fail (if host compiler is too old), or recompile various
objects of the compiler with system gcc before it is installed.
This happens because starting with the automati
The current coarray implementation uses a global static variable for
this_image() and num_images(), which is set by the CAF init function,
which is called by before the Fortran main function.
I somehow had the thinko that this permits for better optimizations than
a library call. However, glob
45 matches
Mail list logo