Hi,
On 03/05/2014 10:47 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 5 March 2014 21:35, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Please put _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_DEFECTS (or whatever
it is we use elsewhere) in the comment, rather than just "DR 2106". I
think the point of that is to be able to grep for all DR fixes
(especially ones that aren't actually accepted as defects yet :-)
Believe it or not, I did look at other occurences in the code, and didn't
hit any that used such a keyword. Now that I know to look for it, there is
indeed _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS (I'll add it), but it is missing in a
lot of places.
That's the one. I know I've not always been consistent about adding
it, but I try to when I remember.
Agreed. I remember being sloppy about issues not relative to a released
Standard. Well, in fact we also used to keep
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bugs.html
up to date...
Paolo.
