On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Paulo Matos <pa...@matos-sorge.com> wrote:
> On 05/03/2014 11:51, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominique Dhumieres <domi...@lps.ens.fr>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Revision 208312 causes
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
>>
>>
>> Uhm.  pointer comparison against double_type_node ...
>>
>> I'd say we want to revert the patch.  Paulo, please do that.  Let's
>> do the alternate approach of marking -fshort-double eligible for LTO
>> as well and handle it there properly.
>>
>
> Sure, I will prepare a new patch and post it for approval by the end of the
> day.
>
> Apologies for the regression.

I have reverted the patch for now.

Richard.

Reply via email to