On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:42:33 +0100, Ingo Juergensmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Been there, done that.
> The short answer: "We don't want anyone else to play in our playground!"
> The longer answer: "More machines mean more work for the the buildd admin.
> Additional buildd admins for those arch
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:44:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op di, 15-03-2005 te 16:19 -0500, schreef Anthony DeRobertis:
> > Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > | You misunderstood. I don't fight generic changes to the order; I just
> > | don't think it would be a good thing that a
2005/11/19, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> FWIW he currently does a. Rejecting at SMTP time causes backscatter on
> forwarded mail, as the forwarding host cannot reject because it
> already has accepted the mail.
And usual way to deal with this is to set:
ignore_errmsg_errors_after = 7d
I
2005/11/20, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I suspect and hope the DPL try to reason with the people in question
> first, before the DPL wields his authority and push the current holder
> of privileged positions aside, as a power struggle with the overworked
> people in these privileged
2005/11/21, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It can be considered bad from a technical viewpoint - as far as I
> understand the master copy of the keyring is currently on a medium
> that is under the keyring maintainer's direct physical control.
>
> The "obvious" way of switching to team main
2005/12/8, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anthony Towns writes:What is required is abuildd-give-back package_version(or whatever you called the alias for wanna-build --give-back).
Following this train of thought, wouldn't it be reasonable to have a control @ bui
2005/12/12, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We don't want them to open multiple connections even to MULTIPLE servers...
That's odd though, because apt *does* open connections to multiple
servers all the time. To fetch packages lists, or if a package is only
available on one of the
2005/12/13, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Time to devise a way to teach it about that, then. HOW to do it is the big
> problem, though. How should one deal with round-robin DNS mirrors which are
> supposed to be equal, but are not. What are the failure modes to cater
> fo
2005/12/18, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've run some scripts to find out the size of binary pakcages in debian
> > and how theycould be made smaller, here's the results:
>
> > http://www.linuks.mine.nu/sizematters/
>
> Afaict from the webpage
estingly, in the changelog it's listed as a bugfix.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
r
documentation only. :)
It seems that some people see the vote as meaning 1 and others want
meaning 2. The latter would seems to require changing the SC, the
former wouldn't.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
Past policy has been that stable updates don't cover things that arn't
critical, even if it makes us look out of date compared to other
distributions. A change to that policy should be carefully considered
before doing it...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
; else. This usually ends badly for all concerned.
We have no courts, so what's the alternative? If we get a
super-majority of developers to say a majority is enough, we're home.
If a majority of developers say a majority is enough, what does that
mean?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
it originally meant. Why shouldn't people be able to
touch up the language to match modern forms? For example, what you
read as written by Shakespeare now often doesn't match what he wrote
exactly.
Derived works just take the idea further, in that you change the
meaning also. You jus
e and packaged, and then ask whether ordinary packaging practice
> would lead to A a declaring a "Depends:" relationship on B in that
> situation. This test would allow us to move the question into the
> technical realm.
Thank you, this has cleared everything up for me. Now I
I did my "apt-get dist-upgrade" today and received the following message:
Setting up xlibs-data (4.3.0.dfsg.1-14) ...
update-alternatives: internal error:
/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-cursor-theme corrupt: missing newline
after manflag
dpkg: error processing xlibs-data (--configure):
subprocess p
2005/6/17, Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > That's simply another way to say that "the group of people who are
> > offended is a minority".
>
> even if the group where the material is popular is a minority itself?
I think the case is:
- a minority are offended
- a minority like it
- a major
2005/6/17, Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> The ironic thing is, even if we do rename, who is going to do the trademark
> search to prove that the new name we choose is not someone else's trademark
> who we do NOT have permission to use?
I doubt this is relevent. Unless there is another *b
2005/7/3, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 03:28:15PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > That's true, and unavoidable in this scheme; but the use case (beyond
> > > fastidiousness) for this is not clear to me.
> >
> > Well, h
re's progress. Getting translated
descriptions is a really cool goal.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p server is. There's an
alioth project, but it has nothing past the initial commit.
Thanks in advance,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou'll never notice the problem.
That's how I understand it anyway,
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
might be handy, since the main server
doesn't do that well right now.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's rough, please be gentle.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/7/06, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/6/06, Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where can we download the script?
Actually, please try this version:
http://svana.org/kleptog/temp/ddtss-0.2.tar.gz
It's a bit more advanced w.r.t. revie
bly shouldn't be
mentioning it in the description.
What you say is nice to know, but the description is not the right place.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL only
give rules about redistribution, it doesn't change the licence of
anything.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DTP project eventually, it's just two way of
doing the same thing.
Hope this answers your question,
[1] http://kleptog.org/cgi-bin/ddtss2-cgi/
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
hat they're checking your Sender
header (which is where bounces get sent) for validity. I remember
dealing with this once by getting mutt to add an explicit Sender
header, but perhaps you can configure the mail server to rewrite the
header to your normal email.
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn va
get fixed."
Well, ofcourse. Otherwise it wouldn't be stable... Certain types of
bugs are fixed, but by and large, you're stuck with the bugs it was
released with...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cally mail servers on UNIX have ignored the -f switch to the
sendmail command which does the same thing.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
erwise statically linked, and perhaps
slower execution speeds.
There's no performance critical code in libfl. The main function is
hardly ever used, and yywrap() is only called at an of input.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
1 bytes
short 2 bytes
int 4 bytes
long 8 bytes
If you make an int 8 bytes, you have to find some other way of
indicating one of the shorter types (short short maybe? or long
char?).
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
r arguments.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
should never use kernel headers
directly. Instead, userspace should copy the parts of the header that
is relevent to them. I think the idea is that eventually stuff
expected to be used will be moved to the sanitized headers in glibc.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECT
of the gtk+2 pc file needs to be
fixed, then you can start recompiling all the affected programs...
Some of the discussion in bug #340904 is relevent here.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On 9/28/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout skrev:
> Which is all crap. Yes, this is the list you need for static, but
> pkg-config is recursing through modules even for dynamic linking which
> is wrong. Now either pkg-config of the gtk+2 pc f
le gtk+-2.0.pc saved.
vali:/usr/lib/pkgconfig# pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
e, but I would've expected the there to be no difference between
Requires and Requires.private when looking at cflags. At least, that's
my interpretation of this thread.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
hese useless pages and use that memory for cache or network
buffers instead.
On the systems I deal with that usually gives me an extra 50-100MB of
free memory for caching, but whether that's noticable on a server with
8GB of RAM I have no idea.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[E
occasional user installing an ftp server for anyway? It's
not a service you want to be installing without some basic knowledge.
What is the actual risk? That someone not too knowledgable will try to
install multiple servers and getting confused?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout &
d rewriting existing scripts
to work with some generic shell. The former is going to be *much*
easier. Isn't that enough?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;t declare all the libs they need and if you're using
one of those the result might be that you fix your package only to
reveal a bug in another. People building shared libraries can use
-Wl,--no-allow-shlib-undefined to detect this situation.
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
e to the stable libc due a security
issue, will it have the update or will all our machines revert back to
the wrong behaviour?
Thanks in advance,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
d" or "builder". That's somewhere
between compiling and just scripts. Or may be "make" or "maker" as
it's using Makefile fragments.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
ile myself?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
On 4/4/06, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a way to get sane output from pkg-config or should I just
> > parse the .pc file myself?
>
> The .pc file needs converting to use
ly depend
on.
What we need is an option follow requires for cflags but not for libs.
Hopefully, one day....
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
/local/bin called vipager and set your pager variable to that...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
a rule, for a real bug you can just do
it.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
d again, you can change it without losing
the signitures...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
t
appears to be patented.
The rest of the page is a pretty good summary. The compression problem
is the real stumbling block...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
the package.
So, debian changes packages to install to cgi-lib where we can ensure
they won't conflict. If the admin wants to make them visible they
symlink the stuff from cgi-lib to cgi-bin. No special webserver
supported needed.
Just changing the names seems silly in the extreme.
Have a nic
e same mechanism as the packages.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
sly. It's not rocket science, just most people don't
consider it worth the effort.
In any case, I don't think any of this is going to handle multiple
architechtures simultaneously magically. It's more like each arch get
given a namespace and everything is carefully designed
ou want to have both types installed simultaneously anyway?
For libraries the answer is simple, but multiarch applications simply
don't seem useful to me. The solution would be to either forbid having
both versions installed, or deal with it via alternatives. They should
be indistinguishable f
at least 27 meanings, the word "software" is not
adequately defined. Conjunction also has several possible meanings.
Thing like estoppel don't apply the same way everywhere, so you can't
rely on things like that.
Maybe someone should come back with a "More Carefully Worded New Sun
Java Licence"
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
his, except that the
--libs produces too much rubbish to be truly useful (see Bug#340904).
But if it worked correctly, you could add a --arch flags there to
ensure you get the right version.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
tten version
trumps anything. After all, that can be verified, I havn't heard
anything verbally from Sun myself saying what may or may not be
allowed. But IANAL.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
On 5/22/06, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given the word "estoppel" only has meaning in jurisdictions deriving
> from English common law, I think it'd be silly to assume it works the
> way y
ined even though they are not member of the EU (though they
havn't implemented it yet, there are a number of things Switzerland
has to do first). The obvious example is the UK, which insists on
checking your passport if you come from the mainland.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Ooste
of large-scale willing mass copyright infringement.
I guess it's a small risk though...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t applies to the situation at hand, well, use your imagination.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
viewer for the file and display it. There is also edit, compose and
print. Preferences can be consigured globally using
/etc/mailcap.order.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27; is
displayed under Window mamager to notify the user?
Well, an error status is returned. The calling program can handle this
any way it likes. Only the calling program knows the appropriate way
to pass this information onto the user.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://s
g up the entire process.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for trying to create
a symlink in a directory it does not ship.
Aha, if you do a dpkg -L fvwm1 it doesn't list a /usr/X11R6 directory,
but the postinst definitely refers to it. Looks like a bug, I'll file
one in the morning...
Thank you very much.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL P
y form); some don't, or haven't yet, and those apps
Debian doesn't distribute.
The other alternative is to port it to another SSL library, like
Mozilla NSS or GnuTLS. Most of the time the SSL code is not terribly
complicated and the port is fairly straight-forward.
Have a nice day,
--
M
On 6/19/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:27:28 +0200, "Martijn van Oosterhout"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The other alternative is to port it to another SSL library, like
>Mozilla NSS or GnuTLS. Most of the time the SSL code is not t
is versioned (on debian anyway) to prevent
that being a problem. Do you have a reference? Maybe someone forgot to
enable thread safety for libgcrypt.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OTOH, you could weigh up the chance that the number you're going to
output is greater than 2^32. If the chance is small, you cast it to
long and print using %lu. No chance of compiler errors, the display
will just look odd if you do try to print a larger number.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <
ten provide more info than available in
pkg-config (plugin or config directories).
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-config is nice for the constellation of GPL'd libraries currently
installed on most linux systems, but once you step outside of that
it's not quite as useful.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 7/1/06, Vincent Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:42:12PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> It is also used to compile contrib modules that are included in the
> distribution. If you started using pkg-config you'd have introduced a
> build d
roken. APT performs HTTP pipelining.
Judging by the way I saw it run, it looked like it was pipelining but
only maybe five at a time. Maybe some of the mirrors restrict the
number of pipelined requests? Is there a way of detecting such a
situation?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <
iles.
The extra libs should only be listed if you specify --static.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to another, but it would seem to be easiest to simply combine the
diffs into one large diff. Techniques for combining diffs are not new,
I imagine someone just needs to code it...
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
ore. Normal mail I assume generally
doesn't score high and is not susceptable to greylisting.
Not that I mind, the amount of spam received via this mailing list is
so marginal I can hardly imagine people worrying about it.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> h
And if they are, are you sure you want to receive mail from them?
Greylisting everything is silly, and that's not what's being discussed
here (AIUI anyway).
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
ch
everything has a good chance of working, because if anything
breaks I'm pretty much stuffed.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trust the computer industry to shorten "Year 2000" to Y2K.
It was this kind of thinking that caused the problem in the first place.
re on this, we ran into this problem last night with and
upgrade
of slink -> potato. Apt kept on failing saying dpkg failed, something
about -fsys-tarfile. So we then typed: apt-get install dpkg apt
and then reran the upgrade and the problem went away.
Go figure...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <
son true-type fonts look
horrid the other way round.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
formation on which loop devices are
related to which filesystems? AFAIK that's the only thing that went
strange after linking /proc/mounts and /etc/mtab; loop devices not being
freed after unmounting.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cupid.suninternet.com/~kleptog/
serted).
It's much cleverer than that. The blocks are not a fixed size, but
are determined by a rolling checksum based on a certain about of
data. So if a line is inserted the data that causes the block
to finish moves also, so the block is bigger and the rest of
the file is compressed
og/~>gcc -E -dM -c /tmp/x.c
#define __linux__ 1
#define linux 1
#define __i386__ 1
#define __i386 1
#define __GNUC_MINOR__ 95
#define i386 1
#define __unix 1
#define __unix__ 1
#define __GNUC__ 2
#define __linux 1
#define __ELF__ 1
#define unix 1
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cupid.suninternet.com/~kleptog/
h filing a report to ask that the script not try to
> change the permissions and ownership of the pipe if it is not
> necessary to do so, and that it tolerate failure. I'll file it.
Tolerating failure would at least allow you to test with minimal problems.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout
ason to change and can show that gawk
and mawk are 100% compatable, maybe it can be worked on. But it seems most
people don't really care.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout http://svana.org/kleptog/
> "the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or
> rel
nal files. You need the backward-rsync which was patented last I
heard.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout http://svana.org/kleptog/
> "the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or
> religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence.
> Wes
the problem was fixed in
proposed-updates. Any ETA on that being merged with woody or should I grab
the file from p-u?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout http://svana.org/kleptog/
> "All that is needed for the forces of evil to triumph is for enough good
> men to do nothing." - Edmond Burk
g. Linux is dying. The end of the world is nigh.
Things like this (including democracies) only die when people beleive it. As
long a people belive they're doing the right thing, the whole process is
self-sustaining.
Now, on with the regularly scheduled flamewar.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout
first one fails,
assuming the same package is listed in one of the pther archives in the
sources.list. I'm not sure how difficult this would be. If you also
regenerate the Package file then they will simply become invisible to users.
This could get confusing.
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van O
g report (on vrms). Perhaps it'd even be useful if
> installer packages somehow marked that they've installed non-free
> software, then vrms could look at that.
Random package:
Provides: non-free-installer
vrms:
Conflicts: non-free-installer
Done.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout
2005/7/17, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Karl Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Suppose package P contains files /usr/bin/B1 and /usr/bin/B2. B1
> > is the important program, and B2 is not as important. Is it OK
> > for the declared package dependencies to not satisfy all the
2005/10/7, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, only in one direction if I remember my versioning rules correctly.
> Consider the following cases:
> * binary built against unversioned libssl from other distro, running with
> versioned libssl on Debian
> Breaks because it can't find the sym
> And for those of you interested in the architecture distribution, here
> are the numbers and percentages:
I think popcon is a really neat project. I do look every now and then
to see when the "unknown" line crosses the "amd64" line :) It's
getting close.
Keep up the good work,
> Steve Langasek a écrit :
> So I would like to propose to drop testing during a limited period of
> time (let's say 4 months) after the release, to have the time to make
> all the necessary big transitions. If the period of time is limited, the
> stable distribution will not be too out-dated, so t
2005/11/7, Roy Hills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll submit a bug against libpcap-dev first for not allowing
> libpcap0.8-dev to satisfy the dependency, and see where that
> leads. I guess that the libpcap-dev developer should know
> what is supposed to happen.
I wonder if this shouldn't be like libre
RC from logic, a | (b&c) == (a|b) & (a|c), which means you should be
able to represent the above using:
gnome-office | openoffice.org, gnome-office | openoffice.org-gnome
Whether this actually works I don't know...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lled.
Then the configure script should do:
Checking for pkg-config no
ERROR: Please install pkg-config
It's not the dev package's responsibility to ensure gcc/g++/binutils
are installed, I beleive the same applies to pkg-config.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo