Thanks a lot Raphael.
On Oct 24, 2011 7:03 PM, "Raphael Neider" <rnei...@web.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > One day I had the impression that using unsigned char or uint8_t worked
> even
> > if config word was bigger than 8 bits. Am I right?
>
> That's right: the data type is ignored if the address (__at()) refers
> to a config location. I noticed this when I looked into the problem
> with the enhanced pic14-devices but decided not to change it. I do not
> see the "right" way: Specifying uint16_t might trick the reader into
> believing that 0x2007 and 0x2008 (or 0x8007/8) are set at the same
> time, since the __at() directive typically uses a byte-based
> addressing mode.
> I'd recommend to use a larger type (uint16_t) to prevent changes in
> the compiler (implicit, early range check and enforcement) from
> breaking the definition.
>
> Raphael
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
> demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
> Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn
> about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Sdcc-user mailing list
> Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn
about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
