Richard,

> > Note that the assembler/linker is derived from an older version which did 
> > not have '51 support. That was added by John Hartman (of the NoICE fame) - 
> > read README in the same direcotry (there is an important note on the added 
> > .area attributes in there).
> >
> Is that assembler consistent with the others?  ... same syntax, same 
> commands?

Why wouldn't it be? Have you found any mention to 
indicate otherwise?

> Somewhere, presumably among the SDCC files I've downloaded over the years, I 
> found an ASEM51 by W.W. Heinz, which I find to be pretty good, having tried 
> it out, and which I find quite suitable and quite sufficiently documented. 
> Isn't that part of the package?  I don't see it in the current (v2.8.?) 
> download.

AFAIK ASEM-51 has never been distributed with SDCC by 
the SDCC team. What others do is not our responsibility 
of course. SDCC also has never supported and will not in 
the near future support ASEM-51, simply because it has 
no linker that can use a library.

Maarten

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user

Reply via email to